Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1409)
- Universitas Indonesia (872)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (718)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (654)
- University of Richmond (507)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (484)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (480)
- Seattle University School of Law (349)
- University of Colorado Law School (342)
- Pepperdine University (301)
- Notre Dame Law School (286)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (265)
- William & Mary Law School (256)
- UIC School of Law (251)
- University of Georgia School of Law (230)
- Duke Law (215)
- American University Washington College of Law (208)
- Brigham Young University Law School (197)
- Georgetown University Law Center (184)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (173)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (170)
- Fordham Law School (148)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (140)
- Cleveland State University (135)
- New York Law School (134)
- University of Washington School of Law (120)
- West Virginia University (119)
- St. Mary's University (116)
- University of Maine School of Law (113)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (112)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (840)
- Supreme Court (689)
- United States Supreme Court (446)
- Federal courts (416)
- Constitution (381)
-
- Judges (358)
- Judicial review (279)
- Jurisdiction (262)
- Federal (259)
- Constitutional law (255)
- State courts (243)
- New York (220)
- Congress (205)
- Constitutional Law (191)
- Due process (185)
- Jurisprudence (164)
- State (154)
- Federal Courts (153)
- Separation of powers (150)
- United States (150)
- Federalism (147)
- First Amendment (145)
- Evidence (142)
- Litigation (139)
- Sixth Amendment (135)
- Discrimination (134)
- Juries (128)
- Statutory interpretation (128)
- Law reform (123)
- Law (122)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (737)
- Michigan Law Review (705)
- Tennessee Law Review (651)
- Faculty Scholarship (582)
- Indiana Law Journal (453)
-
- Touro Law Review (453)
- Articles (425)
- Faculty Publications (337)
- University of Richmond Law Review (302)
- Seattle University Law Review (282)
- Pepperdine Law Review (231)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (223)
- Cardozo Law Review (206)
- UIC Law Review (204)
- Law Faculty Publications (186)
- Journal Articles (154)
- Faculty Articles (149)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (145)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (142)
- Scholarly Works (135)
- BYU Law Review (134)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Publications (121)
- Court Briefs (119)
- West Virginia Law Review (115)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (113)
- Maine Law Review (106)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (104)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (100)
- American University Law Review (99)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 11881 - 11910 of 12608
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Procedure In Contesting Life Insurance Policies, Aubrey F. Folts
Procedure In Contesting Life Insurance Policies, Aubrey F. Folts
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regulation Of Procedure By Rules Of Court, William H. Wicker, Emily E. Anderson
Regulation Of Procedure By Rules Of Court, William H. Wicker, Emily E. Anderson
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Courts - Substance And Procedure - Effect Of Erie Railroad V. Tompkins And Rule 8 (C) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure Upon Burden Of Proof Of Contributory Negligence, John H. Uhl
Michigan Law Review
The case of Erie Railroad v. Tompkins has wrought a great change in the relationship between the state and federal courts. Prior to its decision, the federal courts under the rule of Swift v. Tyson did not have to apply the state non-statutory law. They could apply their own notions as to what the law was in matters of general law relating to substance. The Conformity Act compelled the federal courts to follow the practice, pleading, and forms and modes of proceeding in like causes in the courts of the state within which the federal district courts were held. In …
Constitutional Law - Power Of Legislative Investigating Committee To Supersede Grand Jury, D. M. Swope
Constitutional Law - Power Of Legislative Investigating Committee To Supersede Grand Jury, D. M. Swope
Michigan Law Review
The court of quarter sessions of Dauphin County ordered a grand jury investigation of alleged criminal misconduct by civil officers of the commonwealth. The governor then issued a call for a special session of the legislature. When this body had convened, seven members of the House of Representatives were appointed a committee to investigate the charges against those civil officers liable to impeachment. This committee sought a writ of prohibition to restrain the quarter sessions court from proceeding with the grand jury investigation, in pursuance of a statute enacted at the special session of the legislature giving the legislative investigating …
Administrative Law - Labor Law - Federal Courts - Equity - Propriety Of Interrogatories Directed To The Members Of The National Labor Relations Board, Michigan Law Review
Administrative Law - Labor Law - Federal Courts - Equity - Propriety Of Interrogatories Directed To The Members Of The National Labor Relations Board, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The National Labor Relations Board brought a proceeding under section 10 of the National Labor Relations Act for the enforcement of an order to cease certain unfair labor practices, its petition stating that the board had considered the case before it and upon all the testimony and evidence made its findings of fact and issued its order. The answer alleged that the board did not consider the evidence but referred it to others for suggested findings of fact, and that with no opportunity to respondent to know of or criticize the suggestions they were adopted by the board without further …
Advantages Of Getting Out Of The Record, Thomas H. Malone
Advantages Of Getting Out Of The Record, Thomas H. Malone
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Special Legislation Removing Disabilities Of Infancy, Edward R. Finch
Special Legislation Removing Disabilities Of Infancy, Edward R. Finch
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bank Deposits For Fiduciaries, E. C. Stothart Jr.
