Digital Commons Network^™

Application Of Philosophy In Substantive Due Process Analysis Focusing On Washington V. Glucksberg, Amelia Schwensen

Honors Program: Senior Projects (Public)

Substantive due process is widely regarded as the most convoluted and controversial legal concept. For years, the court has struggled to interpret and apply value-based terms in the Fourteenth Amendment, as these terms contain deeper significance beyond the words. Additionally, the court must balance expanding the law to enshrine the abstract values of substantive due process and limiting its interpretation so that it is not “creating law” or imposing its personal beliefs on its decision. This push and pull of defending values and maintaining legitimacy has created significant issues in substantive due process analysis and is the background and basis …

What Is Wrong With Maine's Occupational Disease Law?, Thomas R. Watson

Maine Law Review

By enacting occupational disease laws, state legislatures stepped ahead of limited medical knowledge concerning the etiology of disease. Responding to public and political pressures, legislatures placed the responsibility for adjudicating claims based on disease on administrators whose procedural and evidentiary systems were designed for claims due to injuries. But the causal connection of disease to employment is not so easily shown; until quite recently, diseases were not thought to support the common law causes of action that gave rise to the quid pro quo of workers' compensation systems. This Comment first sketches the development of Workers' Compensation law and its …

Comparative Negligence In Jackson V. Frederick's Motor Inn: What Is Compared?, Nancy Lynn Diesel

Maine Law Review

Before 1965, the defense of contributory negligence was an absolute bar to a plaintiff's recovery in tort actions in Maine. Under the contributory negligence principle, any degree of fault attributable to the plaintiff defeated his or her claim; the fault of the plaintiff and of the defendant was not compared. In 1965, the Maine Legislature enacted the Comparative Negligence Act in order to eliminate the harshness and inequities of the contributory negligence doctrine. The Act also served to stop juries from using compromise verdicts to reach a fair result. Under the Act, a plaintiff's fault is compared with that of …

Pretrial In Maine Under New Rule 16: Settlement, Sanctions, And Sayonara, Robert J. Plourde

Maine Law Review

On September 1, 1980, a new pretrial procedure rule became effective in Maine. The rule was heralded as "the most significant modification of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure in recent years." The rule was intended to remedy major defects in existing pretrial procedure and to benefit judges and attorneys through more explicit directions for pretrial procedure. Ultimately, the goal of this reform is to achieve a "just result of litigation.” This Comment begins with an overview and evaluation of quantitative studies of the pretrial conference in various judicial systems. The Comment then analyzes the new Maine rule and its …

The Tax Home Doctrine: Fifty-Five Years Of Confusion, Carolyn Grahame Walker

Maine Law Review

Provisions of the Internal Revenue Code have always allowed taxpayers to deduct business expenses from their gross income before a personal income tax is imposed. Under certain circumstances, traveling expenses, such as amounts expended by taxpayers for travel fares, meals, and lodging, are deductible as business expenses. The United States Supreme Court has held that a taxpayer's traveling expenses must meet three conditions to be deductible under this section: the traveling expenses must be reasonable and necessary, directly related to the pursuit of business, and incurred while away from home. The third condition poses the most problems for taxpayers, the …

Defining An "Appropriate Education" Under The Education For All Handicapped Children Act Of 1975, Stephen A. Mansfield

Maine Law Review

The educational rights of handicapped children have long been neglected due to a combination of societal indifference and ignorance. Judicial recognition of the educational rights of handicapped persons only began in the early 1970's when constitutional challenges were brought against school systems that excluded handicapped children from attending school. Federal statutory reforms, however, have gone much further than the constitutionally-based decisions of the early 1970's. This Comment focuses on the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, the primary federal statute for securing educational rights of handicapped children. Because the Act is relatively new, case law providing guidance for judicial decision …

The International Law Of Maritime Boundary Delimitation, Edward Collins Jr., Martin A. Rogoff

Maine Law Review

The law of the sea, in its essence, divides the seas into zones and specifies the rights and duties of states and ships flying their flags in those zones. Now that states are claiming extensive seaward jurisdiction both on the continental shelf and in the water column, attention has begun to shift from delimiting continental shelf boundaries or economic zone boundaries to the delimitation of a single maritime boundary which would serve both purposes. There are significant legal differences between the delimitation of a single maritime boundary and the delimitation of either a continental shelf boundary or an exclusive economic …

Civil Juries In Maine: Are The Benefits Worth The Costs?, Donald Alexander

Maine Law Review

Throughout this century, legal scholars have vigorously criticized civil juries with little apparent effect. Despite the civil jury's long history of successful resistance to change, new considerations make it imperative that we conduct a fundamental review of the functioning of the civil jury as an instrument of justice for the twenty-first century. That review has begun in Maine. Under the direction of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, a comprehensive jury management study has just been completed. Proposals for changes in jury management and efficiency are now being developed. As part of this process, we can simply perpetuate the past or …

Cumulative Index (1908-1982), Orlando E. Delogu

Maine Law Review

No abstract provided.

