Digital Commons Network^™

A Response To Professor Delogu: Is Impermissible Exclusion A Reality In Maine?, Madge Baker

Maine Law Review

A basic premise of Professor Orlando Delogu's article, The Misuse of Land Use Control Powers Must End: Suggestions for Legislative and Judicial Responses, is that many Maine municipalities are using their land use regulatory powers in impermissibly exclusionary ways. Professor Delogu proposes that the legislature and courts of Maine should respond to correct the situation. This Commentary will attempt to illustrate that Professor Delogu has failed to document his premise or to define accurately the difference between permissible and impermissible exclusion. He is unable, therefore, to substantiate the need for state intervention in an area of law traditionally delegated to …

A Final Note On The Misuse Of Land Use Control Powers Must End: Suggestions For Legislative And Judicial Responses, Orlando E. Delogu

Maine Law Review

The Baker criticism of my article is flawed in several major respects. First, while tacitly accepting the basic premise of the article that impermissible exclusion may be achieved by local misuse of a wide variety of facially permissible land use control tools, Ms. Baker argues that merely because the article did not demonstrate a sufficient degree of misuse in Maine, the corrective measures suggested are unwarranted. But a full reading of the article makes clear that no such exhaustive indictment of Maine towns was intended. The article was not an empirical study. The article intended to point out a widening …

The International Legal Obligations Of Signatories To An Unratified Treaty, Martin A. Rogoff

Maine Law Review

There are currently two major international agreements of the United States which have been signed by the parties and transmitted by the President to the Senate for its advice and consent: the Treaty with the Soviet Union on the Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, known as SALT II, and the Agreement with Canada on East Coast Fishery Resources and the accompanying Treaty to Submit to Binding Dispute Settlement the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area. Both agreements were signed after lengthy and complex negotiations. Both agreements are extremely detailed and represent a delicate balancing of …

The Prima Facie Case Approach To Employment Discrimination, Joanne F. Cole

Maine Law Review

Employment discrimination litigation has increased dramatically during the past decade. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964—Congress' sweeping prohibition of discrimination in employment decisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin –older federal civil rights statutes and state counterparts to Title VII, courts have developed discrete, cognizable theories of discrimination. An analytical framework has also developed by which to evaluate the facts, innuendoes, and statistics that constitute the claims and defenses in a discrimination case. Within the generally accepted approach to the evidence, however, there is no consensus about the weight each element …

Perspectives On Older Workers: Maine's Prohibition Of Mandatory Retirement, Susan Dana Kertzer

Maine Law Review

The 1978 Amendments to the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), which generally prohibit mandatory retirement before the age of seventy, have been criticized as proposing to "extend freedom of choice by restricting freedom of contract. Despite such criticisms and other less philosophical objections to the Act, the 108th Maine Legislature in 1977 passed the first part of a legislative program which, as of January 1, 1980, prohibits all mandatory retirement in Maine, in both the public and private sectors. Emphasizing the parallels between age discrimination legislation and other civil rights legislation, one of the bill's senate supporters acknowledged …

Coastal Recreation: Legal Methods For Securing Public Rights In The Seashore, Jeffrey D. Curtis

Maine Law Review

The coastal shores of the United States are a peculiar form of property in that both the littoral landowner and the general public have legally protected interests in the use and enjoyment of the land. In most coastal states the title to the land below the high-water mark is vested in the state in trust for the beneficial use of the public, subject to certain limited rights of the littoral owner. Maine and Massachusetts, however, share a unique allocation of public and private interests which vests the title to the foreshore, the land between the high and low water marks, …

The Incremental Development Of An Extra-Statutory System Of Regulation: A Critique Of Food And Drug Administration Regulation Of Added Poisonous And Deleterious Substances, James David Poliquin

Maine Law Review

Federal regulation of added poisonous and deleterious substances in food by the Food and Drug Administration has become an administrative quagmire. Although responsibility for this situation evades precise assignment, FDA regulatory problems typically arise through the operation of three factors. First, the applicable statutory provisions are highly ambiguous, far exceeding the level of ambiguity traditionally viewed as necessary to administrative flexibility and efficiency. Even resort to the legislative history of these provisions often leaves many questions unanswered. Second, the perpetual amendment of the original Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act without the simultaneous repeal of all the inapplicable and inconsistent …

