Antitrust And Console Gaming: Preventing Macrocompanies With Microtransactions, Cameron Brody

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note examines antitrust concerns in the console gaming industry, focusing on corporate consolidation and the impact of microtransactions. It argues that traditional antitrust strategies, such as foreclosure arguments, have proven ineffective in addressing these issues. The analysis suggests that microtransactions, particularly their role in exploiting consumers and consolidating market power, should be a focal point for new antitrust enforcement strategies. Regulators are urged to consider the broader implications of microtransactions on market structure and consumer welfare to develop innovative approaches to antitrust law.

Hospitals Pay The Price: Sex Abuse Cover-Ups Accountable Under New York Adult Survivors Act, Olivia Cohen

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note argues that hospitals often fail to address sexual abuse, prioritizing their reputations over patient safety, and that the New York Adult Survivors Act (NYASA) provides a critical but insufficient avenue for accountability. While the NYASA allows survivors to sue abusers and enabling institutions, its one-year lookback window excludes many victims, emphasizing the need for expansion to ensure justice and institutional reform.

From Proposal To Practice: Unpacking The Failed New Jersey Joint Custody Bills And Their Implications For Domestic Violence Victims, Jenna Rosenstein

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note critically examines the failed 2018 New Jersey bills proposing a presumption of joint legal and physical custody in child custody matters, arguing that such measures may inadvertently harm victims of domestic violence by shifting the burden of proof onto them and failing to account for the complexities of abuse. It advocates for a more nuanced legal framework that balances shared parenting with the safety and well-being of domestic violence victims and their children.

"Baby-Steps For Baby Business": Diverse Market, Challenges, And Workable International Regulation For Cross-Border Commercial Surrogacy, Ellene Ko

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the rapid growth of transnational commercial surrogacy as a multibillion-dollar industry, driven by assisted reproductive technologies and fertility tourism. It highlights the legal conflicts and challenges arising from the patchwork of international surrogacy regulations, including issues of citizenship, exploitation, and enforcement of cross-border contracts. The analysis advocates for an international convention to establish a clear legal framework for transnational surrogacy, emphasizing the need for shared responsibility between global and national oversight bodies to prevent exploitation and ensure ethical practices.

The Doors Of Janus: A Critical Analysis Of The Socio-Technical Forces Eroding Trust In The Rule Of Law, Anuj Puri, Esther Keymolen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The Rule of Law is neither just a principle nor solely the institutions that embody that principle, a critical aspect of the Rule of Law is its grounding in trust which often gets neglected in the surrounding discourse. When the citizens' trust in the Rule of Law weakens, the Rule of Law becomes fragile. In this article we examine the impact of emerging technologies on the citizens' trust in the Rule of Law. Our analysis is specifcally focused on the effect of systemic disinformation which is likely to worsen with the advent of Generative AI, algorithmic misgovernance, and the digitalization …

Bridging The Information Gap Between Criminal Law And Psychological Science, John B. Meixner Jr.

Scholarly Works

Some of the most pressing issues in American criminal law—the dominance of plea bargaining, vast executive discretion, and systemic racial disparities—turn on fundamentally empirical questions. Yet, while legal academics largely analyze these issues through doctrinal or theoretical lenses, psychologists and criminologists frequently study the exact same phenomena using empirical methods. Surprisingly, these fields operate almost entirely independently. The legal academy consistently overlooks substantial psychological research that could inform normative arguments, while psychologists often design studies without crucial context from criminal legal scholarship. This chapter outlines the contours of this critical information gap and proposes solutions to bridge it.

Breaking The Bind: Rethinking Non-Compete Agreements In A Federal Framework, Stephen Hendricks

Chapman Law Review

In April 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) adopted a sweeping rule that bans most non-compete agreements nationwide. Though well-intentioned, the FTC’s categorical prohibition neglects the complex interplay between worker mobility, employer investment, and the protection of legitimate business interests. This Article contends that the United States must move beyond the current false binary of complete prohibition or unregulated enforcement. Drawing on comparative legal analysis, it proposes a federal framework modeled on Germany’s Karenzentschädigung system, under which employers must provide post-employment compensation—typically fifty percent of prior salary—to enforce non-competes.

