Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (286)
- UC Law SF (201)
- William & Mary Law School (199)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (139)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (133)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (132)
- American University Washington College of Law (104)
- Seattle University School of Law (92)
- Duke Law (82)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (80)
- UIC School of Law (76)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (76)
- The University of Akron (71)
- Fordham Law School (67)
- Pepperdine University (66)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (61)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (61)
- Columbia Law School (60)
- Georgetown University Law Center (59)
- BLR (57)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (55)
- Florida State University College of Law (54)
- University of Maine School of Law (53)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (52)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (51)
- University of Richmond (49)
- West Virginia University (49)
- Universitas Indonesia (48)
- University of Georgia School of Law (46)
- New York Law School (45)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (279)
- Constitutional law (260)
- Sixth Amendment (184)
- Constitution (157)
- Supreme Court (148)
-
- Fourth Amendment (135)
- United States Supreme Court (135)
- Due process (128)
- Fifth Amendment (119)
- Eighth Amendment (115)
- Criminal law (112)
- Right to counsel (110)
- Criminal procedure (102)
- Death penalty (100)
- Police (90)
- Capital punishment (82)
- First Amendment (82)
- Criminal Law (72)
- Federalism (71)
- Privacy (70)
- Criminal justice (68)
- Evidence (63)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (62)
- Sentencing (62)
- Due Process (61)
- Fourteenth Amendment (60)
- Self-incrimination (58)
- Civil rights (57)
- Habeas corpus (55)
- Law (55)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (213)
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (201)
- Michigan Law Review (141)
- Articles (126)
- Touro Law Review (106)
-
- Faculty Publications (87)
- UIC Law Review (73)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (73)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (72)
- Seattle University Law Review (64)
- Pepperdine Law Review (62)
- Scholarly Works (60)
- William & Mary Law Review (58)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (57)
- ExpressO (54)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (54)
- Maine Law Review (52)
- Indiana Law Journal (50)
- Cardozo Law Review (48)
- West Virginia Law Review (48)
- American University Law Review (42)
- Kentucky Law Journal (40)
- Publications (40)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (40)
- Faculty Articles (39)
- Northwestern University Law Review (39)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (37)
- Akron Law Review (36)
- Maryland Law Review (36)
- Scholarly Publications (36)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 3481 - 3510 of 3981
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Criminal Procedure In A Conservative Age: A Time To Rediscover The Critical Nonconstitutional Issues, Richard S. Frase
Criminal Procedure In A Conservative Age: A Time To Rediscover The Critical Nonconstitutional Issues, Richard S. Frase
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Judicially Ordered Social Reform: Neofederalism And Neonationalism And The Debate Over Political Structure, David Rudenstine
Judicially Ordered Social Reform: Neofederalism And Neonationalism And The Debate Over Political Structure, David Rudenstine
Articles
The article examines the ideological divide within the U.S. Supreme Court between neofederalism and neonationalism, two legal theories that shape the Court's approach to federalism and individual rights. Neofederalism emphasizes state autonomy and limits federal intervention in state institutions, while neonationalism advocates for a stronger federal role in protecting individual rights, even if it requires overriding state decisions. This divide significantly influences the Court's rulings on issues such as prison conditions and institutional reform, reflecting broader debates about the role of federalism in social reform and judicial decision-making.
On Prosecutorial Ethics, Carol A. Corrigan
On Prosecutorial Ethics, Carol A. Corrigan
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
No abstract provided.
Legal Ethics, Client Perjury And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, Thomas S. Donovan
Legal Ethics, Client Perjury And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, Thomas S. Donovan
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
No abstract provided.
Automatic Disbarment: A Convicted Felon's Just Desserts, Michael A. Gentile, Sarah Diane Mcshea
Automatic Disbarment: A Convicted Felon's Just Desserts, Michael A. Gentile, Sarah Diane Mcshea
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
No abstract provided.
Nix V. Whiteside: The Lawyer's Role In Reponse To Perjury, James R. Mccall
Nix V. Whiteside: The Lawyer's Role In Reponse To Perjury, James R. Mccall
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
No abstract provided.
The Constitutional Problems With Late Motions To Disqualify Criminal Defense Counsel: A Proposed Solution, Judith Tury
The Constitutional Problems With Late Motions To Disqualify Criminal Defense Counsel: A Proposed Solution, Judith Tury
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
No abstract provided.
A Case Against Automatic Disbarment, Abraham Abramovsky
A Case Against Automatic Disbarment, Abraham Abramovsky
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
No abstract provided.
