Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (292)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (162)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (107)
- University of Richmond (102)
- Seattle University School of Law (85)
-
- Pepperdine University (65)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (61)
- William & Mary Law School (59)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (58)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (52)
- UIC School of Law (50)
- University of Georgia School of Law (44)
- American University Washington College of Law (40)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (40)
- Georgetown University Law Center (38)
- Brigham Young University Law School (37)
- Fordham Law School (36)
- St. Mary's University (33)
- New York Law School (32)
- University of Maine School of Law (32)
- Notre Dame Law School (29)
- Pace University (29)
- Cleveland State University (27)
- Duke Law (26)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (26)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (26)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (25)
- Columbia Law School (24)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (24)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (24)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (174)
- Sixth Amendment (88)
- Judges (87)
- Supreme Court (84)
- United States Supreme Court (81)
-
- Criminal justice (75)
- Federal courts (75)
- Juries (69)
- Sentencing (62)
- Criminal law (60)
- State courts (55)
- Trials (49)
- Police (46)
- International Criminal Court (45)
- Jury (44)
- Constitution (43)
- Law reform (43)
- Due process (41)
- Evidence (41)
- Criminal procedure (40)
- Justice (39)
- Habeas corpus (38)
- Capital punishment (37)
- Constitutional law (36)
- Court (36)
- Lawyers (35)
- Congress (34)
- Jurisprudence (34)
- Discrimination (33)
- Jurisdiction (31)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (112)
- Indiana Law Journal (110)
- Articles (108)
- Michigan Law Review (102)
- Faculty Publications (79)
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (64)
- Tennessee Law Review (58)
- Pepperdine Law Review (55)
- Seattle University Law Review (54)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (50)
- Faculty Articles (45)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (42)
- UIC Law Review (40)
- Touro Law Review (37)
- BYU Law Review (33)
- Scholarly Works (32)
- Maine Law Review (30)
- Cardozo Law Review (29)
- All Faculty Scholarship (26)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (26)
- Law Faculty Publications (26)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (26)
- Scholarly Articles (26)
- Journal Articles (22)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (21)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (21)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (19)
- West Virginia Law Review (19)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (18)
- Cleveland State Law Review (18)
- Publication Type
Articles 2161 - 2190 of 2535
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
South Carolina's Largest Slave Auctioneering Firm, Thomas D. Russell
South Carolina's Largest Slave Auctioneering Firm, Thomas D. Russell
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
This article presents the original finding that South Carolina's legal system conducted a majority of the state's slave auctions during the antebellum years.Courts conducted slave auctions in several circumstances. Sheriffs sold the property of debtors; and courts also conducted or supervised sales in order to divide estates. Drawing upon extensive empirical analysis of primary sources in various South Carolina archives, this article compares the total number of slaves sold at court-ordered or court-supervised sales with the best empirical estimates for private slave sales - whether at auction or not. The conclusion is that the courts acted as the state's greatest …
Federal Court Reform Should Start At The Top, Roger J. Miner '56
Federal Court Reform Should Start At The Top, Roger J. Miner '56
Endowed/named Lectures and Keynote Addresses
No abstract provided.
Chase Court And Fundamental Rights: A Watershed In American Constitutionalism, The , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Chase Court And Fundamental Rights: A Watershed In American Constitutionalism, The , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
Three weeks before he died in May 1873, the frail and ailing Salmon P. Chase joined three of his brethren in dissent in one of the most important cases ever decided by the United States Supreme Court, the Slaughter-House Cases.1 This decision was a watershed in United States constitutional history for several reasons. Doctrinally, it represented a rejection of the virtually unanimous decisions of the lower federal courts upholding the constitutionality of revolutionary federal civil rights laws enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War. Institutionally, it was an example of extraordinary judicial activism in overriding the legislative will of …
The Death Penalty: A Solution To The Problem Of Intentional Aids Transmission Through Rape, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 941 (1993), Stefanie S. Wepner
The Death Penalty: A Solution To The Problem Of Intentional Aids Transmission Through Rape, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 941 (1993), Stefanie S. Wepner
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Race Factor And Trial By Jury, Kenneth Conboy
The Race Factor And Trial By Jury, Kenneth Conboy
Fordham Urban Law Journal
The institution of trial by jury in criminal cases, one of the great achievements in the history of civilization and a principal foundation of our federal constitutional order, is to day under challenge by two different by interrelated developments in American courtrooms. The first is the development of a broad national imperative to eliminate all aspects of racism in American legal, political, and social life. The second is the heightened scrutiny that electronic media presence is applying to the jury system. This essay explores the utility and fairness of the American trial jury and its premise as a democratic and …
The Urban Criinal Justice System & The Juror's Perception, David Lewis
The Urban Criinal Justice System & The Juror's Perception, David Lewis
Fordham Urban Law Journal
The criminal justice system is anchored in its belief that twelve citizens are capable of working together to sift through the most difficult and complicated information without any preconception or bias to arrive at a "just" result. In this essay, the author explores the diverse perceptions the various actors in a courtroom (prosecutor, defense lawyer, police officer, jurors) and discusses how these views form an integral part of the courtroom dynamic.
