Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (2039)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1511)
- Duke Law (1442)
- University of Colorado Law School (1440)
- Fordham Law School (1409)
-
- William & Mary Law School (1370)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1278)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1270)
- University of Chicago Law School (1138)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1100)
- Notre Dame Law School (1044)
- UC Law SF (969)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (945)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (933)
- American University Washington College of Law (925)
- University of Minnesota Law School (847)
- University of San Diego (828)
- Columbia Law School (808)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (786)
- University of Washington School of Law (731)
- Cornell University Law School (697)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (678)
- Southern Methodist University (669)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (661)
- University of Kentucky (660)
- Seton Hall University (627)
- University of Missouri School of Law (610)
- University of Georgia School of Law (603)
- Seattle University School of Law (601)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (589)
- Keyword
-
- Law (1141)
- First Amendment (502)
- Environmental law (490)
- Constitutional law (489)
- Animal law (474)
-
- Jurisprudence (447)
- United States (417)
- Copyright (412)
- Climate change (410)
- Regulation (394)
- International law (375)
- Constitutional Law (372)
- Intellectual property (355)
- Supreme Court (339)
- Human rights (324)
- Constitution (312)
- International Law (295)
- Discrimination (293)
- Legislation (289)
- Religion (288)
- Ethics (285)
- Criminal law (279)
- United States Supreme Court (278)
- Privacy (275)
- Torts (271)
- Property (263)
- Federalism (252)
- History (252)
- Race (239)
- Technology (233)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (2785)
- Articles (1603)
- Faculty Publications (1074)
- American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 (846)
- Michigan Law Review (799)
-
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (626)
- Journal Articles (531)
- Fordham Law Review (519)
- Scholarly Works (501)
- Cardozo Law Review (487)
- Animal Law Review (452)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (449)
- Faculty Articles (396)
- North Carolina Law Review (387)
- Law and Contemporary Problems (382)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (379)
- Indiana Law Journal (369)
- Seattle University Law Review (362)
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (351)
- Notre Dame Law Review (351)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (345)
- Publications (335)
- University of Colorado Law Review (334)
- Washington Law Review (329)
- William & Mary Law Review (329)
- UC Law Journal (326)
- Louisiana Law Review (323)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (304)
- Minnesota Law Review, Vols. 1-106:1 (1917-2021) (303)
- ExpressO (300)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1741 - 1770 of 54396
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Reclaiming The Genius Of A Free State, Tennessee's Forgotten Anti-Monopolies Clause, Braden H. Boucek
Reclaiming The Genius Of A Free State, Tennessee's Forgotten Anti-Monopolies Clause, Braden H. Boucek
Belmont Law Review
This article argues that Tennessee’s Anti-Monopolies Clause—enshrined in Article I, Section 22 of the Tennessee Constitution since 1796—has been systematically underenforced and misconstrued by Tennessee courts. Although the constitutional text unequivocally provides that “monopolies are contrary to the genius of a free State and shall not be allowed,” judicial interpretation has diluted this categorical prohibition by importing deferential federal rational basis review and engaging in “lockstepping” with federal substantive due process doctrine. The author contends that this approach is doctrinally unsound because the U.S. Constitution contains no analogous anti-monopoly provision, rendering federal precedent inapposite. Through historical analysis grounded in originalist …
The First Thing We Do Is Kill All The Lawsuits, Kenneth S. Klein
The First Thing We Do Is Kill All The Lawsuits, Kenneth S. Klein
Faculty Scholarship
As insurance premiums spike across the Nation, insurers are (yet again) pointing the finger at lawyers and lawsuits as an explanation. This Article offers new and important data on whether, in fact, currently there is a crisis of litigation in the United States. Neither the assertion of a litigation crisis, nor legislatures adopting systemic reform in response to the perception of one, is anything new. For almost two hundred years, there have been recurring cycles of complaints about lawyers, lawsuits, and their impact on society. Yet each time independent researchers have looked at the assertion, they have found the data …
Panel Ii: Disinformation, Deepfakes, And The Law, Rachel Freedman Lyngaas, Michael Cass-Antony
Panel Ii: Disinformation, Deepfakes, And The Law, Rachel Freedman Lyngaas, Michael Cass-Antony
Canada-United States Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Keynote Address For The 2025 University Of The Pacific Law Review Symposium: The Crime Victims' Rights Movement: Historical Foundations, Modern Ascendancy, And Future Aspirations, Paul Cassell
Utah Law Faculty Scholarship
This article, which serves as the keynote address for the 2025 University of Pacific Law Review Symposium, explores the past, present, and future of America's crime victims' rights movement-one of the most successful social movements in modern history.
