Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (292)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (162)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (107)
- University of Richmond (102)
- Seattle University School of Law (85)
-
- Pepperdine University (65)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (61)
- William & Mary Law School (59)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (58)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (52)
- UIC School of Law (50)
- University of Georgia School of Law (44)
- American University Washington College of Law (40)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (40)
- Georgetown University Law Center (38)
- Brigham Young University Law School (37)
- Fordham Law School (36)
- St. Mary's University (33)
- New York Law School (32)
- University of Maine School of Law (32)
- Notre Dame Law School (31)
- Pace University (29)
- Cleveland State University (27)
- Duke Law (26)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (26)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (26)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (25)
- Columbia Law School (24)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (24)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (24)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (171)
- Sixth Amendment (88)
- Judges (87)
- Supreme Court (84)
- United States Supreme Court (81)
-
- Criminal justice (75)
- Federal courts (75)
- Juries (69)
- Sentencing (62)
- Criminal law (60)
- State courts (55)
- Trials (49)
- Police (46)
- International Criminal Court (44)
- Jury (44)
- Constitution (43)
- Law reform (43)
- Due process (41)
- Evidence (41)
- Criminal procedure (40)
- Justice (39)
- Habeas corpus (38)
- Capital punishment (37)
- Constitutional law (36)
- Court (36)
- Lawyers (35)
- Congress (34)
- Jurisprudence (34)
- Discrimination (33)
- Jurisdiction (31)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (112)
- Indiana Law Journal (110)
- Articles (108)
- Michigan Law Review (102)
- Faculty Publications (79)
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (64)
- Tennessee Law Review (58)
- Pepperdine Law Review (55)
- Seattle University Law Review (54)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (50)
- Faculty Articles (45)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (42)
- UIC Law Review (40)
- Touro Law Review (37)
- BYU Law Review (33)
- Scholarly Works (32)
- Maine Law Review (30)
- Cardozo Law Review (29)
- All Faculty Scholarship (26)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (26)
- Law Faculty Publications (26)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (26)
- Scholarly Articles (26)
- Journal Articles (22)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (21)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (21)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (19)
- West Virginia Law Review (19)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (18)
- Cleveland State Law Review (18)
- Publication Type
Articles 1501 - 1530 of 2537
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Addict First, Criminal Second – Addiction Fueled Crimes Should Be Ineligible For The Three-Strikes Penalty, Scott Lindquist
Addict First, Criminal Second – Addiction Fueled Crimes Should Be Ineligible For The Three-Strikes Penalty, Scott Lindquist
Barry Law Review
The author of this article argues that drug addicts who finance their addiction through crime should be ineligible to receive a prison sentence under a recidivist statute like the three-strikes penalty. Part I introduces the problem, addiction and crime among current prisoners reported by the Department of Justice. Part II discusses Gary Ewing, an addict, a criminal, and a third strike offender. The story of Gary Ewing represents the injustices levied upon an addict/criminal by enhanced sentenced statutes like the three-strikes penalty. Part III is a discussion of the history of repeat offender statutes, primarily focusing on the inception of …
The 'Show' In The 'Show Trial': Contextualizing The Politicization Of The Courtroom, Awol K. Allo
The 'Show' In The 'Show Trial': Contextualizing The Politicization Of The Courtroom, Awol K. Allo
Barry Law Review
Questioning the indifference of the law to its own normative correctness and its claim to legitimacy, this article explores the epistemological and ontological foundations upon which the concept and lexicon of show trial is predicated. By invoking the theory of performativity, the article distinguishes between the different models of show trials to allow for a more complex and nuanced reading of the particular nature of the show in judicial practices often called ‘show trials.’ By emphasizing the peculiarity of the ‘show’ in each ‘show trial’, the article seeks to reconceptualize the ambit of the criminal trial. Arguing against the emphasis …
“Death Is Different” No Longer: Graham V. Florida And The Future Of Eighth Amendment Challenges To Noncapital Sentences., Barry Sullivan
“Death Is Different” No Longer: Graham V. Florida And The Future Of Eighth Amendment Challenges To Noncapital Sentences., Barry Sullivan
Faculty Publications & Other Works
No abstract provided.