Attorney Loyalty And Client Perjury - A Postscript To Nix V. Whiteside, Bennett L. Gershman
Attorney Loyalty And Client Perjury - A Postscript To Nix V. Whiteside, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
How much, if at all, can a criminal defense lawyer cooperate in his or her client's decision to commit perjury? Courts, commentators, and bar committees have grappled with this question for years without offering clear or consistent guidelines. Any principled response must take into account some very hard questions. Under what circumstances, for instance, does the lawyer ever really "know" that his client's proposed testimony is false? Is it sufficient if the lawyer simply disbelieves his client's story, or that of his client's witnesses? Does it make any difference if the attorney learns of a plan to perjure during the …
State V. Delaurier: Privacy Rights And Cordless Telephones - The Fourth Amendment Is Put On Hold, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1087 (1986), Donald Battaglia
State V. Delaurier: Privacy Rights And Cordless Telephones - The Fourth Amendment Is Put On Hold, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1087 (1986), Donald Battaglia
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bowers V. Hardwick: The Constitutionality Of Georgia's Sodomy Statute, 20 J. Marshall L. Rev. 325 (1986), James J. Bromberek
Bowers V. Hardwick: The Constitutionality Of Georgia's Sodomy Statute, 20 J. Marshall L. Rev. 325 (1986), James J. Bromberek
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
State High Courts, State Constitutions, And Individual Rights Litigation Since 1980: A Judicial Survey, Ronald K. L. Collins, Peter J. Galie, John Kincaid
State High Courts, State Constitutions, And Individual Rights Litigation Since 1980: A Judicial Survey, Ronald K. L. Collins, Peter J. Galie, John Kincaid
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
No abstract provided.
Survey On The Constitutional Right To Privacy In The Context Of Homosexual Activity, Yao Apasu-Gbotsu, Robert J. Arnold, Paul Dibella, Kevin Dorse, Elisa L. Fuller, Steven H. Naturman, Dung Hong Pham, James B. Putney
Survey On The Constitutional Right To Privacy In The Context Of Homosexual Activity, Yao Apasu-Gbotsu, Robert J. Arnold, Paul Dibella, Kevin Dorse, Elisa L. Fuller, Steven H. Naturman, Dung Hong Pham, James B. Putney
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Court-Ordered Predisposition Evaluation Under Washington's Juvenile Justice Act: A Violation Of The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination?—Wash. Rev. Code § 13.40, Judith H. Ramseyer
The Court-Ordered Predisposition Evaluation Under Washington's Juvenile Justice Act: A Violation Of The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination?—Wash. Rev. Code § 13.40, Judith H. Ramseyer
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment analyzes the significance of the principles animating the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination by first looking at the purposes of Washington’s Juvenile Justice Act; second, by examining the status of the privilege against self-incrimination during sentencing; and third, by applying the values protected by the privilege to the use of predisposition psychological evaluations in Washington juvenile courts.
A Mandatory Right To Counsel For The Material Witness, Susan Kling
A Mandatory Right To Counsel For The Material Witness, Susan Kling
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note argues that a uniform statute establishing a mandatory right to counsel should be adopted, at both the state and federal levels, to afford to the material witness protection that the Constitution fails to provide. Part I describes the general scope of the problem and concludes that neither the federal government, the individual states, nor the United States Constitution provides the material witness with a mandatory right to counsel. Part II argues that the material witness should have a statutorily mandated right to counsel. A mandatory right to counsel should be extended to the material witness both for the …
Whose Right Is It Anyway?: Rethinking Competency To Stand Trial In Light Of The Synthetically Sane Insanity Defendant, Linda C. Fentiman
Whose Right Is It Anyway?: Rethinking Competency To Stand Trial In Light Of The Synthetically Sane Insanity Defendant, Linda C. Fentiman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This article's thesis is that given the magnitude of the insanity defendant's fundamental constitutional liberties--his constitutional right to present and conduct his defense, his privilege against self-incrimination, his constitutional right to privacy and bodily integrity, and his common law right to give informed consent to medical treatment--the state's interest in assuring the defendant's competency must give way if he chooses to waive his right to be tried while competent. Most, if not all, of the purposes of the prohibition against trying an incompetent defendant can be met even if the defendant is tried without psychotropic medication as long as he …
To Have And To Hold: The Marital Rape Exemption And The Fourteenth Amendment, Anne Dailey
To Have And To Hold: The Marital Rape Exemption And The Fourteenth Amendment, Anne Dailey
Faculty Articles and Papers
No abstract provided.
Malley V. Briggs: The Court Offers A Civil Remedy For Fourth Amendment Violations On The Wake Of An Eroding Exclusionary Rule, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1101 (1986), Ellen Keefe-Garner
Malley V. Briggs: The Court Offers A Civil Remedy For Fourth Amendment Violations On The Wake Of An Eroding Exclusionary Rule, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1101 (1986), Ellen Keefe-Garner
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constraints Of Power: The Constitutional Opinions Of Judges Scalia, Bork, Posner, Easterbrook, And Winter, James G. Wilson
Constraints Of Power: The Constitutional Opinions Of Judges Scalia, Bork, Posner, Easterbrook, And Winter, James G. Wilson
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This article completes a two-part series studying the constitutional jurisprudence of Judges Antonin Scalia, Richard Posner, Robert Bork, Frank Easterbrook, and Ralph Winter Jr., five conservative academics appointed by President Reagan to the United States Court of Appeals. Judge Scalia has recently been appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States. In a previous article, published in the last issue of the University of Miami Law Review, I evaluated these five jurists' constitutional scholarship by contrasting their views with those of Edmund Burke, the originator of political conservative theory. That article tested Burke's wariness of political abstractions and his …
Subpoenas To Criminal Defense Lawyers: Proposal For Limits, Ellen Y. Suni
Subpoenas To Criminal Defense Lawyers: Proposal For Limits, Ellen Y. Suni
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
The Emperor Gideon Has No Clothes: The Empty Promise Of The Constitutional Right To Effective Assistance Of Counsel, Richard Klein
The Emperor Gideon Has No Clothes: The Empty Promise Of The Constitutional Right To Effective Assistance Of Counsel, Richard Klein
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
No abstract provided.
