Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1880)
- William & Mary Law School (1679)
- Duquesne University (1616)
- UC Law SF (1188)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1155)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (831)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (808)
- American University Washington College of Law (747)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (703)
- Duke Law (659)
- Universitas Indonesia (642)
- Georgetown University Law Center (593)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (547)
- University of Colorado Law School (535)
- Seattle University School of Law (534)
- Columbia Law School (532)
- The University of Akron (494)
- Notre Dame Law School (483)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (468)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (452)
- Fordham Law School (450)
- West Virginia University (448)
- University of Kentucky (447)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (425)
- University of Georgia School of Law (402)
- BLR (401)
- University of Richmond (390)
- UIC School of Law (378)
- Pepperdine University (361)
- Brigham Young University Law School (319)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (2092)
- Constitutional law (2067)
- Philosophy (1570)
- Theology (1539)
- Constitution (1436)
-
- Hallowed Secularism (1302)
- American Religious Democracy (1295)
- Supreme Court (1186)
- First Amendment (1102)
- Politics (969)
- Law (858)
- Federalism (632)
- United States Supreme Court (588)
- Due process (579)
- Religion (543)
- History (497)
- United States (496)
- Government (425)
- Separation of powers (418)
- Judicial review (411)
- Democracy (405)
- Fourth Amendment (389)
- Equal protection (378)
- Originalism (376)
- Congress (367)
- Fourteenth Amendment (367)
- Fifth Amendment (362)
- Jurisprudence (341)
- Discrimination (340)
- Freedom of speech (328)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1798)
- Michigan Law Review (1304)
- Hallowed Secularism (1302)
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (1171)
- Faculty Publications (781)
-
- Touro Law Review (662)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (575)
- Articles (551)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (548)
- William & Mary Law Review (535)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (448)
- Seattle University Law Review (434)
- Indiana Law Journal (433)
- West Virginia Law Review (432)
- Cardozo Law Review (423)
- Scholarly Works (399)
- ExpressO (375)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (366)
- Kentucky Law Journal (363)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (343)
- UIC Law Review (335)
- Journal Articles (322)
- Publications (322)
- Buffalo Law Review (318)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (296)
- Pepperdine Law Review (291)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (247)
- BYU Law Review (241)
- Akron Law Review (237)
- Scholarly Articles (237)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 27601 - 27630 of 29766
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Political Rights Of Government Employees, Donald H. Buckley
Political Rights Of Government Employees, Donald H. Buckley
Cleveland State Law Review
There are nearly three million federal employees, of whom 50.8 percent are professional, technical or administrative personnel. These federal employees and those individuals employed by a state or local agency whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a federal agency are subject to the United States Civil Service Commission rules regulating political activity. Under Civil Service rules, individuals may be removed from their employment for doing what every other American may consider a constitutionally protected right; namely, participating actively in …
The Constitutional Rights Of Teachers And Professors, William W. Van Alstyne
The Constitutional Rights Of Teachers And Professors, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
The discussion examines the current state of educators' rights and identifies two key areas that are still hotly contested: extramural utterances that my be critical of the institution itself and a teacher's freedom with his own classroom. A survey of two recent cases illuminates these issues.
The Right To A Decent Environment; E =Mc²: Environment Equals Man Times Courts Redoubling Their Efforts, E. F. Roberts
The Right To A Decent Environment; E =Mc²: Environment Equals Man Times Courts Redoubling Their Efforts, E. F. Roberts
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Civil Rights—Public Accommodations—Recreational Facility Held A Covered Establishment Under 1964 Act, Richard R. Stokely
Civil Rights—Public Accommodations—Recreational Facility Held A Covered Establishment Under 1964 Act, Richard R. Stokely
Buffalo Law Review
Daniel v. Paul, 395 U.S. 298 (1969).
Constitutional Law—Detentions For The Purpose Of Obtaining Fingerprints Are Subject To The Fourth Amendment’S Constraints Against Unreasonable Searches And Seizures, Gregory Stamm
Buffalo Law Review
Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721 (1969).
Criminal Law—Electronic Eavesdropping-Standing To Object To Third Party Conversations, Joel E. Schweitzer
Criminal Law—Electronic Eavesdropping-Standing To Object To Third Party Conversations, Joel E. Schweitzer
Buffalo Law Review
Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165 (1969).
