Digital Commons Network^™

Situating Standing In Environmental Litigation, Wyatt Balius

Undergraduate Theses, Professional Papers, and Capstone Artifacts

Controversies over issues of standing in federal civil litigation are hotly contested, as they strike at the heart of separation of powers issues and broader notions of the intent of civil action. Here I identify two competing theories of the purpose of standing and its requirements as such. Restrictive standing, as argued by Professor Ann Woolhandler, seeks to inherently link civil redress with an injury-in-fact requirement for both public and private law claims. Expansive standing, as argued by Professor Cass R. Sunstein, seeks to ground civil redress largely within violations of Congressionally designated causes of action. I argue that the …

A Call For Trained, Trauma-Informed Attorneys To Represent And Support Unaccompanied Children In Removal Proceedings By Petitioning For Special Immigrant Juvenile Status, Will Sheehan

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

May Federal Courts Answer Questions When Not Deciding Cases?, Benjamin B. Johnson

UF Law Faculty Publications

Conventional wisdom says that Article III’s case-or-controversy requirement prevents federal courts from answering legal questions when they are not deciding cases. This is only partially correct. This Article shows conditions under which a federal court may answer questions even when not deciding a case. To do so, it traces the appellate power back to its origins in English common law courts and through the early American judiciary. For centuries, common law judges have answered questions sent to them by lower courts when doing so would help those lower courts to decide pending cases. In England, the “case stated” procedure facilitated …

Copyright, Creativity, And Skill: Authorship And Ai-Assisted Works, Lucas S. Osborn

Scholarly Works

Generative artificial intelligence ("Al") has increasingly become a focal point in legal discussions, raising complex issues across multiple domains, including algorithmic bias, defamation, intellectual property, and privacy. This Article specifically examines the implications of Al-assisted works, with a focus on text-to-image generators, such as Midjourney, that possess the ability to create detailed visual art from simple text prompts. The tools are not, however, limited to simple prompts. Users retain the ability to introduce greater complexity by specifying a host of variables that define the resulting image. Al-assisted art implicates significant legal rights and responsibilities. As to responsibilities: Can the image …

Person-Centered Pluralism About Contract Theory, C. Scott Pryor

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

Football Club Acquisitions And The Markets They Impact, Garry A. Gabison

Marquette Sports Law Review

No abstract provided.

From Beginning To Center Field Spotlight: Celebrating 35 Years Of Nsli/Cas Olympic Sport & Arbitration, Richard Mclaren, Sammie Cheng

Marquette Sports Law Review

No abstract provided.

Sports Law In Law Reviews And Journals, Benjamin C. Coulthard

Marquette Sports Law Review

No abstract provided.

Efficient Norms In Formula One, Samuel Cole

Marquette Sports Law Review

No abstract provided.

Climate Litigation And Third-Party Litigation Finance, Courtney Geiss

Indiana Law Journal

For the last 200 years, human activities have been the main driver of global climate change, particularly the burning of fossil fuels. Increased emissions from fossil fuels have contributed to rising temperatures, food scarcity, and natural disasters, including fires, flooding, and droughts. Although climate change has been an issue in the public eye for the last several decades, global emissions are projected to continue increasing. At this point, it is clear that current actions at the individual and state level are not enough to meaningfully reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In this Note, I will discuss the idea of using third-party …

Super-Groups: Legal Empowerment And "Public Law", Matthew Lawrence

Indiana Law Journal

Not all interest groups are created equal. Some groups are created by or with the help of law. Law can confer political power on groups through wealth, rents, concentrated interest, and durability, creating synthetic factions that use their stategiven influence to dominate lawmaking. Deregulatory and progressive traditions in public law have long thought differently about laws that empower. A deregulatory tradition sees legal empowerment as a democratic pathology that counsels against lawmaking, citing empowerment concerns as a perennial rhetorical point against consumer protection, environmental protection, and social welfare programs, among others, for fear they will lead to “capture.” At the …

Gender-Based Persecution, Protection, And Particularity: The Case For Returning To Acosta, Meg Keiser

Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality

No abstract provided.

