Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Brigham Young University Law School (27100)
- University of Michigan Law School (8666)
- Duke Law (5465)
- Fordham Law School (5366)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4844)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4443)
- William & Mary Law School (4358)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (4111)
- Southern Methodist University (4102)
- University of Chicago Law School (3709)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3660)
- University of Minnesota Law School (3596)
- UC Law SF (3532)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3435)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (3412)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3382)
- Notre Dame Law School (3256)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (3090)
- Cornell University Law School (3062)
- American University Washington College of Law (3045)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2950)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (2848)
- University of Washington School of Law (2720)
- University of Colorado Law School (2606)
- University of South Carolina (2536)
- Seton Hall University (2458)
- University of Kentucky (2426)
- University of Richmond (2380)
- Columbia Law School (2345)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (2267)
- Keyword
-
- Law (2282)
- Constitutional law (1755)
- Supreme Court (1521)
- Constitutional Law (1501)
- Criminal law (1253)
-
- Jurisprudence (1237)
- Evidence (1211)
- Discrimination (1205)
- First Amendment (1186)
- United States Supreme Court (1186)
- Constitution (1125)
- International law (1025)
- Copyright (977)
- Privacy (916)
- Torts (903)
- Courts (892)
- United States (889)
- Regulation (886)
- Legislation (864)
- Human rights (854)
- Jurisdiction (837)
- International Law (819)
- Contracts (815)
- Criminal justice (815)
- Ethics (814)
- Due process (795)
- Judicial review (786)
- Civil rights (785)
- Federalism (773)
- Antitrust (770)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (9168)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006) (6082)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (through 1995) (5842)
- Articles (5687)
- Michigan Law Review (4188)
-
- Faculty Publications (3975)
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (3807)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019) (3460)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (through 1999) (3155)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020) (2528)
- Louisiana Law Review (2403)
- Fordham Law Review (2390)
- North Carolina Law Review (2358)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965) (2181)
- Indiana Law Journal (2107)
- American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 (2044)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –) (1976)
- SMU Law Review (1972)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1872)
- Minnesota Law Review, Vols. 1-106:1 (1917-2021) (1705)
- Law and Contemporary Problems (1683)
- Notre Dame Law Review (1675)
- West Virginia Law Review (1656)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1654)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (1643)
- Washington Law Review (1627)
- Scholarly Works (1590)
- Cornell Law Review (1538)
- Cardozo Law Review (1525)
- Missouri Law Review (1522)
- Publication Type
Articles 1171 - 1200 of 220564
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Thirty Years, Give Or Take: Reflections On My Life In Banking, Joseph A. Smith Jr.
Thirty Years, Give Or Take: Reflections On My Life In Banking, Joseph A. Smith Jr.
North Carolina Banking Institute
No abstract provided.
Fostering An Equitable Scrum: A Conceptual Framework For Using Antiracist Enrollment Management Practices To Counter Job Market Discrimination, Aaron N. Taylor
Fostering An Equitable Scrum: A Conceptual Framework For Using Antiracist Enrollment Management Practices To Counter Job Market Discrimination, Aaron N. Taylor
AccessLex Institute Research
For most law students, attending law school is an investment. At stake are immense amounts of time and money spent pursuing the degree. The most desired payoff is a lucrative and fulfilling career. This chapter argues that law schools must adopt enrollment management practices that attempt to account for the job market their entering students will face at graduation. In proffering this argument, the chapter presents a conceptual framework for aligning class size targets to the future job market and proposes an equity-based approach to tuition discounting that accounts for job market racism. Graduates of color, particularly Black graduates, experience …
Less Fisher More Doe: Non-Testimonial Mental Content And A New Rule For Unlocking Digital Devices, Jordan Wallace-Wolf
Less Fisher More Doe: Non-Testimonial Mental Content And A New Rule For Unlocking Digital Devices, Jordan Wallace-Wolf
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Roughly fifteen years ago, courts started to regularly confront a fact pattern that I refer to as the unlocking scenario. In this kind of case, the government seeks evidence on a criminal defendant’s digital device, but it cannot access it due to a sufficiently strong system of password protection or encryption. May the government compel the defendant to unlock the device, or would this compulsion make the defendant “a witness against himself”?