The Dilemma Of Local Land Use Control: Power Without Responsibility, Orlando E. Delogu

Maine Law Review

Land use planning and control has traditionally been perceived as a set of issues best dealt with by local government. State governments historically have been called upon to provide nothing more than a suitable framework of planning and land use control enabling legislation. In recent years some states have sought to address land use issues having regional or statewide impact. This has usually been done on an intra-state basis, however, and meaningful interstate or multi-state approaches to land use problems, though much discussed in the literature, are almost non-existent in practice. Federal involvement in land use issues has also been …

Mental Abnormality In The Maine Criminal Code: Section 58 (1-A), Susan E. Peck

Maine Law Review

The law surrounding the insanity defense has always been complex and problematic. Since the promulgation of the M'Naghten test in 1843, courts and legislators have attempted to articulate a clear and easily understood definition of insanity. Legal scholars have created an overwhelming volume of literature on such important aspects of the defense as the role of psychiatrists in a jury trial, the appropriateness of the diminished capacity defense, and the constitutionality of imposing the burden of proving insanity on the defendant. Even the necessity of retaining the defense has been questioned. The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has recently confronted a …

Union Liability For Wildcat Strikes: A Look At Carbon Fuel, Jane Rigler

Maine Law Review

For several years the federal district courts and circuit courts of appeal wrestled with the question of a labor union's liabilities and obligations when its members engaged in a wildcat strike. Concern for halting wildcat strikes increased considerably after the Supreme Court's decision in Buffalo Forge Co. v. United Steelworkers. In Buffalo Forge the Court held that a union-sanctioned strike over an issue not subject to binding arbitration could not be enjoined pending an arbitrator's determination of whether the strike violated the no-strike provision of the collective agreement. The Court refused to expand its 1970 Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail …

Editorial Review Vol. 44 No.1 (1992)

Maine Law Review

No abstract provided.

Women Judges And Wikipedia, Sally Kenney

ConLawNOW

Although many academics may openly discourage their students from consulting it, Wikipedia is the go-to first port-of-call for information for scholarly research, journalists, and even judges. Its info boxes are the source for Google and artificial intelligence in general. Wikipedia is the largest and most widely used encyclopedia in history. Just as feminist scholars have broken into mainstream journals and gained a toehold within university presses, these sources have become increasingly irrelevant and unavailable behind paywalls. Instead, Wikipedia has emerged as the standard research source, but it presents significant barriers to entry for feminist scholars and subjects of women, feminism, …

Reproductive Governance In China: National Policies, Human Rights, And Accountability Under International Law, Victoria Xuan Wang

Northwestern Journal of Human Rights

China’s reproductive policies, including the One-Child, Two-Child, and Three-Child Policies, have been widely criticized for violating women’s reproductive rights through coercive enforcement measures such as forced abortion, sterilization, and employment discrimination. This Article argues that these policies violate international human rights law, particularly the right to freely determine the number and spacing of children as protected under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW).

Despite international scrutiny, China has largely resisted direct responses to criticisms from treaty-based and charter-based human rights monitoring bodies, including the CEDAW Committee, the Universal Periodic Review and Special Procedures …

“Appeals On Wheels” Brings Court Of Appeals Of Indiana To Bloomington, James Owsley Boyd

Keep Up With the Latest News from the Law School (blog)

The Court of Appeals of Indiana will hold oral arguments at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law on Thursday, April 3 inside Baier Hall.

The event is part of the court’s Appeals on Wheels series and is open to the public. Arguments begin at 1:45 p.m. and are expected to conclude around 2:45 p.m.