Jbs’S Initial Public Offering: Threats To Environmental And Human Rights, Kayla Thompson

Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality

This paper centers around the decision to be made regarding JBS, the world’s largest meat company, wanting to list shares on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), and the environmental and social impacts that could result from the Security and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) approval. JBS has been at the center of various controversies over the last several years, including sourcing cattle from ranches acquired through illegal deforestation, engaging in greenwashing practices, incorrectly reporting greenhouse gas emissions, and engaging in human rights abuses. Many environmental groups have filed complaints with the SEC concerning JBS’s bid to list on the NYSE. The …

Airplane!: Does The Federal Aviation Act Preempt State Law Design Defect Claims?, Max Birmingham

Journal of Air Law and Commerce

Which level of government—state or federal—has jurisdiction to set safety standards for aviation defect design is a nuanced issue. Generally speaking, federal law preempts state law in this context by occupying the field through a regulatory scheme that permeates aviation safety. The Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (FAAct) confers its namesake agency—the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)—the powers to prescribe the “minimum standards required in the interest of safety.” The word “minimum” has been seized upon by those on the state side of the debate to advocate that it means the floor. And they contend that those in the Union have …

The Complexities Of Consent To Personal Jurisdiction, Scott Dodson

Faculty Scholarship

Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., decided in June 2023, held that consent remains a method of establishing personal jurisdiction independent of the “minimum contacts” test established by International Shoe Co. v. Washington. To many, the decision resolved ambiguity in personal jurisdiction doctrine and represented a straightforward way of establishing personal jurisdiction. But Mallory failed to consider the many complexities underlying consent. In this Article, I showcase those complexities and demonstrate that Mallory is just the tip of the iceberg: A host of questions, some fundamental to both consent theory and personal-jurisdiction doctrine, lurk beneath the surface. I argue that …

The Ninth Circuit’S Nod To Anti-Vaccine Advocates, Richard H. Hughes Iv, Dorit R. Reiss

Faculty Scholarship

On June 7, 2024, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a decision that, while it did not go as far as anti-vaccine activists claimed, clearly drew on anti-vaccine tropes, and suggested a retreat from important public health precedents.

This Article explains the decision and the way in which it can undermine public health law. In short, the decision is problematic in two ways. First, it accepts claims that are untrue on their face. By ignoring the evidence and facts provided by public health authorities and experts, the opinion demonstrates further erosion of the high deference to expertise embodied …

Cdc As A Debunker: The Limits Of Government In Countering Misinformation, Dorit R. Reiss

Faculty Scholarship

This Article argues that even in the best of times, government agencies are not well suited to debunking misinformation and suggests as alternatives a role for government in providing accurate information, a potential role for government in providing grants for debunking, and a more central role for private institutions in supporting debunking. It uses, as a case study, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s response to vaccine misinformation, focusing on issues the CDC has been addressing since before the COVID-19 pandemic, to highlight that the problem goes beyond the challenges of responding fast and accurately to the uncertainties …

Caste-Ing And Recasting Race In Equal Protection Jurisprudence, Vinay Harpalani, Magdalene Bernier

Faculty Scholarship

In this Essay, we analyze how the concept of "caste" has influenced the U.S. Supreme Court's race-based equal protection jurisprudence. Even before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, advocates such as Charles Sumner appealed to caste analogies to argue for rights for Black Americans. The "stigma of caste" a prominent harm of Jim Crow laws was rejected by the majority in Plessy v. Ferguson but articulated in Justice Harlan's Plessy dissent. The notion of caste also undergirded the origin of strict scrutiny and the ruling in Brown v. Board of Education. However, Brown defined the harm ofschool segregation not …

Decentering Property In Fourth Amendment Law, Michael C. Pollack, Matthew Tokson

Articles

For the past several decades, privacy has been the primary conceptual foundation for Fourth Amendment search law. The canonical test for Fourth Amendment searches accordingly looks to whether the government has violated a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy. Yet privacy is no longer the sole determinant of Fourth Amendment protection, as the Supreme Court has recently added a property-based test to address cases involving physical intrusions on land or chattel. Further, given the ambiguity of the reasonable expectation of privacy test, a variety of influential judges and scholars have proposed relying primarily, or even exclusively, on property in determining the …

Property And Information, Jeanne L. Schroeder, David G. Carlson

Articles

The article proceeds as follows. As the information theory is a reaction to legal realism, Part I explores its antecedents in the work of Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld and Ronald H. Coase. Part II presents the information theory as arising from Professor Smith’s interpretation of the Coase theorem.11 In the imaginary world of TC0, we are supposedly indifferent to organizing by property and organizing by contract. Property eclipses contract as the organon of the economy because property reduces the cost of delineation and processing—of speaking and comprehending. We show that this theory is founded on a misunderstanding of Coase. Part III …

Labour Against The Law? Contesting The Restrictive Norms Of Industrial Legality Through Unlawful Strikes, Eric Tucker

All Papers

North American regimes of industrial legality provide workers with protected rights to organize, bargain collectively and strike. However, they also limit the freedom to strike. Trade unions commonly accept and enforce these limits, but at great cost to solidarity and militancy. This article examines the many ways law works against labour by restricting the freedom to strike and explores the practice of unlawful strikes in North America, including recent examples that resulted in successful outcomes. It concludes with reflections on the revival of unlawful strikes as a tactic for rebuilding and remobilizing the North American labour movement. While the article’s …

Canadian Gaar And Statutory Interpretation, Jinyan Li, Joanne Magee

All Papers

The Canadian GAAR is an anti-abuse rule that denies the tax benefit resulted from abusive avoidance transactions. This paper examines the history, technical design, policy objectives and judicial interpretation of the GAAR. It explains the role of the new preamble and economic substance in applying the GAAR.

