Digital Commons Network^™

From Wtp To Wtf: Valuation And Distributive Discourse, Lee Anne Fennell

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

No abstract provided.

Structural Logics Of Presidential Immunity, Aziz Z. Huq

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

In Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court wrought two new presidential immunities from criminal prosecution. Supplemented by a pair of penumbral evidentiary rules, these inhibit criminal indictment or conviction of the president, and indeed many subordinate officials, across many imaginable fact-patterns. The Court justified this result on consequentialist, not originalist or precedential, grounds. But its analysis of immunity’s effects was radically incomplete. It focused narrowly on the person of the president, eschewing any attempt to situate or relate that individual’s incentives and behavior to the wider institutional contexts of the executive branch at large or the partisan-political environment of …

Islands Of Algorithmic Integrity: Imagining A Democratic Digital Public Sphere, Aziz Z. Huq

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

This essay offers a new analytic lens for evaluating the design of digital platforms from the perspective of democratic values. It develops a model of desirable platform design, and them ask present legal interventions move is toward that aspiration. The aspirational model is not draws on an idea found in the scholarly literatures in political science and sociology about economic development . This is the notion that development policy should aim to seed “islands of integrity,” into patrimonial or nepotistic state structures as a way of building foundations for a more robust and hence public-regarding state apparatus. This literature explores …

Family, Faith And Nation: The Roberts Court And The Global Pivot Against Legal Liberalism, Aziz Z. Huq, Tom Ginsburg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

The Roberts Court has veered sharply in a culturally conservative direction. Traditional solidarities of faith, family, and nation have been elevated above the individual autonomy interests that motivated the justices in the twentieth century. The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence in this vein complements and is reinforced by changes in public law more generally—for example, in recent executive orders that amplify the same values. In legal scholarship, this jurisprudential shift is pervasively framed in terms of domestic electoral politics, in particular as a product of Republican dominance of the presidency and the Senate at key moments.

But expand the analytic lens outward, …

Constitutional Drafting Processes And Constitutional Success, Adam Chilton, Murat C. Mungan, Mila Versteeg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Several recent constitution-making processes have been celebrated for being participatory, inclusive, and representative. However, many of these processes also failed. We theorize that aspects of these kinds of constitutional drafting processes could reduce the probability of constitutional success. To show why, we construct a “Constitution Drafting game” (CD game) in which representatives from different interest groups must draft a constitution. We consider the case where the probability of constitutional success is single peaked, but the value from successful adoption is increasing in the degree of issue protection chosen. The drafting process then leads to protection choices that are above those …

When The Executive Has Unclean Hands, William Baude, Samuel L. Bray

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Those who come into equity must come with clean hands. But what happens when it is the executive who seeks equitable relief? This Essay argues that the unclean-hands doctrine applies to the executive, though in a modified form that reflects the relation- ships between officials in the executive branch, between the executive and legislative branch, and between the government and the people. It then applies the doctrine to current controversies such as government requests for stays from the Supreme Court, and a pending lawsuit against the District of Maryland.

Bypassing Agency Adjudication, Brian Lipshutz

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

This Article examines the contested practice of bypassing agency adjudication to accelerate judicial review of non-final executive action. Parties typically challenge final action under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). But parties may also seek an injunction or declaratory judgment with respect to a non-final action that violates a statute or the Constitution. Traditionally, such “ultra vires” review required a clearly unlawful action and an inadequate administrative remedy. But modern courts further limit it by applying three judicially developed timing doctrines—exhaustion, ripeness, and Thunder Basin.

This Article explains why the traditional ultra vires model— without the timing doctrines—should govern the bypassing …

The American Attack On Academic Freedom In Comparative Perspective, Tom Ginsburg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Academic freedom is under threat in many countries, and the United States is no exception. This chapter places the American framework for academic freedom in comparative perspective, and describes the techniques being deployed against it. A common threat is to leverage the use of government funds as a way to change internal university governance. Less common, however, is something that we have seen in the United States, which is a threat to academic freedom from civil society itself. The trend is accelerating through social media, and is structurally similar to that of the fascist period in Europe in which there …

Remedies For A Constitutional Crisis, William Baude, Samuel L. Bray, Marin K. Levy

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Remedies for a Constitutional Crisis William Baude,* Samuel L. Bray,** and Marin K. Levy*** 139 Harv. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2026) Draft of September 29, 2025 In a crisis of authority, where it is unclear whether executive officials will comply with judicial decisions, the courts may seem to have limited remedial options. What can they do other than order that their decisions be followed, and hope for the best? This Essay shows that even once judges are firmly convinced that the executive has violated the law, their remedial options are wide and complicated. Moreover, the best path is frequently not obvious. …

