Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Brigham Young University Law School (1317)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (694)
- University of Michigan Law School (660)
- Fordham Law School (597)
- Seton Hall University (560)
-
- Duke Law (551)
- Southern Methodist University (542)
- William & Mary Law School (512)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (502)
- UC Law SF (487)
- University of San Diego (447)
- American University Washington College of Law (420)
- University of Minnesota Law School (405)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (367)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (361)
- University of the Pacific (356)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (342)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (336)
- University of Colorado Law School (319)
- University of Richmond (316)
- University of Washington School of Law (310)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (303)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (301)
- Notre Dame Law School (298)
- University of Missouri School of Law (284)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (279)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (254)
- University of Chicago Law School (247)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (245)
- University of Kentucky (240)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (321)
- Law (287)
- Constitutional law (271)
- Privacy (246)
- First Amendment (234)
-
- Criminal justice (231)
- Immigration (229)
- Police (220)
- Constitutional Law (209)
- Fourth Amendment (201)
- Supreme Court (170)
- Constitution (166)
- Human rights (157)
- Law enforcement (154)
- Sentencing (147)
- Crime (143)
- Due process (141)
- Legislation (136)
- Regulation (135)
- Criminal procedure (133)
- Race (131)
- Civil rights (129)
- Terrorism (129)
- Incarceration (127)
- Second Amendment (124)
- United States Supreme Court (121)
- Evidence (119)
- Discrimination (118)
- United States (118)
- Criminal Law (116)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1032)
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (566)
- Faculty Publications (442)
- Articles (412)
- Michigan Law Review (302)
-
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006) (299)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (through 1995) (289)
- Journal of Air Law and Commerce (255)
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (254)
- Fordham Law Review (247)
- North Carolina Law Review (224)
- McGeorge Law Review (212)
- Washington Law Review (183)
- Louisiana Law Review (182)
- Scholarly Works (171)
- Cardozo Law Review (168)
- Minnesota Law Review, Vols. 1-106:1 (1917-2021) (166)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019) (166)
- SMU Law Review (160)
- Seton Hall Law Review (160)
- West Virginia Law Review (159)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (157)
- Notre Dame Law Review (157)
- Indiana Law Journal (153)
- UC Law Journal (151)
- Kentucky Law Journal (150)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (150)
- Missouri Law Review (149)
- Student Works (149)
- Case Western Reserve Law Review (148)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 691 - 720 of 23996
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Money For Nothin’, Gifts For Free: The Supreme Court Differentiates Between Bribes And Gratuities In Snyder V. United States, Seth Lewis
Mercer Law Review
The Supreme Court of the United States determined that the federal bribery statute regarding state and local officials did not include gratuities in Snyder v. United States. In Snyder, James Snyder was convicted of accepting an illegal gratuity under 18 U.S.C. § 666 and appealed his conviction. The Court’s decision addressed the split in the United States Courts of Appeals regarding whether 18 U.S.C. § 666 criminalized gratuities, payments made after an official’s act without a prior agreement, along with bribes, payments made with a prior agreement. The Court held that 18 U.S.C. § 666 only criminalized bribes and did …
From Ballots To Bureaucrats: Who Is Really Holding Georgia’S Prosecutors Accountable?, Sutton M. Eggena
From Ballots To Bureaucrats: Who Is Really Holding Georgia’S Prosecutors Accountable?, Sutton M. Eggena
Mercer Law Review
In the modern justice system that we know today, prosecutors play a significant role in shaping the lives, reputations, and liberties the everyday American enjoys. Former United States Attorney General and Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson once said, “[t]he prosecutor has more control over life, liberty, and reputation than any other person in America.” A prosecutor’s position in the criminal justice system is unlike any other, holding the power to decide who gets charged with a crime and the severity of those charges. This power has evolved, moving from a system where individuals and families had to fight for …
Irreparable Harm: How The United States Fails To Remedy Unjust Deportations, Joe Colley
Irreparable Harm: How The United States Fails To Remedy Unjust Deportations, Joe Colley
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
When the United States wrongfully deports individuals, the harm is often irreversible. This piece explores the systemic gaps that leave those unjustly deported without meaningful remedies or recourse.
