Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (152)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (117)
- William & Mary Law School (62)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (47)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (42)
-
- Seattle University School of Law (37)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (36)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (33)
- Duke Law (32)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (28)
- University of Washington School of Law (28)
- American University Washington College of Law (27)
- Pepperdine University (27)
- Brooklyn Law School (25)
- Fordham Law School (25)
- UIC School of Law (25)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (22)
- University of Miami Law School (22)
- Mercer University School of Law (21)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (21)
- University of Richmond (21)
- Cleveland State University (20)
- West Virginia University (20)
- University of Georgia School of Law (19)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (18)
- Georgetown University Law Center (16)
- University of Kentucky (15)
- University of Maine School of Law (15)
- BLR (14)
- Cornell University Law School (14)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (324)
- Testimony (67)
- Admissibility (62)
- Sixth Amendment (56)
- Witnesses (55)
-
- Hearsay (52)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (51)
- Confrontation Clause (49)
- United States Supreme Court (49)
- Criminal law (47)
- Police (47)
- Exclusionary rule (43)
- Fourth Amendment (35)
- Cross-examination (34)
- Criminal procedure (33)
- DNA (30)
- Criminal Law (28)
- Criminal justice (28)
- Expert testimony (28)
- Due process (27)
- Scientific evidence (27)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (26)
- Crawford v. Washington (25)
- Fifth Amendment (24)
- Supreme Court (24)
- Confessions (23)
- Litigation (23)
- Trials (22)
- Criminal Procedure (21)
- Law (21)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (110)
- Articles (80)
- Faculty Publications (72)
- Cardozo Law Review (68)
- Michigan Law Review (42)
-
- Seattle University Law Review (35)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (31)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (30)
- Pepperdine Law Review (26)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (23)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (22)
- Mercer Law Review (21)
- UIC Law Review (21)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (20)
- Indiana Law Journal (20)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (20)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (19)
- Washington Law Review (19)
- West Virginia Law Review (18)
- Cleveland State Law Review (17)
- Fordham Law Review (15)
- Touro Law Review (15)
- ExpressO (14)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (14)
- Maine Law Review (14)
- Scholarly Works (14)
- University of Richmond Law Review (14)
- Maryland Law Review (13)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (12)
- Kentucky Law Journal (12)
- Publication Type
Articles 1261 - 1290 of 1439
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Videotaping Children's Testimony: An Empirical View, Paula E. Hill, Samuel M. Hill
Videotaping Children's Testimony: An Empirical View, Paula E. Hill, Samuel M. Hill
Michigan Law Review
Increases in the number of reported incidents of child abuse and sexual molestation have resulted in more and younger children becoming courtroom participants. Some courts refuse to consider the special needs of the child in this adversarial environment. Relying on questionable precedent, these courts hold that the defendant's right to directly confront the child, as well as strict compliance with evidentiary rules, overrides that child's interest in freedom from embarrassment or psychological trauma. This Note focuses on pressures felt by the testifying child and the ways in which these pressures affect her testimony; it then proposes using videotaped testimony as …
Legal Protection For The Confidentiality Of Health Care Information In Pennsylvania: Patient And Client Recovery For Unauthorized Extra-Legal Disclosure, Richard C. Turkington
Legal Protection For The Confidentiality Of Health Care Information In Pennsylvania: Patient And Client Recovery For Unauthorized Extra-Legal Disclosure, Richard C. Turkington
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Use Immunity Advisements And The Public Employee's Assertion Of The Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Subject Matter Approach To Hearsay Reform, Roger C. Park
A Subject Matter Approach To Hearsay Reform, Roger C. Park
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Loss Of Innocence: Eyewitness Identification And Proof Of Guilt, Samuel R. Gross
Loss Of Innocence: Eyewitness Identification And Proof Of Guilt, Samuel R. Gross
Articles
It is no news that eyewitness identification in criminal cases is a problem; it is an old and famous problem. Judges and lawyers have long known that the identification of strangers is a chancy matter, and nearly a century of psychological research has confirmed this skeptical view. In 1967 the Supreme Court attempted to mitigate the problem by regulating the use of eyewitness identification evidence in criminal trials; since then it has retreated part way from that effort. Legal scholars have written a small library of books and articles on this problem, the courts' response to it, and various proposed …