Reform In California's Immigration Enforcement And Immigration Court, Nelson E. Gil
Reform In California's Immigration Enforcement And Immigration Court, Nelson E. Gil
CMC Senior Theses
According to the Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistic, California accounts for approximately 2,600,000 illegal immigrants in 2009. This number represents about 25 percent of the entire estimated illegal immigrant population in the United States, which is roughly 10.8 million. Between 2003 and 2008, the U.S. government removed 1,446,338 noncitizens from the United States. This rise in deportation is a result o the changes that have been enacted by the federal government over the years that transformed the nature of immigration enforcement. This thesis explores the California Immigration Enforcement system from the programs established to apprehend illegal aliens …
Jamming The Revolving Door: Legislative Setbacks For Mental Health Court Systems In Virginia, Sheila Moheb
Jamming The Revolving Door: Legislative Setbacks For Mental Health Court Systems In Virginia, Sheila Moheb
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
Proponents of MHCs assert that alternative court systems will provide efficient jail diversion programs and reduce the number of individuals with mental illness in the criminal justice system by directing them to appropriate community treatment facilities. At the same time, MHCs must serve as only one branch of a larger, cohesive community effort to deter individuals with mental illness from incarceration, if not from conviction. Both advocates and adversaries of MHCs remain wary of the potential misuse of mental health courts, which may subject people with mental illness to greater criminalization or lead to greater fragmentation of the mental health …
Decriminalizing Students With Disabilities, Dean Hill Rivkin
Decriminalizing Students With Disabilities, Dean Hill Rivkin
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Early Release Programs In Illinois: Justifiable Or Objectionable?, Bill Schramm
Early Release Programs In Illinois: Justifiable Or Objectionable?, Bill Schramm
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Jamming The Revolving Door: Legislative Setbacks For Mental Health Court Systems In Virginia, Sheila Moheb
Jamming The Revolving Door: Legislative Setbacks For Mental Health Court Systems In Virginia, Sheila Moheb
Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest
Proponents of MHCs assert that alternative court systems will provide efficient jail diversion programs and reduce the number of individuals with mental illness in the criminal justice system by directing them to appropriate community treatment facilities. At the same time, MHCs must serve as only one branch of a larger, cohesive community effort to deter individuals with mental illness from incarceration, if not from conviction. Both advocates and adversaries of MHCs remain wary of the potential misuse of mental health courts, which may subject people with mental illness to greater criminalization or lead to greater fragmentation of the mental health …
Prevention And Complementarity In The International Criminal Court: A Positive Approach, Katharine A. Marshall
Prevention And Complementarity In The International Criminal Court: A Positive Approach, Katharine A. Marshall
Human Rights Brief
No abstract provided.
The “Tomahawk” And The “Healing Balm:” Drug Treatment Courts In Theory And Practice, Richard C. Boldt
The “Tomahawk” And The “Healing Balm:” Drug Treatment Courts In Theory And Practice, Richard C. Boldt
University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class
No abstract provided.
Taking A Stand In A Not-So-Perfect World: What’S A Critical Supporter Of Problem-Solving Courts To Do?, Corey Shdaimah
Taking A Stand In A Not-So-Perfect World: What’S A Critical Supporter Of Problem-Solving Courts To Do?, Corey Shdaimah
University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class
No abstract provided.
Community Voice And Justice: An Essay On Problem-Solving Courts As A Proxy For Change, Brenda Bratton Blom, Julie Galbo-Moyes, Robin Jacobs
Community Voice And Justice: An Essay On Problem-Solving Courts As A Proxy For Change, Brenda Bratton Blom, Julie Galbo-Moyes, Robin Jacobs
University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class
No abstract provided.
