Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1128)
- William & Mary Law School (984)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (657)
- UC Law SF (608)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (477)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (456)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (432)
- Duke Law (396)
- Georgetown University Law Center (381)
- Seattle University School of Law (380)
- American University Washington College of Law (330)
- Columbia Law School (319)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (310)
- Notre Dame Law School (288)
- BLR (254)
- The University of Akron (254)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (252)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (250)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (246)
- University of Colorado Law School (239)
- University of Kentucky (238)
- UIC School of Law (237)
- University of Richmond (232)
- Fordham Law School (229)
- West Virginia University (215)
- Pepperdine University (212)
- Cleveland State University (198)
- University of Georgia School of Law (198)
- Brigham Young University Law School (177)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (175)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (1234)
- Constitutional law (1189)
- Constitution (807)
- Supreme Court (657)
- First Amendment (528)
-
- United States Supreme Court (395)
- Federalism (340)
- Due process (339)
- Judicial review (280)
- Originalism (261)
- Separation of powers (249)
- Fourth Amendment (242)
- Fifth Amendment (233)
- Fourteenth Amendment (233)
- Constitutional interpretation (230)
- Jurisprudence (219)
- Congress (217)
- Law (211)
- Equal protection (199)
- Discrimination (197)
- Civil rights (185)
- Religion (180)
- Sixth Amendment (171)
- History (169)
- Abortion (164)
- Freedom of speech (160)
- Privacy (160)
- United States (160)
- Politics (159)
- Democracy (153)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1074)
- Michigan Law Review (758)
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (600)
- Faculty Publications (427)
- Articles (373)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (352)
- Touro Law Review (352)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (345)
- Seattle University Law Review (329)
- William & Mary Law Review (310)
- Indiana Law Journal (256)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (254)
- Cardozo Law Review (244)
- ExpressO (234)
- UIC Law Review (211)
- West Virginia Law Review (211)
- Scholarly Works (209)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (205)
- Journal Articles (195)
- Kentucky Law Journal (195)
- Publications (181)
- Supreme Court Case Files (175)
- Buffalo Law Review (174)
- Pepperdine Law Review (173)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (161)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (146)
- BYU Law Review (139)
- Scholarly Articles (137)
- Akron Law Review (136)
- Maine Law Review (133)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 15031 - 15060 of 15618
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Jurisdiction And Free Speech Problems In Peaceful Picketing, John P. Macarthur
Jurisdiction And Free Speech Problems In Peaceful Picketing, John P. Macarthur
Buffalo Law Review
Construction Workers v. Laburnum, 347 U. S. 656 (1954).
Constitutional Law - Federal Occupation Of Field Of Control Of Subversives, John C. Hall S.Ed.
Constitutional Law - Federal Occupation Of Field Of Control Of Subversives, John C. Hall S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant was chairman of the Communist Party for the western district of Pennsylvania. He was charged with willfully advocating the violent overthrow of the United States Government, and his conviction under state statute was sustained by the superior court. On appeal, held, reversed. The federal Smith Act pre-empted the field of control of subversive activities and the state law is therefore void. Commonwealth v. Nelson, 377 Pa. 58, 104 A. (2d) 133 (1954).
Released Time And Religious Liberty: A Further Reply, Paul G. Kauper
Released Time And Religious Liberty: A Further Reply, Paul G. Kauper
Michigan Law Review
In his "Reply" to the writer's review of his excellent book, Mr. Pfeffer has singled out the part of the review in which the writer discussed the released-time problem and the position taken by Mr. Pfeffer with respect thereto. To prolong the arguments over this matter in the pages of this Review would he unprofitable, hut the writer feels that a few comments on Mr. Pfeffer's reply would not he out of order.
Legislation - Requirement Of Definiteness In Statutory Standards, Robert B. Krueger S.Ed.
Legislation - Requirement Of Definiteness In Statutory Standards, Robert B. Krueger S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
While it is universally recognized that definiteness in statutory standards is a condition prerequisite to the application of a statute, there is no agreement among either the courts or the writers as to the theory behind this requirement. However, common elements in each of the two prevalent theories indicate certain factors which may well be decisive on the question of definiteness in any given case. The purpose of this comment is to explore the practical implications of the interplay of these various factors and theories.