The Inadequate Police Protection Of Battered Wives: Can A City And Its Police Be Held Liable Under The Equal Protection Clause?, Jeffrey A. Shapiro
The Inadequate Police Protection Of Battered Wives: Can A City And Its Police Be Held Liable Under The Equal Protection Clause?, Jeffrey A. Shapiro
Fordham Urban Law Journal
The police strive to settle the vast majority of wife battering cases without arrest or through mediation, often leading to terrible results for the abused wife. This Note supports holding a city and its police liable under the equal protection clause for the inadequate police protection of battered wives. The Note finds the best legal strategy under the equal protection clause would involve showing impermissible gender-based discrimination.
The Exclusionary Rule: A Disputation, Peter Lushing
The Exclusionary Rule: A Disputation, Peter Lushing
Cardozo Law Review
Four-thirty p.m.: the lawyer's decompression hour. Court has just adjourned. The belligerents and (dare we say it) a judge or two recuperate in saloons close by the courthouse; their families can wait. In one tavern, a rear booth is about to be occupied by Mark earnest young county prosecutor. Mark is on the verge of that time when a criminal lawyer begins to doubt the sanity of the system and, perforce, his own integrity. He will be joined by Sam, a born defense counsel. Sam secretly worships America's criminal justice system for its holy commitment to procedural regularity. He has …
National Minimum Drinking Age Act Of 1984: Once Again Congress Mails Home Another Fist, Kevin Kadlec
National Minimum Drinking Age Act Of 1984: Once Again Congress Mails Home Another Fist, Kevin Kadlec
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note will examine the federal interest as it conflicts with the states' interest in setting their own drinking ages, which are derived from section two of the twenty-first amendment and the tenth amendment, respectively. This conflict is given sharper focus when examined in the context of Supreme Court tests and balancing measures developed in recent decades in these constitutional arenas. A controversy has arisen because of the congressional imposition of a national minimum drinking age on the states through coercive withholding of federal funds. It is the purpose of this Note to examine the controversy created by the Drinking …
Compelling Testimony In Alaska: The Coming Rejection Of Use And Derivative Use Immunity, Jeff M. Feldman
Compelling Testimony In Alaska: The Coming Rejection Of Use And Derivative Use Immunity, Jeff M. Feldman
Articles
Until 1972, when the Supreme Court upheld a federal use andderivative use immunity statute in Kastigar v. United States, virtually every court that considered the issue of the compulsion of testimony favored transactional immunity. It appears that most courts interpreted the Supreme Court's 1892 decision in Counselman v. Hitchcock as finding only transactional immunity constitutional. Since Kastigar, the Alaska Supreme Court has had several opportunities totake sides in the debate over the grant of immunity constitutionally required to compel testimony. On each such occasion, the court has expressed a preference for transactional immunity, but has carefullyavoided resolving the …
Cameras In The Courtroom: Guidelines For State Criminal Trials, Nancy T. Gardner
Cameras In The Courtroom: Guidelines For State Criminal Trials, Nancy T. Gardner
Michigan Law Review
This Note analyzes the conflicting interests involved in televising state criminal trials and proposes a model set of guidelines for consideration by states that decide to permit electronic media in their courtrooms. The Note favors restrictions on broadcasters once in the courtroom and advocates that the defendant's right to a fair trial receive more scrupulous protection than the broadcast media's interest in attendance and the public's "right to know." Part I presents the constitutional principles with which any set of guidelines must comply. Part II analyzes the policy considerations that should guide the formulation of state guidelines, and concludes that …
An Examination Of Whether Incarcerated Juveniles Are Entitled By The Constitution To Rehabilitative Treatment, Andrew D. Roth
An Examination Of Whether Incarcerated Juveniles Are Entitled By The Constitution To Rehabilitative Treatment, Andrew D. Roth
Michigan Law Review
This Note attempts to resolve the arguments presented in the literature and the case law and determine whether the federal Constitution mandates a right to treatment for involuntarily incarcerated juveniles. Part I examines the varied situations that have given rise to right to treatment claims. Part II elucidates the three principal theories on which right to treatment claims have been based: (1) that because the purpose of incarcerating juveniles is to promote their welfare, rehabilitation is mandated by the due process requirement that the nature of the commitment "bear some reasonable relation to the purpose for which the individual is …
Press-Enterprise Co. V. Superior Court Of California For The County Of Riverside, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Press-Enterprise Co. V. Superior Court Of California For The County Of Riverside, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Batson V. Kentucky, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Batson V. Kentucky, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Remedies To The Dilemma Of Death-Qualified Juries, Robert M. Berry
Remedies To The Dilemma Of Death-Qualified Juries, Robert M. Berry
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.