Digital Commons Network^™

Immigration Interference: How Immigration Law Creates A Shadow Criminal Legal System, Matthew Vogel

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Wretched All Around, César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Criminal Procedure—Judicial Abuse Of Discretion And The Need For Legislative Intervention, Jeanette Morris

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Barnette’S Robert H. Jackson: The Constitution Protects Individual Conscience When The Cost To Society Is Not Too High, John Q. Barrett

Missouri Law Review

This essay, part of a symposium on Linda McClain’s and James Fleming’s book “WHAT SHALL BE ORTHODOX” IN POLARIZED TIMES, is about Justice Robert H. Jackson’s opinion for the Supreme Court in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette. Justice Jackson explained in Barnette how the U.S. Constitution protects schoolchildren conscientious objectors from being compelled by government to salute and to pledge allegiance to the U.S. flag. But Barnette was not, as the Supreme Court recently seems to read it, an absolutist decision constitutionalizing individual conscience claims to be exempt from societal, general, significant interests in compelling speech. Barnette …

Between The Sword And A Hard Place: Systemic Solutions To The Shortcomings Of The Missouri Public Defender System, Andrew A. Bohon

Missouri Law Review

“Striving to better, oft we mar what’s well.” The attempt to solve a problem can sometimes topple a functional system entirely. The striving to improve a thing can frustrate its purpose. Limping along under the guise of functionality, however, many sociopolitical processes hinder our progress. Something works, so we cling to it in fear of making it worse. The idea has been aphorized that perfect is the enemy of good. Although a quaint and conservative philosophy, there is a countertheory: “Good is the enemy of great.”

Self-Determination Beyond The Nation-State, Ash U. Bali, Omar M. Dajani

University of the Pacific Law Review

No abstract provided.

Abuse Of Power In The Workplace: The New Gender Discrimination Claims, June Carbone, Nancy Levit, Naomi Cahn

University of the Pacific Law Review

No abstract provided.

Leadership And Antiracism In Legal Education, Danielle M. Conway

University of the Pacific Law Review

No abstract provided.

Centennial Talk: From Morality To #Metoo: Constructions Of Unlawful Sex In America, Aya Gruber

University of the Pacific Law Review

No abstract provided.

Introduction: Forever Criminalized?: How Collateral Consequences Advance Disparities In Criminal Justice, Jenny Roberts

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Tale Of Two Cities: Collateral Consequences Of Misdemeanor Non-Convictions, Elizabeth Nevins-Saunders

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.

Putting A Band-Aid On A Bullet Hole: The Deaf Individual's Subdued Constitutional Right Against Self-Incrimination, Alexandra Kotowski

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.

Unlocking Platform Data For Research, Niva Elkin-Koren, Maayan Perel, Ohad Somech

Indiana Law Journal

Digital platforms, which control unique access points to the rich data stored on their servers, have become a “living lab” of real-time information. Scientists and researchers increasingly use platform data for various purposes, such as training machine learning (ML) systems and Natural Language Processing (NLP) models, and for studying diverse fields such as medicine, humanities, and social sciences, including the influence of digital platforms on society. However, researchers increasingly encounter significant barriers when attempting to access platform data. Although platforms typically lack proprietary rights over the data itself, they exert strong control over its use by imposing digital locks and …

Moving Slow And Fixing Things, Scott Shackelford, Janine Hiller, Christos Makridis, Iain Nash, Kathryn Kisska-Schulze, Hannibal Travis

Indiana Law Journal

Silicon Valley, and the U.S. tech sector more broadly, have changed the world in part by embracing a “move fast and break things” mentality popularized by Mark Zuckerberg. While it is true that the tech sector has attempted to break with such a reactive and flippant response to security concerns, including at Microsoft itself through its Security Development Lifecycle, cyberattacks continue at an alarming rate. As a result, there are growing calls from regulators around the world to change the risk equation. An example is the 2023 U.S. National Cybersecurity Strategy, which argues that “[w]e must hold the stewards of …

Dark Patterns As Disloyal Design, Johanna Gunawan, Woodrow Hartzog, Neil Richards, David Choffnes, Christo Wilson

Indiana Law Journal

Lawmakers have started to regulate “dark patterns,” understood to be design practices meant to influence technology users’ decisions through manipulative or deceptive means. Most agree that dark patterns are undesirable, but open questions remain as to which design choices should be subjected to scrutiny, much less the best way to regulate them.

