Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (152)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (117)
- William & Mary Law School (62)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (47)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (42)
-
- Seattle University School of Law (37)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (36)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (33)
- Duke Law (32)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (28)
- University of Washington School of Law (28)
- American University Washington College of Law (27)
- Pepperdine University (27)
- Brooklyn Law School (25)
- Fordham Law School (25)
- UIC School of Law (25)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (22)
- University of Miami Law School (22)
- Mercer University School of Law (21)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (21)
- University of Richmond (21)
- Cleveland State University (20)
- West Virginia University (20)
- University of Georgia School of Law (19)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (18)
- Georgetown University Law Center (16)
- University of Kentucky (15)
- University of Maine School of Law (15)
- BLR (14)
- Cornell University Law School (14)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (324)
- Testimony (67)
- Admissibility (62)
- Sixth Amendment (56)
- Witnesses (55)
-
- Hearsay (52)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (51)
- Confrontation Clause (49)
- United States Supreme Court (49)
- Criminal law (47)
- Police (47)
- Exclusionary rule (43)
- Fourth Amendment (35)
- Cross-examination (34)
- Criminal procedure (33)
- DNA (30)
- Criminal Law (28)
- Criminal justice (28)
- Expert testimony (28)
- Due process (27)
- Scientific evidence (27)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (26)
- Crawford v. Washington (25)
- Fifth Amendment (24)
- Supreme Court (24)
- Confessions (23)
- Litigation (23)
- Trials (22)
- Criminal Procedure (21)
- Law (21)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (110)
- Articles (80)
- Faculty Publications (72)
- Cardozo Law Review (68)
- Michigan Law Review (42)
-
- Seattle University Law Review (35)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (31)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (30)
- Pepperdine Law Review (26)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (23)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (22)
- Mercer Law Review (21)
- UIC Law Review (21)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (20)
- Indiana Law Journal (20)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (20)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (19)
- Washington Law Review (19)
- West Virginia Law Review (18)
- Cleveland State Law Review (17)
- Fordham Law Review (15)
- Touro Law Review (15)
- ExpressO (14)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (14)
- Maine Law Review (14)
- Scholarly Works (14)
- University of Richmond Law Review (14)
- Maryland Law Review (13)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (12)
- Kentucky Law Journal (12)
- Publication Type
Articles 1201 - 1230 of 1439
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Scientific Evidence In Criminal Prosecutions, Paul C. Giannelli
Scientific Evidence In Criminal Prosecutions, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Aftermath Of The Iran-Contra Trials: The Uncertain Status Of Derivative Use Immunity, Jerome A. Murphy
The Aftermath Of The Iran-Contra Trials: The Uncertain Status Of Derivative Use Immunity, Jerome A. Murphy
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Character And Credibility: A Proposal To Realign Federal Rules Of Evidence 608 And 609, Robert D. Okun
Character And Credibility: A Proposal To Realign Federal Rules Of Evidence 608 And 609, Robert D. Okun
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Federal Rules Of Evidence After Sixteen Years -- The Effect Of "Plain Meaning" Jurisprudence, The Need For An Advisory Committee On The Rules Of Evidence, And Suggestions For Selective Revision Of The Rules, Aviva A. Orenstein, Edward R. Becker
The Federal Rules Of Evidence After Sixteen Years -- The Effect Of "Plain Meaning" Jurisprudence, The Need For An Advisory Committee On The Rules Of Evidence, And Suggestions For Selective Revision Of The Rules, Aviva A. Orenstein, Edward R. Becker
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The New Evidence Scholarship, William Twining
The New Evidence Scholarship, William Twining
