Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (595)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (129)
- University of Michigan Law School (107)
- American University Washington College of Law (89)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (80)
-
- Fordham Law School (76)
- Columbia Law School (75)
- Seattle University School of Law (60)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (59)
- University of Richmond (55)
- University of Georgia School of Law (54)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (53)
- University of the Pacific (49)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (48)
- Southwestern Oklahoma State University (47)
- UIC School of Law (43)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (41)
- Brooklyn Law School (39)
- Cleveland State University (38)
- Georgetown University Law Center (37)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (37)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (37)
- University of Colorado Law School (37)
- William & Mary Law School (37)
- New York Law School (36)
- Roger Williams University (35)
- Florida State University College of Law (34)
- Pace University (34)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (33)
- Notre Dame Law School (32)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (245)
- Criminal justice (148)
- Sentencing (108)
- Crime (99)
- Criminal Law (98)
-
- Criminal procedure (77)
- Incarceration (71)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (70)
- Justice (67)
- Corrections (64)
- Police (59)
- Criminology (55)
- Recidivism (51)
- Punishment (50)
- Mass incarceration (49)
- Due process (47)
- Law (47)
- Qc (47)
- Qualitative criminology (47)
- Fourth Amendment (46)
- Prison (46)
- Race (46)
- Evidence (45)
- Policing (44)
- Criminal Justice (42)
- Constitutional Law (40)
- Criminal (40)
- Bail (38)
- Criminal justice reform (38)
- Juvenile justice (38)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (561)
- Faculty Scholarship (225)
- Cardozo Law Review (54)
- Scholarly Works (49)
- Articles (47)
-
- Qualitative Criminology (QC) (47)
- Seattle University Law Review (42)
- Faculty Publications (38)
- Fordham Law Review (36)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (36)
- Michigan Law Review (36)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (36)
- McGeorge Law Review (34)
- University of Richmond Law Review (34)
- UIC Law Review (32)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (32)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (31)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (29)
- ExpressO (28)
- Publications (28)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (27)
- Scholarly Articles (27)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (27)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (26)
- Journal Articles (26)
- Cleveland State Law Review (24)
- Maine Law Review (24)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (24)
- Akron Law Review (23)
- Scholarly Publications (23)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 421 - 450 of 3269
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Atryzek V. State, 268 A.3d 37 (R.I. 2022), Emily Hogan
Atryzek V. State, 268 A.3d 37 (R.I. 2022), Emily Hogan
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Behind The Screen: Examining The Human Consequences And Constitutional Ramifications Of The Virtual Criminal Defendant, Mallory Kostroff
Behind The Screen: Examining The Human Consequences And Constitutional Ramifications Of The Virtual Criminal Defendant, Mallory Kostroff
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
Defendants are waiting behind a screen to learn their fate in their criminal proceedings. This Note sounds the alarm that having incarcerated defendants appear virtually for their criminal proceedings will lead the criminal justice system further down a path of mass incarceration and destruction. This Note demonstrates and argues that there are no benefits for having an incarcerated defendant appear virtually because there are no real benefits to the defendant themselves. Courts further try to argue that video appearances are efficient as they save time and money but as this Note shows those arguments are misleading and miss the point …
Criminal Law—Unfettered Discretion: Prosecutorial Discretion In The Aftermath Of Dobbs V. Jackson Women’S Health Org., Samual F. Pollock
Criminal Law—Unfettered Discretion: Prosecutorial Discretion In The Aftermath Of Dobbs V. Jackson Women’S Health Org., Samual F. Pollock
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Scotus On Immigration: A Review Of Recent Decisions & What's To Come
Scotus On Immigration: A Review Of Recent Decisions & What's To Come
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The symposium discusses recent Supreme Court decisions on immigration, focusing on cases that address issues such as mandatory detention, limits on judicial review, and the expansion of executive discretion. These rulings have significant implications for immigration law and practice, particularly in areas of detention, due process, and the ability of federal courts to review immigration-related decisions.
Sb 44 - Expanding The Street Gang Terrorism And Prevention Act, Aaron L. Brown, Anna C. Dillon
Sb 44 - Expanding The Street Gang Terrorism And Prevention Act, Aaron L. Brown, Anna C. Dillon
Georgia State University Law Review
The Act enhances penalties for violations of the Street Gang Terrorism and Prevention Act, including imposing mandatory minimums, and preserves the State’s right to appeal a court’s deviation from the mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines provided in the Act. The Act also imposes limits on the use of unsecured judicial release.
Hb 219 - Venue For Money Laundering And Theft Involving Digital Currency, Samuel P. Robertson, Lindsey N. Smith
Hb 219 - Venue For Money Laundering And Theft Involving Digital Currency, Samuel P. Robertson, Lindsey N. Smith
Georgia State University Law Review
The Act creates venue in cases of money laundering and theft that involve the transfer of digital currency by establishing that the crime may be considered to have happened wherever power was exercised over the property, wherever an act in furtherance of the crime occurred, or wherever the victim resides.