Courts gave different answers to this question right from the start, but their answers have started to diverge even more markedly in recent years, notwithstanding two formative papers …
Free Speech Trapped In Amber: The Rise Of The 'History And Tradition' Test, From Unregulated Guns To Highly Regulated Speech, Matthew D. Bunker, Emily Erickson
Free Speech Trapped In Amber: The Rise Of The 'History And Tradition' Test, From Unregulated Guns To Highly Regulated Speech, Matthew D. Bunker, Emily Erickson
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
An insidious virus appears poised to invade First Amendment free speech doctrine. “History and tradition,” a deeply flawed variant of originalism, threatens to transform speech law from a rational enterprise, employing tiers of scrutiny to evaluate potential infringements on speech, to a random scavenger hunt through the distant past that could upend numerous vital First Amendment principles.
Traditionalism’s ascendence to the forefront of history-centric constitutional interpretation was heralded in three dramatic cases decided at the end of the U.S. Supreme Court’s October 2021 term. New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen elicited particular concern among First Amendment scholars, …
Inequality As Market Failure, Erick J. Sam
Inequality As Market Failure, Erick J. Sam
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
This Article explores economic, philosophical, and legal relationships between economic inequality and market failure, and it draws on these linkages to develop an innovative normative justification and alternative constitutional basis for a levy on wealth.
The Article’s central analytic result is that several general mechanisms responsible for common market failures can also systematically produce economic inequalities whenever preferences against extreme inequality are fairly widespread. Because these mechanisms satisfy both the ‘process-based’ and ‘outcome-based’ criteria of market failure, redistributive transfers designed to reduce these inequalities would be normatively justified under the widely accepted market failure theory of government action. On this …
Engendering Authority: Social Movements, Legitimacy, And Gender, Judith Resnik
Engendering Authority: Social Movements, Legitimacy, And Gender, Judith Resnik
UMKC Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Do We Have To Lose? The Lasting Legacies And Lost Promise Of Feminist Legal History, Serena Mayeri
What Do We Have To Lose? The Lasting Legacies And Lost Promise Of Feminist Legal History, Serena Mayeri
UMKC Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Should The Legal System Help Redistribute Income?, Jacob Goldin, Zachary Liscow
When Should The Legal System Help Redistribute Income?, Jacob Goldin, Zachary Liscow
University of Chicago Law Review
Should legal rules be designed exclusively based on efficiency considerations, or should they also attempt to promote an equitable distribution of social resources? The answer traditionally associated with scholarship in law and economics is that they should focus only on efficiency. Even for a society that cares about achieving an equitable distribution of resources by income, the argument goes, it is generally better to adopt legal rules based exclusively on efficiency considerations while relying on the income tax and transfer system to promote distributional goals.
