Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (378)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (337)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (276)
- William & Mary Law School (226)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (145)
-
- Columbia Law School (140)
- American University Washington College of Law (134)
- BLR (126)
- University of Richmond (120)
- University of Washington School of Law (114)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (109)
- Brooklyn Law School (100)
- University of Colorado Law School (96)
- UIC School of Law (95)
- Mercer University School of Law (87)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (85)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (85)
- Southern Methodist University (80)
- University of Kentucky (78)
- Pepperdine University (76)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (75)
- Pace University (72)
- University of Miami Law School (72)
- Fordham Law School (70)
- Seattle University School of Law (70)
- University of Georgia School of Law (70)
- Boston University School of Law (69)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (68)
- University of Maine School of Law (63)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (61)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal procedure (436)
- Criminal law (356)
- Criminal justice (269)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (248)
- Criminal Procedure (221)
-
- Sentencing (204)
- Police (182)
- Sixth Amendment (165)
- Death penalty (153)
- Evidence (150)
- United States Supreme Court (146)
- Capital punishment (132)
- Criminal Law (127)
- Prosecutors (117)
- Fourth Amendment (114)
- Due process (110)
- Right to counsel (106)
- Fifth Amendment (105)
- Constitutional Law (92)
- Punishment (92)
- Plea bargaining (85)
- Criminal justice system (84)
- Race (81)
- Supreme Court (79)
- Juries (78)
- Miranda v. Arizona (77)
- Criminal Justice (74)
- Incarceration (72)
- Courts (68)
- Exclusionary rule (68)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (521)
- Articles (228)
- Faculty Publications (165)
- Michigan Law Review (163)
- Cardozo Law Review (142)
-
- ExpressO (113)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (103)
- Scholarly Articles (90)
- Publications (89)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (83)
- Mercer Law Review (81)
- UIC Law Review (79)
- All Faculty Scholarship (76)
- University of Richmond Law Review (74)
- William & Mary Law Review (70)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (68)
- Washington Law Review (68)
- Pepperdine Law Review (67)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (65)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (65)
- Kentucky Law Journal (62)
- Maine Law Review (61)
- Touro Law Review (60)
- Scholarly Works (58)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (56)
- Faculty Articles (54)
- West Virginia Law Review (52)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (46)
- Indiana Law Journal (46)
- Seattle University Law Review (44)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 5371 - 5400 of 5712
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Improving Police Discretion: Rationality In Handling Public Inebriates, David Aaronson
Improving Police Discretion: Rationality In Handling Public Inebriates, David Aaronson
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Improving Police Discretion: Rationality In Handling Public Inebriates, David Aaronson, C. Dienes, Michael Musheno
Improving Police Discretion: Rationality In Handling Public Inebriates, David Aaronson, C. Dienes, Michael Musheno
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This two-part article reports on the findings of the "prescriptive" phase of the American University Law School's Project on Public Inebriation.' First, we provide a framework or model designed to contribute to efforts to improve the rationality of police discretion and the quality of discretionary justice. Second, we seek to increase understanding of, and provide the basis for improving, the intake process whereby public inebriates are delivered to designated facilities-jails, detoxification centers, etc.-in criminal and decriminalized jurisdictions. While the article focuses on the discretionary power of police officers to remove street inebriates, it should increase awareness of problems of decriminalizing …
The Omnibus Hearing: Benefit Or Burden For State Courts?, Joel J. Fryer
The Omnibus Hearing: Benefit Or Burden For State Courts?, Joel J. Fryer
Mercer Law Review
The inefficiency of the criminal justice system has come to be recognized by judicial reformers as a major problem that has been exacerbated by the expansion of the rights of defendants. During the past 15 years, largely in response to U.S. Supreme Court decisions attempting to insure due process and promote fairness, trial courts have had to accommodate not only the resultant changes in criminal practice and procedure but also the increased caseload caused by defendants' assertion of constitutional rights which have been recently articulated and guaranteed. The recognition that the burden placed on courts must not be so great …
Williams V. State, 316 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1975), Richard W. Epstein
Williams V. State, 316 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1975), Richard W. Epstein
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law- GUILTY PLEAS- FACTUAL BASIS DETERMINATION NOT MANDATORY WHEN A COURT ACCEPTS A PLEA OF GUILTY OR NOLO CONTENDERE.
