Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (154)
- William & Mary Law School (142)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (122)
- UC Law SF (118)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (79)
-
- Duke Law (71)
- Fordham Law School (68)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (66)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (62)
- American University Washington College of Law (53)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (53)
- University of Washington School of Law (49)
- Seattle University School of Law (48)
- The University of Akron (45)
- West Virginia University (45)
- University of Colorado Law School (44)
- BLR (40)
- University of Kentucky (39)
- Pepperdine University (37)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (36)
- UIC School of Law (36)
- Cleveland State University (35)
- Columbia Law School (35)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (35)
- Georgetown University Law Center (34)
- Notre Dame Law School (33)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (33)
- Brigham Young University Law School (31)
- University of Richmond (31)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (31)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (174)
- Constitutional law (168)
- Constitution (123)
- First Amendment (113)
- Fourth Amendment (84)
-
- Supreme Court (81)
- Second Amendment (63)
- Fifth Amendment (59)
- Due process (58)
- Privacy (58)
- United States Supreme Court (45)
- Federalism (44)
- Criminal law (41)
- Police (41)
- Equal protection (37)
- Civil rights (36)
- Fourth amendment (36)
- Eighth Amendment (35)
- Gun control (34)
- Firearms (32)
- Fourteenth Amendment (32)
- Habeas corpus (31)
- Separation of powers (30)
- Freedom of speech (28)
- Judicial review (28)
- Free speech (27)
- Freedom of Speech (27)
- Law (27)
- Miranda v. Arizona (27)
- Congress (26)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (161)
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (117)
- Michigan Law Review (103)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (69)
- Faculty Publications (60)
-
- Touro Law Review (54)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (50)
- Cardozo Law Review (45)
- Articles (44)
- West Virginia Law Review (44)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (41)
- Seattle University Law Review (40)
- Indiana Law Journal (38)
- ExpressO (37)
- Washington Law Review (37)
- Publications (34)
- UIC Law Review (33)
- Kentucky Law Journal (32)
- Translated Opinions (32)
- Akron Law Review (30)
- Buffalo Law Review (30)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (30)
- Fordham Law Review (29)
- Maine Law Review (28)
- Northwestern University Law Review (28)
- William & Mary Law Review (26)
- Scholarly Articles (25)
- Scholarly Works (24)
- University of Richmond Law Review (23)
- Pepperdine Law Review (22)
- Publication Type
Articles 2311 - 2340 of 2634
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Justice Sanford And Modern Free Speech Analysis: Back To The Future?, Philip J. Prygoski
Justice Sanford And Modern Free Speech Analysis: Back To The Future?, Philip J. Prygoski
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Punishment In Search Of A Crime: Standards For Capital Punishment In The Law Of Criminal Homicide, Franklin E. Zimring, Gordon Hawkins
A Punishment In Search Of A Crime: Standards For Capital Punishment In The Law Of Criminal Homicide, Franklin E. Zimring, Gordon Hawkins
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Law Of Confessions: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
The Law Of Confessions: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Twenty-First Amendment And The Commerce Clause: What Rationale Supports Bacchus Imports, Eric T. Freeman
The Twenty-First Amendment And The Commerce Clause: What Rationale Supports Bacchus Imports, Eric T. Freeman
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
No abstract provided.
Debating Conviction Against Conviction--Constitutional Considerations On The Sanctuary Movement, Ruti G. Teitel
Debating Conviction Against Conviction--Constitutional Considerations On The Sanctuary Movement, Ruti G. Teitel
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
No abstract provided.
National Minimum Drinking Age Act Of 1984: Once Again Congress Mails Home Another Fist, Kevin Kadlec
National Minimum Drinking Age Act Of 1984: Once Again Congress Mails Home Another Fist, Kevin Kadlec
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note will examine the federal interest as it conflicts with the states' interest in setting their own drinking ages, which are derived from section two of the twenty-first amendment and the tenth amendment, respectively. This conflict is given sharper focus when examined in the context of Supreme Court tests and balancing measures developed in recent decades in these constitutional arenas. A controversy has arisen because of the congressional imposition of a national minimum drinking age on the states through coercive withholding of federal funds. It is the purpose of this Note to examine the controversy created by the Drinking …
The Law Of Confessions: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
The Law Of Confessions: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Debating Conviction Against Conviction — Constitutional Considerations On The Sanctuary Movement, Ruti G. Teitel
Debating Conviction Against Conviction — Constitutional Considerations On The Sanctuary Movement, Ruti G. Teitel
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
California V. Ciraolo, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
California V. Ciraolo, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Equal Protection—Zoning Ordinance Excluding Home For The Mentally Retarded Fails The Rational Basis Test, Patricia J. Dolson
Constitutional Law—Equal Protection—Zoning Ordinance Excluding Home For The Mentally Retarded Fails The Rational Basis Test, Patricia J. Dolson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Takings Clause: Principles Or Politics?, Leslie Bender
The Takings Clause: Principles Or Politics?, Leslie Bender
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hardwick V. Bowers: An Attempt To Pull The Meaning Of Doe V. Commonwealth's Attorney Out Of The Closet, Elisa L. Fuller
Hardwick V. Bowers: An Attempt To Pull The Meaning Of Doe V. Commonwealth's Attorney Out Of The Closet, Elisa L. Fuller
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Doe And Dronenburg: Sodomy Statutes Are Constitutional, Arthur E. Brooks
Doe And Dronenburg: Sodomy Statutes Are Constitutional, Arthur E. Brooks
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Admissibility Of Prior Silence To Impeach The Testimony Of Criminal Defendants, Rex A. Sharp
The Admissibility Of Prior Silence To Impeach The Testimony Of Criminal Defendants, Rex A. Sharp