Historically, crime victims played a central role in criminal justice processes through private prosecutions-i.e., the ability of victims to initiate or participate in criminal prosecutions. Today, while private prosecutions have been largely supplanted by public prosecutions, the victims' rights movement has successfully restored the victims' voice in criminal processes. The movement has reformed contemporary American criminal justice so that criminal processes now …
Who Do We Think We Are? Human Rights In A Time Of Ecological Change, Usha Natarajan
Who Do We Think We Are? Human Rights In A Time Of Ecological Change, Usha Natarajan
Loyola University Chicago International Law Review
This article explores the relationship between international human rights law and the environment. It begins with asking “who do we think we are” to understand the forms of subjecthood and subjectivity produced by human rights. It argues that human rights normalize a series of false conceptions about our collective self that have detrimental social and ecological consequences. The article next examines the question of “where we think we are”, probing the ontological rift between humans as subjects of rights and “the environment” as the repository of resources with which to satisfy human entitlements. The article challenges human rights as a …
Historical Perspectives On Family Law: An Annotated Bibliography, Allen Roston
Historical Perspectives On Family Law: An Annotated Bibliography, Allen Roston
Faculty Works
This bibliography lists articles and books that provide historical perspectives on major aspects of family law. It focuses on legal history, but it includes some works that look at family relationships and issues through the broader lenses of social history, cultural history, or other historical approaches.
Scaling Energy Resilience Through Energy Commons And The Solar Commons Community Trust, Marc L. Roark
Scaling Energy Resilience Through Energy Commons And The Solar Commons Community Trust, Marc L. Roark
Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
The Complexities Of Consent To Personal Jurisdiction, Scott Dodson
The Complexities Of Consent To Personal Jurisdiction, Scott Dodson
Faculty Scholarship
Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., decided in June 2023, held that consent remains a method of establishing personal jurisdiction independent of the “minimum contacts” test established by International Shoe Co. v. Washington. To many, the decision resolved ambiguity in personal jurisdiction doctrine and represented a straightforward way of establishing personal jurisdiction. But Mallory failed to consider the many complexities underlying consent. In this Article, I showcase those complexities and demonstrate that Mallory is just the tip of the iceberg: A host of questions, some fundamental to both consent theory and personal-jurisdiction doctrine, lurk beneath the surface. I argue that …
The Silicon Valley No-Poach Conspiracy, Eric A. Posner, Ruth Zheng
The Silicon Valley No-Poach Conspiracy, Eric A. Posner, Ruth Zheng
Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series
The Silicon Valley no-poach conspiracy is the most important cartel no one has heard of. It is rarely discussed in the cartel literature and is lost to public memory. More than forty tech firms, including Apple and Google, agreed not to poach employees from one another over three decades, causing an estimated $3.1 billion in lost wages. The Justice Department discovered and broke apart the cartel in 2010, but did not punish the cartel members, who quickly settled with employees and never admitted guilt. However, the case foreshadowed, and perhaps helped spur, two major developments in antitrust law a decade …
#Taxback? Prohibiting State Real Property Taxes On Land In Indian Country, Pippa Browde
#Taxback? Prohibiting State Real Property Taxes On Land In Indian Country, Pippa Browde
Marquette Law Review
Land is a critical asset of Indian tribes. As tribes wrestle with how to create sustainable economies to support their sovereignty, the use and management of tribal land is integral. Taxation is a key component of economic development. This Article is about taxation of land within Indian country. It considers existing law that allows for state taxation of some land within Indian country. It makes a normative claim as to who the proper taxing sovereign should be based on tax policy principles and principles that support tribal self-governance and tribal sovereignty.