A Review Of The Presentence Diagnostic Study Procedure In North Carolina, Charles E. Smith
A Review Of The Presentence Diagnostic Study Procedure In North Carolina, Charles E. Smith
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Criminal Justice Act - 1964 To 1976, Dudley B. Bonsal
The Criminal Justice Act - 1964 To 1976, Dudley B. Bonsal
Indiana Law Journal
Colloquium: The Federal Judiciary: Essays from the Bench
Plea Bargaining, Decision Theory, And Equilibrium Models: Part Ii, Stuart S. Nagel, Marian Neef
Plea Bargaining, Decision Theory, And Equilibrium Models: Part Ii, Stuart S. Nagel, Marian Neef
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Domestic Intelligence Informants, The First Amendment And The Need For Prior Judicial Review, Martin L. Perschetz
Domestic Intelligence Informants, The First Amendment And The Need For Prior Judicial Review, Martin L. Perschetz
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law—Affirmative Defenses In The Washington Criminal Code—The Impact Of Mullaney V. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684 (1975), Pamela Cowan
Criminal Law—Affirmative Defenses In The Washington Criminal Code—The Impact Of Mullaney V. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684 (1975), Pamela Cowan
Washington Law Review
A Maine jury found Stillman E. Wilbur, Jr., guilty of murder after the prosecution's proof of two elements: (1) that the homicide was unlawful, and (2) that it was intentional. Wilbur offered no evidence on his behalf to negate or otherwise refute the state's case other than his statement that he attacked the deceased in a frenzy provoked by a homosexual advance. The trial judge instructed the jury that if the prosecution established the above two elements, malice aforethought was to be conclusively inferred, unless the defendant proved by a fair preponderance of the evidence that he had acted in …
Rape Shield Laws: Some Constitutional Problems, David S. Rudstein
Rape Shield Laws: Some Constitutional Problems, David S. Rudstein
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expanding Criminal Procedural Rights Under State Constitutions
Expanding Criminal Procedural Rights Under State Constitutions
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Plea Bargaining, Decision Theory, And Equilibrium Models: Part I, Stuart S. Nagel, Marian Neef
Plea Bargaining, Decision Theory, And Equilibrium Models: Part I, Stuart S. Nagel, Marian Neef
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law--Criminal Responsibility--A Pragmatic Approach To The Fourth Circuit, Michael Frank Pezzulli
Criminal Law--Criminal Responsibility--A Pragmatic Approach To The Fourth Circuit, Michael Frank Pezzulli
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Speedy Trial Act - Justice On The Assembly Line., Thomas Black
The Speedy Trial Act - Justice On The Assembly Line., Thomas Black
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Withdrawal Of The Plea Of Guilty Upon A Decision By The Judge Not To Accept The Plea Agreement., Frank A. Porter
Withdrawal Of The Plea Of Guilty Upon A Decision By The Judge Not To Accept The Plea Agreement., Frank A. Porter
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Acquittal Of The Guilty, Alec Samuels
Acquittal Of The Guilty, Alec Samuels
Dalhousie Law Journal
Every acquittal is an injustice. Either a guilty man has escaped conviction, or an innocent man has been subjected to false accusation, with all the accompanying worry, anxiety, publicity, humiliation, perhaps detention, probably expense. Some of the difficulties undoubtedly spring from the adversary system, a system evolved in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to meet the then contemporary problems. It is a system with certain inherent inefficiencies and ineffectivenesses, a system designed to ascertain whether the prosecution has proved an allegation against D the defendant beyond all reasonable doubt and not designed to ascertain the truth of the incident in …
Acquittal Of The Guilty, Alec Samuels
Acquittal Of The Guilty, Alec Samuels
Dalhousie Law Journal
Every acquittal is an injustice. Either a guilty man has escaped conviction, or an innocent man has been subjected to false accusation, with all the accompanying worry, anxiety, publicity, humiliation, perhaps detention, probably expense. Some of the difficulties undoubtedly spring from the adversary system, a system evolved in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to meet the then contemporary problems. It is a system with certain inherent inefficiencies and ineffectivenesses, a system designed to ascertain whether the prosecution has proved an allegation against D the defendant beyond all reasonable doubt and not designed to ascertain the truth of the incident in …
Acquittal Of The Guilty, Alec Samuels
Acquittal Of The Guilty, Alec Samuels
Dalhousie Law Journal
Every acquittal is an injustice. Either a guilty man has escaped conviction, or an innocent man has been subjected to false accusation, with all the accompanying worry, anxiety, publicity, humiliation, perhaps detention, probably expense. Some of the difficulties undoubtedly spring from the adversary system, a system evolved in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to meet the then contemporary problems. It is a system with certain inherent inefficiencies and ineffectivenesses, a system designed to ascertain whether the prosecution has proved an allegation against D the defendant beyond all reasonable doubt and not designed to ascertain the truth of the incident in …
