Digital Commons Network^™

Private Financing Of Criminal Prosectuions And The Differing Protections Of Liberty And Equality In The Criminal Justice System, Joseph E. Kennedy

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Government prosecutors have begun accepting, and in some cases soliciting, voluntary contributions from the private sector in order to finance certain types of criminal prosecutions. Such private financing introduces a new tension between society's interest in punishing the guilty and society's interest in equal treatment by government. Private financing of criminal prosecution also raises interesting questions as to whether institutions, as opposed to individuals, can be biased by money.

This Article concludes that private financing in any of its likely forms threatens important equality interests. Part I argues that conflict-of-interest rules provide the only protection for important equality interests implicated …

This Is Who Will Die When Doctors Are Allowed To Kill Their Patients, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (1997), Michael Mcgonnigal

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Unconstitutionality Of State And Local Enactments In The United States Restricting Business Ties With Burma (Myanmar), David Schmahmann, James Finch

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

As a punitive measure against the military regime in Burma, state and municipal governments in the United States have adopted laws penalizing firms that conduct business in that nation. This Article analyzes the validity of these statutes and ordinances under various provisions of the U.S. Constitution.

After introducing the nature of this development and the constitutional issues raised, Part II of this Article proceeds to examine the character of the local enactments and the political backdrop which lead to their adoption. In Part II, the Authors analyze four federal constitutional issues surrounding the local legislation: implied preemption by federal legislation, …

Recent Legislation: Constitutional Law – Congress Imposes New Restrictions On Use Of Funds By The Legal Services Corporation – Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions And Appropriations Act Of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, Benjamin L. Liebman

Faculty Scholarship

Fierce political battles have raged about the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) for much of its twenty-three year history. Critics have attacked LSC for pursuing a "radical agenda" and for "engaging in dubious litigation that is of no real benefit to poor people," while supporters have termed LSC "the one program in the entire war on poverty that made a difference" and have decried the "campaign to deny the right of legal representation to the poor." Last year, in the Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996 (OCRAA), Congress reduced LSC funding by thirty percent – to $278 million in …

The Constitution And Racial Preference In Law School Admissions, Robert A. Sedler

Law Faculty Research Publications

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law—Supreme Court Upholds Thirty-Day Moratorium On Lawyers' Direct Mail Solicitation Of Accident Victims, Mark W. Hodge

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Grasping The Intangible: A Guide To Assessing Nonpecuniary Damages In The Eeoc Administrative Process , Douglas M. Staudmeister

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Tinkering With The Machinery Of Death: An Examination And Analysis Of State Indigent Defense Systems And Their Application To Death-Eligible Defendants, Michael D. Moore

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Two Wrongs Don't Add Up To Rights: The Importance Of Preserving Due Process In Light Of Recent Welfare Reform Measures Administrative Driver's License Suspension: A Remedial Tool That Is Not In Jeopardy , Rebecca E. Zietlow

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Do You Need A Lawyer? You May Have To Wait 30 Days: The Supreme Court Went Too Far In Florida Bar V. Went For It, Inc. , Daniel L. Zelenko

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Treading On Sacred Ground: Congress's Power To Subject White House Advisers To Senate Confirmation, Douglas S. Onley

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Constitution As An Obstacle To Government Ethics - Reformist Legislation After National Treasury Employees Union, George D. Brown

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Championship Season For The First Amendment, Joel Gora

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The State As Landlord: The Constitutionality Of The Termination Of Public Housing Leases On Account Of A Tenant's Illegal Activities, Mark Anthony Drumbl

Scholarly Articles

Paragraph 107(l)(b) of the Ontario Landlord and Tenant Act enables landlords to evict tenants on short notice for engaging in illegal activity or for permitting such activity to be conducted in or on any part of the rental premises. Under this provision, the landlord can serve a notice of termination on the tenant, who may then exercise his/her right to dispute the landlord's allegation at a scheduled court hearing.

This paper suggests that paragraph 107(l)(b) is inconsistent with the underlying purposes of the Landlord and Tenant Act, and might run afoul of sections 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter …

Good Kids, Bad Kids: A Revelation About The Due Process Rights Of Children, Cecelia M. Espenoza

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

In the case of Reno v. Flores, the United States Supreme Court held that the indefinite detention of unaccompanied, immigrant children without a mandatory hearing before an immigration judge did not violate the children's substantive or procedural due process rights. To fully examine the procedural and substantive due process rights of these children, the Article engages in an analysis of children's due process rights in general, and then places the Reno v. Flores decision in context.

An Argument For Universal Pediatric Hiv Testing, Counseling And Treatment, Colin Crawford

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article argues that mandatory pediatric HIV testing, counseling, and treatment are essential to address a public health emergency, overriding constitutional concerns. The author, Colin Crawford, asserts that early detection and treatment significantly improve the lives of HIV-positive children, making it a compelling state interest that should take precedence over privacy and autonomy concerns.

Back To The Briarpatch: An Argument In Favor Of Constitutional Meta-Analysis In State Action Determinations, Ronald J. Krotoszynski Jr.