National Population Programs And Policy: Social And Legal Implications, Carl S. Shultz, H. Yuan Tien, Edwin D. Driver, Cyril C. Means
National Population Programs And Policy: Social And Legal Implications, Carl S. Shultz, H. Yuan Tien, Edwin D. Driver, Cyril C. Means
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Reflections On Abortion Reform, Patrick L. Baude
Constitutional Reflections On Abortion Reform, Patrick L. Baude
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
United States abortion law is evolving comparably. Even eight years ago, public opinion was deeply divided when a Phoenix housewife sought to avoid giving birth after taking Thalidomide. The Model Penal Code, promulgated that year, authorized abortion in cases of felonious intercourse, to avoid deformity, and to protect the physical or mental health of the mother; these faintly daring innovations are now in danger of being declared unconstitutional because they are too limited. In the last year, three courts have invalidated moderate abortion statutes and the New York legislature has permitted abortion at will in early pregnancy. The purpose of …
Massachusetts In The Federal Courts: The Constitutionality Of The Vietnam War, Anthony A. D'Amato
Massachusetts In The Federal Courts: The Constitutionality Of The Vietnam War, Anthony A. D'Amato
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
One of the most singular pieces of legislation in American constitutional history passed both houses of the Massachusetts legislature on April 1st, 1970, and was signed into law on the following day by Governor Francis W. Sargent. It provides that, except for an emergency, no inhabitant of Massachusetts inducted into or serving in the armed forces "shall be required to serve" abroad in an armed hostility that has not been declared a war by Congress under Article 1, Section 8, clause 11 of the United States Constitution. The bill further directs the state's attorney general to bring a suit testing …
Constitutional Law--The Right To A Jury Trial In Disbarment Proceedings, Michigan Law Review
Constitutional Law--The Right To A Jury Trial In Disbarment Proceedings, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Lawyers in the United States have long been considered officers of the court, subject to examination for good moral character and adequate education in law before admission to the bar. They have also been subject to summary proceedings for disbarment whenever they have deviated from accepted standards of conduct embodied in various codes of professional ethics. Although the specific grounds for disbarment vary from state to state and between federal and state courts, one thing is clear: in the absence of a specific statutory provision there traditionally has been no right to a jury trial in disbarment proceedings. Since the …
Of Justice Delayed And Justice Denied: The Welfare Prior Hearing Cases, Robert M. O'Neil
Of Justice Delayed And Justice Denied: The Welfare Prior Hearing Cases, Robert M. O'Neil
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Federal Courts--Juries--Exclusion Of Women, C. Michael Buxton
Federal Courts--Juries--Exclusion Of Women, C. Michael Buxton
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
With Temperate Rod: Maintaining Academic Order In Secondary Schools, Arnold Taylor
With Temperate Rod: Maintaining Academic Order In Secondary Schools, Arnold Taylor
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law--Abortion--Man, Being Without A Legal Beginning, William T. Robinson Iii
Criminal Law--Abortion--Man, Being Without A Legal Beginning, William T. Robinson Iii
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Students And The University: Group Interaction And The Law, Louis De Falaise, William T. Robinson Iii
Students And The University: Group Interaction And The Law, Louis De Falaise, William T. Robinson Iii
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law--Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause--Right Of Defendant To Be Present At Criminal Trial, Donna H. Terry
Constitutional Law--Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause--Right Of Defendant To Be Present At Criminal Trial, Donna H. Terry
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law--The Power Of A Governor To Proclaim Martial Law And Use State Military Forces To Suppress Campus Demonstrations, Scott T. Wendelsdorf
Constitutional Law--The Power Of A Governor To Proclaim Martial Law And Use State Military Forces To Suppress Campus Demonstrations, Scott T. Wendelsdorf
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Books Received
University of Richmond Law Review
These are the books received by the Law School in 1970.