Racial Disparities In Crime-Based Removal Proceedings, Emily Ryo, Ian Peacock, Weston Ley, Christopher Levesque
Racial Disparities In Crime-Based Removal Proceedings, Emily Ryo, Ian Peacock, Weston Ley, Christopher Levesque
Minnesota Law Review Vols. 106:2 onward (2021-present)
Whether and to what extent racial minorities experience harsher treatment or face worse outcomes in court are questions of fundamental importance for any justice system. Questions of racial inequality are especially salient in the context of removal proceedings that are triggered by immigrants’ criminal history. Many individuals in crime-based removal proceedings are immigrants of color who face a host of legal disadvantages that are tantamount to double penalties for the same crime for which they have already been punished through the criminal justice system. This Article offers, for the first time, systematic empirical analyses of crime-based removal proceedings decided between …
State V. Smith 2024-Ohio-5745, Joseph Phillipps
State V. Smith 2024-Ohio-5745, Joseph Phillipps
Ohio Northern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
State V. Hickman 2024-Ohio-5747, Alyssa Hohlbein
State V. Hickman 2024-Ohio-5747, Alyssa Hohlbein
Ohio Northern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Fourth Amendment And Defending Domestic Networks, Anthony M. Rodrigues J.D., Ll.M.
The Fourth Amendment And Defending Domestic Networks, Anthony M. Rodrigues J.D., Ll.M.
Ohio Northern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York City Misses The Exit To Traffic Safety, Joseph Caffrey
New York City Misses The Exit To Traffic Safety, Joseph Caffrey
Capstones
New York City Misses the Exit to Traffic Safety investigates New York City’s mounting traffic violence crisis through the lens of a devastating crash that killed a Brooklyn mother and her two daughters. It examines the city’s inconsistent enforcement of reckless driving and the failure of the Dangerous Vehicle Abatement Program (DVAP), which aimed to reform recidivist speeders. The piece investigates the imperfections of Vision Zero, public backlash to automated enforcement, and the broader failure to prevent recidivist speeding. It also explores policy alternatives like Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA), highlighting legislative efforts to revive accountability and save lives, while advocating …
Judicial Deference And Presidential Power Under The Alien Enemies Act, Rebecca Ingber
Judicial Deference And Presidential Power Under The Alien Enemies Act, Rebecca Ingber
Online Publications
On March 15, 2025, President Donald Trump issued a proclamation titled, “Invocation of the Alien Enemies Act Regarding the Invasion of The United States by Tren De Aragua.” In purporting to invoke the Alien Enemies Act, Trump resurrected a 1798 statute that grants the President extraordinary removal powers in times of “declared war” or “invasion or predatory incursion … against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government.” Specifically, this wartime power permits the President to apprehend and remove as “alien enemies” the non-U.S. citizen nationals of the foreign state, as long as they are fourteen …
Hospitality Operators And Cannabis Tourism In The South: Insights On Policy & Regulations, Nick E. Johnston, Kelly Way, Chloe Tyner, Betsy Garrison
Hospitality Operators And Cannabis Tourism In The South: Insights On Policy & Regulations, Nick E. Johnston, Kelly Way, Chloe Tyner, Betsy Garrison
ICHRIE Research Reports
Cannabis tourism offers new opportunities for U.S. hospitality, although regional adoption is limited and complex due to diverse legal frameworks. Through qualitative document analysis (QDA) of regulatory frameworks in 14 Southern U.S. states, this study compares policies on consumption, sales, and employment in states with limited or emerging cannabis programs. Findings reveal that hospitality operators can enhance guest experiences by creating private, wellness-focused cannabis environments and advocating for gradual policy adjustments. However, compliance with strict consumption, licensing, and workplace rules is essential to mitigate legal risks. This study highlights the South's cannabis tourism potential within politically conservative markets, suggesting that …
Lgbtq Wedding Party: Conscientous Objections To The Enforcement Of Anti-Discrimination Law, Ioanna Tourkochoriti
Lgbtq Wedding Party: Conscientous Objections To The Enforcement Of Anti-Discrimination Law, Ioanna Tourkochoriti
Tulsa Law Review
No abstract provided.