After tracing the evolution of non-compete doctrine in American law, this …

Wartime Homefront Medical Ethics, Nili Karako-Eyal, Shelly Kamin-Friedman, Maya Pered Raz

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Medically Necessary Abortions After Dobbs: What, If Anything, Has Changed?, Maura K. Quinlan, Paul B. Linton

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Person-Centered Pluralism About Contract Theory, C. Scott Pryor

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Debate On Trying Minors Who Commit Adultlike Offenses As Adults: A Middle-Ground Contribution, Philip C. Aka

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Generative A.I., Virtual Child Pornography, And The First Amendment: Time To Reconsider Ashcroft V. Free Speech Coalition?, Seth Atisha

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Nontestimonial: State Child Hearsay Exceptions In The Post-Crawford Era, Mckenzie J. Brummond

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

What’S Wrong With Inflicting Death? Evaluating Marquis’S “Future Of Value” Account, Christopher Kaczor

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Primacy Of Parental Authority In End-Of-Life Decisions For Children, Patrick A. Tully

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Optimizing Death To Effectuate Deterrence, Lucas Brolin

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The End Is Still To Come: How The Law’S Interaction With Digital Replicas And Derivative Digital Replicas Will Shape The Future, Spencer Kweskin

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Case For Climate Refugee Protection, Nicole Theriot

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Art Belongs To The Artists, Deborah M. Weissman, Louis A. Pérez

Faculty Publications

This Article examines the rights of detainees interned at the Guantánamo Bay Naval Station to claim ownership of cultural work produced during their imprisonment. Through a series of arbitrary policies, the U.S. government alternately punished detainees for creating works of art, confiscated paintings and drawings, and otherwise denied detainees’ rights to control their creative works. This Article suggests the need to understand these policies as acts akin to plunder—that is, as a practice long associated with colonialism as a means through which the artifacts of the material culture of conquered peoples were expropriated and claimed as “trophies” of conquest. It …

Suspending The Truancy Paradigm, Barbara A. Fedders, Lucy Carlson, Max Parker

Faculty Publications

In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, school absences have skyrocketed. While racially minoritized, disabled, and low-income students have historically been, and remain, most likely to experience absence, white and affluent students’ rates of attendance have also declined. To respond to this new universality of student absenteeism, some policymakers have begun to seek alternatives to what we term “the truancy paradigm.”

We define the truancy paradigm as the range of coercive and often punitive interventions deployed by states and school districts to enforce compulsory attendance statutes. This paradigm, we argue, wrongly assumes (a) that strict enforcement of compulsory attendance laws …

Pierce, Don't Say Gay Laws, And The Rise Of Illiberal Authoritarianism, Maxine Eichner

Faculty Publications

In the last four years, legislators and policymakers in red states have passed a wave of measures directed at reforming public schools’ policies and curricula. Some of these measures deal with issues of sexual orientation and gender identity. Others restrict educators’ ability to teach issues of race. Still other initiatives seek to insert Christianity into the schools. While a number of these reforms have been passed under the label of “parental-rights laws,” these measures actually do little to foster the autonomy of parents to direct their children’s upbringing. Instead, they are muscular attempts by state governments, themselves, to impose their …

Carceral Firms In Disguise: Prison Labor, Human Rights, And The Public-Private Divide, Mao-Hong Lin

Emory International Law Review

The prohibition of forced labor is a globally recognized principle. International laws such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights, and the American Convention on Human Rights explicitly ban all forms of slavery, including forced labor, with an exception for forced labor behind bars. Further, ILO asserts that forced prison labor must be conducted solely under the control of public authorities, explicitly excluding private entities from involvement. ILO’s prohibition against private use of prison labor is based on two main concerns: abuse of power over inmates and unfair competition between inmates and …

Josef Bohatec: The First Historian Of The Calvinist Reformation Of Rights, John Witte Jr., Thomas Jared Farmer

Emory International Law Review

This Article analyzes the pioneering work of the first great historian of Calvinist rights talk, Josef Bohatec (1876–1954), a Moravian-born and Vienna-based church historian. Bohatec built on the earlier efforts of several German scholars who were excavating pre-Enlightenment sources of human rights going back to antiquity. But Bohatec placed strong new emphasis on the original rights contributions of sixteenth-century Protestant reformer John Calvin (1509-1564) and his followers. Bohatec showed how Calvin’s legal training shaped the many new statutes and rights ordinances that he crafted for Geneva. He also showed how Calvin’s theological training shaped his highly innovative Protestant legal and …

Exploring The Dynamics And Outcomes Of Family Engagement In Child Welfare Services: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach, Jianchao Lai, Michelle Graef, Todd Franke