Framing Justice: Media, Bias, And Legal Decisionmaking, Perry L. Moriearty
Framing Justice: Media, Bias, And Legal Decisionmaking, Perry L. Moriearty
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Litigation Strategies For Dealing With The Indigent Defense Crisis, Eve Brensike Primus
Litigation Strategies For Dealing With The Indigent Defense Crisis, Eve Brensike Primus
Articles
The indigent defense delivery system in the United States is in a state of crisis. Public defenders routinely handle well over 1,000 cases a year, more than three times the number of cases that the American Bar Association says one attorney can handle effectively. As a result, many defendants sit in jail for months before even speaking to their court-appointed lawyers. And when defendants do meet their attorneys, they are often disappointed to learn that these lawyers are too overwhelmed to provide adequate representation. With public defenders or assigned counsel representing more than 80% of criminal defendants nationwide, the indigent …
Reply To Richard A. Leo And Jon B. Gould, Samuel R. Gross, Barbara O'Brien
Reply To Richard A. Leo And Jon B. Gould, Samuel R. Gross, Barbara O'Brien
Articles
The following is a letter to the Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law received from Professors Samuel Gross and Barbara O'Brien, responding to an article published in the Journal in Fall 2009 by Professors Richard Leo and Jon Gould. This letter is followed by a reply from Professors Leo and Gould. Professors Gross and O'Brien did not see the reply prior to the Journal going to press. As we have indicated before, we welcome letters to the Journal from readers on any topic covered in a prior issue. - Editors
Wired: What We've Learned About Courtroom Technology, Fredric I. Lederer
Wired: What We've Learned About Courtroom Technology, Fredric I. Lederer
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Sex Representation On The Bench: Legitimacy And International Criminal Courts, Nienke Grossman
Sex Representation On The Bench: Legitimacy And International Criminal Courts, Nienke Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
This essay examines the relationship between legitimacy and the presence of both male and female judges on international criminal court benches. It argues that sex representation – an approximate reflection of the ratio of the sexes in the general population – on the bench is an important contributor to legitimacy of international criminal courts. First, it proposes that sex representation affects normative legitimacy because men and women bring different perspectives to judging. Consequently, without both sexes, adjudication is inherently biased. Second, even if one rejects the proposition that men and women "think differently", sex representation affects sociological legitimacy because sex …
Wrongful Convictions In Singapore: A General Survey Of Risk Factors, Siyuan Chen, Eunice Chua
Wrongful Convictions In Singapore: A General Survey Of Risk Factors, Siyuan Chen, Eunice Chua
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
This article seeks to raise awareness about the potential for wrongful convictions in Singapore by analysing the factors commonly identified as contributing towards wrongful convictions in other jurisdictions, including institutional failures and suspect evidence. It also considers whether the social conditions in Singapore are favourable to discovering and publicising wrongful convictions. The authors come to the conclusion that Singapore does well on a number of fronts and no sweeping reforms are necessary However there are areas of risk viz the excessive focus on crime control rather than due process, which require some tweaking of the system.
A Foothold For Real Democracy In Eastern Europe, Elizabeth R. Sheyn
A Foothold For Real Democracy In Eastern Europe, Elizabeth R. Sheyn
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Ukraine has never had a criminal or civil jury trial despite the fact that the right to a criminal jury trial is guaranteed by Ukraine's Constitution. The lack of jury trials is one of the factors likely contributing to the corruption and deficiencies inherent in Ukraine's judicial system. This Article argues that Ukraine can and should make room for juries in its judicial system and proposes a framework for both criminal and civil jury trials. Although the use of juries will not remedy all of the problems plaguing Ukraine, it could bring the country closer to achieving a truly democratic …
A Conversation About Problem-Solving Courts: Take 2, Jane M. Spinak
A Conversation About Problem-Solving Courts: Take 2, Jane M. Spinak
Faculty Scholarship
The University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class symposium on problem-solving courts surfaced a wide array of issues on the meaning and practices of these courts. My prepared remarks at the symposium addressed the first issue discussed in this article: the potential disparate impact of problem-solving courts on minority families who are disproportionately affected by these court processes. The second part of the article draws on the discussion during the symposium to reflect on the difficulty supporters and critics of the problem-solving court movement have in talking and listening to each other.