In this Article, we propose adapting the concept of dark patterns to better fit legal frameworks. Critics allege that the legal conceptualizations of dark patterns are overbroad, impractical, and counterproductive. We argue that law and policy conceptualizations of dark patterns suffer from three deficiencies: First, dark patterns lack …

Design Patent Law's Three Little Words, Mark D. Janis

Indiana Law Journal

U.S. design patent law protects the visual characteristics of articles of manufacture. For many years, major manufacturers of athletic footwear have protected their visually iconic designs with design patents, fueling a global market valued at nearly $100 billion. Today, however, shoe design has arrived in the digital universe. Digital sneakers such as Gucci’s Virtual 25 and Nike’s “Our Force Ones” can be “worn” only in virtual worlds but have substantial real world economic value. Yet U.S. design patent law makes it difficult—some would say impossible—to protect those designs, on the ground that they do not satisfy the statutory requirement for …

Can Ai, As Such, Invade Your Privacy? An Experimental Study Of The Social Element Of Surveillance, Aileen Nielsen

Indiana Law Journal

The increasing use of AI rather than human surveillance puts pressure on two long-used cultural and (sometimes) legal distinctions: as between human and machine observers and as between content and metadata. Machines do more and more watching through advancing technology, rendering AI a plausible replacement for humans in surveillance tasks. Further, machines can commit to surveil only certain forms of information in a way that humans cannot, rendering the distinction between content and metadata increasingly relevant too for crafting privacy law and policy. Yet despite the increasing importance of these distinctions, their legal importance remains in four key domains of …

Ninth Amendment Neurorights, Joseph A. Tomain

Indiana Law Journal

Neurotechnology developments threaten two fundamental human rights: freedom of thought and mental privacy. For example, neuroscientists use brain scans to decode unspoken thoughts and to predict political ideology and sexual orientation. Additionally, they have successfully implanted false memories in the minds of mice. There are undoubtedly beneficial uses of this dual-use technology, such as identifying and treating a variety of medical conditions. But left unchecked, neurotechnology will be exploited by public and private actors alike. There is a growing and contested literature about how the law should respond to the increasing risks of neurotechnology. This Essay contributes to that literature …

People Power And Police Policy: How Denying Intervenors In Pattern-Or-Practice Police Litigation Undermines Police Accountability, Alexander Lindenfelser

Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality

No abstract provided.

Keynote Address: Envisioning Wage Justice, Ruben J. Garcia

Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality

No abstract provided.

Governing Global Gig Platforms In The Age Of Ai: When The Manager Is An Algorithm, David S. Lee, Felicia F. Chen Prosecution Development Fellow

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

Gig workers are vulnerable to discrimination from the sharing economy platforms on which they work. This challenge is worsened by these platforms’ dependence on algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI) systems, which are used to control and direct gig workers. These platforms also often operate globally, and discrimination embedded within their algorithms can be magnified when exported into new cultural contexts.

These platforms exercise significant influence over gig workers, but their for-profit nature means that their boards and directors often prioritize shareholder value over gig worker protection. This tension has led to intense debates, as platforms attempt to minimize the rights …

Roll For Lawsuit: Are Actual-Play Series Copyright Ingringers?, Mark Mehochko J.D. Candidate

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

Dungeons and Dragons is a highly popular Tabletop Role-Playing Game designed by Gary Gygax and Dave Arneson in 1973. The game’s emphasis on narrative storytelling makes it an interesting subject for copyright analysis. When a group plays Dungeons and Dragons (D&D) for an audience, using copyrighted materials from Dungeons and Dragons’s publisher, Wizards of the Coast, there is an open question about whether the players infringe on Wizards of the Coast’s exclusive rights under § 106 of the Copyright Act of 1976. This issue is further complicated by Wizards of the Coast’s unique approach to licensing.