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marshalling Evidence For Adversary Litigation, David Schum, Peter Tillers
Marshalling Evidence For Adversary Litigation, David Schum, Peter Tillers
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marshalling Information Prior To Litigation, Bernard Robertson
Marshalling Information Prior To Litigation, Bernard Robertson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Five Cheers For Schum And Tillers, William Twining
Five Cheers For Schum And Tillers, William Twining
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The New Criminal Discovery Code In Oklahoma: A Two Way Street In The Wrong Direction, Rodney J. Uphoff
The New Criminal Discovery Code In Oklahoma: A Two Way Street In The Wrong Direction, Rodney J. Uphoff
Faculty Publications
This article first examines criminal discovery in Oklahoma prior to the Allen decision. Next, section II of the article explores Allen and the court’s justifications for creating a reciprocal discovery system. The article reviews the Allen procedures and similar pre-trial discovery provisions contained in the American Bar Association’s Standards for Criminal Justice and questions whether Allen’s new discovery system will achieve the desired results. Section II also focuses on the constitutionality of the defendant’s disclosure obligations and the adverse effects of mandating such disclosures on the adversary system. Finally, section III of the article proposes an alternative discovery code based …
Idaho V. Wright: The Defenestration Of Corroborating Evidence, John Clairborne Koski
Idaho V. Wright: The Defenestration Of Corroborating Evidence, John Clairborne Koski
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Modern Confession Law After Duckworth V. Eagan: What's The Use Of Explaining?, Julia C. Weissman
Modern Confession Law After Duckworth V. Eagan: What's The Use Of Explaining?, Julia C. Weissman
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Criminal Discovery, Scientific Evidence, And Dna, Paul C. Giannelli
Criminal Discovery, Scientific Evidence, And Dna, Paul C. Giannelli
Vanderbilt Law Review
"At bottom the case against Claus von Bilow was a scientific case. It would have to be refuted by scientific evidence,"' wrote Alan Dershowitz. The von Bilow case is not alone. Many recent notorious criminal trials involved scientific proof. For example, the prosecution offered hypnotically refreshed testimony and bite mark evidence in the Ted Bundy case. Fiber evidence proved critical in the trial of Wayne Williams for the murder of two of the thirty young black males killed in Atlanta in the late 1970s.' Other illustrations include the pathology and serology testimony in the Jean Harris trial, the forensic analysis …
Drug Testing And Welfare: Taking The Drug War To Unconstitutional Limits?, Philippa M. Guthrie
Drug Testing And Welfare: Taking The Drug War To Unconstitutional Limits?, Philippa M. Guthrie
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
To See Or Not To See The Defendant: Expanding The Use Of Florida's Special Procedures For Taking The Testimony Of Witnesses, Glenn F. Lang
To See Or Not To See The Defendant: Expanding The Use Of Florida's Special Procedures For Taking The Testimony Of Witnesses, Glenn F. Lang
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The "Whys" And "Whynots" Of Judicial Comments On Evidence In Jury Trials, Allen Hartman Justice
The "Whys" And "Whynots" Of Judicial Comments On Evidence In Jury Trials, Allen Hartman Justice
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Videotaped Reenactments In Civil Trials: Protecting Probative Evidence From The Trial Judge's Unbridled Discretion, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 433 (1991), Elizabeth A. Savage
Videotaped Reenactments In Civil Trials: Protecting Probative Evidence From The Trial Judge's Unbridled Discretion, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 433 (1991), Elizabeth A. Savage
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gunshot Residue Tests, Paul C. Giannelli
Evidence Engendered, Kit Kinports
Evidence Engendered, Kit Kinports
Faculty Scholarship
Part I of this article briefly describes feminist legal theory and its evolution. Part II then discusses the extent to which evidence as a whole is a gendered topic that reflects predominantly male traits and ideals, and Part III analyzes various specific evidentiary doctrines from a feminist perspective. Finally, Part IV examines way of incorporating feminist theories in teaching an evidence course.