When A Company Confesses, Christopher Jackson
When A Company Confesses, Christopher Jackson
Michigan Law Review
Under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a defendant is normally obligated to attend all of the proceedings against her. However Rule 43(b)(2) carves out an exception for organizational defendants, stating that they "need not be present" if represented by an attorney. But on its face, the language of 43(b)(2) is ambiguous: is it the defendant or the judge who has the discretion to decide whether the defendant appears? That is, may a judge compel the presence of an organizational defendant? This Note addresses the ambiguity in the context of the plea colloquy, considering the text of several of the …
Saving Civil Justice: Judging Civil Justice, Elizabeth G. Thornburg
Saving Civil Justice: Judging Civil Justice, Elizabeth G. Thornburg
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
Snyder V. Louisiana: Continuing The Historical Trend Towards Increased Scrutiny Of Peremptory Challenges, John P. Bringewatt
Snyder V. Louisiana: Continuing The Historical Trend Towards Increased Scrutiny Of Peremptory Challenges, John P. Bringewatt
Michigan Law Review
In March 2008, the Supreme Court decided Snyder v. Louisiana, the latest in the line of progeny of Batson v. Kentucky. This Note demonstrates that Snyder is part of a historical pattern of Supreme Court decisions concerning the use of peremptory challenges in which the Court has moved away from permitting the unfettered use of the peremptory challenge in favor of stronger Equal Protection considerations. Snyder alters the requirements for trial judges in deciding Batson challenges by requiring them to provide some explanation of their reasons for accepting a prosecutor's justification of a peremptory challenge. Snyder is the …
The Stigma Of Conviction: Coram Nobis, Civil Disabilities, And The Right To Clear One's Name, David Wolitz
The Stigma Of Conviction: Coram Nobis, Civil Disabilities, And The Right To Clear One's Name, David Wolitz
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Robert E. Shepherd, Jr.: Tending To His Flock To Improve Its Lot, John P. Cunningham
Professor Robert E. Shepherd, Jr.: Tending To His Flock To Improve Its Lot, John P. Cunningham
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Robert E. Shepherd, Jr. September 22, 1937 - December 11, 2008, Hon. Walter S. Felton Jr.
Professor Robert E. Shepherd, Jr. September 22, 1937 - December 11, 2008, Hon. Walter S. Felton Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Look Back And A Look Forward: Legislative And Regulatory Highlights For 2008 And 2009 And A Discussion Of Juvenile Transfer, Andrew K. Block
A Look Back And A Look Forward: Legislative And Regulatory Highlights For 2008 And 2009 And A Discussion Of Juvenile Transfer, Andrew K. Block
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Disclosure Of Juror Identities To The Press: Who Will Speak For The Jurors?, Kenneth J. Melilli
Disclosure Of Juror Identities To The Press: Who Will Speak For The Jurors?, Kenneth J. Melilli
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article argues that courts misapply the First Amendment right of access by disclosing juror identities, which can lead to harassment. It advocates for concealing juror information to protect them, similar to how soldiers are protected after service. The solution proposed is to respect jurors' preferences regarding disclosure.
"Knock And Talk" And The Fourth Amendment, Craig M. Bradley
"Knock And Talk" And The Fourth Amendment, Craig M. Bradley
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Retribution's Role, John Bronsteen
Retribution's Role, John Bronsteen
Indiana Law Journal
Two main types of principle, retributive and consequentialist, have long been identified as the main approaches to justifying criminal punishment. Retributivists deem punishment justified by the wrongdoing of the offender, whereas utilitarians deem it justified by its good consequences such as deterring future crime. Over the past fifty years, each has spent decades as the dominant theory, and many hybrid theories have also been advanced. But few, if any, of the hybrid approaches have valued heavily both retributive and consequentialist considerations while locating the particular justificatory role each category plays. This Article points in that direction by reframing the central …