Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (957)
- Seattle University School of Law (625)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (603)
- William & Mary Law School (473)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (351)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (339)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (321)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (318)
- Columbia Law School (246)
- Fordham Law School (229)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (211)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (210)
- BLR (206)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (199)
- University of Richmond (186)
- University of Miami Law School (176)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (173)
- University of Colorado Law School (169)
- Brigham Young University Law School (164)
- New York Law School (157)
- Georgetown University Law Center (156)
- UIC School of Law (152)
- University of Georgia School of Law (146)
- Pepperdine University (145)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (143)
- University of Washington School of Law (142)
- Cleveland State University (137)
- St. John's University School of Law (128)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (119)
- Boston University School of Law (114)
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (1153)
- Civil rights (881)
- Civil Rights (586)
- Race (531)
- Title VII (376)
-
- Constitutional Law (338)
- Racism (333)
- Affirmative action (304)
- Supreme Court (304)
- Equal protection (283)
- United States Supreme Court (277)
- Race and law (269)
- Racial discrimination (247)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (239)
- Constitutional law (235)
- Equality (234)
- Women (223)
- Employment discrimination (222)
- First Amendment (213)
- Constitution (210)
- Sex discrimination (207)
- Segregation (205)
- Minorities (196)
- Gender (178)
- Fourteenth Amendment (176)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (168)
- Diversity (157)
- Race discrimination (157)
- Education (155)
- Slavery (155)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (857)
- Michigan Law Review (426)
- Seattle University Law Review (317)
- Faculty Publications (298)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (277)
-
- Articles (276)
- ExpressO (194)
- All Faculty Scholarship (189)
- Touro Law Review (189)
- Scholarly Works (177)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (173)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (166)
- Publications (150)
- Indiana Law Journal (149)
- Faculty Articles (145)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (142)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (141)
- William & Mary Law Review (138)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (135)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (131)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (128)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (125)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (121)
- UIC Law Review (117)
- Pepperdine Law Review (115)
- Cardozo Law Review (100)
- West Virginia Law Review (100)
- Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality (95)
- Law Faculty Publications (95)
- Fordham Law Review (94)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 11881 - 11910 of 11932
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Missouri Supreme Court; Decision; September Term 1937, Judge William F. Frank
Missouri Supreme Court; Decision; September Term 1937, Judge William F. Frank
Case Materials
No abstract provided.
Missouri Supreme Court; Respondant's Brief; May Term 1937
Missouri Supreme Court; Respondant's Brief; May Term 1937
Case Materials
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Race Segregation Ordinance - Effect Of Military Order Of Governor Issued For Same Purpose
Michigan Law Review
A "segregation ordinance" of Oklahoma City, prospective in nature, made it unlawful for any negro to occupy as a residence any house or building located in a block wherein a majority of the buildings used were occupied by white persons. The initial step in the segregation of races in the city occurred when the Governor issued a military order for the separation of the races, because it appeared that riot and bloodshed were imminent; such order to remain in effect until an ordinance was passed in lieu of the order. Held, the ordinance was an invalid exercise of the …
Circuit Court, Boone County, Missouri; Respondents Trial Brief; June Term 1936
Circuit Court, Boone County, Missouri; Respondents Trial Brief; June Term 1936
Case Materials
No abstract provided.
Circuit Court, Boone County, Missouri; Respondents Return To The Alt. Writ Of Mandamus; April Term 1936
Case Materials
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law-Exclusion From Juries On Grounds Of Race And Color-Scottsboro Case
Constitutional Law-Exclusion From Juries On Grounds Of Race And Color-Scottsboro Case
Michigan Law Review
A negro convicted of rape in one of the so-called "Scottsboro" cases moved to quash the indictment and the trial venire, alleging systematic exclusion of negroes from the grand and petit juries on the grounds of race and color. The trial court overruled the motions, and the Alabama Supreme Court sustained this decision, holding that the evidence failed to establish such exclusion. On certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, held, that the refusal to quash the indictment and trial venire was a denial of equal protection of the laws contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment, since the evidence on …
Constitutional Law - Discrimination Against Negroes - Control Of Party Membership, Everett S. Brown
Constitutional Law - Discrimination Against Negroes - Control Of Party Membership, Everett S. Brown
Michigan Law Review
The petitioner, R. R. Grovey, allegedly a citizen of the United States and of Texas, and possessing all the qualifications of a voter, was refused a ballot for a Democratic party primary because he was of the Negro race. Grovey demanded ten dollars damages from the respondent, Albert Townsend, the county clerk, a state officer. The Revised Civil Statutes of Texas provide for primary elections and regulate absentee voting. When Grovey demanded of Townsend an absentee ballot it was refused in virtue of a resolution of the state Democratic convention of Texas, adopted May 24, 1932, as follows:
"Be it …
Segregation Of Residences Of Negroes, Arthur T. Martin
Segregation Of Residences Of Negroes, Arthur T. Martin
Michigan Law Review
Most white people do not want Negroes for neighbors. For many years this race prejudice alone seemed adequate to secure the type of domiciliary segregation which the majority desired. In recent years, however, Negro incursions into so-called white territory have become more numerous, and white landowners have resorted to legal devices to secure race exclusiveness in residential sections. In considering the validity of these segregation devices the courts have not ordinarily purported to take into account the social desirability of the end sought. No examination has been made of the factors back of Negro migration into white territory. No thought …
Primary Elections And The Constitution, Luther Harris Evans
Primary Elections And The Constitution, Luther Harris Evans
Michigan Law Review
Recent attempts in Texas and elsewhere to exclude Negro voters from primary elections reveal the unsettled state of constitutional law in this field. Two struggles of principle, individualism versus police power and States' rights versus nationalism, are outlined in the judicial opinions reviewed below under the following headings: (I) Basis of state power over primaries; (II) Limitations on state power over primaries imposed by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments; (III) Basis of state power over primaries for nominating United States Senators and Representatives; and (IV) Basis of national power over primaries for nominating United States Senators and Representatives.
