Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (681)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (605)
- Duke Law (458)
- Fordham Law School (442)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (369)
-
- University of Chicago Law School (352)
- American University Washington College of Law (346)
- William & Mary Law School (343)
- University of Minnesota Law School (311)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (302)
- Brigham Young University Law School (290)
- UC Law SF (286)
- Cornell University Law School (263)
- Notre Dame Law School (262)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (254)
- Columbia Law School (247)
- University of Colorado Law School (245)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (241)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (236)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (232)
- University of Miami Law School (215)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (198)
- Georgetown University Law Center (195)
- University of Washington School of Law (195)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (192)
- Southern Methodist University (191)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (178)
- Boston University School of Law (174)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (172)
- Universitas Indonesia (172)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (326)
- Law (289)
- Constitutional law (287)
- International law (225)
- Human rights (219)
-
- Statutory interpretation (201)
- Originalism (174)
- Language (163)
- Constitution (156)
- Constitutional Law (151)
- Supreme Court (138)
- First Amendment (129)
- International Law (127)
- Legal education (118)
- Copyright (113)
- Discrimination (113)
- Textualism (113)
- Intellectual property (109)
- Immigration (108)
- Race (106)
- Interpretation (103)
- Canada (102)
- Ethics (98)
- History (98)
- Legislation (94)
- Democracy (91)
- Evidence (88)
- Gender (87)
- United States (85)
- Women (84)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1057)
- Articles (571)
- Faculty Publications (352)
- Cardozo Law Review (286)
- Michigan Law Review (243)
-
- Scholarly Works (208)
- Fordham Law Review (185)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (180)
- Faculty Articles (168)
- Journal Articles (160)
- Publications (135)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (133)
- International Review of Humanities Studies (126)
- ExpressO (120)
- Law and Contemporary Problems (118)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (117)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (116)
- BYU Law Review (114)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (114)
- Duke Law Journal (112)
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (112)
- Journal of Legal Education (110)
- Midad AL-Adab Refereed Quarterly Journal (107)
- Notre Dame Law Review (107)
- Buffalo Law Review (106)
- Indiana Law Journal (102)
- Pacific Studies (101)
- Scholarly Articles (98)
- William & Mary Law Review (98)
- North Carolina Law Review (97)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1261 - 1290 of 16578
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Placing Legal Context In Context, Chad Squitieri
Placing Legal Context In Context, Chad Squitieri
Scholarly Articles
In Biden v. Nebraska, Justice Barrett authored a concurrence in which she characterized the major questions doctrine as a linguistic canon that accounts for the “legal context” surrounding delegations of power. Some scholars have critiqued Justice Barrett's concurrence on the grounds that empirical research suggests that ordinary readers do not account for “majorness” in the way that the major questions doctrine requires. This Essay argues that those critiques miss the mark because they conflate factual context with legal context. Justice Barrett's concurrence should be considered within the broader textualist tradition of understanding “ordinary meaning” as a legal concept, and not …
Judicial Power And Potential Unconstitutionality: A Scholastic Perspective, Kevin C. Walsh
Judicial Power And Potential Unconstitutionality: A Scholastic Perspective, Kevin C. Walsh
Scholarly Articles
There is a fundamental legal distinction between making the law and applying it. All manner of juridical confusion follows from neglect of this distinction, as the Supreme Court’s statutory severability doctrine strikingly illustrates. In this lecture, I diagnose the cause of severability doctrine’s problems and identify a basic framework for replacement doctrine by drawing on that perennial philosophy which “view[s] the history of philosophy as the development of basic doctrines long discerned and taught, a development by way of deepening appreciation as opposed to constant replacement of one worldview by another.”
Minority Indigenous Language Rights Laws: A Comparative Study, Caroline Baltay
Minority Indigenous Language Rights Laws: A Comparative Study, Caroline Baltay
Emory International Law Review
No abstract provided.