State Responses To Task Force Reports On Race And Ethnic Bias In The Courts, Suellyn Scarnecchia
State Responses To Task Force Reports On Race And Ethnic Bias In The Courts, Suellyn Scarnecchia
Articles
While several states have embarked on studies of race and ethnic bias in their courts, Minnesota is only the sixth to publish its report to date. As Minnesota joins the ranks of states with published reports, it is worthwhile to assess the impact of the five earlier published reports from other states. Final reports have been published in Michigan (1989), Washington (1990), New York (1991), Florida (1991) and New Jersey (1992). The published reports make findings and provide several specific recommendations for change. This article will review the published findings and recommendations of the task forces and will discuss the …
Cornerstones Of The Judicial Process, Jerold H. Israel
Cornerstones Of The Judicial Process, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
Under our federated system of government, each state and the federal government have their own criminal justice processes. The federal system must comply with the constitutional prerequisites set forth in the Bill of Rights, and the state systems must comply with those Bill of Rights' provisions made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment,1 but those constitutional prerequisites allow considerable room for variation from one jurisdiction to another. In many respects, the fifty states and the federal government have used that leeway to produce considerable diversity in their respective criminal justice processes. At the same time, however, one can …
The Gender Gap On The Montana State Bench, Carl W. Tobias
The Gender Gap On The Montana State Bench, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Governor Racicot should expeditiously and forcefully act to remedy the gender gap on the state courts for many reasons. First, there is a significant, highly qualified, pool of female attorneys in Montana who could render excellent judicial service. Numerous women have participated in the types of rigorous legal practices which would prepare them well for the bench. These female lawyers are intelligent, industrious, and independent, while they have exhibited the kind of impeccable integrity and appropriately measured judicial temperament to be fine judges. Some of the attorneys have engaged in challenging public law practices, others have been involved in rigorous …
Journeying Through The Valley Of Evil., Douglas O. Linder
Journeying Through The Valley Of Evil., Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Why Civil Protection Orders Are Effective Remedies For Domestic Violence But Mutual Protective Orders Are Not, Elizabeth Topliffe
Why Civil Protection Orders Are Effective Remedies For Domestic Violence But Mutual Protective Orders Are Not, Elizabeth Topliffe
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?, Ian Holloway
The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?, Ian Holloway
Dalhousie Law Journal
Coming as it does in the midst of all the palaver over political correctness within the American academic community, The Hollow Hope is, if nothing else, an opportune articulation of iconoclasm in the debate over civil rights and constitutional law in the United States.' Professor Rosenberg's questioning of the "cult of the court" provides a welcome expression of healthy skepticism towards an institution which conventional myth reveres beyond its due.
Hypnotic Memories And Civil Sexual Abuse Trials, Jacqueline Kanovitz
Hypnotic Memories And Civil Sexual Abuse Trials, Jacqueline Kanovitz
Vanderbilt Law Review
In the next few paragraphs, the reader will eavesdrop on a psycho- therapy session. During this session, the therapist uses hypnosis, a common technique in clinical practice today. In the past, the legal system has paid little attention to the memory retrieval techniques used in psychotherapy because statutes of limitations have prevented patients from using memories of childhood wrongs uncovered in adult psycho-therapies to bring suit. However, recent changes will force the legal system to examine whether the memory restoring techniques used in psychotherapy can produce memory that is trustworthy enough for the legal system to accept. What follows is …
Beyond Maryland V. Craig: Can And Should Adult Rape Victims Be Permitted To Testify By Closed-Circuit Television?, Lisa Hamilton Thielmeyer
Beyond Maryland V. Craig: Can And Should Adult Rape Victims Be Permitted To Testify By Closed-Circuit Television?, Lisa Hamilton Thielmeyer
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Retributive Theory Of "Just Deserts" And Victim Participation In Plea Bargaining, David A. Starkweather
The Retributive Theory Of "Just Deserts" And Victim Participation In Plea Bargaining, David A. Starkweather
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Choosing Between Normative And Descriptive Versions Of The Judicial Role, Michael E. Herz
Choosing Between Normative And Descriptive Versions Of The Judicial Role, Michael E. Herz
Articles
No abstract provided.