Agonistic Federalism, Aziz Z. Huq, Zachary D. Clopton

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

It’s been called the “oldest question” of American constitutional law: How does the national government deal with its sovereign subnational states? Judges and scholars have tried to capture this dynamic via theories of “dual federalism,” “process federalism,” “cooperative federalism,” or “federalism by integration.” But all these models suddenly seem to have superseded, and even perhaps rendered obsolete, by an unexpected step-change in the intensity of federal-state conflicts. In the place of longstanding federalism models, this article demonstrates, an underappreciated form of intergovernmental relations has emerged. We call this model “agonistic federalism.” The article’s aim is to introduce and theorize this …

Pretrial Detention Without Counsel, Alison M. Siegler, Jaden M. Lessnick

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

In federal courts across the country, judges are locking defendants in jail before trial without first giving them a lawyer. This deprivation-of-counsel crisis not only violates the statutory, regulatory, and administrative right to counsel at initial appearance hearings, but may even contravene the Sixth Amendment. This article builds on our Freedom Denied report—the first nationwide study of federal pretrial detention—and new data collected since. It makes three primary contributions. First, we explain the sources and nature of the right to counsel at federal initial appearance hearings (the first bail hearing in federal court). Second, we provide a data-driven illustration of …

Falsifying Tradition, Darrell A.H. Miller

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

From cases spanning gun rights, reproductive freedom, religious liberty, and personal jurisdiction; to separation of powers and other structural features of the Constitution, courts increasingly rely on tradition to guide their decisions. Often, judges appeal to tradition in a vaguely empirical way, as “facts to study, not convictions to demonstrate about,” in the words of Justice Antonin Scalia. Yet, for a claim that purports to be factual, there’s very little agreement, or even analysis, about what renders this factual assertion—tradition—true or false. This Article tackles that foundational issue.

Part I surveys the ways in which courts use tradition in different …

The Supreme Court Under Threat: Early Lessons In Judicial Self- Protection, Curtis Bradley, Neil S. Siegel

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

This Essay explores how the U.S. Supreme Court, despite being vulnerable to defiance of its decisions and political retaliation, has developed tools of judicial self- protection to preserve its institutional authority as well as the Constitution and the rule of law. Arguing that the Court performs not only a legal role that requires interpretation of the law but also a political one that demands institutional preservation, the Essay examines how the Court has historically navigated political threats by using a range of tools—including avoidance, delay, narrow rulings, strategic dicta, and rhetorical appeals. The Essay focuses on three nineteenth-century episodes: the …

Space Over Time: Housing For The Life Cycle, Lee Anne Fennell

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

People need housing throughout the life cycle, and what they need from that housing changes over time. Yet the menu of residential options is often too static, rigid, and limited to respond to these changes. What would it mean to configure housing to adapt to households’ evolving spatial requirements, risk tolerances, health challenges, and financial statuses? How could greater flexibility in the built environment enable communities to deliver better residential services to their populations? Elder housing offers a illuminating window into these questions and their answers. Addressing life-stage correlated housing mismatches could help to loosen the larger supply constraints—and failures …

The Constitution And The War On Dei, Sonja A. Starr, Genevieve Lakier

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

his Article examines how the second Trump Administration’s aggressive attacks on programs, policies, and speech loosely associated with diversity, equity, and inclusion [DEI] intersect with the constitutional guarantees of equal protection and freedom of speech. We argue first that there is little doctrinal support for the administration’s pervasive efforts to justify its war on DEI by invoking the Equal Protection Clause and parallel statutory law. Instead, the administration is stretching existing colorblindness doctrine beyond recognition, into a radical vision that we label “anti-antisubordination.” On this view, vindicating equality values does not only require restricting practices that treat individuals differently based …

The Limits And Promise Of Global Antitrust Law, Anu Bradford, Adam Chilton, Katerina Linos

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

No abstract provided.

The Tom Sawyer Effect: Invisible Work And Labor Market Power, Eric A. Posner

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

No abstract provided.

Yes, The Founders Were Originalists, William Baude

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Jonathan Gienapp’s Against Constitutional Originalism accuses originalism of a kind of self- defeat, arguing that the Founders weren’t really originalists. But like Jefferson Powell’s sim- ilar argument forty years ago, which encouraged a shift from original intent to original meaning, Gienapp’s work may only help along a similar shift, this time from original mean- ing to our original law.