Anglo-Saxon Res Judicata Culture For Civil Law Systems, Cesare Cavallini
Anglo-Saxon Res Judicata Culture For Civil Law Systems, Cesare Cavallini
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
One traditional aspect distinguishing the common law system from the civil law one lies in the perceived disparities in the inspiration of the law-making process. The Anglo-Saxon system typically grounds its rules in explicit and discernible policies spanning social, anthropological, and economic realms directly relevant to the circumstances. In contrast, the civil law tradition frequently necessitates a fixed conceptual framework, sometimes detached from the practical needs of society. Or, at least, this dynamic persisted until recent changes prompted by the “doing business” model, which has timidly ascended to the forefront of the State agenda, particularly across Europe, notably in Italy. …
The Emerging Crime Of Persecution Based On Sexual Orientation, Anthony J. Colangelo
The Emerging Crime Of Persecution Based On Sexual Orientation, Anthony J. Colangelo
Northwestern Journal of Human Rights
This Article argues that persecution based on sexual
orientation constitutes a crime against humanity under international law.
Unlike other scholarship that has focused on the definition of crimes against
humanity in the 1998 Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court—
which does not explicitly enumerate “sexual orientation” as a protected
classification—this Article looks to customary international law made up by
the practices of states.
Diligent research has revealed that between 1998 and 2022, at least 107
states enacted laws or revised existing laws decriminalizing sexual
orientation and/or categorizing sexual orientation as a protected
classification from discrimination. This is in addition …
Desettling Fixation, Emily T. Behzadi Cárdenas
Desettling Fixation, Emily T. Behzadi Cárdenas
Faculty Scholarship
Scholars have long contemplated how the effects of colonialism have permeated even race “neutral” laws. This Article scrutinizes the ways Eurocentric copyright systems have failed to protect, and have even encouraged, the unauthorized uses of indigenous heritage in derivative subject matter, exposing how settler colonialism in copyright law has entrenched an unequal hierarchy among communities seeking copyright protection. Due to its ephemeral nature, intangible cultural heritage constantly faces the threat of exploitation by dominant cultures. The intangible heritage of indigenous groups has been particularly vulnerable to illicit and uncompensated commodification. Intangible heritage, such as oral histories and traditional dances, is …
Law As A Liberal Art, Francis J. Mootz Iii
Law As A Liberal Art, Francis J. Mootz Iii
McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles
Law is a liberal art. Unfortunately, this fact is often forgotten by legal educators, legal practitioners, and citizens. This collective amnesia does not just pose a problem of proper academic categorization. Our inattention to law’s character as a liberal art of law has a profound effect on the full realization of the rule of law in contemporary constitutional democracies. Reclaiming law as a liberal art is critically important, and this effort should be at the center of our approach to legal education.
In this short essay, I begin by providing a brief overview of what I mean by saying that …
Regional Discrimination As A Quasi-Form Of Racial Discrimination: Comparing The Protection Under Anglo-American, International And Chinese Laws, Martin Yc Kwan
Regional Discrimination As A Quasi-Form Of Racial Discrimination: Comparing The Protection Under Anglo-American, International And Chinese Laws, Martin Yc Kwan
American University International Law Review
This article seeks to explore the issue of regional discrimination from two perspectives. First, the article evaluates whether it is possible to remedy the absence of direct protection by fitting regional discrimination within the scope of current anti-racial discrimination laws. Second, it highlights China’s protection against regional discrimination and evaluates the Chinese laws’ scope and gaps in protection.
Did The Butler Do It? A Theory Of Worthy Work In The Remains Of The Day, Christopher Wong Michaelson Ph.D.
Did The Butler Do It? A Theory Of Worthy Work In The Remains Of The Day, Christopher Wong Michaelson Ph.D.
Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy
No abstract provided.
Assimilation As A Tactic For Cultural Genocide: Tibetan Children In Boarding Schools, Naeyong Choedon
Assimilation As A Tactic For Cultural Genocide: Tibetan Children In Boarding Schools, Naeyong Choedon
Emory International Law Review
No abstract provided.
