Digital Commons Network^™

What Was Saddam’S Status When He Was In United States Custody At The Request Of The Iraqi Government? Does The Characterization Of The Conflict Affect Saddam's Status As A Detainee? Can A Prisoner's Status Change Over Time, And If So, How?, Robert C. Bliss

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

"If That Is Heaven, We Would Rather Go To Hell": Contextualizing Us-Cuba Relations, Rumbaut, Rubén G. Rumbaut

Societies Without Borders

The history of Cuba is one of conquest and rebellion. Since the arrival of Columbus, it has had two colonial masters: Spain and the United States. Spain, after the collapse of its empire, ceased to be a threat to the peoples of America. Now, the Spanish are among the principal investors in Cuba, and make up a high percentage of tourists to the island. The United States, engaged in empire-building as sole superpower and continuing to pursue a half-century-old policy of regime change in Cuba, is still seen by the Cubans as the greatest threat to their independence and sovereignty. …

International Water Disputes: How To Prevent A War Over The Nile River, Lee A. Laudicina

Loyola University Chicago International Law Review

No abstract provided.

Botswana's Success In Balancing The Economics Of Hiv/Aids With Trips Obligations And Human Rights, Beata Guzik

Loyola University Chicago International Law Review

No abstract provided.

To Live In In-‘Fame’-Y: Reconceiving Scandalous Marks As Analogous To Famous Marks, Jasmine C. Abdel-Khalik

Faculty Works

In 1905, Congress enacted a revised trademark registration act, which included a prohibition on registering marks containing or consisting of scandalous or immoral material. Because Congress failed to provide any further guidance either in legislative history or in the statutory language, administrative bodies and the courts have struggled to define this standard. Over the past century, decisions applying this prohibition have been inconsistent. The general public and potential trademark owners are unable to predict accurately if a mark will be accepted or refused for federal registration, which has some significant benefits. Perhaps because of this uncertainty, some estimate that hundreds …

Law And Heidegger’S Question Concerning Technology: Prolegomenon To Future Law Librarianship, Paul D. Callister

Faculty Works

Following World War II, the German philosopher Martin Heidegger offered one of the most potent criticisms of technology and modern life. His nightmare is a world whose essence has been reduced to the functional equivalent of a giant gasoline station, an energy source for modern technology and industry. "This relation of man to the world [is] in principle a technical one . . . [It is] altogether alien to former ages and histories. For Heidegger, the problem is not technology itself, but the technical mode of thinking that has accompanied it." Such a viewpoint of the world is a useful …

The Massie (Honor Killing) Trials 1931-32, Douglas O. Linder

Faculty Works

Two dramatic criminal trials, one for rape and one for murder and both involving multiple defendants, forever changed the nature of Hawaiian race relations and politics. Filled with twists and turns and unanswered questions, the trials have all the elements of a good mystery. The second of the so-called Massie Affair trials also closes out the courtroom career of America's greatest defense attorney, Clarence Darrow. No trials ever had a more significant effect on a state's history than those that shocked and shook Hawaii in 1931 and 1932.

The Trial Of William 'Big Bill' Haywood, Douglas O. Linder

Faculty Works

The struggle between the Western Federation of Miners and the Western Mine Owners' Association at the turn of the twentieth century might well be called a war. When the state of Idaho prosecuted William Big Bill Haywood in 1907 for ordering the assassination of former governor Frank Steunenberg, fifteen years of union bombings and murders, fifteen years of mine owner intimidation and greed, and fifteen years of government abuse of process and denials of liberties spilled into the national headlines. Featuring James McParland, America's most famous detective; Harry Orchard, America's most notorious mass murderer turned state's witness; Big Bill Haywood, …