Bail And Mental Illness, Samuel Wiseman
Bail And Mental Illness, Samuel Wiseman
Faculty Scholarship
In many parts of the United States, the bail system is strikingly unfair, imposing burdensome, and often unmeetable, financial conditions on pretrial liberty even for low-risk defendants. Reforms that reduce or eliminate cash bail and lower pretrial detention rates have made progress in recent years, but now face growing opposition even in generally progressive jurisdictions such as San Francisco and New York City. One source of this opposition is rising concern about crime—particularly crime associated with the unhoused, who disproportionately suffer from mental illness, including substance abuse disorder. This is not a coincidence, as one effect of a cash-bail system, …
Collusive Prosecution, Ben A. Mcjunkin, J.J. Prescott
Collusive Prosecution, Ben A. Mcjunkin, J.J. Prescott
Articles
In this Article, we argue that increasingly harsh collateral consequences have surfaced an underappreciated and undertheorized dynamic of criminal plea bargaining. Collateral consequences that mostly or entirely benefit third parties (such as other communities or other states) create an interest asymmetry that prosecutors and defendants can exploit in plea negotiations. In particular, if a prosecutor and a defendant can control the offense of conviction (often through what some term a “fictional plea”), they can work together to evade otherwise applicable collateral consequences, such as deportation or sex-offender registration and notification. Both parties arguably benefit: Prosecutors can leverage collateral consequences to …
Between Cooperation And Conflict In Second Look Sentence Review, Kay L. Levine, Ronald F. Wright
Between Cooperation And Conflict In Second Look Sentence Review, Kay L. Levine, Ronald F. Wright
Faculty Articles
This Article offers the first scholarly assessment of new resentencing practices initiated by state prosecutors in the United States. Unlike the conviction integrity units that have become institutional fixtures in many prosecutors’ offices over the past two decades, attorneys working on resentencing matters rarely address concerns about the legal integrity or factual accuracy of the conviction itself. Prosecutors and defense attorneys instead consider the continuing integrity of the sentence imposed on the defendant. Perhaps a second look is necessary because the sentence imposed for the crime no longer appears necessary to serve public safety goals, because the prisoner has aged …
Are Police Officers Bayesians? Police Updating In Investigative Stops, Jeffrey A. Fagan, Lila J.E. Nojima
Are Police Officers Bayesians? Police Updating In Investigative Stops, Jeffrey A. Fagan, Lila J.E. Nojima
Faculty Scholarship
Theories of rational behavior assume that actors make decisions where the benefits of their acts exceed their costs or losses. If those expected costs and benefits change over time, behavior will change accordingly as actors learn and internalize the parameters of success and failure. In the context of proactive policing, police stops that achieve any of several goals — constitutional compliance, stops that lead to “good” arrests or summonses, stops that lead to seizures of weapons, drugs, or other contraband, or stops that produce good will and citizen cooperation — should signal to officers the features of a stop that …
In Search Of: A Federal Safe Harbor For State Legalization Of Psilocybin, Kathryn L. Tucker, Holly Martinez, Ebony Morris
In Search Of: A Federal Safe Harbor For State Legalization Of Psilocybin, Kathryn L. Tucker, Holly Martinez, Ebony Morris
Lewis & Clark Law Review
In 2020, Oregon voters passed the Oregon Psilocybin Services Act (PSA). The PSA allows for the adult use of psilocybin at designated service centers and does not require a medicinal purpose for consumption. While the use of psilocybin becomes legal in Oregon in 2023 under the PSA, psilocybin remains a Schedule I substance under the federal Controlled Substances Act. This conflict between state legalization and federal prohibition creates significant challenges for individuals and businesses intending to abide by the requirements of the PSA—including the potential of jail time, fines, and forfeiture of property. This Essay explores three potential solutions the …
Error Aversions And Due Process, Brandon L. Garrett, Gregory Mitchell
Error Aversions And Due Process, Brandon L. Garrett, Gregory Mitchell
Faculty Scholarship
William Blackstone famously expressed the view that convicting the innocent constitutes a much more serious error than acquitting the guilty. This view is the cornerstone of due process protections for those accused of crimes, giving rise to the presumption of innocence and the high burden of proof required for criminal convictions. While most legal elites share Blackstone’s view, the citizen-jurors tasked with making due process protections a reality do not share the law’s preference for false acquittals over false convictions.