Crystal Clear Disparities: The Failure Of Sentencing Guidelines And How They Repeatedly Contribute To Systematic Racism In The United States, Makayla Perez
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Reasonable Suspicion And Racial Profiling In The Enforcement Of Immigration Laws In Arizona, George L. Wajackoyah
Reasonable Suspicion And Racial Profiling In The Enforcement Of Immigration Laws In Arizona, George L. Wajackoyah
Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies
The delegation of immigration enforcement authority to local law enforcement under Section 287(g) raised concerns about increased racial profiling, fueling fear and distrust in immigrant communities. Understanding these effects aided in evaluating the broader impact of immigration policies on public safety and community relations. Grounded in critical race theory, this study explored how Section 287(g) enabled racial profiling by giving local law enforcement broad discretionary authority over immigration enforcement. A qualitative research design was employed using thematic analysis of interview data from 26 immigrants and law enforcement officers. Manual coding and NVivo software were utilized to conduct the analysis. The …
We, “The People,” Deserve A Second Chance, Meghan Monahan
We, “The People,” Deserve A Second Chance, Meghan Monahan
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
The Rape Kit Backlog: Problems And Solutions, Tracey Cao
The Rape Kit Backlog: Problems And Solutions, Tracey Cao
Themis: Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science
This literature review examines the ongoing issue of rape kit backlog in the United States. Rape kits are a means of evidence collection from victims of sexual assault that can be used in court. Across the nation, many state jurisdictions have hundreds and thousands of rape kits left untested and locked away in storage facilities. Consent for testing, police bias, and funding issues are the main issues that will be addressed. Many victims choose not to have their kits tested. Other kits never get tested due to police choosing not to submit a kit due to their bias against some …
Law School News: Rwu Class Of 2025 Urged To Embrace Discomfort, Pursue Their Dreams And Careers With Purpose 05-16-2025, Jordan J. Phelan
Law School News: Rwu Class Of 2025 Urged To Embrace Discomfort, Pursue Their Dreams And Careers With Purpose 05-16-2025, Jordan J. Phelan
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
The Environment Through The Lens Of International Courts And Tribunals, Sean Speers
The Environment Through The Lens Of International Courts And Tribunals, Sean Speers
Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)
No abstract provided.
The Banality Of Crimmigration—Can Immigration Law Recover Itself?, Catherine Dauvergne
The Banality Of Crimmigration—Can Immigration Law Recover Itself?, Catherine Dauvergne
All Faculty Publications
This article argues that criminal law has overtaken immigration law to such an extent that the notion of “crimmigration” is no longer shocking. In Canada, where the population has long been supportive of immigration and where national politics have been remarkably consensual in matters of immigration, crimmigration now forms the basis of a new form of bipartisan consensus. By looking back on the Justin Trudeau Liberal government, we see that most of the Harper-era crimmigration measures were left in place, and the advance of crimmigration continued unabated. If we are to make any progress in recovering space for values other …
Utilizing Equitable Remedies Via The Defend Trade Secrets Act's Extraterritorial Reach To Enforce Judgments Against Foreign Defendants, Marty Ishmael
Utilizing Equitable Remedies Via The Defend Trade Secrets Act's Extraterritorial Reach To Enforce Judgments Against Foreign Defendants, Marty Ishmael
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
Automation Mismatch: How Contractor Ai Adoption Challenges Institutional Procurement Norms At U.S. Customs And Border Protection (Cbp), Farhan Bin Amjad
Automation Mismatch: How Contractor Ai Adoption Challenges Institutional Procurement Norms At U.S. Customs And Border Protection (Cbp), Farhan Bin Amjad
Beyond the Project Horizon: Journal of the Center for Project Management Innovation
This letter explores a growing strain in the U.S. federal procurement: the automation mismatch between AI-powered proposal development by contractors and the regulation-bound evaluation systems at agencies like U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Tools like Vultron and Unanet AI have enabled federal contractors to increase proposal submission volume, yet institutional constraints such as data sensitivity, budget limitations, and cultural barriers have hindered equivalent modernization on the government side. This article leverages institutional theory and prior research to analyze this disparity, highlighting how legal and cultural factors limit AI integration in procurement. Detailed analysis of these regulatory and cultural influences …
Platform Capital And The City: Governing Uber In Buenos Aires And Manchester, Mathew Johnson, Angel Martin-Caballero
Platform Capital And The City: Governing Uber In Buenos Aires And Manchester, Mathew Johnson, Angel Martin-Caballero
Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal
Recent literature has drawn attention to the various regulatory battles and flashpoints triggered by the entry of platform Transportation network Companies such as Uber and Lyft into cities around the world. Drawing on original case study analysis of Uber in Buenos Aires and Greater Manchester, we explore the increasingly complex and dynamic nature of local regulatory responses to platforms, and how they evolve over time. We develop a three-fold analytical framework that illustrates the important interactions between the competencies of local regulatory actors, the power of different interest groups, and the legitimacy of institutional rules. Our findings suggest that balancing …
Monochromacy Of Justice: The Global Cost Of Racial Colorblindness, Arnold Brown Jr.