Another Veil Of Protection For Exclusionary Zoning Ordinances: Warren V. Municipal Offices Of Gorham, Peter A. Gleichman

Maine Law Review

In Warren v. Municipal Officers, the Maine Law Court refused to alter the rules it articulated eighteen years ago for reviewing municipal zoning decisions and reaffirmed the application of a narrow standard of review of allegedly exclusionary zoning ordinances. The plaintiffs asserted that the Gorham zoning ordinance, which prohibited them from locating a single-unit modular home' on their land and restricted such units to mobile home parks, unconstitutionally discriminated against them. On appeal of the denial of a permit for the Warrens to place their modular home on their property, the Superior Court held that state statutes regulating the construction …

State V. Grant: Is Intent An Essential Element Of Criminal Attempt In Maine?, Bethanne Lyons Poliquin

Maine Law Review

Criminal attempt is a conceptually difficult area of the criminal law. Efforts to develop a judicial and statutory framework for the imposition of criminal attempt liability have resulted in analytical difficulties from which sound policy has not emerged. The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has recently encountered this problem in State v. Grant. Liability for criminal attempt has traditionally been limited to those situations in which the actor is shown to have had the specific intent to engage in conduct that constituted a substantial step toward the commission of the substantive crime. Because of this requirement, courts have reasoned that criminal …

An Analysis Of Federal Drug-Related Civil Forfeiture, Susan J. Parcels

Maine Law Review

Drug Enforcement Administration Special Agent Arthur J. Goldenbaum participated in a raid at the home of Mrs. Edna Salas, arrested her husband, and charged him with possession of heroin. Pursuant to a warrant, Goldenbaum searched the Salas's 1975 Mercedes and found four marijuana cigarette butts in the ashtray. The government seized the Mercedes, sold it, and collected the proceeds. This is an example of forfeiture-the loss of goods to the government as a result of the commission of a crime-under the federal drug laws. This Comment examines federal civil forfeiture statutes applicable to drug trafficking. The widespread judicial reluctance to …

Damage Apportionment In Maine: A Proposal For Reform, Barry A. Bachrach

Maine Law Review

Most jurisdictions have some form of comparative negligence system. Such systems reflect an evolving policy of equating liability with a proportional percentage of fault. Yet a vast majority of jurisdictions that have adopted comparative negligence also retain the common law rules of either joint and several liabilities or entire liability. Although these rules derive from discrete common law roots, the rules currently stand for the proposition that a tort-feasor should be responsible for all the damages his or her negligence proximately caused. Thus, even though a jurisdiction adopts comparative negligence, simultaneous application of the incongruent common law rules may frequently …

Criminal Contempt In Maine: Constitutionally Protected Or Neglected?, Christopher D. Hardy

Maine Law Review

The power to punish contempt of court is an ancient power justified as inherent and necessary for the effective administration of justice. Because criminal contempts are willful challenges to the power of a court to maintain control over its proceedings, contempts are acts which serve to lessen the dignity and authority of the court. Certainly, the maintenance of decorum in the courtrooms is of paramount importance. Absent the ability to sanction willful disobedience, a court is powerless to enforce its decrees or control its proceedings. Yet it is a power readily open to abuse; application of this power must be …

Informed Consent In Maine: Woolley V. Henderson And The Informed Consent Statute, John C. Milazzo

Maine Law Review

In recent years, American courts have used two different standards in informed consent actions to define the scope of a physician's duty to disclose to his patient the risks inherent in a proposed medical procedure—the professional disclosure standard and the material-risk standard. In Woolley v. Henderson, the Maine Law Court expressly adopted the professional disclosure standard. Prior to the Law Court's decision, however, but after the cause of action in Woolley arose, the Maine Legislature enacted the Maine informed consent statute. Justice Glassman's opinion in Woolley expressly declined to construe the statute. The continued relevance of Woolley to similar cases …

A Rule 54(B) Dilemma: Divorces Lacking "Finality" Due To Undismissed Counterclaims, Ellen Kandoian

Maine Law Review

Recent decisions of the Maine Law Court bring into sharp focus certain difficulties inherent in applying rules of civil procedure developed in the context of federal practice to a state law setting. In such instances, the rules must operate on certain types of litigation peculiar to state law, notably the entire field of domestic relations. In a field bearing the unique features and demands of domestic relations, it is not surprising that federally patterned rules raised problems not anticipated by their drafters. In the 1981 case of Parent v. Parent, the Maine Law Court, in customary observance of Rule 54(b) …

In Memoriam Harry P. Glassman, L. Kinvin Wroth, Daniel E. Wathen, Gerald F. Petruccelli, Melvyn H. Zarr

Maine Law Review

Harry Paul Glassman was a remarkable lawyer, scholar, teacher, judge, colleague, and friend, whose untimely death has been deeply felt by all who knew him. The editors of the Maine Law Review have brought together in this issue a wide-ranging and moving col- lection of essays that illuminates each of these aspects of Harry's multifaceted life.

