Digital Commons Network^™

Evidence (Routledge Handbook Of International Criminal Law), Nancy Amoury Combs

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

"Fact-Finding Without Facts": A Conversation With Nancy Combs, Nancy Amoury Combs

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Formalization Of Plea Bargaining In Germany: Will The New Legislation Be Able To Square The Circle?, Regina E. Rauxloh

Fordham International Law Journal

In German criminal trials, the common law instrument of the guilty plea is unknown. Consequently, one cannot speak of plea bargaining in the strict sense. Nevertheless, informal negotiations, which center on the exchange of a confession for a sentence concession, play an increasing role in the German criminal process. It is claimed that in today’s Germany “the criminal procedure cannot be imagined without the phenomenon of informal agreements.” After years of academic debate and developing case law on informal agreements, the German Federal Parliament (Deutscher Bundestag) has now passed new legislation that regulates agreements and makes them part of the …

Head-Of-State And Foreign Official Immunity In The United States After Samantar: A Suggested Approach, Christopher D. Totten

Fordham International Law Journal

A concept of immunity for foreign heads of state has existed since ancient times. Such immunity constitutes customary international law (“CIL”) and, when applicable, frees such individuals from the criminal jurisdiction of foreign nations while carrying out their duties. In the United States, executive branch guidance is considered determinative on the issue of foreign head-of-state immunity; however, the executive branch does not always provide suggestions of immunity, or it may provide suggestions that violate CIL. Drawing upon both US and against foreign sitting and former heads of state and government officials increasingly are becoming more established and ma provide additional …

Steven M. Schneebaum On The Death Penalty And Human Rights. By Sir Fred Phillips. Q.C. Kingston, Jamaica: Caribbean Law Publishing Company. 2009. 101pp., Steven M. Schneebaum

Human Rights & Human Welfare

A review of:

The Death Penalty and Human Rights. By Sir Fred Phillips. Q.C. Kingston, Jamaica: Caribbean Law Publishing Company. 2009. 101pp.

Human Trafficking And Minorities: Vulnerability Compounded By Discrimination, Heidi Box

Human Rights & Human Welfare

Human trafficking is an extreme human rights violation that impacts all populations across the globe and is characterized by force, fraud, and coercion intended for exploitation (Palermo Protocol 2000). Currently, human trafficking research is particularly limited by non-standard terminology and a clandestine research population. While estimates of the number of trafficked persons vary widely and are notoriously unsubstantiated, we can still arrive at some conclusions regarding the overall number of trafficked persons. One low estimate suggests that in 2005, at least 2.4 million people had been trafficked into forced labor situations and approximately 12.3 million people were victims of forced …

Book Review Of Fact Finding Without Facts: The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations Of International Criminal Convictions, Linda A. Malone

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Obligation Ignored: Why International Law Requires The United States To Provide Adequate Civil Legal Aid, What The United States Is Doing Instead, And How Legal Empowerment Can Help, Zachary H. Zarnow

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

Judging Aggression, Noah Weisbord

Faculty Publications

One of the most polarizing debates in international law is how the goal of peace should figure into the work of international criminal tribunals. The freshly minted crime of aggression lands the judges of the International Criminal Court in the middle of the peace versus justice dilemma and will challenge the court to prove its value for advancing peace in appropriate circumstances while building the rule of law and maintaining its legitimacy.

This article, the final installment in the author's trilogy on the crime of aggression, explores the gaps, ambiguities and contradictions woven into the definition of the crime and …

International Decision, International Criminal Court, Decision On The Authorization Of An Investigation Into The Situation In The Republic Of Kenya, Charles Chernor Jalloh

Faculty Publications

On March 31, 2010, in its first ever decision authorizing a prosecutorial proprio motu investigation, the Pre-Trial Chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC) granted the ICC Prosecutor permission to investigate the shocking violence which followed Kenya’s December 2007 Presidential elections under Article 15 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The majority of the Chamber ruled that both the contextual and underlying requirements of crimes against humanity had been fulfilled, including that they were committed as part of a state or organizational policy as required by Article7(2)(a) of the Rome Statute. According to the majority, the latter …

The United States And The International Criminal Court Post-Bush: A Beautiful Courtship But An Unlikely Marriage, Megan A. Fairlie

Faculty Publications

The article focuses on the relationship status between the U.S. and the International Criminal Court (ICC) from being dormant due to being renewed. The renewal was evident from the U.S. representation at the 2009 ICC's Assembly of States Parties annual meeting and the 2010 ICC Review Conference. Using the Rome Statute, the ICC has been granted subject matter jurisdiction over war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.

The Reason Behind The Rules: From Description To Normativity In International Criminal Procedure, Noah Weisbord

Faculty Publications

As the International Criminal Court (ICC) continues to mature in its practices, it provokes discussion on whether the comfortable framework of adversarial and inquisitorial systems should be used to evaluate an institution that exists in a fundamentally different context from that of national criminal justice systems. In order to avoid entangling the ICC in rules that are not tailored to fit its specific goals and institutional context, the normative purposes underlying procedural rules derived from domestic institutions should be reexamined.