Political Neutrality In The Rules Of International Sports Federations: Compatible With Fundamental Freedoms?, Ilias Bantekas
Political Neutrality In The Rules Of International Sports Federations: Compatible With Fundamental Freedoms?, Ilias Bantekas
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
International sports federations celebrate and impose strict political neutrality in their institutional rules. Such neutrality is inconsistent with the individual rights of athletes to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. The contractual basis of such restriction is irrelevant because fundamental rights are constitutionally entrenched and cannot be limited by contract or law, save for if the expression incites to violence, hatred, discrimination or is otherwise inconsistent with criminal law. There is no empirical evidence suggesting that restricting the political expression of influential athletes leads to generalized political or other violence. Instead, it is clear that international sports federations, and particularly …
Reform And Removal At The Federal Reserve: Independence, Accountability, And The Separation Of Powers In U.S. Central Banking, Peter Margulies
Reform And Removal At The Federal Reserve: Independence, Accountability, And The Separation Of Powers In U.S. Central Banking, Peter Margulies
Marquette Law Review
Separation of powers issues concerning the Federal Reserve System have generated intense debate. Controversy has been acute regarding the system’s provision of for-cause protection from presidential removal for members of the Board of Governors and the absence of the gold standard of presidential appointment or Senate advice and consent for other key officers. This debate has gained traction from the Supreme Court’s recent decisions finding constitutional flaws with removal protections in federal agencies such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and with procedures for appointing and supervising other federal officials.
This Article turns to a novel approach that assesses past …
The Historical Regulation Of Intoxicated Firearms Possession And Carry: A Response To F. Lee Francis’S Armed And Under The Influence: The Second Amendment And The Intoxicant Rule After Bruen, Mark Anthony Frassetto
The Historical Regulation Of Intoxicated Firearms Possession And Carry: A Response To F. Lee Francis’S Armed And Under The Influence: The Second Amendment And The Intoxicant Rule After Bruen, Mark Anthony Frassetto
Marquette Law Review
Recently, the Marquette Law Review published Armed and Under the Influence: The Second Amendment and the Intoxicant Rule After Bruen by Professor F. Lee Francis. In that article, Professor Francis provocatively argues that the Second Amendment protects the right of intoxicated people to carry guns in public. Francis argues that, under the history-focused framework for deciding Second Amendment cases laid out by the Supreme Court in Bruen, there is an insufficient historical tradition to support prohibiting intoxicated people from carrying arms in public. Francis is wrong about the historical tradition. The historical tradition of regulating the intersection of guns and …
Roots Of The Living Tree: The Growth Of Constitutional Interpretation In Canada, The Honourable Suzanne CôTé
Roots Of The Living Tree: The Growth Of Constitutional Interpretation In Canada, The Honourable Suzanne CôTé
Marquette Law Review
None.
Dilemmas In Digital Abuse, Thomas E. Kadri
Dilemmas In Digital Abuse, Thomas E. Kadri
Books and Book Chapters
Digital abuse is on the rise. People are increasingly using networked technologies to engage in harassment, stalking, privacy invasions, and surveillance. The law will often adapt to deal with harmful technologies, but is it adapting quickly enough? Is law even the right tool to confront digital abuse? If it is, which laws work best and who should enforce them? One of the pressing challenges of our time is deciding whether and how to regulate digital abuse. Through a range of “dilemmas” involving digital abuse, this book will interrogate responses to various harms enabled by networked technologies, exploring issues related to …
Cybercrime Scenarios, Thomas E. Kadri, Samuel Won
Cybercrime Scenarios, Thomas E. Kadri, Samuel Won
Books and Book Chapters
Technological innovation alters the commission, definition, and conception of crime. In some cases, computers, social media, and the internet have made existing criminal activity harder to detect or easier to commit. In other cases, they’ve created new forms of criminal activity that challenge longstanding views about the permissibility and punishment of human behavior. Through a range of cybercrime scenarios, this book will address topics such as digital privacy, free speech, terrorism, cybersecurity, image-based sexual abuse, stalking, harassment, doxing, and identity theft.