Across multiple national surveys, sampling more than 10,000 people, we find that a majority of Americans views false acquittals and …
Making Red Lives Matter: Public Choice Theory And Indian Country Crime, Adam Crepelle
Making Red Lives Matter: Public Choice Theory And Indian Country Crime, Adam Crepelle
Faculty Publications & Other Works
American Indians are victims of violence at higher rates than members of any other racial group. Nevertheless, Indian victims receive little media attention. Aside from the prevalence of violence against Indians, the violence is unique because of the rules governing Indian country law enforcement. Tribes, absent compliance with federally mandated procedural safeguards, cannot prosecute non-Indian criminals. While state or federal law enforcement have jurisdiction over reservation crimes involving non-Indian perpetrators, they often fail to respond. Hence, non-Indians know they can target Indians with little fear of reprisal. This Article argues the rules governing Indian country crimes were not designed to …
The Presumption Of Wealthiness: How The Current Bail System In Minnesota Is Problematically Classist, Myranda Sandberg
The Presumption Of Wealthiness: How The Current Bail System In Minnesota Is Problematically Classist, Myranda Sandberg
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sex Offenders And Internet Speech: First Amendment Protections For America's Most Reviled Outcasts, Gabriel Aderhold
Sex Offenders And Internet Speech: First Amendment Protections For America's Most Reviled Outcasts, Gabriel Aderhold
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Minnesota Statutes Section 243.166 Subdivision 1(B) Has Got To Go: Why Requiring Predatory Offender Registration Based On A Charge As Opposed To A Conviction Violates Procedural Due Process, Alison Baker Faul
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Taking The Knee No More: Police Accountability And The Structure Of Racism, David Dante Troutt
Taking The Knee No More: Police Accountability And The Structure Of Racism, David Dante Troutt
Washington and Lee Law Review
From before the birth of the republic to the present day, police brutality has represented a signature injustice of state authority, especially against African Americans. Defining that injustice is the lack of accountability for official misconduct. The rule of law has systematically failed to deter lawbreaking by its law enforcement departments. This Article explores the various legal and institutional means by which accountability should be imposed and demonstrates the design elements of structured immunity. Using Critical Race Theory and traditional civil rights law notions of how structural racism operates, this Article argues that transformative change can only come about through …
The Prosecutor Lobby, Carissa Byrne Hessick, Ronald F. Wright, Jessica Pishko
The Prosecutor Lobby, Carissa Byrne Hessick, Ronald F. Wright, Jessica Pishko
Washington and Lee Law Review
Prosecutors shape the use of the criminal law at many points during criminal proceedings but there is an earlier point in the process where prosecutors have influence: during the legislative process. The conventional wisdom in legal scholarship is that prosecutors are powerful and successful lobbyists who routinely support laws that make the criminal law more punitive and oppose criminal justice reform. In this Article, we test that narrative with an empirical assessment of prosecutor lobbying in America. Using an original dataset of four years of legislative activity from all fifty states, we analyze how frequently prosecutors lobbied, the issues on …
Sentencing In An Era Of Plea Bargains, Jeffrey Bellin, Jenia I. Turner
Sentencing In An Era Of Plea Bargains, Jeffrey Bellin, Jenia I. Turner
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
The literature offers inconsistent answers to a question that is foundational to criminal law: Who imposes sentences? Traditional narratives place sentencing responsibility in the hands of the judge. Yet, in a country where 95 percent of criminal convictions come from guilty pleas (not trials), modern American scholars center prosecutors – who control plea terms – as the decider of punishment. This Article highlights and seeks to resolve the tension between these conflicting narratives by charting the pathways by which sentences are determined in a system dominated by plea bargains.
After reviewing the empirical literature on sentence variation, state and federal …
The Way Forward: A Review Of Virginia's 2023 Regular General Assembly Session, Benjamin Raab, Mariam Rasooli
The Way Forward: A Review Of Virginia's 2023 Regular General Assembly Session, Benjamin Raab, Mariam Rasooli
Law Student Publications
The 2023 General Assembly Session can best be defined by the success of bipartisanship. In an era of heightened polarization, Virginia legislators were able to meet across the aisle on a number of relevant issues. This article will provide a summary of key bills that were passed during the 2023 Regular and Special Sessions. The other articles within this issue touch upon the following topics: the Virginia Commission on School Construction and Modernization, family law, and the opioid and addiction crises. This article summarizes legislation passed with bipartisan support in the areas of: drugs, mental healthcare, labor and commerce, public …
Alone In The Lone Star State: How A Lack Of Centralized Public Defender Offices Fails Rural Indigent Defendants, Aiden Park
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The criminal justice system is stacked against indigent defendants. The disadvantages indigent defendants face are exacerbated when mixed with the unique qualities of rural America.