Monochromacy Of Justice: The Global Cost Of Racial Colorblindness, Arnold Brown Jr.
DePaul Law Review
No abstract provided.
Of K9s And Quadrupeds: A Cautionary Concession To Police Dogs, Elizabeth N. Jones
Of K9s And Quadrupeds: A Cautionary Concession To Police Dogs, Elizabeth N. Jones
DePaul Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Deterrence Dilemma: Is It Time For Canada To Abandon General Deterrence As A Sentencing Objective?, Caitlin Salvino
The Deterrence Dilemma: Is It Time For Canada To Abandon General Deterrence As A Sentencing Objective?, Caitlin Salvino
Dalhousie Law Journal
When Canada first codified its sentencing framework in the Criminal Code, Parliament included deterrence as a sentencing objective. The sentencing objective of deterrence encompasses two aspects: specific deterrence for the individual offender and general deterrence for other potential offenders. I engage with the concept of general deterrence and its incorporation into Canadian sentencing law throughout this article. I argue that Parliament should abandon general deterrence as a sentencing objective under the Criminal Code. After reviewing the jurisprudence on general deterrence and conducting a systematic review of its current application in Ontario sentencing decisions, I argue that general deterrence should be …
Unveiling Injustice: The Case For Ending Guantanamo Bay And Extrajudicial Detention, Aasiyah Wasif
Unveiling Injustice: The Case For Ending Guantanamo Bay And Extrajudicial Detention, Aasiyah Wasif
Northwestern Law Journal des Refusés
No abstract provided.
In Praise Of Attainder, Nathan Ristuccia
Robots And (Indian) Reservations: A Jurisdictional Nightmare Waiting To Happen, Adam Crepelle
Robots And (Indian) Reservations: A Jurisdictional Nightmare Waiting To Happen, Adam Crepelle
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
Advances in artificial intelligence are expanding the possibilities of robots. Indeed, robots are now engaging in numerous activities previously thought to require human cognition, such as driving cars and diagnosing diseases. Scholars have published numerous articles examining the intersection of law and robots across myriad fields. However, legal scholarship has yet to explore the relationship between robots and federal Indian law. This is a significant oversight because there are 574 federally recognized tribes and over fifty-six million acres of Indian country. Thus, legal issues involving tribes and robots are inevitable. This is the first law review article dedicated to exploring …
Who Holds The Hammer? A Private Ordering Framework As The Key To Carpenter’S Privacy Puzzle, Matthew Green
Who Holds The Hammer? A Private Ordering Framework As The Key To Carpenter’S Privacy Puzzle, Matthew Green
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
This Note builds on the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Carpenter v. United States, suggesting that its technology-specific approach may be insufficiently elastic to address the complexities of modern data privacy. Through an analysis of several exemplars, this Note advocates for a private ordering framework—where data collectors respond to consumer expectations of privacy through self-regulating practices—as a more adaptive and effective means of safeguarding digital privacy. This approach preserves the third-party doctrine while reducing the burden on courts to draw technological boundaries in a rapidly evolving digital environment.
Asegurar La Frontera: Expansion Of Governor Greg Abbott’S Powers Over Border Security, Marshall B. Lloyd
Asegurar La Frontera: Expansion Of Governor Greg Abbott’S Powers Over Border Security, Marshall B. Lloyd
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Distancing From Precedent & Procedures In Favor Of An Uninformed Public: A Survey Of Energy Transfer V. Friedman, Gina R. Salash
Distancing From Precedent & Procedures In Favor Of An Uninformed Public: A Survey Of Energy Transfer V. Friedman, Gina R. Salash
Widener Commonwealth Law Review
No abstract provided.