Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (292)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (162)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (107)
- University of Richmond (102)
- Seattle University School of Law (85)
-
- Pepperdine University (65)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (61)
- William & Mary Law School (59)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (58)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (52)
- UIC School of Law (50)
- University of Georgia School of Law (44)
- American University Washington College of Law (40)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (40)
- Georgetown University Law Center (38)
- Brigham Young University Law School (37)
- Fordham Law School (36)
- St. Mary's University (33)
- New York Law School (32)
- University of Maine School of Law (32)
- Notre Dame Law School (31)
- Pace University (29)
- Cleveland State University (27)
- Duke Law (26)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (26)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (26)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (25)
- Columbia Law School (24)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (24)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (24)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (171)
- Sixth Amendment (88)
- Judges (87)
- Supreme Court (84)
- United States Supreme Court (81)
-
- Criminal justice (75)
- Federal courts (75)
- Juries (69)
- Sentencing (62)
- Criminal law (60)
- State courts (55)
- Trials (49)
- Police (46)
- International Criminal Court (44)
- Jury (44)
- Constitution (43)
- Law reform (43)
- Due process (41)
- Evidence (41)
- Criminal procedure (40)
- Justice (39)
- Habeas corpus (38)
- Capital punishment (37)
- Constitutional law (36)
- Court (36)
- Lawyers (35)
- Congress (34)
- Jurisprudence (34)
- Discrimination (33)
- Jurisdiction (31)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (112)
- Indiana Law Journal (110)
- Articles (108)
- Michigan Law Review (102)
- Faculty Publications (79)
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (64)
- Tennessee Law Review (58)
- Pepperdine Law Review (55)
- Seattle University Law Review (54)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (50)
- Faculty Articles (45)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (42)
- UIC Law Review (40)
- Touro Law Review (37)
- BYU Law Review (33)
- Scholarly Works (32)
- Maine Law Review (30)
- Cardozo Law Review (29)
- All Faculty Scholarship (26)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (26)
- Law Faculty Publications (26)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (26)
- Scholarly Articles (26)
- Journal Articles (22)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (21)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (21)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (19)
- West Virginia Law Review (19)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (18)
- Cleveland State Law Review (18)
- Publication Type
Articles 1231 - 1260 of 2537
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Take My Child, Please - A Plea For Radical Nonintervention, William M. Marticorena
Take My Child, Please - A Plea For Radical Nonintervention, William M. Marticorena
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The California Youth Authority: Planning For A Better Tomorrow, Pearl S. West
The California Youth Authority: Planning For A Better Tomorrow, Pearl S. West
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Statement Of William S. White, William S. White
Statement Of William S. White, William S. White
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fare V. Michael C.: Juveniles And In Custodial Interrogations , Gregory S. Chudacoff
Fare V. Michael C.: Juveniles And In Custodial Interrogations , Gregory S. Chudacoff
Pepperdine Law Review
In the principal case, Fare v. Michael C., the United States Supreme Court rejects the position of the Supreme Court of California that a juvenile's request for the presence of his probation officer constitutes an invocation of the juvenile's right to remain silent within the meaning of the Miranda decision. The author examines the rationale applied by each court enroute to this split of opinion, and suggests a middle ground which would accommodate the concerns of both courts with respect to the protection of an accused juvenile at the custodial interrogation stage.
Status Offenders Should Be Removed From The Juvenile Court , Luke Quinn, Peter M. Hutchison
Status Offenders Should Be Removed From The Juvenile Court , Luke Quinn, Peter M. Hutchison
Pepperdine Law Review
Inadequate financial resources and overcrowded juvenile placement facilities have frequently been cited as grounds for the abrogation of the juvenile court's practice of retaining jurisdiction over status offenders. In this article, Judge Quinn suggests the existence of even more compelling reasons which support diversion of status offenders to programs better suited to their particular needs. The author contends that the juvenile court's jurisdiction should be confined to matters of fact-finding and adjudication, rather than intruding into areas within the domain of the parents, and into areas in which the court lacks the necessary expertise. It is argued that diversion of …
A Rationale For The Abolition Of The Juvenile Court's Power To Waive Jurisdiction , John Gasper, Daniel Katkin
A Rationale For The Abolition Of The Juvenile Court's Power To Waive Jurisdiction , John Gasper, Daniel Katkin
Pepperdine Law Review
The juvenile court's power to waive jurisdiction which entails the transfer of juvenile offenders to adult courts presents a topic of longstanding controversy. It's rationale, one of protection of the public, has been labeled by the authors as untenable. Moreover, it is asserted that waiver of jurisdiction in such cases contravenes the very cornerstone of the juvenile court process--the doctrine of parens patriae. Three methods of transfer are seen to exist--legislative, prosecutorial, and judicial. Focusing on the latter, the authors posit an argument advocating the abrogation of the concept of waiver. Justification for this proposition is seen to flow from …