However, even proponents of the claim that social welfare is best promoted through the adoption …
Trademasks, Matthew Sipe
Pocket Arbitration!, D. Mclean Campbell
Pocket Arbitration!, D. Mclean Campbell
North Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Contagious Discrimination: Why Race-Blind Justice In Courtrooms Is Not Enough, Yijia Lu, Murat C. Mungan
Contagious Discrimination: Why Race-Blind Justice In Courtrooms Is Not Enough, Yijia Lu, Murat C. Mungan
Faculty Scholarship
Existing theories of discrimination focus on discrimination at the individual, societal, or organizational level. We highlight the importance of the dynamic relationship between different institutional actors who jointly give rise to discriminatory outcomes. This reveals that discrimination can be contagious: discrimination that would otherwise not occur at one institutional level can arise due to discrimination at another institutional level. Therefore, discrimination by some actors can trickle down and create disparate impacts in processes that would otherwise be free of discrimination. This phenomenon, which we term “contagious discrimination,” can manifest itself in various settings such as employment and commercial trade negotiations. …
Chicana Professionalism: Embracing Greñas, Glitter & Boots, Luz E. Herrera
Chicana Professionalism: Embracing Greñas, Glitter & Boots, Luz E. Herrera
Faculty Scholarship
The current political moment, where immigrant identity is scapegoated and academic freedom is threatened, requires an affirmation of personal identity, a recognition of personal struggle, and a celebration of resilience. This Essay embraces the ideas that professional identity development is temporal and that the current conceptualization of professionalism requires embarking on a reflection journey that addresses the dissonance between personal conscience and professional duty. Part I briefly revisits the work of Professor Margaret E. Montoya, one of the first Chicana law professors that describes the formation of her professional identity as a law student. It explores the status of Latinas …
The Lost Origins Of Antitrust, William Magnuson
The Lost Origins Of Antitrust, William Magnuson
Faculty Scholarship
Over the last decade, the once-sleepy field of antitrust has suddenly sprung to the forefront of public attention. The digitalization of the economy, the expansion of Big Tech, and the rise of platform monopolies have all raised deep questions about the nature of corporate power and law’s capacity to constrain it. Some scholars have argued that antitrust enforcement must be reinvigorated in substance and broadened in scope in order to combat rapidly rising economic inequality. Others have argued that antitrust law is ill-equipped to address these broad moral issues and instead must be re-focused on its traditional principles of consumer …
Post-Chevron Deference In Asylum Proceedings, Shawn E. Fields
Post-Chevron Deference In Asylum Proceedings, Shawn E. Fields
Cardozo Law Review
The Supreme Court held for four decades that Chevron deference should apply in all immigration proceedings. How, then, will asylum proceedings change in a post-Chevron world? When, and under what circumstances, will courts continue to defer to the findings of immigration judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)? And why does it matter? This Article answers those questions.
These issues require urgent examination for three reasons. First, they directly confront an issue pending before the U.S. Supreme Court in Urias-Orellana v. Bondi: Without the protection of Chevron insulating BIA decisions from meaningful judicial review, can certain legal questions like …
The History Of Multi-Member Commissions At The Founding, 1789-1840: New Evidence On Independent Agencies, Victoria Frances Nourse
The History Of Multi-Member Commissions At The Founding, 1789-1840: New Evidence On Independent Agencies, Victoria Frances Nourse
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The executive removal power figures prominently on the Supreme Court’s current agenda. That agenda is beset, however, by a historical misunderstanding, when it comes to multi-member bodies, which too often are assumed to be modern creatures. This paper provides crucial new historical evidence showing that the Founders, indeed a who’s who list of Founders, approved and even sat on commissions in the Republic’s early years. In some cases, the Founders called these early commissions “independent,” deferred to their judgments as “final,” and demanded that the members be “impartial.” Given the vast discretion given these commissions, these characteristics are best described …
A Ghost Of Slavery: Osha’S De Facto Exclusion Of Incarcerated Workers, Jacqueline Glenn
A Ghost Of Slavery: Osha’S De Facto Exclusion Of Incarcerated Workers, Jacqueline Glenn
The Business, Entrepreneurship & Tax Law Review
From chattel slavery to convict leasing to sharecropping to present-day prison work, exploitative labor has always had a place in the American economy. Incarcerated workers are compelled to perform long hours of dangerous work for mere pennies, often without adequate breaks and under the threat of solitary confinement, physical abuse, or other punitive measures if they refuse. Federal labor protections that shield free people from such conditions are largely unapplied to incarcerated workers, leaving them with little legal recourse. Tracing the development of involuntary labor through American history, this article contends that the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 …
Our Eviction Court Clients Need This Treaty: The U.S. Must Finally Ratify The International Covenant On Economic, Social, And Cultural Rights, Fran Quigley
Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review
Anyone enduring poverty in the U.S. or working with persons enduring poverty–as we do in our law school eviction clinic–is aware that housing, healthcare, food, and sufficient income are essential to human survival and dignity. Yet those basic necessities are not rights guaranteed under U.S. law. Instead, discretionary, underfunded efforts to address economic needs have led to widespread U.S. poverty and a toxic one-step-forward/one-step-backward policy dance, characterized by safety net programs expanding only to be cut when political winds shift.