Gienapp makes four main claims: that the Founders’ Constitution wasn’t conventional law; that the Founders couldn’t agree on how to read it; that much of their fundamental law was unwritten; and that no originalist theory can account for this. As we …

Presidential Brokering In The Regulatory State, Jennifer Nou

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Presidents seeking to make regulatory policy face formidable hurdles—most recently, heightened litigation risk, reduced judicial deference, and political polarization. In response, they have increasingly relied upon the Executive Office of the President (“EOP”) to manage these challenges. This Foreword spotlights the practice of presidential brokering, a structured process often led by White House policy councils such as the Domestic Policy Council and National Economic Council. Brokering involves the delegated authority to generate and test regulatory options through moderated deliberation with the rulemaking agency and other components of the EOP, ultimately shaping select rules to align with the highest presidential priorities. …

The Power Of Subnational Actors In Enforcement Of The Convention On Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, Wendy Erickson

Minnesota Journal of International Law, Vols. 28:2 onward (2019-present)

The Geneva Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) was adopted in 1979 and continues to serve as the preeminent international framework for transboundary air pollution. The international community has used a range of multilateral and bilateral cooperative arrangements to address international movement of harmful pollutants. Each has had to contend with the issue of ensuring compliance among party States. CLRTAP faces challenges in addressing transboundary pollution in non-Western countries despite clear evidence that air pollution is harmful to human health and technological developments that enable more accurate tracking of pollutants. In the absence of a model assigning liability for …

Solving Standing Is Simply The Start: Climate Litigation Lessons Learned From The Evolution Of Rights Of Nature, Madeleine L. Kim

Minnesota Journal of International Law, Vols. 28:2 onward (2019-present)

The global climate crisis continues to worsen. The Sixth Synthesis Report issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2023 unequivocally stated that “[w]idespread and rapid changes in the atmosphere, ocean, cryosphere and biosphere have occurred” and that “[h]uman-caused climate change is already affecting many weather and climate extremes in every region across the globe.” This report expressly states that climate change has “led to widespread adverse impacts and related losses and damages to nature and people” and that the “projected adverse impacts and related losses and damages from climate change escalate with every increment of global warming." However, …

Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Volume 48 Masthead

Voting Matters: Materiality Considerations And The Shareholder Vote, Renee M. Jones

Seattle University Law Review

For the shareholder franchise to have meaning, shareholders must have access to relevant information to inform their voting decisions. The securities laws’ disclosure requirements play an essential role in informing the shareholder vote.

This Essay focuses on the question of the materiality of information in the context of shareholder voting. It addresses the question of whether ESG-related information is material, positioning the materiality inquiry within the context of shareholders’ voting decisions. It explores the definition of materiality with a focus on the “reasonable investor” concept embedded within the definition. The Essay argues that the implicit expectations of many commentators that …

Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Volume 48 Masthead

Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen

Seattle University Law Review

Because of their substantial equity portfolios, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street (the Big 3) are central players in corporate governance. It is, therefore, critical to understand how they vote. One puzzle is that their support for shareholder proposals on environmental and social matters appears to waiver. In 2020, for instance, BlackRock supported 11.1% of environmental proposals at S&P 500 firms. In 2021, it seemingly reversed course, supporting 55.2%. It then flipped again, supporting 32.1% in 2022. Such statistics suggest that the Big 3 are constantly changing their views on these topics. This Article seeks to better understand whether this is …

Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Volume 48 Masthead

The Face Of Ageism, The Reach Of Ageism: Law, Medicine And Society, Janet Dolgin

Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Judging Bankruptcy Without Distress, Jack Zarin-Rosenfeld

Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship

In Harrington v. Purdue Pharma, the United States Supreme Court rejected the bankruptcy plan of OxyContin producer Purdue Pharma, which purported to settle claims against both Purdue (the bankruptcy debtor) and Purdue’s individual owners and managers, all members of the Sackler family who had not themselves filed for bankruptcy (the Sackler Release). Concluding that the United States Bankruptcy Code does not authorize settlement of claims against non-debtors without claimant consent, the Harrington Court appeared set to stem the tide of “bankruptcy without distress,” a flourishing practice in which solvent non-debtors (like the Sacklers) would settle their liabilities within the …

40 Years Passing By In (A) “Heartbeat”, Christopher Janney

Monsoon: South Asian Studies Association Journal

This article outlines the forty-year history go Christopher Janney’s iconic performance work “HeartBeat.” Trained as an architect and jazz musician, Janney combines these two disciplines to create large interactive light/sound installations and performances. On the one hand, he attempts to make architecture more like music, more “alive” using real-time sensing devices as on his “Harmonic Convergence” installation on the Miami International Airport. On the other hand, he attempts to make music more like architecture, more physical more visual. In his “HeartBeat” performance, a dancer wears a heartbeat device that amplifies his/her heartbeat in “real time.” Over this pulse, live musicians …

Yoga Sūtra Book Four And The Yogabindu, Christopher Key Chapple

Monsoon: South Asian Studies Association Journal

Four themes from the fourth pāda of Patañjali’s Yoga Sūtra are examined here: karma (IV:2-13), individuality (IV:16), humility (IV:20-22), and freedom (IV:29-34). Affirmations and variant interpretations of these four are provided from Haribhadra Virahāṅka’s Yogabindu, most likely composed a century or two later.