Evidence-The Unchastity Of A Female Witness As A Ground For Impeaching Her Veracity
Evidence-The Unchastity Of A Female Witness As A Ground For Impeaching Her Veracity
Michigan Law Review
The underlying question which we propose to consider is this: Has the trait of chastity any such definite correlation with that of veracity that courts are justified in using the former as a criterion of the latter? It must be apparent from even a brief survey of the decisions in this field, and the reasons given therefor, that on this question the courts are swayed far more than ordinarily by their emotional reactions. Buttressed with sentiments that cannot fail to stir the heart of the male in any monogamous community and riveted with references to religion as well as the …
Criminal Law And Procedure - Evidence - Presumptions
Criminal Law And Procedure - Evidence - Presumptions
Michigan Law Review
The Alien Land Law of California forbids the acquisition of real property for agricultural purposes by aliens ineligible to citizenship; amendment 9b provides that proof of the acquisition of land by the defendant and of his being a member of a race ineligible to United States citizenship raises the presumption of ineligibility to citizenship against the defendant, and the burden is on him to show citizenship or eligibility thereto. Defendants, an American and a Japanese, were indicted for conspiracy to violate the act. No evidence as to the birthplace of the Japanese was adduced by either side, and both were …
Constitutional Law - Due Process And Equal Protection - Right Of Counsel
Constitutional Law - Due Process And Equal Protection - Right Of Counsel
Michigan Law Review
The Scottsboro cases decided by the Supreme Court at the present term raise several interesting constitutional questions. The judgments were assailed on the ground that they were violative of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment in three respects: (1) that the negroes were tried by juries from which members of their race were systematically excluded; (2) that they were not accorded a fair, impartial and deliberate trial; (3) that due process was denied because the right of counsel, with the usual incidents of consultation and adequate preparation for trial, was lacking. While the Supreme Court …
Schools-Race Segregation-Constitutional Law
Report On Crime And The Foreign Born, Joseph Cohen
Report On Crime And The Foreign Born, Joseph Cohen
Michigan Law Review
That the foreign born, more than the native born, tend to run afoul of the law, especially with respect to the more serious offenses, is a popular doctrine which critical opinion in the field of criminology has long been inclined either to qualify as to essential details or to contradict in toto. Twenty years back the Federal Immigration Commission reported that all the evidence then available indicated a lesser criminality on the part of the immigrant group as a whole. Succeeding studies have supported this conclusion. That an adverse view of the foreign born should persist in the face of …
Recognition Of Validity And Incidents Of Marriages Between Blacks And Whites, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Recognition Of Validity And Incidents Of Marriages Between Blacks And Whites, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Powell Writings
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law-Equal Protection-Disparity Of Privilege And Discrimination
Constitutional Law-Equal Protection-Disparity Of Privilege And Discrimination
Michigan Law Review
The equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment provides that no person or class of persons shall be denied the same protection of the laws that others in the same place and under like circumstances enjoy. But it has been said that "equality and not identity of privileges and rights is what is guaranteed to the citizen" by the fourteenth amendment. People v. Gallagher, 93 N. Y. 438, 45 Am. Rep. 232. Any law which in terms provides for identity of privileges and rights, but which operates in such a manner as to produce political or economic inequality. because of …
Constitutional Law -- Equal Protection Clause -- Discrimination, Fowler V. Harper
Constitutional Law -- Equal Protection Clause -- Discrimination, Fowler V. Harper
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Restraints On Alienation-Restrictive Covenants-Racial Discrimination
Restraints On Alienation-Restrictive Covenants-Racial Discrimination
Michigan Law Review
Three cases decided in 1925 in three widely separated parts of the United States, namely, California, Michigan, and the District of Columbia, raise the question: How far may one give legal effect to his racial prejudices through the medium of covenants and conditions inserted in wills and inter vivos conveyances? An attempt was made in each of these cases to restrict the use or sale of the property involved to white persons or to deny it to colored persons. Two of the cases upheld the restriction; one declared it invalid.