In Part II, this Article provides the background for …
South To Justice: Using International Law To Defend Against U.S. Border Externalization Policies Through The Example Of Forcibly Disappeared Migrants In Mexico, Cadwalader, Natalie
South To Justice: Using International Law To Defend Against U.S. Border Externalization Policies Through The Example Of Forcibly Disappeared Migrants In Mexico, Cadwalader, Natalie
Santa Clara Law Review
The United States is increasingly employing border externalization controls as a primary means of preventing immigrants and asylum seekers from accessing due process and protection on U.S. soil. From Title 42, to metering, to the Remain in Mexico program, to Texas’s State Bill 4 today, no country has been more instrumental in facilitating or halting this suite of policies than Mexico. In this paper, I address the rise of border externalization policies in the United States, describe key differences between Mexican and U.S. human rights frameworks, and show how U.S. lawyers have mischaracterized enforced disappearances of migrants at the U.S.-Mexico …
Navigating Wastewater: Minnesota Mining Wastewater Permit Challenges And Evolving Compliance Standards, Madelaine Adamich
Navigating Wastewater: Minnesota Mining Wastewater Permit Challenges And Evolving Compliance Standards, Madelaine Adamich
Journal of Earth and Life Science
February of 2021 marked the beginning of Minnesota clearly establishing that groundwater qualifies as a Class 1 water in a legal battle involving United States Steel, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, WaterLegacy, Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, the Minnesota Court of Appeals, and eventually the Minnesota Supreme Court (MNSC). Minnesota has a water classification system, as required by the federal Clean Water Act, with 7 classes of use. Class 1 waters are waters used for domestic consumption (MPCA 4, n.d.). According to Minnesota Statute § 7050.0220, the acceptable level for sulfate is 250 mg/L in Class 1 …
Sidgwick’S “Move”: A Reply, T. A. Cavanaugh
Sidgwick’S “Move”: A Reply, T. A. Cavanaugh
Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy
No abstract provided.
Social Justice, Practical Lawyering, And The Elephant In Solitary Confinement: Why Animal Law Belongs In The Legal Writing Classroom, Conley Wouters
Social Justice, Practical Lawyering, And The Elephant In Solitary Confinement: Why Animal Law Belongs In The Legal Writing Classroom, Conley Wouters
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
An Eye For An Eye Makes A Vigilant Society, Liam C. Preyer
An Eye For An Eye Makes A Vigilant Society, Liam C. Preyer
Capstone Showcase
Vigilantism is one of the oldest practices of mankind; for as long as there have been moral and legal laws to govern us and live by, there have been individuals who have sought justice outside these systems. Vigilantism is the response to failures in the justice system, and in the United States in particular, we have seen examples from the Western Frontier to the modern-day digital landscape. This paper will explore the nature of vigilante justice through historical, psychological, media-driven, legal, and digital lenses. We will explore how cultural narratives, media influences, government actions, and psychological motivations have shaped the …
The Gift Of Exit Financing, Robert W. Miller
The Gift Of Exit Financing, Robert W. Miller
Faculty Publications
Aggressive liability management exercises have spilled over into bankruptcy court and exit financing is often the prize in the center of the arena. Debtors no longer rely upon gifting, the traditional strategy for buying plan support. Instead, they can replicate gifting's benefits in a more defensible package by funneling discounted subscription rights to chosen constituencies as part of exit financing.
