Digital Commons Network^™

A House Divided Against Itself: A Comment On “Mastery, Slavery, And Emancipation”, Kendall Thomas

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Shop Talk: Conversations About The Constitutionality Of Our Labor Law, David M. Beatty

Osgoode Hall Law Journal

In this essay Professor Beatty joins the debate as to how, if at all, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the process of judicial review can be integrated with our tradition of democratic rule and the sovereignty of the popular will. Rather than deal directly with the arguments of those who are critical of the entrenchment of a written bill of rights, Professor Beatty endeavors to cast the Charter and the new role of the judges in the best possible light. Analogizing the process of constitutional review to "conversations of justification" (using examples drawn from the labour law field), …

Pornography And Cognition: A Reply To Cass Sunstein, Paul Chevigny

Duke Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Work On A Labor Theory Of Meaning, Kenneth Casebeer

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Persons And Masks: The Phenomenology Of Spirit And Its Laws, Robert Bernasconi

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Contradiction And Critical Legal Studies, David G. Carlson

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Self-Determination In The Arab-Israeli Conflict: Meaning, Myth, And Politics, Malvina Halberstam

Articles

No abstract provided.

Vol. 12 No. 2 (1989): Pacific Studies Front Matter, The Jonathan Nāpela Center For Hawaiian And Pacific Islands Studies

Pacific Studies

Pacific Studies is published two times a year by The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies, Brigham Young University Hawai‘i #1979, 55–220 Kulanui Street, Lāʻie, Hawai‘i 96762, but responsibility for opinions expressed in the articles rests with the authors alone. Subscription rate is US$40.00 yearly, payable to The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies. The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies (formerly The Pacific Institute) is an organization funded by Brigham Young University Hawai‘i. The Center assists the University in meeting its cultural and educational goals by undertaking a program of teaching, research, and …

Vol. 12 No. 2 (1989): Pacific Studies Full Issue, The Jonathan Nāpela Center For Hawaiian And Pacific Islands Studies

Pacific Studies

Pacific Studies is published two times a year by The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies, Brigham Young University Hawai‘i #1979, 55–220 Kulanui Street, Lāʻie, Hawai‘i 96762, but responsibility for opinions expressed in the articles rests with the authors alone. Subscription rate is US$40.00 yearly, payable to The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies. The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies (formerly The Pacific Institute) is an organization funded by Brigham Young University Hawai‘i. The Center assists the University in meeting its cultural and educational goals by undertaking a program of teaching, research, and …

Contributors: Vol 12 No. 2, The Jonathan Nāpela Center For Hawaiian And Pacific Islands Studies

Pacific Studies

Contributors list of Vol. 12 (1989): Pacific Studies Full Issue 2

Te'o I. J. Fairbairn's Review Of Michael T. Skully's Financial Institutions And Markets In The South Pacific, Te'o I. J. Fairbairn

Pacific Studies

No abstract provided.

Competency Testing: The Hidden Risk Of School Reform, Stephen T. Schroth

Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality

No abstract provided.

Hegel's Legal Plenum, Arthur J. Jacobson

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Hegelian Vanity, Common Law Humility: On Legal Theory, Its Expression, And Its Criticism, Thomas M. Eisele

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rethinking The Hegilian State, Fred Dallmayr

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

State And Civil Society In Hegel's Philosophy Of Right: Comments On Dallmayr And Arato, Kenneth Baynes

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Vol. 37, No. 19, February 22, 1989, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•MLR,JLR Name Editors •Bollinger Announces New Faculty Appointment •Black History Month Seeks Inclusion •Glimmers of Truth •Is this What We Fought for? •The NRA: Beyond the Lunatic Fringe •Practice What You Preach •Playing Politics with Environmental Disaster •The Richness of Black History •Perspectives on Western Civilization •LSSS Argues Over Committee Staffing Rules •Classifieds •Crossword •To the Finals! •Law in the Raw

Vol. 37, No. 16, February 1, 1989, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•CBS to Broadcast from Law Quad •Giamatti Demands Excellence for Fans •Tony Winner Criticizes Arts •The Failing Wall •A Kinder, Gentler Militarism •Ah, the Irony of It All •In America Today, Racism Is In •Club Rates Set to Jump for 1989-90 •Classifieds •Wolverine Cagers Lazy on Defense •Law lcers Humiliate Squalid Frat Boys •Roundball Tourney Next Sports Event •Law in the Raw

Judge Richard Posner's Wealth Maximization Principle: Another Form Of Utilitarianism?, Robin F. Grant

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Deconstructing Gender, Joan C. Williams

Michigan Law Review

I start out, as have many others, from the deep split among American feminists between "sameness" and "difference." The driving force behind the mid-twentieth-century resurgence of American feminism was an insistence on the fundamental similarity of men and women and, hence, their essential equality.

I begin in Part I by challenging the widely influential description of gender advocated by Carol Gilligan. While Part I challenges the description of gender differences offered by Gilligan feminists, it does not deny the existence of gender differences. The chief strength of the feminism of difference is its challenge to what have been called male …

The Obscenity Exception: Abusing The First Amendment, Simon Roberts

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Code Of Ethics Revisited, William I. Weston

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Misreading The Williams Act, Lyman P.Q. Johnson, David K. Millon

Scholarly Articles

No abstract provided.

Hegelian Vanity, Common Law Humility: On Legal Theory, Its Expression And Its Criticism, Thomas D. Eisele

Faculty Articles and Other Publications

Commentary on Arthur Jacobson, Hegel's Legal Plenum, 10 Cardozo L. Rev. 877 (1989).

Discipline Of Clear Expression, Donald L. Burnett Jr.

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Amicus: Vol.3, No.1, Valparaiso University School Of Law

Alumni Magazine: Alumni News (1970, 1978-1987) / The Amicus (1987-1995) / Valpo Lawyer (2000-2006) / Annual Review (2013-2020)

No abstract provided.

Santa Clara Magazine, Volume 31 Number 2, Winter 1989, Santa Clara University

Santa Clara Magazine

10 - MANUFACTURED MOTHERHOOD A Catholic theologian looks at reproductive technology.

16 - ELECTION '88 Will Bush put a new face on Uncle Sam?

20 - IN THE FACE OF AIDS What alumna Sharon Kugler '81 learned hel ping AIDS sufferers.

23 - ON A ROLL New York's hottest director is SCU's Ron Lagomarsino '73.

25 - DO JOBS AND COLLEGE MIX? Alumni and students tell how they fit part-time jobs into their schedules/

The Utilitarian Foundations Of Natural Law, Richard A. Epstein

Articles

No abstract provided.

Interpreting Statutes In The Regulatory State, Cass R. Sunstein

Articles

Discussing the judge's role in interpreting statutes, Justice Holmes wrote that "if my fellow citizens want to go to Hell I will help them. It's my job."' Critics of the view of the courts as passive agents of the legislature claim that it understates the difficulty of interpretation, the indeterminacy of both the language and the will of the citizens, and the resulting discretion of the judge. Similarly, a vigorous debate continues over the proper role of the traditional sources of statutory interpretation - the text, the legislative history, the purpose of the enacting Congress, and the structure of the …

International Jurisdiction In National Legal Systems: The Case Of Antitrust, Diane P. Wood

Articles

No abstract provided.