Crosskey And The Constitution: A Reply To Goebel, Sylvester Petro
Crosskey And The Constitution: A Reply To Goebel, Sylvester Petro
Michigan Law Review
The immediate purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the inadequacies of the most embittered of the reviews of Crosskey's book which I have read, "Ex Parte Clio,'' written by Professor Goebel (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "the reviewer"). Demonstrating these things will involve repeated reference to the thesis and the methodology of the book, and comparison of the book with the contentions advanced by the reviewer. The reading will probably be as tedious as the writing has been, but that cannot be helped, for the longer aim of this paper cannot be achieved in any other manner. That aim …
Federal Procedure - Availability Of Coram Nobis In Federal Cases Involving Right Of Counsel, John Leddy S.Ed.
Federal Procedure - Availability Of Coram Nobis In Federal Cases Involving Right Of Counsel, John Leddy S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
ln 1939 Robert Morgan pleaded guilty to a charge of mail theft and was sentenced by a federal district court to four years imprisonment. He served the term and was released. In 1950 he was convicted of a crime in New York state and sentenced as a second offender because of his previous federal conviction. In 1952 he made application to the district court of original sentence for a common law writ of coram nobis, seeking an order vacating and setting aside his conviction by that court on the ground that he was not given assistance of counsel and had …
Book Reviews, Grant Gilmore, Robert J. Nordstrom, Richard J. Faletti, Robert Barbeau Mautz, Charles Elmer Fiddler, Calvin W. Corman, George B. Fraser, Adam Yarmolinsky, James A. Durham, Reginald Parker, Jo Desha Lucas, Thomas W. Christopher, Frederick J. Ludwig, John S. Bradway, Harold Gill Reuschlein, Henri Renard S.J., C. Dallas Sands, William P. Murphy
Book Reviews, Grant Gilmore, Robert J. Nordstrom, Richard J. Faletti, Robert Barbeau Mautz, Charles Elmer Fiddler, Calvin W. Corman, George B. Fraser, Adam Yarmolinsky, James A. Durham, Reginald Parker, Jo Desha Lucas, Thomas W. Christopher, Frederick J. Ludwig, John S. Bradway, Harold Gill Reuschlein, Henri Renard S.J., C. Dallas Sands, William P. Murphy
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Conflict Of Laws -- 1954 Tennessee Survey, John W. Wade
Conflict Of Laws -- 1954 Tennessee Survey, John W. Wade
Vanderbilt Law Review
There are three Tennessee Supreme Court cases involving Conflict of Laws and an equal number of federal cases arising in Tennessee. One of the state cases raises constitutional questions and the United States Supreme Court may someday disagree with the Tennessee court.
"Stockholders' Liability." This case is Paper Products Co. v. Doggrell. The facts are not complicated, but a rather involved mix-up developed between the state and federal courts.
Doggrell, Konz and Whitaker were sole stockholders in an Arkansas business association entitled Forest City Wood Products, Inc., with principal office located in St. Francis County, Arkansas. Doggrell and Konz were …
Constitutional Law--Separation Of Powers--Control By Judiciary Of Compensation Of Court Attaches, W. R. B. Ii.
Constitutional Law--Separation Of Powers--Control By Judiciary Of Compensation Of Court Attaches, W. R. B. Ii.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law, Joan Smith
Constitutional Law, Joan Smith
Washington Law Review
Covers cases on the enrolled bill rule and on the right to trial by jury in contempt proceedings.
The Right Of Privacy And Due Process Of Law, Paul Gonson
The Right Of Privacy And Due Process Of Law, Paul Gonson
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Crosskey's Constitution: An Archeological Blueprint, Howard J. Graham
Crosskey's Constitution: An Archeological Blueprint, Howard J. Graham
Vanderbilt Law Review
Could it be fortunate that so much of history is a closed, or at least a forbidden, book? Otherwise might we not squander our resources reliving and refighting the past? The present soon would be unendurable, the future an endless remarshalling yard for causes stretching back to antiquity.