Michigan Law Review

Brer Rabbit, after claiming repeatedly that he would prefer almost anything to being thrown into the briarpatch, expressed glee once tossed there. In fact, Brer Rabbit wanted to be in the briarpatch because, like most rabbits, he could navigate the briarpatch with relative ease: the briarpatch was home.

Over the course of a century, the Supreme Court has developed a great degree of familiarity with the state action doctrine, a doctrinal briar patch. Like Brer Rabbit, the Court has disclaimed repeatedly any interest in being there.

In this article, I argue that the existing tests for establishing the presence of …

S.L.A.P.P. Suits: A First Amendment Issue And Beyond, Alice Glover, Marcus Jimison

North Carolina Central Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Legal System And American Constitutional Democracy, Edited By Maria Frankowska And Albert P. Melone, Emilia Kandeva-Spiridonova

Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies

No abstract provided.

Offensiveness, The New Standard For First Amendment Legal Advertising Cases: Florida Bar V. Went For It, Inc., Tara L. Lattomus

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Money Talks: The First Amendment Implications Of Counterfeiting Law, Julie K. Staple

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Liberating Commercial Speech: Product Labeling Controls And The First Amendment, Lars Noah, Barbara A. Noah

Faculty Scholarship

As federal regulators impose increasing limits on what manufacturers may say about their products, constitutional protections for commercial speech become ever more important. Indeed, the United States Supreme Court's most recent First Amendment decisions suggest meaningful regard for the value of advertising and labeling as types of protected expression. At the same time, however, federal lawmakers are imposing ever more onerous restrictions on promotional activities and product labeling. The Authors discuss federal law relating to regulation of product labeling.

Constitutional Law—Commercial Speech—Face-To-Face Solicitation By Certified Public Accountants (But Not Attorneys?) Is Protected Speech Under The First Amendment, L. Kyle Heffley

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Private Property Rights Protection Legislation Across The Nation, Nancie G. Marzulla

Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)

25 pages (includes 1 map).

Contains footnotes.

When Is The Senate In Recess For Purposes Of The Recess Appointment Clause?, Michael A. Carrier

Michigan Law Review

This Note argues that courts should interpret the Constitution to allow the President to make recess appointments only during intersession recesses of the Senate. Part I chronicles the history of presidential recess appointments. This Part highlights the increasing frequency of, and questionable need for, intrasession recess appointments in the past twenty-five years. Part II examines the text of the Recess Appointments Clause and the intentions of the Framers regarding the scope of the clause and the appointment power in general. This Part argues that the text and the Framers' intentions indicate that the President's power to make recess appointments should …

Queer Intersectionality And The Failure Of Recent Lesbian And Gay "Victories", Darren Rosenblum

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

Part I of this essay will introduce the queer theories underlying my critique and will outline the discrete positioning of lesbian and gay identity and community which labels these cases “victories.” The intersectionality of queer identity is the key blind spot in the litigation model. The queer continuum, a re-conceptualization of Adrienne Rich's lesbian continuum, delineates the spectrum of queer identity. Part II will explore the facts, issues and holdings of these four cases. My examination of these cases will reveal how they grant some rights to “but-for” queers, who, “but-for” their being lesbian or gay, would be “perfect citizens.” …

The Public Interest And The Unconstitutionality Of Private Prosecutors, John Bessler

All Faculty Scholarship

This article discusses the history of private and public prosecution in the United States, including standards governing prosecutorial ethics. It argues that the use of private prosecutors is unethical and violative of defendants' constitutional rights. In particular, the article asserts that the use of such prosecutors violates due process principles and creates, at the very least, an unacceptable appearance of impropriety. The article contends that the public's interest in not having its members erroneously charged or convicted in the criminal process outweighs an interested party's right to retain a private prosecutor as set forth in some state laws. In addition …

Racism In Our Courts: The Underfunding Of Public Defenders And Its Disproportionate Impact Upon Racial Minorities, Rebecca Marcus

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

The severe underfunding of the nation's Public Defender System has jeopardized the criminal defendant's right to adequate assistance of counsel. The denial of this right has a disproportionate impact upon racial minorities because they are disproportionately represented by public defenders. The result is a violation of minorities' Sixth Amendment right to counsel and Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection.

This Note examines the causes of under-funding and its effects on racial minorities. To remedy this discrimination, this Note offers several proposals, including a burden-shifting scheme, the use of the disparate impact standard to show discrimination (as opposed to the discriminatory …

The Right To Appointment Of Counsel For The Indigent Civil Contemnor Facing Incarceration For Failure To Pay Child Support - Mcbride V. Mcbride, Kurt F. Hausler

Campbell Law Review

This Note will provide a history of a civil contemnor's right to appointed counsel in North Carolina by reviewing the statutory and judicial history prior to McBride v. McBride, primarily through a study of the North Carolina Supreme Court holding in Jolly v. Wright. Next, this Note will look at the law outside of North Carolina which effected the holding in McBride. Next, this Note will examine the court's ruling in McBride, and discuss the altered judicial reasoning which led to the court's holding. Finally, this Note will address the ramifications of McBride, and conclude …

The Constitution And Personal Autonomy: The Lawyering Perspective, Robert Allen Sedler

Law Faculty Research Publications

No abstract provided.