The U.S. should join nearly every other nation in the world by ratifying the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and …
Conceptions Of Law, Ideology, And The Rule Of Law, Alani Golanski
Conceptions Of Law, Ideology, And The Rule Of Law, Alani Golanski
Hofstra Law Review
This Article claims that law and the rule of law ought not be seen as coextensive concepts, for if a legal order’s deviations from rule of law ideals count equally as departures from criteria for being a legal system at all, then the rule of law loses motivation as a discrete concept. In turn, the Article emphasizes the need to galvanize critical assessments of the legal system rooted in rule of law moralities. Toward this end, the argument shifts the terrain on which we discuss law’s nature from concepts to conceptions, critiquing certain currently influential conceptions, with special emphasis on …
Reconstructing The "Best Interests" Inquiry In Termination Of Parental Rights Cases: Setting The Threshold At "Affirmative Need", Vivek Sankaran, Timothy Pinto
Reconstructing The "Best Interests" Inquiry In Termination Of Parental Rights Cases: Setting The Threshold At "Affirmative Need", Vivek Sankaran, Timothy Pinto
Hofstra Law Review
No abstract provided.
Squeezing The System: How The Orange Book Is Ripe For Exploitation, Sarah Kopyto
Squeezing The System: How The Orange Book Is Ripe For Exploitation, Sarah Kopyto
Hofstra Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evolution Of Execution: The Introduction Of Nitrogen Hypoxia In Death Penalty Methodology, And The Need For Statutory Scientific Review, Madeline Ostrander
Evolution Of Execution: The Introduction Of Nitrogen Hypoxia In Death Penalty Methodology, And The Need For Statutory Scientific Review, Madeline Ostrander
Hofstra Law Review
No abstract provided.
Shifting A "Gray Area Of Rape" To Black Letter Law: A Push Towards Uniformity In United States Stealthing Legislation, Allison Walkley
Shifting A "Gray Area Of Rape" To Black Letter Law: A Push Towards Uniformity In United States Stealthing Legislation, Allison Walkley
Hofstra Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pornographic Deepfakes And Ugly Social Facts: The Costs Of A Normative Approach To Defamation, Kathleen Ross
Pornographic Deepfakes And Ugly Social Facts: The Costs Of A Normative Approach To Defamation, Kathleen Ross
Michigan Law Review
Around the world, women and girls are being victimized by pornographic deepfakes— alarmingly convincing, sexually exploitative images and videos generated using artificial intelligence (AI). Facing statutory gaps, victims may turn to traditional tort law claims to recover for the injuries inflicted by pornographic deepfakes. Defamation law, which protects against reputational injuries caused by false statements, is a particularly compelling arena for vindicating the interests invaded by a pornographic deepfake—interests which are, at their heart, social and reputational. Fortunately for deepfake victims, a pornographic deepfake will often satisfy defamation’s basic elements: A false and defamatory communication that concerns the victim and …
Courts Of Indian Offenses, Courts Of Indian Resistance, Alexandra Fay
Courts Of Indian Offenses, Courts Of Indian Resistance, Alexandra Fay
Michigan Law Review
In the late nineteenth century, the Department of the Interior created the Courts of Indian Offenses with the express goal of eliminating elements of Native culture through the coercive power of criminal law. The courts stood on dubious constitutional grounds, were almost universally replaced by tribal courts in the twentieth century, and have been widely derided as crude assimilationist tools.