“The Appeals on Wheels program is the best trust-building tool we have as a judiciary,” said Anne Fuchs, the Court’s director of communications. “The court brings real oral arguments to communities around the state so the public can understand how the judiciary really works. We …

The Enduring Genocide Against The Yazidis: How Iraq's Law On Religious Identity Violates The Human Rights Of Yazidi Survivors Of Isis Captivity And Their Children Born Of Sexual Violence, Michelle Xiao Liu

Northwestern Journal of Human Rights

2024 marked the ten-year anniversary of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) genocide against the Yazidis—an ethnoreligious minority community indigenous to northwest Iraq. Beginning in August 2014, ISIS executed between 3,000 and 5,000 Yazidi men and elderly Yazidi women and buried them in mass graves, kidnapped and converted young Yazidi boys to a radical form of Sunni Islam and pressed them into military service, and captured or trafficked over 6,800 Yazidi women and children, subjecting many of them to sexual violence. ISIS carried out its intent to eradicate the Yazidis through systematic murder, forced conversion, and sexual violence …

Jarkesy, The Seventh Amendment, And Tax Penalties, Steve R. Johnson

University of Miami Law Review

In 2024, in the Jarkesy case, a divided Supreme Court held unconstitutional a provision of the Dodd-Frank Act that allowed the SEC to assert securities law anti-fraud penalties through administrative proceedings subject to judicial review. The Jarkesy majority concluded that the invalidated procedure violated the Seventh Amendment’s guarantee of jury trial in some civil cases.

The dissent predicted that the reasoning of Jarkesy could be applied outside of the securities law area, putting hundreds of other statutes at peril of constitutional invalidation. This Article examines one such possible “spillover.” The Article explores whether Jarkesy threatens the current procedures by which …

Standard Search Logic Under Article 9: The Florida Debacle Revisited, Kenneth C. Kettering

University of Miami Law Review

If a financing statement is filed in a filing office that does not have a search system that uses a standard search logic, Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code provides that there is no tolerance for any error, however slight, in the debtor’s name shown on that financing statement. Such an erroneous financing statement will not be effective to perfect a security interest. In 2012 the author warned that the search system used by Florida’s central filing office lacks a standard search logic, and in 2022 the Florida Supreme Court so held. This Article (i) details how Florida should …

Beware Of The Dangers Of The State-Created Danger Doctrine: A Look At The Ninth Circuit's Approach, Julia Steiner

University of Miami Law Review

The Fourteenth Amendment applies to state, not private, actors. It, like the whole of our Constitution, operates as a negative restraint on government. The Due Process Clause thus forbids states from taking certain action—but it does not and cannot compel the state to act ab initio. These core concepts formed the basis of the Supreme Court’s decision in DeShaney v. Winnebago County, where the Court reaffirmed that the only instance where the state assumes an affirmative duty to provide safety and security is when the state itself restrains an individual from protecting themselves.

Yet, since DeShaney, the circuit …

Melissa Benton, Et. Al, V. Lynn Linnane, Et. Al., Order On Pending Motions, Wesley B. Tailor

Superior Court of Fulton County: Metro Atlanta Business Case Division Opinions

No abstract provided.

Prefatory Matter And Table Of Contents

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Flaws In The Preemption Defense To Liability Claims Against Generic Drug Manufacturers, Lars Noah

University of Miami Law Review

More than a dozen years have passed since the U.S. Supreme Court decided that federal preemption protects manufacturers of generic (but not brand-name) drugs from most types of products liability claims. This seemingly arbitrary distinction sprang from a peculiarity in the regulations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). That agency soon thereafter proposed to modify its rules in order to eliminate this asymmetry in how the implied preemption defense worked to bar inadequate warning claims, but its effort ultimately failed, while lower courts have confronted some creative efforts to circumvent the special protection enjoyed by generic drug manufacturers. …

Masthead

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Dean Melanie Leslie’S Office Hors On The Trump Administration's Immigration Enforcement Tactics, Melanie Leslie, Lindsay Nash

2025 Event Invitations

Join Dean Leslie and Professor Lindsay Nash to discuss the immigration enforcement tactics of President Trump’s second term. Topics will include the intersection between immigration enforcement and political speech, the administration’s expansion of summary removal processes, the administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act, and the administration’s recission of longstanding rules placing important constraints on immigration enforcement. The two will also answer questions raised by the student attendees.