Acquittal Of The Guilty, Alec Samuels
Acquittal Of The Guilty, Alec Samuels
Dalhousie Law Journal
Every acquittal is an injustice. Either a guilty man has escaped conviction, or an innocent man has been subjected to false accusation, with all the accompanying worry, anxiety, publicity, humiliation, perhaps detention, probably expense. Some of the difficulties undoubtedly spring from the adversary system, a system evolved in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to meet the then contemporary problems. It is a system with certain inherent inefficiencies and ineffectivenesses, a system designed to ascertain whether the prosecution has proved an allegation against D the defendant beyond all reasonable doubt and not designed to ascertain the truth of the incident in …
Acquittal Of The Guilty, Alec Samuels
Acquittal Of The Guilty, Alec Samuels
Dalhousie Law Journal
Every acquittal is an injustice. Either a guilty man has escaped conviction, or an innocent man has been subjected to false accusation, with all the accompanying worry, anxiety, publicity, humiliation, perhaps detention, probably expense. Some of the difficulties undoubtedly spring from the adversary system, a system evolved in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to meet the then contemporary problems. It is a system with certain inherent inefficiencies and ineffectivenesses, a system designed to ascertain whether the prosecution has proved an allegation against D the defendant beyond all reasonable doubt and not designed to ascertain the truth of the incident in …
Judicial Review Of Parole Release Decisionmaking, Thomas B. Grier
Judicial Review Of Parole Release Decisionmaking, Thomas B. Grier
IUSTITIA
An inmate at a federal penal institution "is entitled only to be released after full service of his sentence less good time earned during incarceration." He or she is not entitled to parole, for parole is not a right but a privilege, a matter of "legislative grace". The United States Board of Parole has "absolute discretion" in deciding whether and when to grant parole. The judiciary will not interfere with the Board, as "courts are without power to grant a parole or to determine judicially eligibility for parole." And since the Board is statutorily authorized to exercise broad discretion, and …
Criminal Procedure—Filing By Information: Determination Of Probable Cause Required Before Extended Restraint On Liberty—Gerstein V. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 (1975), Cynthia B. Whitaker
Criminal Procedure—Filing By Information: Determination Of Probable Cause Required Before Extended Restraint On Liberty—Gerstein V. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 (1975), Cynthia B. Whitaker
Washington Law Review
Robert Pugh was arrested in Florida without a warrant and charged by prosecutor's information. Pugh and other incarcerated arrestees charged by information without a preliminary hearing brought a class action suit in federal district court challenging the constitutionality of the charging procedure. Plaintiffs maintained that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment required that accused persons be accorded a determination of probable cause for detention soon after their arrest. They also argued that the prosecuting attorney was not sufficiently neutral or detached to make the necessary determination. The district court accepted the plaintiffs' arguments, and the Court of Appeals …
The Determination Of Probable Cause In Illinois - Grand Jury Or Preliminary Hearing, John C. Robinson Jr.
The Determination Of Probable Cause In Illinois - Grand Jury Or Preliminary Hearing, John C. Robinson Jr.
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Preface, Allan A. Ackerman
Preface, Allan A. Ackerman
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Introduction/Exclusionary Rule/Arrest/Identifications/Confessions/Preliminary Proceedings/Discovery/Speedy Trial/Selection Of Jurors/Instruction To Jurors/Sentencing/Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act/Prisoners' Rights, Mary Anne Mason, Patrick E. Deady, Nancy Kane Hall, David M. Heller
Introduction/Exclusionary Rule/Arrest/Identifications/Confessions/Preliminary Proceedings/Discovery/Speedy Trial/Selection Of Jurors/Instruction To Jurors/Sentencing/Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act/Prisoners' Rights, Mary Anne Mason, Patrick E. Deady, Nancy Kane Hall, David M. Heller
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Pro Se Litigation -- Litigating Without Counsel: Faretta Or For Worst, Susan Herman, Ira P. Robbins
Pro Se Litigation -- Litigating Without Counsel: Faretta Or For Worst, Susan Herman, Ira P. Robbins
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Privacy: A Case For Accurate And Complete Criminal History Records, Thomas J. Madden, Helen S. Lessin
Privacy: A Case For Accurate And Complete Criminal History Records, Thomas J. Madden, Helen S. Lessin
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Confidentiality Of Criminal Records Privacy V. The Public Interest, David Weinstein
Confidentiality Of Criminal Records Privacy V. The Public Interest, David Weinstein
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Remedies For Prejudicial Publicity: A Brief Review, James T. Ranney
Remedies For Prejudicial Publicity: A Brief Review, James T. Ranney
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.