A Great American Gun Myth: Race And The Naming Of The “Saturday Night Special”, Jennifer L. Behrens, Joseph Blocher
A Great American Gun Myth: Race And The Naming Of The “Saturday Night Special”, Jennifer L. Behrens, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
At a time when Second Amendment doctrine has taken a strongly historical turn and gun rights advocates have increasingly argued that gun regulation itself is historically racist, it is especially important that historical claims about race and guns be taken seriously and vetted appropriately. In this short article, we evaluate the often-repeated claim that the nickname “Saturday Night Special” derives from the phrase “[n___er]-town Saturday night.”
Based on a review of newspapers, legislative debates, dictionaries, slang compendiums, and other sources, we find no historical support for this claim. It apparently appeared for the first time, unsourced, in a 1976 article …
The Belfast/Good Friday Agreement And Transformative Change: Promise, Power And Solidarity, Fionnuala Ní Aoláin
The Belfast/Good Friday Agreement And Transformative Change: Promise, Power And Solidarity, Fionnuala Ní Aoláin
Articles
In 2023 the 1998 Belfast/Good Friday Agreement marks its twenty-fifth anniversary. For many the Agreement projects a global image of a successfully concluded end to conflict. However, key aspects of the agreement remain under-enforced or simply undelivered: in particular, provisions related to significant and wide-ranging guarantees addressing human rights and equality of opportunity. As a result, socio-economic and cultural deficits persist, undermining the capacity to achieve a ‘positive peace’. In this article we address the question of how transformative the Agreement and associated reforms have been in addressing the root causes of the conflict and the structures that underpinned it. …
Importance And Interpretive Questions, Ilan Wurman
Importance And Interpretive Questions, Ilan Wurman
Articles
In its October 2021 Term, the Supreme Court formalized what it calls the major questions doctrine. The doctrine, as currently formulated, appears to require a clear and specific statement from Congress if Congress intends to delegate questions of major political or economic significance to agencies. The doctrine has been almost universally assailed on the right by scholars who argue that the doctrine is inconsistent with textualism and on the left by those who claim it is a recently invented, functionalist tool devised to reach antiadministrativist results. One can explain at least some of the cases, however, in a way that …
Ot '22 And The Path Of Administrative Law, Ilan Wurman
Ot '22 And The Path Of Administrative Law, Ilan Wurman
Articles
This symposium piece reflects on the Supreme Court’s October 2022 term and what it reveals for the direction of administrative law. It argues first that the nondelegation doctrine is dead but not for the reason functionalists have been arguing for so long. It is dead rather because the causes of its revival have been effectively removed. Nondelegation concerns are most felt when there is significant executive unilateralism; in the past such unilateralism was encouraged by the Chevron doctrine, which allows the executive branch to interpret statutes creatively and, so long as those interpretations are plausible, requires courts to defer to …
Legal Endearment: An Unmarked Barrier To Transforming Policing, Public Safety, And Security, Emmanuel Mauleón
Legal Endearment: An Unmarked Barrier To Transforming Policing, Public Safety, And Security, Emmanuel Mauleón
Articles
The problems of racialized policing have come into renewed focus over the past decade. The advent of viral bystander videos has not only forced a popular confrontation with moments of both routine and extraordinary policing violence but also sparked protests, uprisings, and grassroots movements to challenge current practices in policing and determine what must be done to transform it. And yet, even after the mobilization of one of the largest racial justice movements in American history, transformative change remains elusive. This Article offers an answer to this puzzle by foregrounding White people’s collective relationship with policing and describing how this …