Juvenile Discovery: A Developing Trend And A Word Of Caution, Diane Geraghty
Juvenile Discovery: A Developing Trend And A Word Of Caution, Diane Geraghty
Pepperdine Law Review
The use of discovery is acknowledged as essential to the efficient administration of justice and to the fairness of the adversary system in both civil and criminal proceedings. However, the juvenile court system has been slow to implement various means of discovery, largely as a result of the doctrine of parens patriae and the unique nature of the juvenile process. Although a discernible trend indicates acceptance of pretrial discovery, there has been considerable experimentation at decisional and statutory levels to develop procedurally protective discovery mechanisms. Professor Geraghty traces the use of discovery in juvenile proceedings and devotes particular attention to …
From Gault To Fare And Smith: The Decline In Supreme Court Reliance On Delinquency Theory , Victor L. Streib
From Gault To Fare And Smith: The Decline In Supreme Court Reliance On Delinquency Theory , Victor L. Streib
Pepperdine Law Review
The Supreme Court's reliance upon research and scholarly commentaries which examine the sociological factors that contribute to delinquent behavior has declined considerably during the last fourteen years. The author, in an effort to explain this decline, analyzes the seven major juvenile cases which have been considered by the Court since 1966. He conducts this analysis by focusing upon the subject matter of each decision, the importance of the issues arising therein and the author of each opinion. While some similarities appear, no consistent pattern emerges from this analysis. The article concludes that while juvenile law is an area which is …
People V. Drew: Adoption Of The Ali Rule Of Insanity In California , David Darbyshire
People V. Drew: Adoption Of The Ali Rule Of Insanity In California , David Darbyshire
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The California Supreme Court Survey: A Review Of Decisions: December 1980 - February 1981, Drago C. Baric, William C. Bollard
The California Supreme Court Survey: A Review Of Decisions: December 1980 - February 1981, Drago C. Baric, William C. Bollard
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The California Supreme Court Survey: A Review Of Decisions: March - May 1981, Stephen H. Doorlag
The California Supreme Court Survey: A Review Of Decisions: March - May 1981, Stephen H. Doorlag
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chandler V. Florida: Cameras, Courts, And The Constitution, Allen F. Camp
Chandler V. Florida: Cameras, Courts, And The Constitution, Allen F. Camp
Pepperdine Law Review
The rising importance of television journalism in the 1960's has resulted in the Supreme Court deciding whether a criminal defendant's due process rights are violated by camera coverage of the courtroom proceeding. The decision of Chandler v. Florida clearly provides the answer; for unless a defendant proves prejudice with specificity, the Constitution does not ban televised criminal trials. The author examines the issues with a revealing historical perspective. He then traces the Court's factual and legal analysis and concludes that the decision will serve to offer the states guidance in deciding whether to implement a program allowing television coverage of …
Dissent: Supreme Court Reform: Diversion Instead Of Division, Gerald F. Uelmen
Dissent: Supreme Court Reform: Diversion Instead Of Division, Gerald F. Uelmen
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Implementation Of California's Dispute Resolution Programs Act: A State-Local Partnership, Mary-Alice Coleman
Implementation Of California's Dispute Resolution Programs Act: A State-Local Partnership, Mary-Alice Coleman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Juror Journalism: Are Profit Motives Replacing Civic Duty?, Brent K. Ashby
Juror Journalism: Are Profit Motives Replacing Civic Duty?, Brent K. Ashby
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
California Supreme Court Survey -- A Review Of Decisions: February 1988-April 1988, Thomas V. Smith-Cupani
California Supreme Court Survey -- A Review Of Decisions: February 1988-April 1988, Thomas V. Smith-Cupani
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Restraints On The Doctrine Of Punitive Damages, Theodore B. Olson, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Constitutional Restraints On The Doctrine Of Punitive Damages, Theodore B. Olson, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of The Federal Sentencing Reform Act After Mistretta V. United States, Charles R. Eskridge Iii
The Constitutionality Of The Federal Sentencing Reform Act After Mistretta V. United States, Charles R. Eskridge Iii
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Unlocking The Eighth Amendment's Power To Make Innocence A Constitutional Claim: The 'Objective' Views Of State Legislators, David Niven
Barry Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dispute System Design: A Comparative Study Of India, Israel And California, Janet Martinez, Sheila Purcell, Hagit Shaked-Gvili, Mohan Mehta
Dispute System Design: A Comparative Study Of India, Israel And California, Janet Martinez, Sheila Purcell, Hagit Shaked-Gvili, Mohan Mehta
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Alternative dispute resolution ("ADR") is practiced around the world with myriad approaches, though not without common ground. In an increasingly interconnected world, the sharing of this knowledge and experience has become a natural and even necessary step in the evolution of ADR. Professor Frank Sander, of Harvard Law School, spoke at the Pound Conference in 1976 and posed the notion of the multi-door courthouse, a concept that led to the development of ADR process options in courts throughout the country.