Human Rights And The War On Terror: Complete 2005 - 2007 Topical Research Digest, Jack Donnelly, Simon Amajuru, Susannah Compton, Robin Davey, Syd Dillard, Amanda Donahoe, Charles Hess, Sydney Fisher, Kelley Laird, Victoria Lowdon, Chris Maggard, Alexandra Nichols, Travis Ning, Toni Panetta, Greg Sanders, James Smithwick, Angela Woolliams, Chris Saeger, Sarah Bania-Dobyns, Eric Dibbern, David Gillespie, Latife Bulur, Katie Friesen, Arika Long, Arianna Nowakowski, Joel R. Pruce

Human Rights & Human Welfare

“9/11 changed everything.” Not really. In fact, there has been far more continuity than change over the past six years in both international and domestic politics. Nonetheless, human rights often have been harmed—although not by terrorism but by “the war on terror.”

Rethinking Patent Law’S Uniformity Principle, Craig Allen Nard, John F. Duffy

Faculty Publications

Modern law on expert testimony insists, as a condition of admissibility, that the asserted expertise be determined by the trial judge to be reliable. Reliability is usually characterized as a dichotomous attribute of evidence, as if expertise were either reliable or unreliable. This article argues that making progress in the development of meaningful and appropriate restrictions on the admissibility of expert testimony requires that we abandon this conceptualization and understand the implications of endorsing a gradational notion of reliability in which evidence can be more or less reliable and in which a comparative assessment of reliability is prominent. Consistent with …

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. As An International Human Rights Leader, Henry J. Richardson Iii

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

To-May-To, To-Mah-To; Act Of War, Act Of Terrorism: How Semantics In Insurance Contracts Affect The Public Insurance Adjuster, Megan Reuwer

Student Articles and Papers

No abstract provided.

The Untold Story Of Al Qaeda's Administrative Law Dilemmas, Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar

Minnesota Law Review, Vols. 1-106:1 (1917-2021)

No abstract provided.

The Preventive Paradigm And The Perils Of Ad Hoc Balancing, Jules Lobel

Minnesota Law Review, Vols. 1-106:1 (1917-2021)

No abstract provided.

Modern War And Modern Law, David Kennedy

Minnesota Journal of International Law, Vols 1-28:1 (1992-2019)

No abstract provided.

The Nine Lives Of Article 2(4), David Wippman

Minnesota Journal of International Law, Vols 1-28:1 (1992-2019)

No abstract provided.

Squaring The Circle: Democratizing Judicial Review And The Counter-Constitutional Difficulty, Miguel Schor

Minnesota Journal of International Law, Vols 1-28:1 (1992-2019)

No abstract provided.

The Doctrine Of Proportionality In A Time Of War, E. Thomas Sullivan

Minnesota Journal of International Law, Vols 1-28:1 (1992-2019)

No abstract provided.

The Value Of The Comparative And The International In Reflecting On State Responses To The War On Terror, Colm Campbell, Oren Gross, Fionnuala Ni Aolain

Minnesota Journal of International Law, Vols 1-28:1 (1992-2019)

No abstract provided.

Crimes Against Humanity At The Extraordinary Chambers In The Courts Of Cambodia: Is A Connection With Armed Conflict Required, 24 Ucla Pac. Basin L.J. 125 (2007), Stuart K. Ford

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Hegemonic Intervention As Legitimate Use Of Force, Achilles Skordas

Minnesota Journal of International Law, Vols 1-28:1 (1992-2019)

No abstract provided.

A Uniform Domestic Partnership Act: Marrying Business Partnership And Family Law, Jennifer A. Drobac, Antony Page

Georgia Law Review

This Article contends that domestic partnership based upon business partnership law and associated fiduciary duties would better serve more couples, their families, and society as a whole than marriage law does now. Four problems-the rising divorce rate, the poverty of some "divorced" children and their custodians, the same-sex marriage controversy, and families that exist without a formal legal acknowledgment-have increased concerns about the viability of marriage as an institution that promotes domestic stability and economic security. As a response and solution, Professors Drobac and Page propose a Uniform Domestic Partnership Act, modeled after the Uniform Partnership Act (1914) for businesses. …