Bank Deposits For Fiduciaries, E. C. Stothart Jr.
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Oil And Gasoline Inspection Tax, George C. Anderson
The Oil And Gasoline Inspection Tax, George C. Anderson
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lord Mansfield, Earl C. Arnold
Courts-Conflicting Jurisdiction Between State And Federal Courts
Courts-Conflicting Jurisdiction Between State And Federal Courts
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Changes Suggested In Washington Practice And Procedure: Comparative Analysis Of State Rules And Statutes With New Federal Rules Points To Desirable Amendments, George Donworth, Laurence B. Hamblen, Elwood Hutcheson, John S. Robinson
Changes Suggested In Washington Practice And Procedure: Comparative Analysis Of State Rules And Statutes With New Federal Rules Points To Desirable Amendments, George Donworth, Laurence B. Hamblen, Elwood Hutcheson, John S. Robinson
Washington Law Review
In accordance with action taken at the July Convention of the Washington State Bar Association, the Board of Governors appointed a committee (Paul P. Ashley of Seattle, chairman) on Judicial Administration to concern itself with the matters considered and reported upon by the section on Judicial Administration of the American Bar Association. This committee divided itself into sections, and to each was assigned one of the subjects under consideration, including Pre-trial Procedure, Improvement in the Law of Evidence, Trial Practice and Administrative Agencies and Tribunals. Among other things the American Bar Association recommended that the State Bar Associations undertake to …
International Law And Democracy, Wallace Mcclure
International Law And Democracy, Wallace Mcclure
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trials And New Trials Under The New Federal Rules, William H. Wicker
Trials And New Trials Under The New Federal Rules, William H. Wicker
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Friday Evening, October 28, 1939, Dinner And Evening Session
Friday Evening, October 28, 1939, Dinner And Evening Session
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pre-Trial Procedure, Edward R. Finch
Adaptation Of Program Of Procedural Reform To Tennessee Practice, Walter P. Armstrong
Adaptation Of Program Of Procedural Reform To Tennessee Practice, Walter P. Armstrong
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Speeding Up The Courts, Edward R. Finch
Symposium On The Movement For The Simplification Of Legal Procedure, Charles S. Coffey
Symposium On The Movement For The Simplification Of Legal Procedure, Charles S. Coffey
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fundamental Changes Effected By The New Federal Rules I, Charles E. Clark
Fundamental Changes Effected By The New Federal Rules I, Charles E. Clark
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law Versus Discretion In Government, Marvin B. Rosenberry
Law Versus Discretion In Government, Marvin B. Rosenberry
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Administrative Law - Requirements Of "Full Hearing", Collins E. Brooks
Administrative Law - Requirements Of "Full Hearing", Collins E. Brooks
Michigan Law Review
The late Professor Ernst Freund once wrote, "A judicial hearing involves two things: that the party be heard as to his own case and that he hear the case against him." Were the words "quasi-judicial" to be substituted for the word "judicial" in Dr. Freund's definition, it would be difficult more concisely to paraphrase the two decisions of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Morgan v. United States. Fifty suits, later consolidated for purposes of trial, were started by certain market agencies of the Kansas City Stockyards to enjoin the enforcement of an order of the …