Trauma-Transformed Law: The Why And How Of Trauma-Informed Care (Tic) Practice, Kukin Program For Conflict Resolution, Laura Mcguire

2025 Event Invitations

From intake to deposition, mediation, and trial, legal clients are traversing one of the most re-traumatizing experiences of their lives when they decide to seek justice. Understanding how to address this from a personal and systems theory approach benefits survivors and attorneys alike, increasing client satisfaction, referrals, retention, and preventing longitudinal burnout. In this presentation, Dr. Laura McGuire, creator of the Certified Trauma-Informed ® Legal Professional program, will highlight some of the key areas of TIC in practice and offer additional insight into real-world application.

Justice, Human Rights, And The New Charisma Of Anti-Democratic Ideologies, Cardozo Law Institute In Holocaust And Human Rights (Clihhr), Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy, Matthias Mahlmann

2025 Event Invitations

Democracies are under pressure worldwide – externally by authoritarian states and internally by political forces that spread anti-democratic ideologies even if masked by avowed concern for the people. While reasons are intensely debated, this talk critically revisits explanations for the charisma of post-democratic ideologies by (1) investigating normative foundations of the exacting and fragile project of democracy and its relation to human rights and (2) discussing human rights theory in times of widespread human rights skepticism and its meaning for crises of democracy. How can we defend the project of democracy in theory and practice?

Comparing Freedom Of Speech In The United States And Germany, Simon Morgenstern

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

A citizen’s freedom of speech is a fundamental right that is guaranteed by most democracies around the world. In fact, some estimates have it that free speech is a right in almost 165 countries across the globe. While the ideal is one shared by most, the application of the right to real life situations differs amongst countries. Some countries have a broader understanding of the right while others offer a more limited approach. This blog post will compare and analyze the approach taken by the United States and Germany to free speech, specifically with regards to their attitude towards “hate …

Cardozo Aelj’S Spring 2025 Symposium Delves Into The Implications Of Artificial Intelligence On Copyright Law And Publicity Rights, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

The Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal is pleased to present the 2025 Arts and Entertainment Law Journal Symposium: Fake It Till You Make It?: Striking the Right Balance Between Innovation, Publicity Rights, and Copyright. This event will bring together leading scholars and industry experts to explore the legal challenges posted by AI-generated voices, deepfake performances, and digital replicas.

"Fighting Words" And The First Amendment In Maine: State V. John W., Deborah J. Ross

Maine Law Review

On April 1, 1979, John W. was driving his car, accompanied by his sister Maria. The car was stopped by a police officer who requested John's license and registration. Maria asked the officer why they had been stopped. When the officer remained silent, Maria became abusive and was arrested for disorderly conduct. John demanded to know what was going on. Ordered to get back into his car, John began shouting at the police: "Hey, turn around and come back here;" "Hey, you fucking pig, you fuckin' kangaroo;" "Fuck you." John was arrested and convicted in a juvenile proceeding of disorderly …

Developments In The News Media Privilege: The Qualified Constitutional Approach Becoming Common Law, Lawerence J. Mullen

Maine Law Review

In late 1977 and early 1978, the Boston Globe published a series of articles about a Delaware corporation engaged in building fiberglass boats in New Hampshire. The articles reported a number of allegedly serious defects in the boats, some of which may have contributed to sinkings. Critical comments of boat owners, surveyors, Coast Guard officers, company employees and a repairman were included. The builder was given an opportunity to respond in part of one article. Provoked by this quotidien instance of investigative journalism, the boat builder brought a libel action against the Globe in federal district court. The boat builder's …

The Constitutional Law Of Defamation—Recent Developments And Suggested State Court Responses, Susan Gail Shorey

Maine Law Review

Prior to the 1964 decision in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, defamation law in the United States was controlled by common law principles developed in the state courts. In New York Times the United States Supreme Court staked out an area of first amendment privilege, which limited the states' power to permit recovery in defamation actions brought by public officials. Later extensions of this constitutional privilege made it appear for a time that constitutional requirements would produce a unified nation-wide body of defamation law to replace the various common law rules followed in the fifty states. In view of …