Edward L. Barrett, Jr.: The Critic With 'That Quality Of Judiciousness Demanded Of The Court Itself', Yale Kamisar
Edward L. Barrett, Jr.: The Critic With 'That Quality Of Judiciousness Demanded Of The Court Itself', Yale Kamisar
Articles
Barrett was as talented and as dedicated a law teacher as any of his distinguished (or soon-to-become-distinguished) contemporaries. But Barrett resisted the movement toward new rights in fields where none had existed before. At least, he was quite uneasy about the trend. To be sure, others in law teaching shared Barrett's concern that the clock was spinning too fast. Indeed, some others were quite vociferous about it.' But because his criticism was cerebral rather than emotional - because he fairly stated and fully explored the arguments urging the courts to increase their tempo in developing constitutional rights - Barrett was …
Media Access To Tape-Recorded Evidence In Criminal Trials, Lisa Kahaty Starczewski
Media Access To Tape-Recorded Evidence In Criminal Trials, Lisa Kahaty Starczewski
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Substantive Admissibility Of A Non-Party Witness' Prior Inconsistent Statements: Pennsylvania Adopts The Modern View, Jennifer L. Hilliard
Substantive Admissibility Of A Non-Party Witness' Prior Inconsistent Statements: Pennsylvania Adopts The Modern View, Jennifer L. Hilliard
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Repuation And Character In Defamation Actions, Charles W. Ehrhardt
Repuation And Character In Defamation Actions, Charles W. Ehrhardt
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
The Exclusionary Rule: Not The "Expressed Juice Of The Woolly-Headed Thistle", Keith A. Fabi
The Exclusionary Rule: Not The "Expressed Juice Of The Woolly-Headed Thistle", Keith A. Fabi
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interlocutory Appeal Of Preindictment Suppression Motions Under Rule 41 ( E ), Clifford A. Godiner
Interlocutory Appeal Of Preindictment Suppression Motions Under Rule 41 ( E ), Clifford A. Godiner
Michigan Law Review
This Note argues that preindictment rulings denying 41(e) motions are not immediately appealable. Part I discusses decisions that mandate dismissal of such appeals for want of jurisdiction. Part II examines the policy rationales behind these precedents. Finally, Part III argues that an adequate remedy exists outside of rule 41(e), rendering immediate appellate review of rulings on 41(e) motions unnecessary.
Admission Of Evidence Of Other Misconduct In Washington To Prove Intent Or Absence Of Mistake Or Accident: The Logical Inconsistencies Of Evidence Rule 404(B), Eric D. Lansverk
Admission Of Evidence Of Other Misconduct In Washington To Prove Intent Or Absence Of Mistake Or Accident: The Logical Inconsistencies Of Evidence Rule 404(B), Eric D. Lansverk
Washington Law Review
In Washington, the introduction of evidence of other misconduct to show intent or absence of mistake or accident has proven particularly troublesome. Washington courts have made no attempt to delineate the differences between proof of intent and proof of absence of mistake or accident. Nor have they satisfactorily distinguished either of the proofs from a mere showing of propensity to commit crime. By failing to make these distinctions, the courts undermine the letter and spirit of ER 404(b). The lack of clear standards to guide application of the intent and absence of mistake or accident aspects of ER 404(b) leaves …
The Emerging "Victim Factor" In The Supreme Court's Criminal Jurisprudence: Should Victims' Interests Ever Prevent A Court From Overturning A Conviction And Ordering A Retrial?, Roger A. Pauley
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Casenotes Criminal Law — Evidence — Expert Testimony That Rape Victim Suffered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Is Admissible To Rebut A Defense Of Consent. State V. Allewalt, 308 Md. 89, 517 A.2d 741 (1986), Robert C. Sanders
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Malley V. Briggs: The Court Offers A Civil Remedy For Fourth Amendment Violations On The Wake Of An Eroding Exclusionary Rule, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1101 (1986), Ellen Keefe-Garner
Malley V. Briggs: The Court Offers A Civil Remedy For Fourth Amendment Violations On The Wake Of An Eroding Exclusionary Rule, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1101 (1986), Ellen Keefe-Garner
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gates, Leon And The Compromise Of Adjudicatory Fairness: (Part Ii)-Aggressive Majoritarianism, Willful Deafness, And The New Exception To The Exclusionary Rule, Joel J. Finer
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This Article will offer an elaboration of the idea of judicial "aggressiveness" (which Professor Stone, by and large, leaves undefined) through examination of the majority opinion in United States v. Leon and its application in Massachusetts v. Sheppard. It will also advance the thesis that the majority in Leon exhibited a particular kind of aggressiveness--willful deafness.
Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony: Is It Legally Relevant To A Criminal Proceeding In Ohio, Thomas H. Allison
Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony: Is It Legally Relevant To A Criminal Proceeding In Ohio, Thomas H. Allison
Cleveland State Law Review
In the past twenty years a growing number of courts, both state and federal, have addressed the problem of the admissibility in a criminal trial of testimony by a witness whose memory has been "refreshed" by the use of pre-trial hypnosis. Some courts are of the opinion that hypnosis is nothing more than a memory aid, to be treated like any other device to refresh recollection. Other courts believe hypnosis is more of a "science," and as such should be treated consistently with the rules for the admission of other scientific evidence. While the reliability of using hypnosis to refresh …
The Exclusionary Rule: A Disputation, Peter Lushing
The Exclusionary Rule: A Disputation, Peter Lushing
Cardozo Law Review
Four-thirty p.m.: the lawyer's decompression hour. Court has just adjourned. The belligerents and (dare we say it) a judge or two recuperate in saloons close by the courthouse; their families can wait. In one tavern, a rear booth is about to be occupied by Mark earnest young county prosecutor. Mark is on the verge of that time when a criminal lawyer begins to doubt the sanity of the system and, perforce, his own integrity. He will be joined by Sam, a born defense counsel. Sam secretly worships America's criminal justice system for its holy commitment to procedural regularity. He has …
The Battered Woman Syndrome And Self-Defense: A Legal And Empirical Dissent, David L. Faigman
The Battered Woman Syndrome And Self-Defense: A Legal And Empirical Dissent, David L. Faigman
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Hearsay Rule And The Stability Of Verdicts: A Response To Professor Nesson, Roger C. Park
The Hearsay Rule And The Stability Of Verdicts: A Response To Professor Nesson, Roger C. Park
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
I Cannot Tell A Lie: The Standard For New Trial In False Testimony Cases, Daniel Wolf
I Cannot Tell A Lie: The Standard For New Trial In False Testimony Cases, Daniel Wolf
Michigan Law Review
This Note examines the question of what standard should be used for granting a new trial when a defendant's conviction is alleged to have been based, at least in part, on false testimony. Part I demonstrates the failure of the existing standards to strike a satisfactory balance between defendants' rights and the efficient administration of the criminal justice system. Part II argues that motions for retrial based upon false testimony should be governed by a standard drawn not only from newly discovered evidence cases generally, but also from cases involving prosecutorial misconduct. Finally, Part III suggests that the proper test …
Confidence In Probability: Burdens Of Persuasion In A World Of Imperfect Knowledge, Neil B. Cohen
Confidence In Probability: Burdens Of Persuasion In A World Of Imperfect Knowledge, Neil B. Cohen
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Burger Court And Prosecutorial Misconduct, Bennett L. Gershman
The Burger Court And Prosecutorial Misconduct, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Professor Gershman critically examines a series of recent Supreme Court decisions dealing with prosecutorial misconduct. In each case, the Court reversed the lower court and reinstated the conviction.
There are a broad range of issues involved; from suppression of evidence to trial misconduct. As a former prosecutor in New York City, the author is forced to conclude that, "Prosecutorial misconduct occurs because it works and because sanctions for misbehavior are virtually nonexistent."
Does A Criminal Defendant Have A Constitutional Right To Compel The Production Of Privileged Testimony Through Use Immunity, Louis M. Natali Jr.
Does A Criminal Defendant Have A Constitutional Right To Compel The Production Of Privileged Testimony Through Use Immunity, Louis M. Natali Jr.
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Federal Rules Of Evidence In The States: A Ten-Year Perspective, L. Kinvin Wroth
The Federal Rules Of Evidence In The States: A Ten-Year Perspective, L. Kinvin Wroth
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Need To Amend Federal Rule Of Evidence 404(B): The Threat To The Future Of The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Edward J. Imwinkelried
The Need To Amend Federal Rule Of Evidence 404(B): The Threat To The Future Of The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Edward J. Imwinkelried
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Expert Testimony, Paul C. Giannelli
Prior Inconsistent Statements As Substantive Evidence: Illinois Takes The Sting Out Of The Turncoat Witness, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 69 (1985), Mark D. Krauskopf
Prior Inconsistent Statements As Substantive Evidence: Illinois Takes The Sting Out Of The Turncoat Witness, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 69 (1985), Mark D. Krauskopf
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Right To Independent Testing: Boon For Defendant--Burden For Prosecution?, Judith K. Jones
The Right To Independent Testing: Boon For Defendant--Burden For Prosecution?, Judith K. Jones
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In A Rescue Situation, William T. Pizzi
The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In A Rescue Situation, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.