This Article examines the Courts of Indian Offenses to study how law and legal institutions operate as sites of colonial struggle. The Courts of Indian Offenses were formally created to criminalize Native culture. In practice, they were more complicated. Native …
Complicit Nullification: The Illegitimate (Abrogation) Of School Religious Liberty Precedent, Amanda Harmon Cooley
Complicit Nullification: The Illegitimate (Abrogation) Of School Religious Liberty Precedent, Amanda Harmon Cooley
Cardozo Law Review
Louisiana has enacted legislation that mandates the display of the Ten Commandments in every public school classroom. This statutory mandate directly contradicts the Supreme Court’s extant precedent in Stone v. Graham. Legislators in Texas, North Dakota, South Dakota, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Kentucky have also indicated plans to introduce similar unconstitutional legislation, defying the Supreme Court’s interpretations of the First Amendment’s Religion Clauses. Similarly, Texas and Florida now permit public school chaplains or Bible-based public school curricula, which violates the Court’s longstanding prohibitions on such actions, as established in its 1948 ruling in Illinois ex rel. McCollum v. Board of Education …
After Grants Pass: The Case For Recentering The Criminal Legal System And Its Constitutional Constraints, Scout Katovich
After Grants Pass: The Case For Recentering The Criminal Legal System And Its Constitutional Constraints, Scout Katovich
William & Mary Law Review
In City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment does not prohibit cities from punishing unhoused people for sleeping outside when they have nowhere else to go. While the holding was legally narrow, the Court’s rhetoric framed criminalization as sound policy rather than punishment, obscuring the criminal legal system implications at the heart of the case. Cities responded not to the narrow holding but to the rhetorical message: In the year following the decision, they enacted hundreds of new laws criminalizing homelessness and dramatically intensified enforcement.
This Article argues for the recentering of …
Sidewalk Living, Michael C. Pollack
Sidewalk Living, Michael C. Pollack
William & Mary Law Review
In City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment does not prohibit a city from enforcing a criminal ban on encampments on public property such as parks and sidewalks. But even if municipalities are now permitted to use tactics such as policing, encampment clearing, arrests, and imprisonment, these are not the right ways to address the problems of public homelessness.
Instead, homelessness must be understood as one of many conflicts over limited public space. At its best, vibrant sidewalk life enhances communities and local economies. But at its worst, every use of these …
Behind Every Case Is A Conversation, Donna Shestowsky
Behind Every Case Is A Conversation, Donna Shestowsky
Nevada Law Journal
Lawyers play a central role in guiding clients through critical decisions that shape the trajectory of litigation. Among the most consequential of these is the choice of procedures by which disputes will be resolved—whether through trial, mediation, arbitration, or other mechanisms. Despite the weight of these decisions, legal scholarship offers little guidance on how lawyers might structure conversations about procedural options. This Article seeks to address that gap by drawing on empirical research from psychology and related disciplines to develop recommendations for educating and counseling clients—particularly those with little or no prior exposure to the civil justice system—so that they …
Exception To Abolition: Reforming Prison Labor Through Constitutional And State-Level Change, Caren Abourjeily
Exception To Abolition: Reforming Prison Labor Through Constitutional And State-Level Change, Caren Abourjeily
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Betting The House: Why The Safe Bet Act Is A Long Shot To Survive Constitutional Scrutiny Under The Commerce Clause And Anti-Commandeering Doctrine, Jared Weingard
UNLV Gaming Law Journal
The rapid expansion of legalized sports gambling following Murphy v. NCAA has raised concerns about problem gambling, predatory marketing, and inconsistent state regulations. In response, the SAFE Bet Act, introduced by Representative Paul Tonko, seeks to impose nationwide standards on sports betting. However, its framework raises significant constitutional concerns under the Commerce Clause and the anti-commandeering doctrine. This Article argues that the Act’s enforcement mechanism likely violates the Tenth Amendment by coercing states into compliance, conflicting with Supreme Court precedent on federal conditional spending and preemption.
Given these vulnerabilities, this Article explores three alternative approaches that would achieve similar regulatory …