First Amendment "Due Process", Henry Paul Monaghan
First Amendment "Due Process", Henry Paul Monaghan
Faculty Scholarship
A number of recent Supreme Court opinions, primarily in the obscenity area, have fastened strict procedural requirements on governmental action aimed at controlling the exercise of first amendment rights. Professor Monaghan believes that there are two basic principles that can be distilled from these cases: that a judicial body, following an adversary hearing, must decide on the protected character of the speech, and that the judicial determination must either precede or immediately follow any governmental action which restricts speech. The author argues that these two broad principles should limit any governmental activity which affects freedom of speech, no matter how …
Appointed Counsel For The Indigent Civil Defendant: A Constitutional Right Without A Judicial Remedy., Michael Botein
Appointed Counsel For The Indigent Civil Defendant: A Constitutional Right Without A Judicial Remedy., Michael Botein
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Cafeteria Workers Revisited: Does The Commander Have Plenary Power To Control Access To His Base?, Jethro K. Lieberman
Cafeteria Workers Revisited: Does The Commander Have Plenary Power To Control Access To His Base?, Jethro K. Lieberman
Articles & Chapters
The Supreme Court's decision in Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy (1961) has often been cited by military commanders to support claimed plenary power over access to the installation commanded. Observing that plenary power is a rarity in contemporary society, Lieutenant Lieberman questions the prof erred interpretation of Cafeteria Workers particularly in light of more recent decisions. He concludes that while commanders do possess broad powers over access, the power is not plenary but must be weighed in each instance against the individual's rights of freedom of speech and association.
Cafeteria Workers Revisited: Does The Commander Have Plenary Power To Control Access To His Base?, Jethro K. Lieberman
Cafeteria Workers Revisited: Does The Commander Have Plenary Power To Control Access To His Base?, Jethro K. Lieberman
Articles & Chapters
The Supreme Court's decision in Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy (1961) has often been cited by military commanders to support claimed plenary power over access to the installation commanded. Observing that plenary power is a rarity in contemporary society, Lieutenant Lieberman questions the prof erred interpretation of Cafeteria Workers particularly in light of more recent decisions. He concludes that while commanders do possess broad powers over access, the power is not plenary but must be weighed in each instance against the individual's rights of freedom of speech and association.
Book Review. Gajendragadkar, P.B., The Constitution Of India, Ralph F. Fuchs
Book Review. Gajendragadkar, P.B., The Constitution Of India, Ralph F. Fuchs
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Generality Of Neutral Principles: A Game-Theoretic Perspective, Robert L. Birmingham
The Generality Of Neutral Principles: A Game-Theoretic Perspective, Robert L. Birmingham
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Eleven years ago Professor Wechsler first argued that constitutional adjudication should be based on neutral principles of general applicability that transcend the factual contexts of the cases in which they are announced. Since that time, legal scholars have been engaged in a continuing debate over both the meaning and the validity of Wechsler's thesis. Professor Birmingham adds a new perspective to this debate by analyzing neutrality and generality in terms of game theory.
Constitutional Reflections On Abortion Reform, Patrick L. Baude
Constitutional Reflections On Abortion Reform, Patrick L. Baude
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Recent Decisions
University of Richmond Law Review
This is a summary of the case law that was decided in 1970.
Prospectivity And Retroactivity Of Supreme Court Constitutional Interpretations
Prospectivity And Retroactivity Of Supreme Court Constitutional Interpretations
University of Richmond Law Review
The freedom of a court, state or federal, to define the limits of ad- herence to precedent has been sanctioned by the Supreme Court in both civil' and criminal cases. Accordingly, any decision can be made to apply to future cases or relate back to all past cases. In no other area of the law is such a decision more important than in the field of criminal procedure where the freedom of a convicted man can rest upon a decision to apply a new "rule" retroactively or prospectively. It is not surprising, therefore, that the majority of retroactivity cases involve …
The Supreme Court, The President And Congress, William F. Swindler
The Supreme Court, The President And Congress, William F. Swindler
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Judicial Power, The “Political Question Doctrine,” And Foreign Relations, Michael E. Tigar
Judicial Power, The “Political Question Doctrine,” And Foreign Relations, Michael E. Tigar
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Expression In Secondary Schools, Ann Aldrich, Joanne V. Sommers
Freedom Of Expression In Secondary Schools, Ann Aldrich, Joanne V. Sommers
Cleveland State Law Review
Guzick v. Drebus, currently under consideration on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, raises important questions concerning the application of the First Amendment to secondary school students.