Center on Children, Families, and the Law: Faculty Publications

Background: Engaging families effectively in child welfare services remains a persistent challenge, shaped by complex interactions between agency practices and family circumstances. While existing research has explored this issue, it has predominantly relied on data from agency and caseworker perspectives, often overlooking the crucial viewpoint of the families. Objectives: This study investigates families’ subjective experiences and perceptions within the child welfare system, focusing on their satisfaction with child welfare workers and overall engagement. Methods: The study draws on data collected through an evaluation of the implementation of Alternative Response in a Midwestern state. Agency administrative data is integrated with additional …

Contesting "Address": Conflicts Over The Words We Use To Address And Refer To Each Other, Helen Norton

Publications

Professor Richard Brooks's generative insights provide us with valuable tools for recognizing, and trying to make sense of, address's role in human interactions. That "address"--the words we use to address and refer to each other--has the potential both to offer value and to inflict harm to these interactions sometimes triggers conflict over appropriate forms of address. In this Commentary to Professor Brooks's Frankel Lecture, I examine some of these conflicts.

As we'll see, some address conflicts involve debates over whether and when address actually makes meaning or whether it’s instead relatively trivial--while others involve contestants who agree that address makes …

Health Equity In Times Of Crisis: The Impact Of Economic And Public Health Shocks On Access To Care Among Women In Zimbabwe And The United States, Vimbainashe Dihwa

Theses and Dissertations

Abstract

This dissertation examines health equity during times of national public health and economic crises by examining access to care among women of reproductive age. Papers 1 and 2 estimate the effects of the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic in the United States (US). Paper 3 examines the potential effects of the 2008 hyperinflation and subsequent economic crisis in Zimbabwe.

Paper 1 assessed the role of health professional shortage areas (HPSAs) in the Covid-19 pandemic-related temporal trends in mental health access among women in the 18 to 44 years age group with self-reported anxiety and/or depression. The findings suggest decreased unmet prescription …

Stereotypes As Character Evidence, Hillel J. Bavli

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

Base rate evidence often connects a defendant to an act through the defendant’s membership in a certain population. It includes evidence arising from forensic analysis, criminal profiling, statistical analysis, artificial intelligence, and many other common and emerging scientific methods. But while this evidence is prevalent in civil and criminal trials, it is poorly understood, and there is little predictability in how a court will decide its admissibility or even what standard the court will apply.

In this Article, I show that although some forms of base rate evidence are desirable and even critical to achieving an accurate case outcome, a …

On Snow's Intellectual Property And Immorality, David O. Taylor

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

In this Essay, I consider the “why” and “how” of Professor Snow’s controversial, countercultural, important, and relevant position that immorality may result in the denial of intellectual property protection. First, I highlight how surprising it is that Professor Snow’s argument springs from the theories underlying intellectual property protection, rather than the theories underlying the morality and ethics he believes ought to be considered in determining intellectual property protection. No one (that I know, at least) goes to the Environmental Protection Agency seeking better regulations to protect the environment and uses the labor desert theory of property rights as an argument. …

Is Originalism Bullshit?, Michael L. Smith

Lewis & Clark Law Review

It’s finally time to answer the big question. This Article draws on the surprisingly robust literature examining the definition, essence, and significance of bullshit and evaluates whether originalist constitutional interpretation fits the bill. I begin with Harry Frankfurt’s definition of bullshit as utterances made in pursuit of the speaker’s goals without regard for their truth value. I also rely on alternate formulations, including bullshit as unclarifiable nonsense as well as contextual and audience-centric variations of bullshit.

While not all instances of originalism are bullshit, I identify those instances which are, and go on to demonstrate that originalism is uniquely prone …

Admitting Science: Problems With Current Admissibility Standards, William O'Donohue, Sneha Gupta

Lewis & Clark Law Review

Attorneys use expert testimony to advance legal positions in courtrooms. Because expert testimony can have tremendous influence over judges and juries, it is admitted only if it meets specific admissibility standards, i.e., Frye and Daubert. These standards provide different admissibility criteria, have been adopted by distinct sets of jurisdictions, and, we argue, are of questionable validity. These standards are attempts to ensure that only knowledge is admissible and are, then, essentially an epistemic matter. Science serves as a proxy for knowledge because science is the epistemic process that has been successful at generating knowledge. However, both epistemology and the philosophy …