The Exclusionary Rule And Confession Evidence: Some Perspectives On Evolving Practices And Policies In The United States And England And Wales, Mark Berger
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Expert Evidence, Samuel R. Gross
Expert Evidence, Samuel R. Gross
Articles
It seems that the use of expert witnesses in common law courts has always been troublesome. In his Treatise on the Law of Evidence, first published in 1848, Judge John Pitt Taylor describes several classes of witnesses whose testimony should be viewed with caution, including: enslaved people (which accounts for "the lamentable neglect of truth, which is evinced by most of the nations of India, by the subjects of the Czar, and by many of the peasantry in Ireland"); women (because they are more susceptible to "an innate vain love of the marvelous"); and "foreigners and others ... living out …
Errors In Good Faith: The Leon Exception Six Years Later, David Clark Esseks
Errors In Good Faith: The Leon Exception Six Years Later, David Clark Esseks
Michigan Law Review
Given this vast literature on the good faith exception, little room appears to exist for additional commentary on the propriety of the decision, its theoretical weaknesses or strengths, or what further changes in constitutional criminal procedure it forebodes. This Note will not add to the many voices complaining of the Court's misconstrual of the grounding of the exclusionary rule, nor of its crabbed notion of deterrence. Instead, it accepts, arguendo, the propriety of the exception and its underlying purpose, and then examines the six-year experience with the revised rule. The proliferation of reported applications of the good faith exception …
The Military Rules Of Evidence: Origins And Judicial Implementation, Fredric I. Lederer
The Military Rules Of Evidence: Origins And Judicial Implementation, Fredric I. Lederer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Self-Incrimination Debate, Mark Berger
Dna "Profiles" - The Problems Of Technology Transfer, Michael J. Dirusso
Dna "Profiles" - The Problems Of Technology Transfer, Michael J. Dirusso
NYLS Journal of Human Rights
No abstract provided.
What Was Discovered In The Quest For Truth?, Steven H. Goldberg
What Was Discovered In The Quest For Truth?, Steven H. Goldberg
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Criminal discovery has outstripped Justice Brennan's claim of "mixed" results. His description of the twenty-five year transformation as merely "rapid" is too modest. From the picture in 1963, which he accurately describes as "quite a bleak one," discovery is, today, de rigueur in criminal cases. There is little to suggest a general reduction of criminal case discovery in the future.
Dna Fingerprinting: Evidence Of The Fuiture, Jane E. Hanner
Dna Fingerprinting: Evidence Of The Fuiture, Jane E. Hanner
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Evidence, Charles E. Friend
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Evidence, Charles E. Friend
University of Richmond Law Review
The past year has brought a variety of appellate court decisions (and a few legislative actions) in the evidence area. Some of these are merely affirmations of well-established principles; others answer questions about evidence law which have troubled lawyers and judges in the Commonwealth for some time. And, inevitably, some of them raise questions in areas once thought to be definite and certain.
The Existing Confidentiality Privileges As Applied To Rape Victims, Bridget M. Mccafferty
The Existing Confidentiality Privileges As Applied To Rape Victims, Bridget M. Mccafferty
Journal of Law and Health
It is evident that when this type of questioning occurs, the victim must overcome the presumption that she is at fault. As it exists, the prosecution of the rapist also results in the prosecution of the victim. However, it is undeniable that the defendant in a rape case is presumed innocent until a judicial determination states otherwise. A dilemma arises when the court attempts to balance the victim's right to bring the accused to trial and the defendant's right to prove his innocence. Currently, the judicial system favors the presumption of the defendant's innocence, presupposing that the victim has falsely …
Remembering The 'Old World' Of Criminal Procedure: A Reply To Professor Grano, Yale Kamisar
Remembering The 'Old World' Of Criminal Procedure: A Reply To Professor Grano, Yale Kamisar
Articles
When I graduated from high school in 1961, the "old world" of criminal procedure still existed, albeit in its waning days; when I graduated from law school in 1968, circa the time most of today's first-year law students were arriving on the scene, the "new world" had fully dislodged the old. Indeed, the force of the new world's revolutionary impetus already had crested. Some of the change that the criminal procedure revolution effected was for the better, but much of it, at least as some of us see it, was decidedly for the worse. My students, however, cannot make the …
The Exclusion Of Evidence In The United States, Paul Marcus
The Exclusion Of Evidence In The United States, Paul Marcus
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.