Returning Individual Research Results From Digital Phenotyping In Psychiatry, Francis X. Shen, Matthew L. Baum, Nicole Martinez-Martin, Adam S. Miner, Melissa Abraham, Catherine A. Brownstein, Nathan Cortez, Barbara J. Evans, Laura T. Germine, David C. Grady, Ingrid A. Holm, Elisa A. Hurley, Sara Kimble, Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz, Kimberlyn Leary, Mason Marks, Patrick J. Monette, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, P. Pearl O'Rourke, Scott L. Rauch, Carmel Shachar, Srijan Sen, Ipsit Vahia, Jason L. Vassy, Justin T. Baker, Barbara E. Bierer, Benjamin C. Silverman
Returning Individual Research Results From Digital Phenotyping In Psychiatry, Francis X. Shen, Matthew L. Baum, Nicole Martinez-Martin, Adam S. Miner, Melissa Abraham, Catherine A. Brownstein, Nathan Cortez, Barbara J. Evans, Laura T. Germine, David C. Grady, Ingrid A. Holm, Elisa A. Hurley, Sara Kimble, Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz, Kimberlyn Leary, Mason Marks, Patrick J. Monette, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, P. Pearl O'Rourke, Scott L. Rauch, Carmel Shachar, Srijan Sen, Ipsit Vahia, Jason L. Vassy, Justin T. Baker, Barbara E. Bierer, Benjamin C. Silverman
Articles
Psychiatry is rapidly adopting digital phenotyping and artificial intelligence/machine learning tools to study mental illness based on tracking participants’ locations, online activity, phone and text message usage, heart rate, sleep, physical activity, and more. Existing ethical frame-works for return of individual research results (IRRs) are inadequate to guide researchers for when, if, and how to return this unprecedented number of potentially sensitive results about each participant’s real-world behavior. To address this gap, we convened an interdisciplinary expert working group, supported by a National Institute of Mental Health grant. Building on established guidelines and the emerging norm of returning results in …
Heresies, Heretics, And Hermeneutics: The Battle Of Textualism Against Pragmatism--And Itself--On The Robert Court, Jeffrey A. Van Detta
Heresies, Heretics, And Hermeneutics: The Battle Of Textualism Against Pragmatism--And Itself--On The Robert Court, Jeffrey A. Van Detta
Belmont Law Review
This Article examines the deepening jurisprudential conflict on the Roberts Court over statutory interpretation, framing the contest between textualism and pragmatism as analogous to theological disputes over orthodoxy and heresy. Drawing on the interpretive writings of Justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer, as well as the scholarly work of William Eskridge, the Article argues that contemporary textualism—particularly in its more rigid forms—risks distorting statutory meaning when divorced from broader contextual and purposive analysis. Through an eclectic examination of three statutory battlegrounds—the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, Reconstruction-era civil rights legislation and its modern successors, and the Alien Tort Statute—the Article demonstrates …
Content Moderation On Social Media: Social And Computational Standards And Implications, Mohit Singhal
Content Moderation On Social Media: Social And Computational Standards And Implications, Mohit Singhal
Computer Science and Engineering Dissertations - Archive
Social media has become a powerful tool that reflects human communication's best and worst aspects. They allow individuals to freely express opinions, communicate with others, and learn about new stories. On the other hand, they have become fertile grounds for several forms of abuse, harassment, and the dissemination of misinformation. Social media platforms have established and employed content moderation to counteract the spread of abuse and misinformation.