Presumptions Against Criminal Defendants, Affirmative Defenses, And A Substantive Due Process Interpretation Of County Court Of Ulster V. Allen, John C. Sheldon

Maine Law Review

In County Court of Ulster County v. Allen, the Supreme Court stated: "inferences and presumptions are a staple of our adversary system of factfinding." Because Allen concerned the constitutionality of the use against criminal defendants of such deductive devices as statutory inferences and presumptions, it appeared that the decision would ultimately favor their unrestricted use in criminal cases by the prosecution. Further, that expectation was buttressed by the ruling in Patterson v. New York, in which the Court awarded constitutional sanction to state use of affirmative defenses against criminal defendants. These facts suggested that the Court would refrain from imposing …

Is There A Relationship Between Drug Addiction And Incarceration?, Lindsey M. Lopez

SACAD: Scholarly Activities

The connection between drug addiction and incarceration has been widely debated. Many individuals who struggle with substance abuse will end up in the criminal justice system, mainly due to drug-related crimes or offenses committed under the influence like DUI’s. This study examines whether incarceration is effective in solving substance abuse issues or if alternative approaches such as rehabilitation, offer better results. The analysis explores the balance between punishment and treatment programs to determine what the most effective strategy is in reducing recidivism and addressing why drug addiction is high in the justice system.

California’S Gamble: Trading In Rehabilitation For Incarceration, Drew Svensson

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice (ERSJ) Blog

No abstract provided.

Tiktok: To Ban Or Not To Ban: A Threat To Free Speech, Hannah Cohen

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice (ERSJ) Blog

On January 17, 2025, the Supreme Court in TikTok Inc. v. Garland upheld the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (the “Act”),[2] effectively banning TikTok in the United States unless its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, sells its American operations.  This decision impacts over 170 million Americans and presents a significant threat to their First Amendment rights.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice website on March 27, 2025. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

President Trump’S Attack On Congestion Pricing Is An Attack On New York City, Alyx Mckinnon

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice (ERSJ) Blog

Despite a rocky start, New York City’s Central Business District Tolling Program, more commonly known as the city’s congestion pricing plan, has seen demonstrable success in its implementation.  The plan aims to ease traffic in some of Manhattan’s busiest streets by charging motorists nine dollars for entry to the Congestion Relief Zone during peak hours, with the revenue supporting the struggling Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”) and funding the public transportation that keeps the city running.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice website on March 27, 2025. The original post can be …

The Regulatory Triad: Reimagining Environmental Law In The Post-Chevron Era, Shai Stern, Itay Biton

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

Get Your Act Together: The Alternative Fines Act In Federal Prosecutions Of Corporate Environmental Crimes, Josiah B. Harmar

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

Pedagogy Of The Polluted: Environmental Justice For School Communities, Sarah M. Hofgesang

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

Invasive Species From Sea To Shining Sea: An Exploration Of Different Government Responses To Invasive Species In The United States, Caroline G. Nelson

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

Revving Up Or Stalling Out? Examining The Effectiveness Of Electric Vehicles In Combating Climate Change, Meghan E. Miller Termat

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

Unveiling A Hidden Hazard: A Deep Dive Into Forever Chemicals And The Urgent Need For Solutions, Katie L. Uszakiewicz

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

Kukin Program For Conflict Resolution Spring 2025 Events, Kukin Program For Conflict Resolution

2025 Event Invitations

Kukin Program for Conflict Resolution Spring 2025 Events:

• A Conversation with Gretchen Carlson & Julie Roginsky, Thursday, March 27 at 12:40 p.m.
• Book Talk with Sarah Staszak, Tuesday, April 1 at 4:00 p.m.
• Trauma-Transformed Law: The Why and How of Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) Practice, Wednesday, April 2 at 12:40 p.m.

The Bet Tzedek's 40th Anniversary Celebration, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law, Bet Tzedek Civil Litigation Clinic

2024–2025 Flyers

Join us for cocktails & hors d'oeuvres as we celebrate Prof. Salzman’s 35th and final year at Cardozo!