Recognizing exit financing's distortive power, courts responded by evaluating the quality of negotiations and reviewing precedent transactions. Meanwhile, commentators suggest heightened monitoring and informal guardrails. All of these approaches ignore the shortcomings of judicial valuation. Market testing is the only …
Civil Rights Law—One Foot In, One Foot Out: Fourth Circuit Holds Tester’S Informational Injury Obtains Sufficient Standing—Laufer V. Naranda Hotels, Llc, 60 F.4th 156 (4th Cir. 2023), Abigail Walsh
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Understanding Free Speech Values At The Supreme Court, Noah C. Chauvin
Understanding Free Speech Values At The Supreme Court, Noah C. Chauvin
Faculty Articles
This essay is a book review of The Supreme Court and the Philosopher: How John Stuart Mill Shaped US Free Speech Protections, by Professors Eric Kasper and Troy Kozma. The book argues that John Stuart Mill had an indelible impact on the Supreme Court's free speech jurisprudence, and that through the power of precedent, we have come to have a "Millian "First Amendment. As I explain in the review, Kasper and Kozma have made a compelling case. However, because Mill offered an expansive defense of freedom of expression, it is not enough to say that the Court's free speech jurisprudence …
Agreement On Climate Change, Trade And Sustainability: Forging New Frontiers In Trade And Sustainability Debate, Rishabha Meena, Apoorva Singh Vishnoi
Agreement On Climate Change, Trade And Sustainability: Forging New Frontiers In Trade And Sustainability Debate, Rishabha Meena, Apoorva Singh Vishnoi
Indian Journal of International Economic Law
The Agreement on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainability (ACCTS) is a historic international trade agreement that weaves environmental considerations into a traditional trade agreement. While only four countries, namely New Zealand, Switzerland, Iceland, and Costa Rica, are Parties to the ACCTS, it is open to new members, and a textual analysis of its review provisions underscores the commitment of ACCTS Parties to ‘design flexibility’. Its Chapters liberalising trade in environmental goods and services, disciplining fossil fuel subsidies and providing voluntary guidelines on ecolabelling mark it as an international trade agreement with many historical firsts. This Article will undertake a legal …
Finding Method To Madness: The Indian Supreme Court's Dignity Jurisprudence, Aishani Gupta
Finding Method To Madness: The Indian Supreme Court's Dignity Jurisprudence, Aishani Gupta
National Law School of India Review
This article critically examines the Indian Supreme Court’s use of the concept of dignity in constitutional adjudication. Though the Indian Constitution references dignity only thrice, its substantive development has occurred mainly through case law. Using recent literature on dignity as well as case law between 1978 and 2023 this article categorises three main uses of dignity: (i) the constitutional status of dignity; (ii) the expansion of dignity; (iii) homage to dignity. The paper argues that while dignity is necessarily multifaceted, its application should be consistent across similar fact patterns to ensure consistency. To support this, the author analyzes nine Supreme …
That’S Using Your Head! Head Shaking, Nodding, And Smiling As Evidentiary Admissions, Marc Ginsberg
That’S Using Your Head! Head Shaking, Nodding, And Smiling As Evidentiary Admissions, Marc Ginsberg
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Siren Song Of Territoriality, Robin J. Effron, Alan M. Trammell
The Siren Song Of Territoriality, Robin J. Effron, Alan M. Trammell
Scholarly Articles
Territoriality—the theory that a state’s physical borders determine its power and sovereignty—boasts a long, venerable history. For centuries, it served as the dominant political theory for myriad ideas. It defined a wide range of doctrines, including personal jurisdiction, choice of law, and prescriptive jurisdiction. By the middle of the twentieth century, though, this rigid territoriality no longer described or responded to the challenges of a society that had grown increasingly mobile and interconnected. Courts replaced inflexible territorial theories with more functional theories rooted in fairness and state regulatory interests.