This Note examines how …

De-Identified And Unregulated: How Data Brokers Outpace State Privacy Laws, Hannah Moore

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

State consumer privacy laws, though increasingly important in the absence of a comprehensive federal privacy framework, fail to effectively regulate the practices of data brokers who exploit de-identified data. Laws like the Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA) exempt de-identified data from key protections, leaving significant gaps in oversight.

While the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) establishes standards for de-identification, advanced analytics and linkage techniques employed by data brokers render this data increasingly susceptible to re-identification. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has taken steps to address these risks, but its limited authority highlights the need for comprehensive solutions.

This …

The Mirage Of Artificial Intelligence Terms Of Use Restrictions, Peter Henderson, Mark A. Lemley

Indiana Law Journal

Artificial intelligence (AI) model creators commonly attach restrictive terms of use to both their models and their outputs. These terms typically prohibit activities ranging from creating competing AI models to spreading disinformation. Often taken at face value, these terms are positioned by companies as key enforceable tools for preventing misuse, particularly in policy dialogs. The California AI Transparency Act even codifies this approach, mandating certain responsible use terms to accompany models.

But are these terms truly meaningful, or merely a mirage? There are myriad examples where these broad terms are regularly and repeatedly violated. Yet except for some account suspensions …

The Overstated Cost Of Ai Fairness In Criminal Justice, Ignacio Cofone, Warut Khern-Am-Nuai

Indiana Law Journal

The dominant critique of algorithmic fairness in AI decision-making, particularly in criminal justice, is that increasing fairness reduces the accuracy of predictions, thereby imposing a cost on society. This Article challenges that assumption by empirically analyzing the COMPAS algorithm, a widely used and widely discussed risk assessment tool in the U.S. criminal justice system.

This Article makes two contributions. First, it demonstrates that widely used AI models do more than replicate existing biases—they exacerbate them. Using causal inference methods, we show that racial bias is not only present in the COMPAS dataset but also worsened by AI models such as …

Regulating Healthcare Coverage Algorithms, Jennifer D. Oliva

Indiana Law Journal

American healthcare facilities and providers increasingly rely on algorithmic tools to support clinical decision-making, standards of care, and institutional practices related to patient diagnosis and treatment. This development has been characterized as both “promising” and “peril[ous].” Healthcare algorithms are intended to improve and standardize healthcare decision-making, but they also are capable of exacerbating bias and discrimination and, thus, contributing to the delivery of inequitable care for already disadvantaged groups.

Does Third Party Litigation Funding Need Regulations On Consumer Protection, Ronen Avraham, Eric Schuller, Anthony J. Sebok

Articles

Transcript of a roundtable discussion during the Third-Party Litigation Symposium at the S.J. Quinney College of Law.

Copyright

UC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Income Tax As A Market Correction, Rebecca N. Morrow

UC Law Journal

I confess. As a tax professor, it has long hurt my feelings that economists label tax as a market distortion. My field is summed up as an impurity on the otherwise pristine complexion of the economist’s pure market. I like to think that tax scholars are not so disparaging of economics. We do not view economically motivated action as a distortion to our tax system, but as a component of it. It is tax planning. This Article proposes that tax should be viewed as a component of a market system. Just as tax scholarship acknowledges that an imagined world in …

Legal Personhood For Artwork, Sergio Alberto Gramitto Ricci

UC Law Journal

Artwork is unique and irreplaceable. It is signifier and signified. The signified of a work of art is its coherent purpose. But the signified of a work of art can be altered when not protected. The ramifications of unduly altering the signified of a work of art are consequential for both living and future generations. While the law provides protection to artists and art owners, it fails to grant rights to works of art themselves. The current legal paradigm, designed around the interest of owners and artists, also falls short of protecting Indigenous art aimed at conserving traditions and cultural …