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note focuses on whether a defendant who was called as a witness at the prior, severed trial of a codefendant and refused to testify by invoking the fifth amendment can subsequently be impeached by this silence at his own trial. In addition to the obvious implications this issue has for severed criminal trials, the factors considered when deciding whether impeachment by silence should be allowed generally are in sharpest focus in this factual setting. Thus, the analysis of the constitutional and evidentiary questions this Note enlists to argue that impeachment by silence in this context is permissible applies as …
A Lesson In Incaution, Overwork, And Fatigue: The Judicial Miscraftsmanship Of Segura V. United States, Joshua Dressler
A Lesson In Incaution, Overwork, And Fatigue: The Judicial Miscraftsmanship Of Segura V. United States, Joshua Dressler
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Of Cultural Determinism And The Limits Of Law, Paul R. Dimond, Gene Sperling
Of Cultural Determinism And The Limits Of Law, Paul R. Dimond, Gene Sperling
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Civil Rights: Rhetoric or Reality? by Thomas Sowell
Entrapment, De Lorean And The Undercover Operation: A Constitutional Connection, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 365 (1985), Kevin Hackett O'Neill
Entrapment, De Lorean And The Undercover Operation: A Constitutional Connection, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 365 (1985), Kevin Hackett O'Neill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York V. Quarles: Dimming Miranda's Bright Line, W. Scott Campbell
New York V. Quarles: Dimming Miranda's Bright Line, W. Scott Campbell
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Roadside Sobriety Tests May Not Be Administered By Law Enforcement Officials Without Probable Cause To Believe The Defendant Was Driving While Intoxicated. People V. Carlson, 677 P.2d 310 (Colo. 1984), Elena A. Rodney
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Casenotes: Constitutional Law — First Amendment — Regulation Prohibiting Sleeping In National Parks Upheld As A Valid Time, Place, And Manner Regulation Regardless Of Whether Sleeping Is Speech. Clark V. Community For Creative Non-Violence, 104 S. Ct. 3065 (1984), Susan H. Hickes
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Stanley Mosk: A Federalist For The 1980'S, Arthur J. Goldberg
Stanley Mosk: A Federalist For The 1980'S, Arthur J. Goldberg
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
No abstract provided.
Cordless Telephones And The Fourth Amendment: A Trap For The Unwary Consumer, Mark S. Snell
Cordless Telephones And The Fourth Amendment: A Trap For The Unwary Consumer, Mark S. Snell
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Constricting Federal Habeas Corpus: From Great Writ To Exceptional Remedy, Yale L. Rosenberg
Constricting Federal Habeas Corpus: From Great Writ To Exceptional Remedy, Yale L. Rosenberg
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
No abstract provided.
New York V. Quarles: The Dissolution Of Miranda, Mary M. Keating
New York V. Quarles: The Dissolution Of Miranda, Mary M. Keating
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Stough V. Crenshaw Country Board Of Education: Parental Rights And Segregation Academies, Stuart Melnick
Stough V. Crenshaw Country Board Of Education: Parental Rights And Segregation Academies, Stuart Melnick
Fordham Urban Law Journal
The author of this student note explores a recent 11th Circuit decision in Strough v. Crenshaw Country Board of Education, which held that the state's proffered interests were not compelling, and therefore failed to override a fundamental right. In the case, a county school board forbid its employees from sending their children to private school, and the regulation was contested by two tenured teachers who sought to enroll their children in a private, racially segregated school. The court eventually found that a parent's right to educate their child was a fundamental right, and the policy reasons advanced by the school …
The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In A Rescue Situation, William T. Pizzi
The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In A Rescue Situation, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
United States V. Hensley, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Hensley, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Rights And Judges In A Democracy: A New Canadian Version, Paul C. Weiler
Rights And Judges In A Democracy: A New Canadian Version, Paul C. Weiler
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Canadians sought a constitutionally entrenched Charter of Rights not just for its own sake, but also as part of a larger effort at constitutional renewal. The hope was that such a Charter would preserve a united Canada in the face of the serious threat posed by French Canadian nationalism within a potentially independent Quebec. In this Article, I comment on those features of the Canadian debate and its denouement that are noteworthy within the Canadian context, as well as those that illustrate some of the universal themes of constitutional theory.
Consequences Of Supreme Court Decisions Upholding Individual Constitutional Rights, Jesse H. Choper
Consequences Of Supreme Court Decisions Upholding Individual Constitutional Rights, Jesse H. Choper
Michigan Law Review
The thrust of this Article is to attempt to ascertain just what differences the Court's judgments upholding individual constitutional rights have made for those who fall within the ambit of their protection. It seeks to address such questions as: What were the conditions that existed before the Court's ruling? How many people were subject to the regime that was invalidated by the Justices? Was the Court's mandate successfully implemented? What were the consequences for those affected? At a subjective level, were the repercussions perceived as salutary by those (or at least most of those) who were the beneficiaries of the …
A Sign Of The Times: Billboard Regulation And The First Amendment Symposium - Selected Topics On Land Use Law - Comment., Anne E. Swenson
A Sign Of The Times: Billboard Regulation And The First Amendment Symposium - Selected Topics On Land Use Law - Comment., Anne E. Swenson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Evaluation of a billboard ordinance is complicated by the unique properties of this form of expression. The physical structure of the sign is not a form of expression; therefore, a state may regulate the size, height, degree of illumination, and location of the billboard. The sign’s message, on the other hand, is speech and thus protected from government action by the First Amendment. Further, the precise degree of First Amendment protection afforded to a particular message is a function of the character of the speech involved. First Amendment protection attaches if the sign’s message concerns a political, cultural, social, or …