What Should We Celebrate On Constitution Day?, Alan E. Garfield

Georgia Law Review

Congress recently created a new national observance, Constitution Day, to be marked each year on September 17. This observance presents a valuable opportunity for the vastly diverse American populace to celebrate its shared values. But what, exactly, should Americans celebrate about the Constitution? The Constitution's text, after all, is hardly perfect, and judicial interpretations of the Constitution are similarly problematic. This Article sets out to identify the Constitution's core meaning for Americans. If first draws lessons from two contemporary Establishment Clause disputes (the teaching of intelligent design and the displaying of Ten Commandments monuments). These examples illustrate why the Constitution,and …

Guatemala's Femicides And The Ongoing Struggle For Women's Human Rights: Update To Cgrs's 2005 Report Getting Away With Murder, Katharine Ruhl

UC Law SF Journal on Gender and Justice

This Article is an update to the report entitled Getting Away With Murder: Guatemala's Failure to Protect Women and Rodi Alvarado's Quest for Safety, published by the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies (CGRS) in November 2005, and by the Hastings Women's Law Journal in its Summer 2006 issue. That report explored the root causes of why Guatemalan women are forced to seek asylum in order to escape violence in their home country, and offered recommendations to the Guatemalan government. In this Article, the author argues that the Guatemalan government has made only limited progress in addressing the problem of …

The Rhetoric Of Symmetry, Karen Petroski

Valparaiso University Law Review

No abstract provided.

State Intelligence Gathering: Conflict Of Laws, Charles H.B. Garraway

Michigan Journal of International Law

This Article begins with an examination of the development of the law of war (Part II) and human rights law (Part III) before looking at the differing legal categories of armed conflict (Part IV). It then examines the applicability of human rights law in situations of armed conflict (Part V) and the increasing complexity of defining violence, whether as armed conflict or otherwise (Part VI). The Article proceeds with an examination of the overlap between the law of war and human rights law (Part VII) and the risk of divergence that this overlap causes (Part VIII). Finally, it seeks to …

Counterintuitive: Intelligence Operations And International Law, Glenn Sulmasy, John Yoo

Michigan Journal of International Law

The question before us is whether international law is useful or required to govern the covert intelligence-gathering activities of nation-states during peacetime. The very notion that international law is currently capable of regulating intelligence gathering is dubious. In fact, we suggest that international regulation of intelligence operations could have the perverse effect of making international conflict more, rather than less, likely. Certainly, there is legitimate space for coordination and cooperation between states in sharing intelligence, but such "sharing" does not involve significant needs for universal regulation by international law. Simply stated, it is not in the interests of nation-states or …

What's International Law Got To Do With It? Transnational Law And The Intelligence Mission, James E. Baker

Michigan Journal of International Law

This Article describes a continuum of contemporary threats to U.S. national security, with a focus on nonstate terrorism. Part III addresses the role of intelligence and national security law, and in particular law addressed to process, in combating these threats. Good process advances the liberty and safety interests embodied in the concept of national security. Good process improves the quality of decision. It also enhances accountability, which in turn improves decision. Where good process is defined in law to include executive directive, it is better insulated from the immediate imperatives of secrecy and speed.

Arne John Jacobsen Ii V. Minnie Larue Thomas : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019)

On Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Utah County The Honorable Judge Lynn W. Davis

Privatizing Eminent Domain: The Delegation Of A Very Public Power To Private, Non-Profit And Charitable Corporations , Asmara Tekle Johnson

American University Law Review

In an age of privatization of many governmental functions such as health care, prison management, and warfare, this Article poses the question as to whether eminent domain should be among them. Unlike other privatized functions, eminent domain is a traditionally governmental and highly coercive power, akin to the government’s power to tax, to arrest individuals, and to license. It is, therefore, a very public power.

In particular, the delegation of this very public power to private, non-profit and charitable corporations has escaped the scrutiny that for-profit private actors have attracted in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in …