Dealing With The Appellate Caseload Crisis: The Report Of The Federal Courts Study Committee Revisited, Roger J. Miner '56
Dealing With The Appellate Caseload Crisis: The Report Of The Federal Courts Study Committee Revisited, Roger J. Miner '56
Federal Court System and Administration
No abstract provided.
Courts Of Appeal And Colonialism In The British Caribbean: A Case For The Caribbean Court Of Justice, Ezekiel Rediker
Courts Of Appeal And Colonialism In The British Caribbean: A Case For The Caribbean Court Of Justice, Ezekiel Rediker
Michigan Journal of International Law
In recent years, a public debate on law and the colonial legacy has engaged people of all walks of life in the English Speaking Caribbean (ESC), from judges and politicians to young people in the streets. Throughout the ESC, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC)—based in London and composed of British jurists—has been the highest court of appeal since the colonial era. In the past decade, however, Caribbean governments have sought greater control over their legal systems. In 2005, they created the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) to supplant the British Privy Council as the Supreme Court for …
Judicial Attention As A Scarce Resource: A Preliminary Defense Of How Judges Allocate Time Across Cases In The Federal Courts Of Appeals, Marin K. Levy
Faculty Scholarship
Federal appellate judges no longer have the time to hear argument and draft opinions in all of their cases. The average annual filing per active judgeship now stands at 330 filed cases per year — more than four times what it was sixty years ago. In response, judges have adopted case management strategies that effectively involve spending significantly less time on certain classes of cases than on others. Various scholars have decried this state of affairs, suggesting that the courts have created a “bifurcated” system of justice with “separate and unequal tracks.” These reformers propose altering the relevant constraints of …
Fairness And Politics At The Icty: Evidence From The Indictments, 39 N.C. J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 45 (2013), Stuart K. Ford
Fairness And Politics At The Icty: Evidence From The Indictments, 39 N.C. J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 45 (2013), Stuart K. Ford
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Waiving Goodbye To A Fundamental Right: Allocation Of Authority Between Attorneys And Clients And The Right To A Public Trial, 38 J. Legal Prof. 1 (2013), Alberto Bernabe
Waiving Goodbye To A Fundamental Right: Allocation Of Authority Between Attorneys And Clients And The Right To A Public Trial, 38 J. Legal Prof. 1 (2013), Alberto Bernabe
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Toward A Conceptual Framework For Trauma-Responsive Practice In Courts, Shawn C. Marsh, Joan Byer
Toward A Conceptual Framework For Trauma-Responsive Practice In Courts, Shawn C. Marsh, Joan Byer
Criminal Law Practitioner
No abstract provided.
International Perspectives On Correcting Wrongful Convictions: The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission, Lissa Griffin
International Perspectives On Correcting Wrongful Convictions: The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission, Lissa Griffin
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Part I of this Article traces the history of the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) and outlines the procedures employed by the SCCRC after an application is received, with particular attention to its extensive investigatory procedures. It also describes and analyzes the standards for referral of an application to the Scottish court. Part II briefly sets forth the statistics concerning applications, referrals, and judicial decisions. Part III includes an analysis of the SCCRC’s work by looking at the cases that have been referred and decided by the court. Those cases are divided into several categories: fresh evidence referrals, referrals …
Defying Gravity: The Development Of Standards In The International Prosecution Of International Atrocity Crimes, Matthew H. Charity
Defying Gravity: The Development Of Standards In The International Prosecution Of International Atrocity Crimes, Matthew H. Charity
Faculty Scholarship
The International Criminal Court (the “ICC”), now one decade old, is still in the process of setting norms as to scope, jurisdiction, and other issues. One issue that has thus far defied resolution is a key issue of jurisdiction: the place of complementarity in deciding whether certain criminal issues impacting international standards or interests should be decided before the ICC or national tribunals. Although the Rome Statute crystallizes definitions of core international crimes that may be tried before the ICC, the process of determining whether to leave jurisdiction with the nation or allowing jurisdiction to the ICC continues to lack …
Miranda And Its (More Rights-Protective) International Counterparts, Megan A. Fairlie
Miranda And Its (More Rights-Protective) International Counterparts, Megan A. Fairlie
Faculty Publications
The goal of this article is to encourage the international legal community to revisit its unexamined acceptance of strategic communications. This can lead to a debate that, at a minimum, should prompt Court supporters — specifically civil society members — to think carefully before engaging in conduct that creates dangerous consequences for the ICC.
The Sky Is Falling (Again): Evaluating The Current Funding Crisis In The Judiciary, Donald E. Campbell
The Sky Is Falling (Again): Evaluating The Current Funding Crisis In The Judiciary, Donald E. Campbell
Journal Articles
This Article will consider the current crisis in a broad historical context. This larger narrative can provide a helpful perspective in the current debate. It offers a glimpse into how we came to the current system and allows us to question our assumptions regarding the way the system currently works. Historical context is an important (and under-discussed) aspect of this crisis. As the leaders of the bench and bar come together to evaluate changes to the current system, the discussion should begin with understanding how the system evolved to where it is now and with appreciating the fact that the …