In recent years, territoriality has seen a curious resurgence. The Supreme …
Universal Public Defense, Alexis Hoag-Fordjour
Universal Public Defense, Alexis Hoag-Fordjour
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Limits Of Tradition: Counterman, True Threats, And The Categorical Approach To Free Speech, Brett Zicari
The Limits Of Tradition: Counterman, True Threats, And The Categorical Approach To Free Speech, Brett Zicari
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
Tradition is in vogue.[1] Across a wide variety of areas, the Supreme Court has embraced “history and tradition” as its primary methodology for determining the meaning of constitutional provisions.[2] Recently the Court has even suggested that a restriction on the use of names in trademarks could rest entirely on its traditional status,[3] but nowhere has this move toward tradition been as robust or longstanding as in the speech context. Since the 1940s, the Supreme Court has invoked tradition to defend content-based or categorical restrictions, and more recently, it has purported to rely exclusively on tradition.[4] The …
Introduction To The Special Issue: Current Challenges In Reproduction And Law, Régine Tremblay
Introduction To The Special Issue: Current Challenges In Reproduction And Law, Régine Tremblay
Canadian Journal of Family Law
No abstract provided.
A Last Full Measure: Defining Insurrection In The Fourteenth Amendment, Caleb Wootan
A Last Full Measure: Defining Insurrection In The Fourteenth Amendment, Caleb Wootan
Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice
No abstract provided.
Intersecting Abuse Of People And Animals In Practice: Implications Of The Connection Between Intimate Partner Violence And Animal Abuse For Family Justice Professionals, Amy Fitzgerald, Valerie Monckton, Kerri Thomson, Kendra Coulter
Intersecting Abuse Of People And Animals In Practice: Implications Of The Connection Between Intimate Partner Violence And Animal Abuse For Family Justice Professionals, Amy Fitzgerald, Valerie Monckton, Kerri Thomson, Kendra Coulter
Canadian Journal of Family Law
According to recent estimates, 60% of Canadian homes have at least one cat or dog, and the number continues to climb. Often considered family members, these animals are vulnerable to family violence. Their presence can also render human victims of violence more vulnerable: research indicates many victims delay leaving their abuser out of concern for their animals or consider returning to the abusive relationship because their abuser has the animal companions. Despite a substantial body of literature documenting the link between intimate partner violence (IPV) and animal abuse, research has not examined how family law professionals encounter and deal with …
Sorting Out Surrogacy: Three Considerations For Evidence-Informed Law Reform, Vanessa Gruben, Alana Cattapan
Sorting Out Surrogacy: Three Considerations For Evidence-Informed Law Reform, Vanessa Gruben, Alana Cattapan
Canadian Journal of Family Law
This article draws on novel survey research with surrogates in Canada—the Exploring Surrogates Experiences and Insights Survey—to examine three critical issues for potential law reform: (1) reimbursement and compensation (i.e., payment); (2) the work of surrogacy agencies; and (3) surrogacy arrangements involving foreign intended parents. Following a brief history of the regulation of surrogacy in Canada and a description of the survey’s methods, it explores each of these areas in turn, using the survey results to identify considerations for law reform. It argues that while the current legislative and regulatory framework largely addresses key issues related to commercialization and commodification, …
The Layered Harms Of Nursing Home Segregation, Mary Crossley
The Layered Harms Of Nursing Home Segregation, Mary Crossley
Saint Louis University Journal of Health Law & Policy
This Essay explores several dimensions of how segregation, separation, and shielding from view permit and contribute to the ethically problematic state of nursing home care in the United States. A quarter of a century ago, the Supreme Court recognized in the Olmstead decision that institutional care can function to segregate disabled people (whether young or old) from the richness of community life. Research over the past few decades confirms that racial segregation exists within the nursing home industry, and during the COVID-19 pandemic, the correlations between nursing homes’ racial makeup and their level of COVID fatalities were shocking. On another …