This article draws out basic principles that may be of use in reexamining the reasoning behind the rules of procedure …

Should Juries Give Reasons For Their Verdicts?: The Spanish Experience And The Implications Of The European Court Of Human Rights Decision In Taxquet V. Belgium, Stephen C. Thaman

All Faculty Scholarship

This article discusses the Belgian jury system and the decision in Taxquet v. Belgium and then explores to what extent a requirement of reasoned judgments will affect the survival of European juries. It focuses on Spain, where the jury is required to give reasons for its verdicts, and where a lively high-court jurisprudence has developed addressing the quality and sufficiency of jury reasons. This article suggests that it might be appropriate for jury courts in the United States to in some way justify their decision of guilt, in order to minimize the amount of completely innocent persons who have been …

What Are The Common Forms Of Lawyer Misconduct Likely To Occur Before The Eccc, And How Can The Eccc Address And Sanction Such Misconduct?, Rizwan Chowdhry

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Comparative Analysis Of The Modes Of Individual Criminal Responsibility As Defined By Article 3(1)(A) Of The Statute Of The Special Tribunal For Lebanon And The Modes As Defined In The Statutes Of The International Criminal Tribunal For The Former Yugoslavia, The International Criminal Tribunal For Rwanda, The Special Court For Sierra Leone, And The International Criminal Court Asserting That The Differences In Language Utilized By The Statutes Of International Tribunals To Denote The Modes Of Individual Criminal Responsibility Serve A Non-Substantive Legal Purpose., Ashanti C. Lisowitz

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Can Piracy Be Considered A Crime Against Humanity For Purposes Of The Jurisdiction Of The International Criminal Court?, Baker & Mckenzie Llp

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Under International Standards Of Justice, Can Audio Or Video Recordings Of Distress Calls And Footage From Vessels Allegedly Subjected To Piratical Attacks Be Admitted Into Evidence? How Would Authenticity Be Proved? Does This Deny The Opportunity To Cross-Examine?, Baker & Mckenzie Llp

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

What Domestic And International Legal Efforts Can Best Ensure The Freezing Of Assets And Money Acquired Through Acts Of Piracy?, Baker & Mckenzie Llp

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

In What Ways Should Provisions And Agreements Governing Surrender And Legal Assistance Of A Security Council-Created Piracy Court Differ From A War Crimes Tribunal?, Brett Ashley Edwards

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Prosecuting Child Pirates, Danielle Fritz

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Case Brief: In Re Mohamud Mohamed Hashi Et Al. (2009), Pilpg

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

'Accountability' As 'Legitimacy': Global Governance, Global Civil Society And The United Nations, Kenneth Anderson

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

This essay is a contribution to a symposium on international NGO accountability. It distinguishes between "internal" accountability for NGOs (fiduciary standards, fiscal and internal governance controls, etc.) and "external" accountability (the legitimacy with which they act in the international world, and the legitimacy which they confer upon others, and why). The essay focuses upon the latter, external accountability, and argues that the transformation of international NGOs into "global civil society" signaled an ideological move with regards to legitimacy in the global community, one which asserted claims of "representativeness" and not merely interest or expertise. The essay criticizes this legitimacy move, …

Assessing The African Union Concerns About Article 16 Of The Rome Statute Of The International Criminal Court, Charles C. Jalloh, Dapo Akande, Max Du Plessi

Articles

This article assesses the African Union's (AU) concerns about Article 16 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). It seeks to articulate a clearer picture of the law and politics of deferrals within the context of the AU's repeated calls to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC, or the Council) to invoke Article 16 to suspend the processes initiated by the ICC against President Omar Al Bashir of Sudan. The UNSC's failure to accede to the AU request led African States to formally withhold cooperation from the ICC in respect to the arrest and surrender of the …

The International Criminal Court And Justice On The Ground, Jane E. Stromseth

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

It is wonderful to be here today to celebrate Justice O'Connor's 80th birthday and to honor her enormous contribution to our national civic life. Let me acknowledge up front that the title of my essay conveys a certain double meaning. Justice O'Connor has always been a "justice on the ground." Grounded in experience and practical wisdom, she has always been concerned with the practical impact of Supreme Court decisions, and very determined that decisions should be understandable to the public (no footnotes allowed!). Moreover, her current work on "Our Courts" recognizes that maintaining fair, independent courts depends crucially on public …

Rule Of Law Capacity Building In Iraq, Richard Pregent

International Law Studies

No abstract provided.

Legal Basis For Coalition Combat Operations In Iraq, May 2003-Present, Alexandra Perina

International Law Studies

No abstract provided.

The "Fog Of Law": The Law Of Armed Conflict In Operation Iraqi Freedom, Marc Warren

International Law Studies

No abstract provided.

Professionalism In Corrections And The Need For External Scrutiny: An International Overview, Andrew Coyle

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mondrowitz V. State Of Israel, Ayala Procaccia, Miriam Naor, Elyakim Rubinstein

Translated Opinions

[This abstract is not part of the Court's opinion and is provided for the reader's convenience. It has been translated from a Hebrew version prepared by Nevo Press Ltd. and is used with its kind permission.] 

An appeal against the decision by the Jerusalem District Court whereby the State’s request to declare the appellant eligible for extradition to the United States, and this in order that he be criminally prosecuted for serious sex offenses against minors which he allegedly committed in the 1980s, must be granted. Until 1984, when he moved to Israel, the appellant was a resident and citizen …

Foreword, Brian J. Kennedy

San Diego International Law Journal

This twelfth issue of the San Diego International Law Journal is composed of articles which examine a broad range of contemporary legal issues of international and foreign significance.