For instance, rural court-assigned attorneys are often picked through ad hoc systems by the very judges these attorneys must appear in front of, creating a judicial conflict of interest. The financial realities of rural public defense work often force counsel to manage a private practice while also balancing court-appointed cases. To the extent integral resources like investigators or experts are present in rural spaces, they are seldom used. This Note highlights the way Texas organizes …
The Geography Of Unfreedom, Ann M. Eisenberg
The Geography Of Unfreedom, Ann M. Eisenberg
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Coal, Cages, Crisis: The Rise of the Prison Economy in Central Appalachia. By Judah Schept.
The Great Effacement: New Zealand's Silencing On The 2019 Mosque Shooter, J.C. Oleson
The Great Effacement: New Zealand's Silencing On The 2019 Mosque Shooter, J.C. Oleson
University of San Francisco Law Review
No abstract provided.
Improving New York City's Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate For Public Sector Workers: A Collaborative Framework For Labor-Management Relations In High Impact Circumstances, Chelsea Hill
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
No abstract provided.
Exigencies, Not Exceptions: How To Return Warrant Exceptions To Their Roots, Michael Gentithes
Exigencies, Not Exceptions: How To Return Warrant Exceptions To Their Roots, Michael Gentithes
Akron Law Faculty Publications
When a police officer interacts with an individual, the encounter is subject to myriad exceptions to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement that lack a coherent justifying theory. For instance, officers can warrantlessly search if an automobile was involved in the interaction, an arrest occurred, or a protective sweep was necessary to prevent a third- party ambush. Officers and indi viduals struggle to understand the breadth and complexity of these exceptions. The resulting confusion breeds widespread distrust and raises the tension in millions of interactions across the country. There is an easier way. The Supreme Court has recently reaffirmed its support …
“Progressive” Prosecutors And “Proper” Punishments, Benjamin Levin
“Progressive” Prosecutors And “Proper” Punishments, Benjamin Levin
Scholarship@WashULaw
After decades of relative inattention to prosecutorial elections, academics and activists recently have focused on “progressive prosecutors” as a promising avenue for criminal justice reform. That said, the growing literature on progressive prosecutors reflects little clarity about what makes a prosecutor “progressive.” Recent campaigns suggest disparate visions of how to operationalize “progressive prosecution.” In this chapter, I describe four ideal types of progressive prosecutor: (1) the progressive who prosecutes, (2) the proceduralist prosecutor, (3) the prosecutorial progressive, and (4) the anti-carceral prosecutor. Looking to sentencing policy as a case study, I examine how these different ideal types illustrate different visions …
Prosecuting The Crisis, Benjamin Levin
Prosecuting The Crisis, Benjamin Levin
Scholarship@WashULaw
Over the past decade, activists and academics have celebrated the rise of the so-called “progressive prosecutor” movement. District attorney candidates—often former public defenders or civil rights lawyers—have promised to use prosecutorial discretion to address the injustices of the criminal system. A proliferation of such campaigns, and the electoral successes of some of these candidates have raised questions about progressive prosecution: what does it actually mean to be a progressive prosecutor? Does progressive prosecution work? Do progressive candidates follow through on campaign promises? And, how enthusiastic should defense attorneys, reformers, and critics of the carceral state be about progressive prosecution? The …
Punishment Externalities And The Prison Tax, Sheldon Evans
Punishment Externalities And The Prison Tax, Sheldon Evans
Scholarship@WashULaw
Punishment as a social institution has failed to live up to the quixotic ideals of theory and has descended into the practice of mass incarceration, which is one of the defining failures of this generation. Scholars have traditionally studied punishment and incarceration as parts of a social transaction between the criminal offender, whose crime imposes a cost to society, and the state that ensures the offender repays this debt by correcting past harms and preventing future offenses. But if crime has a cost that must be repaid by the offender, punishment also has a cost that must be repaid by …
Making Justice Available For Victims Of Sexual Misconduct Within The Prison System, Emma L. Bruder
Making Justice Available For Victims Of Sexual Misconduct Within The Prison System, Emma L. Bruder
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The note advocates for amending the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) to include a private cause of action, enabling survivors of sexual misconduct in confinement to seek judicial remedies. This amendment would enforce their Eighth Amendment rights and address the limitations imposed by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), which hinders access to justice for incarcerated individuals.
The Death Of The Legal Subject, Katrina Geddes
The Death Of The Legal Subject, Katrina Geddes
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The law is often engaged in prediction. In the calculation of tort damages, for example, a judge will consider what the tort victim’s likely future earnings would have been, but for their particular injury. Similarly, when considering injunctive relief, a judge will assess whether the plaintiff is likely to suffer irreparable harm if a preliminary injunction is not granted. And for the purposes of a child custody evaluation, a judge will consider which parent will provide an environment that is in the best interests of the child.
Relative to other areas of law, criminal law is oversaturated with prediction. Almost …