If the first volumes of Professor Crosskey's study invite this somber opening reflection, it is not that his achievement is unimpressive. Here, undeniably, is a work in the great tradition of controversial writing. Few lawyers and certainly fewer historians--ever willingly have assumed greater burdens of proof. Yet fewer still have contrived a …
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
A Commentary on Recent Case Law --By Subject:
Constitutional Law--Due Process--Use in State Prosecution of Evidence obtained by Illegal Invasion of Privacy
==============================
Constitutional Law--Unlawful Search and Seizure--Admissibility of Evidence for Impeachment Purposes
===============================
Evidence--Radar Evidence of Speed--Coincidence of Radar and Speedometer Readings as Hearsay
===============================
Federal Courts--State NonResident Motorist Statute--Waiver of Federal Venue Privilege
===============================
Federal Jurisdiction--Diversity of Citizenship--Retroactive Effect of Amendments to Perfect Jurisdiction
===============================
Income Taxation--Deductions--Periodic Alimony Payments
===============================
Labor Law--Preemptive Effect of Taft-Hartley--Scope of State Jurisdiction
===============================
Torts--Dog Bite--Owner's Scienter
===============================
Workmen's Compensation--Accident Arising out of Employment--Pre-Existing Heart Disease
Kiwaan V. Minister Of Defense, Shneor Zalman Cheshin, David Goitein, Zvi Berinson
Kiwaan V. Minister Of Defense, Shneor Zalman Cheshin, David Goitein, Zvi Berinson
Translated Opinions
An order of deportation was issued against the petitioner who had lived in Palestine and who in the year 1948 had been registered in the Register of Inhabitants. He had been compelled in 1949 to leave the country as a result of army action and had lived for a while in a neighbouring Arab country. He returned to Israel without permission and as a result of subsequent court proceedings was held to be entitled to receive and did receive an identity card. The petitioner now contended that as he was the holder of an identity card and had become an …
Constitutional Law—Scope Of Fifteenth Amendment Protection Against Attempts To Restrict Franchise Of Negroes. [United States Supreme Court], John F. Kay Jr.
Constitutional Law—Scope Of Fifteenth Amendment Protection Against Attempts To Restrict Franchise Of Negroes. [United States Supreme Court], John F. Kay Jr.
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Judicial Powers - Legality Of The Grand Jury Report, Alan Reeve Hunt S.Ed.
Constitutional Law - Judicial Powers - Legality Of The Grand Jury Report, Alan Reeve Hunt S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
On December 2, 1952, a federal grand jury for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in a "presentment" made to that court, took the State Department severely to task for what it considered to be a conspicuous failure in handling the problem of subversive employees, United States citizens, at the United Nations. It further charged the State Department with impeding the grand jury's progress in attempting to fix responsibility for the failure upon certain State Department officials. On October 11, 1951, the Camden County grand jury presented to the Superior Court of New Jersey …
Constitutional Law - Due Process - Scope Of Inquiry In Habeas Corpus Petitions From Military Prisoner, Eugene Alkema
Constitutional Law - Due Process - Scope Of Inquiry In Habeas Corpus Petitions From Military Prisoner, Eugene Alkema
Michigan Law Review
Petitioners, military personnel, were convicted by courts martial of rape and murder. After exhausting military appellate remedies, they petitioned federal civil courts for writs of habeas corpus on the ground that they had been convicted in proceedings denying them basic constitutional rights. The petitions were denied. On appeal, held, affirmed, two justices dissenting. When the record shows that military courts have fairly considered all of the allegations of the petitioners and have found no denial of constitutional rights, civil courts in habeas corpus proceedings will not hear evidence on the merits of the allegations. Burns v. Wilson, 346 …
Criminal Procedure - Standing Of The Press To Protest Exclusion Of Public From Criminal Trial By Order Of The Trial Judge, M. Fred Mallender, Ii
Criminal Procedure - Standing Of The Press To Protest Exclusion Of Public From Criminal Trial By Order Of The Trial Judge, M. Fred Mallender, Ii
Michigan Law Review
Defendant judge, believing that great harm to public morals and decency was to be apprehended from the testimony in the vice trial of Minot F. Jelke, exercised his discretion to exclude the general public including plaintiff newspapers from the court room during the state's case. The family and friends of the accused along with officers of the court, witnesses, and jury were not excluded. The plaintiffs applied for a writ of prohibition to restrain the defendant from enforcing his order. The court denied the application on the grounds that the defendant judge had the power to make the exclusion order …
The Federalism Of Freedom, Chester James Antieau
The Federalism Of Freedom, Chester James Antieau
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure Under The Fourth Amendment As Interpreted By The United States Supreme Court, E. G. Trimble
Search And Seizure Under The Fourth Amendment As Interpreted By The United States Supreme Court, E. G. Trimble
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Potentialities Of Equal Protection As An Implement Of Judicial Review
Potentialities Of Equal Protection As An Implement Of Judicial Review
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Developments In The Law Of Coerced Confessions, Howard Klemme
Developments In The Law Of Coerced Confessions, Howard Klemme
Publications
No abstract provided.