Freedom Of Peaceful Assembly Under Section 2(C) Of The Charter: A Call For Action, Jamie Cameron

All Papers

“A Call for Action” builds on the author’s previous work on s.2(c) for the Rouleau Commission (“Freedom of Assembly and Section 2(c) of the Charter”; available on SSRN and Osgoode Digital Commons). There is no framework of legality under the Charter for the scope and limits of peaceful assembly, and this follow-up paper begins the task of filling that gap. It addresses the relationship between s.2(b) and s.2(c), critiquing the “factual matrix principle” for subsuming issues freedom of assembly into freedom of expression, and explaining that assembly is a distinctive collective entitlement that is spatial and performative in nature. …

What Is The Standard Of Review For (Mixed) Constitutional Questions?, Anthony R. Sangiuliano, Mark Friedman

All Papers

According to the framework for selecting the standard of review in civil appeals developed in Housen v Nikolaisen, questions of mixed fact and law are reviewed on a standard of palpable and overriding error. This framework applies to allegations that a statute is constitutionally invalid. However, in Société des casinos du Québec inc v Association des cadres de la Société des casinos du Québec, the Supreme Court held that when a statute is challenged as unconstitutional before an administrative tribunal, questions of mixed fact and law are subject to a correctness standard on judicial review as an exception to the …

Indigenous Governance And The Charter: What Can Indigenous Constitutionalism Offer?, Karen Drake

All Papers

The question of whether the Charter should apply to Indigenous governance is often presented in terms of a contest between Indigenous self-determination and protections for vulnerable individuals. The two judgments applying the Charter in the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Dickson v. Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation exemplify this dichotomy. This approach, however, reflects a false dilemma; it overlooks Indigenous constitutionalism’s ability to resolve the kinds of issues that the Charter aims to resolve, but without sacrificing Indigenous self-determination. To illustrate this point, this article applies one form of Indigenous constitutionalism— Anishinaabe constitutionalism grounded within an Anishinaabe lifeworld—to the fact …

Paternity, Protection, And Pirates: A Queer Theory Analysis Of Intellectual Property Metaphors, Eden Sarid

IP Theory

Intellectual Property and queer theory share a fundamental concern with the interplay between private and public, tangible and intangible, and language and form. Queer theory emphasizes how language impacts the construction of identity and belonging, highlighting that discourse plays a pivotal role in structuring gender, sexuality, and normativity. Intellectual Property is often portrayed as strictly neutral, laser-focused on spurring creativity and innovation. However, is this portrayal reflective of reality? And does this purported neutrality hold up in IP’s rhetoric? By examining two principal IP terminologies through a queer lens – the term “protection” to describe IP legal privilege, and the …

¡We Count! The Enumerated History Of The Latinx Legal Academy: Part One, Beginnings To 1990, Emile Loza De Siles

Seattle Journal for Social Justice

Latinx law teachers and scholars are vital to the success of Latinx and other students in legal education, as well as to the attainment of the power, influence, economic advancement, and justicegetting that students seek through that education. Today, one in five Americans are Latinx with the proportion quickly growing to one in four. Although there are many Latinx law professors who are highly credentialed, sharply skilled, and deeply committed, to date, there has not been an adequate accounting of their presence and contributions at law schools. What is known is that their numbers are, and have long been, grossly …

Washington’S Crime Free Rental Housing Programs: A Two-Tier Housing Regime, Eric Strain

Seattle Journal for Social Justice

No abstract provided.

America's Forgotten History Of Constitutional Crisis, Marcus A. Gadson

Faculty Publications

Scholars have insisted that constitutional crisis is rare in American history. They are wrong. Constitutional crisis has been one of the most important constants in American history. The events of January 6, 2021, the assassination attempt on President Trump, and the debate about whether to invoke the Twenty-Fifth Amendment to force President Biden out of office are child’s play compared to the constitutional crises this country has endured. Those observations are only surprising because so few scholars have studied constitutional crises at the state level. They are focused on national and international constitutional crises. This Article has three goals. First, …

The Unauthorized 2025 Beginner’S Guide To Classical Music And The Dso Soundcard, Stephen Calkins, Tierney Hoffman

Law Faculty Research Publications

No abstract provided.