Review Of Judicial Decision-Making In The People's Republic Of China: An Overview Of Unique Developments, Mark Findlay
Review Of Judicial Decision-Making In The People's Republic Of China: An Overview Of Unique Developments, Mark Findlay
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
While the constitutional injunction to independence is general, specific legislative provisions do not directly preclude the overall governance of the Party. In fact, the initial articles of the 1982 Constitution celebrate the 'dignity of the socialist legal system' (Article 5), and as the preamble confirms, the construction and maintenance of Chinese socialism remains under the leadership of the Communist Party of China. Therefore it might be argued that the protection of judicial power from the 'interference by administrative organs, public organisations or individuals' (Article 126) does not envisage the intervention of the Party.
Do Courts Matter?, Stephen L. Carter
Do Courts Matter?, Stephen L. Carter
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Hollow Hope: Ca Courts Bring About Social Change? by Gerald N. Rosenberg
Judicial Federalism: Current Trends And Long-Term Prospects, Stanley H. Friedelbaum
Judicial Federalism: Current Trends And Long-Term Prospects, Stanley H. Friedelbaum
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction To The Report And Recommendations Of The Florida Supreme Court Racial And Ethnic Bias Study Commission, Leander J. Shaw, Jr.
Introduction To The Report And Recommendations Of The Florida Supreme Court Racial And Ethnic Bias Study Commission, Leander J. Shaw, Jr.
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reforming Florida's Juvenile Justice System: A Case Example Of Bobby M. V. Chiles, Jodi Siegel
Reforming Florida's Juvenile Justice System: A Case Example Of Bobby M. V. Chiles, Jodi Siegel
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Report And Recommendations Of The Florida Supreme Court Racial And Ethnic Bias Commission, Florida Supreme Court Racial And Ethnnic Bias Study Commission
Report And Recommendations Of The Florida Supreme Court Racial And Ethnic Bias Commission, Florida Supreme Court Racial And Ethnnic Bias Study Commission
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Addendum To The Report And Recommendations Of The Florida Supreme Court Racial And Ethnic Bias Study Commission, Florida Supreme Court Racial And Ethnnic Bias Study Commission
Addendum To The Report And Recommendations Of The Florida Supreme Court Racial And Ethnic Bias Study Commission, Florida Supreme Court Racial And Ethnnic Bias Study Commission
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Forfeiture Of Property For Drug Offenders Under Illinois And Federal Statute: Zero Tolerance, Zero Exceptions, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 389 (1992), T. J. Hiles
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Preserving The Past, Roger J. Miner '56
Conservative Supreme Court: Its Impact On Traditional Values, Donald E. Wildman, Benjamin W. Bull
Conservative Supreme Court: Its Impact On Traditional Values, Donald E. Wildman, Benjamin W. Bull
University of Richmond Law Review
Most court watchers agree that the changing composition of the Supreme Court will ineluctably favor the interests of traditional values organizations like the American Family Association. The next decade will surely see the Court return to a more balanced approach in line with the preservation of family values. Certainly some will characterize the new Court as more conservative. To the extent that it will emphasize core principles in the Constitution as the bedrock from which it must proceed, it will be conservative. Yet this is simply a return of the Court to its intended function: interpretation and application of law …
Judicial Lobbying And Court Reform: U.S. Magistrate Judges And The Judicial Improvements Act Of 1990, Christopher E. Smith
Judicial Lobbying And Court Reform: U.S. Magistrate Judges And The Judicial Improvements Act Of 1990, Christopher E. Smith
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Starting From Scratch: Rethinking Federal Habeas Review Of Death Penalty Cases, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Starting From Scratch: Rethinking Federal Habeas Review Of Death Penalty Cases, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Up In Smoke: Fourth Amendment Rights And The Burger Court, Gerald S. Reamey
Up In Smoke: Fourth Amendment Rights And The Burger Court, Gerald S. Reamey
Faculty Articles
When Warren Burger was appointed Chief Justice in 1969, he was expected to lead the Supreme Court away from its liberal, value-laden approach to constitutional adjudication. Indeed, a retrospective of the court’s work during the seventeen years Warren Burger served as Chief Justice reveals the expected conservative trend of the Chief Justice himself, as well as the Supreme Court generally. It does not, however, reflect wholesale rejection of the most controversial civil liberties decisions rendered by the Warren Court. It is also unclear that Chief Justice Burger was responsible for the Court’s retrenchment on civil liberties where it did occur. …