Federal Control Of Health And Safety Standards In Peacetime Private Atomic Energy Activities, Samuel D. Estep
Federal Control Of Health And Safety Standards In Peacetime Private Atomic Energy Activities, Samuel D. Estep
Michigan Law Review
This article is directed to the question of the power of Congress to provide for such regulation of those who handle radioactive materials in private industry and not to the policy question of whether Congress ought to attempt such regulation.
Evidence - Wiretapping And The Congress, Richard W. Pogue S.Ed.
Evidence - Wiretapping And The Congress, Richard W. Pogue S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The familiar cry that "there ought to be a law" is frequently raised concerning the practice which Justice Holmes long ago characterized as "dirty business" - the tapping of telephone wires. Although existing legislation on both federal and state levels deals with interception of telephone messages, the almost universal conclusion of commentators on the subject has been that many of the present day statutes are inadequate. It is particularly apparent that the famous section 605 of the Federal Communications Act of 1934 has long been in need of replacement or thorough revision. The purpose of this comment is to examine …
Religious Education And The Historical Method Of Constitution Interpretation - A Review Article, Robert E. Rodes
Religious Education And The Historical Method Of Constitution Interpretation - A Review Article, Robert E. Rodes
Journal Articles
Confusion Twice Confounded is sufficiently typical of a growing body of literature to warrant more extensive treatment than is usually accorded in a book review. It analyzes at great length the opinions in the Everson and McCollum cases and criticizes them in the light of the historical background of the First Amendment. Everson, it will be recalled, derived from the Founding Fathers the doctrine that the Constitution required a "wall of separation between church and state," which was not breached by public payment of transportation to and from parochial schools. McCollum used the test laid down in Everson to invalidate …
Constitutional Law In A Liberal Arts Curriculum, Robert Y. Fluno
Constitutional Law In A Liberal Arts Curriculum, Robert Y. Fluno
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
The Fourteenth Amendment And School Segregation, Howard Jay Graham
The Fourteenth Amendment And School Segregation, Howard Jay Graham
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Equal Protection - Damage Action For Breach Of Racial Restrictive Covenant, Raymond R. Trombadore S.Ed.
Constitutional Law - Equal Protection - Damage Action For Breach Of Racial Restrictive Covenant, Raymond R. Trombadore S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Petitioners sued at law for breach of a racial restrictive covenant, alleging that respondent violated the covenant by conveying restricted realty without incorporating restrictions in the deed, and by permitting non-Caucasians to enter and occupy the premises. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, the California court of appeals affirmed, and hearing was denied by the state supreme court. On certiorari the United States Supreme Court held, affirmed, Chief Justice Vinson dissenting. An award of damages by a state court for breach of racial restrictive covenants would constitute state action which would deprive the excluded class of …
Aliens - Naturalization - Netural Aliens Who Sought Relief From Military Service Barred From Becoming United States Citizens, John Houck S.Ed.
Aliens - Naturalization - Netural Aliens Who Sought Relief From Military Service Barred From Becoming United States Citizens, John Houck S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
During World War II, an alien who was a citizen or a subject of a neutral country was allowed to escape service in the armed forces of the United States by signing Selective Service Form DSS 301. A release thus obtained carried with it a disability ever to become a citizen of the United States. A substantial number of neutral aliens availed themselves of this relief from military service. Today, the courts are faced with the problem of whether signing Form 301 shall in every case prevent the alien from becoming a citizen. It is the purpose of this comment …
The Right Of Petition, L. A. S.