Some critical challenges hinder the understanding of the social media content moderation ecosystem. This dissertation investigates various aspects of content moderation, including their coverage, fairness, and effectiveness. Firstly, it investigates how, in practice, …
Can Litigation Analytics Tell Us What Became Of The 2015 Proportionality Amendments To The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure?, Patricia W. Moore
Can Litigation Analytics Tell Us What Became Of The 2015 Proportionality Amendments To The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure?, Patricia W. Moore
Faculty Articles
In 2015, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure pertaining to discovery were amended for the seventh time in 40 years–part of a cyclic effort to address the so-called “cost and delay” of litigation. The centerpiece of the amendments was the reconfigured requirement that requested discovery be “proportional to the needs of the case,” in addition to being relevant and nonprivileged. The concept of “proportionality” crystallized the 2015 amendments in a single mantra. The proposed amendments inspired passionate and polarized public reactions. Plaintiffs’ attorneys opposed them as an impediment to obtaining the discovery they needed to prove their case, particularly in …
Oil & Gas And Corpus Linguistics, Chad J. Pomeroy
Oil & Gas And Corpus Linguistics, Chad J. Pomeroy
Faculty Articles
Oil and gas law focuses on the subsurface mineral estate, which is just what it sounds like: the estate that entitles one to the subsurface, to the stuff that is underground. That, of course, includes the minerals under a given piece of property, and the value associated with that is enormous. So, it is a big deal to have the right to minerals, and, if I convey to you "the mineral estate" of Blackacre or "the minerals under Blackacre" or something similar, then I have given you something very significant, indeed. As such, it is critical to know just what …
De Minimis Non Curat Lex?: Law And Little Things, William Ian Miller
De Minimis Non Curat Lex?: Law And Little Things, William Ian Miller
Book Chapters
We are all familiar with the maxim de minimis non curat lex. It is not true at all; a good portion of law is concerned with nothing if not little things. Yes, there are often jurisdictional amounts that purport to deny jurisdiction to disputes too trivial for the courts to get moving. But sometimes these amounts are so minimal that it falsifies the maxim, a maxim which is not classical, apparently being a late medieval modification of de minimis non curat praeter.<.p>
Fair Notice And Criminalizing Abortions, Brian G. Slocum, Nadia Banteka
Fair Notice And Criminalizing Abortions, Brian G. Slocum, Nadia Banteka
Scholarly Publications
The principle of legality requires that individuals receive 'fair notice" of conduct that is criminal. Courts enforce this fair notice requirement through various interpretive principles and practices, including the void-for-vagueness doctrine. The void-for-vagueness doctrine remains undertheorized, however, despite its centrality to the interpretation of criminal statutes. We offer a new theory of the void-for-vagueness doctrine that accounts for recent Supreme Court decisions. Specifically, we propose a scalar theory that fair notice is a matter of degree, dependent on various factors. We explore the implications of this theory for anti-abortion statutes post-Dobbs and explain why many of these statutes do not …
Reconciling Riverside Bayview Homes, Sackett, And County Of Maui, Stephen Johnson
Reconciling Riverside Bayview Homes, Sackett, And County Of Maui, Stephen Johnson
Articles
Near the end of the 2022 term, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Sackett v. EPA. The case has been described as "the most important Clean Water Act case the Court has ever decided, and ... probably ... one of the most impactful environmental decisions in the Court's history." For the fourth time, the Court interpreted the meaning of the term "navigable waters" in the Clean Water Act (CWA), and the Sackett Court narrowed the interpretation of the term in a manner that critics claim will eliminate federal protection for more than 50% of the wetlands in the United …
"I Can't Breathe": A Comparison Of Racial Inequity And Police Brutality Observed In France And The United States, Jasmine Oesterling
"I Can't Breathe": A Comparison Of Racial Inequity And Police Brutality Observed In France And The United States, Jasmine Oesterling
Akron Law Student Publications
This paper explores the unanticipated convergence of human experiences among Black and Brown citizens of France and the United States, despite their historical and legislative differences. Investigating racial inequity and police brutality through a comparative lens, this paper highlights global connections forged by racial and ethnic minorities in their shared anti-racist struggles. Emphasizing the transformative potential of acknowledging and sharing these narratives, this paper navigates linguistic, social, and legislative dimensions, providing insights into legal standings and communal ideologies. Addressing the lasting consequences of racial bias, this paper urges a reevaluation of societal structures and legal frameworks to foster global racial …