Constitutional Validity Of Statute Barring Negroes From Primary Elections
Constitutional Validity Of Statute Barring Negroes From Primary Elections
Michigan Law Review
The history of suffrage in the South during the last thirty-five years has been largely a story of the adoption and administration of discriminatory regulations devised to catch the negro without debarring any considerable number of white people. This legal disfranchisement has been accomplished by property or educational qualifications possessed generally by whites but not by negroes, or by giving a great deal of discretion to election and registration officials, who, understanding what is expected of them, find quite uniformly that the negroes do not meet the requirements while the white applicants generally do. How the letter of the Fifteenth …
Aliens-Right To Own Or Lease Land-Effect Of "Equal Protection" Clause
Aliens-Right To Own Or Lease Land-Effect Of "Equal Protection" Clause
Michigan Law Review
Right of alien residents under the "equal protection" clause of- the federal Constitution received further delimitation in the Alien Land Law Cases, decisions handed down last November. Terrace v. Thompson (U. S. 1923), Adv. Ops. 35, and Porterfield v. Webb, Adv. Ops. 42. In the former case the court was concerned with a Washington statute passed to enforce a provision in the Washington constitution that forbade the ownership of land by any aliens other than those who had in good faith declared their intention to become citizens. The California statute in the second case differed chiefly in limiting its …
Amendments To The Constitution Of Missouri Proposed By The Constitutional Convention, 1922-1923, And The Address To The People : To Be Submitted At Special Election To Be Held Tuesday, February 26, 1924
Missouri Constitutional Sections Related to Race and Education
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law--Minimum Wage Law For Women As A Violation Of The Fifth Amendment
Constitutional Law--Minimum Wage Law For Women As A Violation Of The Fifth Amendment
Michigan Law Review
The advance of so-called social legislation within the last several decades has furnished an intensely interesting period in constitutional and industrial development. The last skirmish with the fast-disappearing forces of logic and anachronistic formalism seems to have been fought in the recent case of Adkins v. Lyons (April 9, 1923), U. S. Adv. Ops. 795 and 796.
A Critique Of Methods For Alteration Of Women's Legal Status, Gladys Wells
A Critique Of Methods For Alteration Of Women's Legal Status, Gladys Wells
Michigan Law Review
A case was appealed because all women electors were excluded from the jury. Held, the Nineteenth federal Amendment merely prohibits discrimination, leaving the states to confer the right of suffrage. Moreover, jury service is distinct therefrom; and the state constitution excludes women by providing for juries of twelve "men." If being an elector ipso facto entitled to jury service, the legislature could prescribe no other limitation. No question of violation of the Fourteenth Amendment can be raised since the accused does not belong to the excluded class.
Does The Constitution Protect Free Speech, Herbert F. Goodrich
Does The Constitution Protect Free Speech, Herbert F. Goodrich
Michigan Law Review
Many thoughtful men and women, witnessing the suppression of speech, by means both judicial and extra-judicial, in the period through which we have just passed, have reluctantly concluded that our hard won ight of freedom of speech has been lost, swept away in the flood tide of war enthusiasm. They point to the example of the recent candidate for the presidency, Eugene Debs, who is still confined in a federal prison for words he uttered during the war. They call attention to the fact that the fate of Mr. Debs is no worse than that of scores of other persons, …
Alien Rights In The United States In Wartime, W C. Hunter
Alien Rights In The United States In Wartime, W C. Hunter
Michigan Law Review
The large number of aliens in the United States presents one of the many problems with which the Government has had to deal in the present war. Technically every immigrant from Germany and Austria-Hungary who has not taken out papers of naturalization and who therefor still owes allegiance to the Fatherland is an enemy alien. But while the great majority of these aliens are naturally sympathetic with German war aims, or at least are not ready to give their wholehearted support to the Allies, they are not a source of danger to the United States. Only a small section have …
Race Segregation Ordinance Invalid, Henry M. Bates
Race Segregation Ordinance Invalid, Henry M. Bates
Articles
The opinion in Buchanan v. Warley reflects the confusion and difficulty of that troublesome problem, the place of the negro race in the United States, with which the case and the segregation ordinance of Louisville discussed therein are essentially concerned. The decision by a unanimous court reverses the holding of the Kentucky Court of Appeals, and declares that the ordinance violates the Fourteenth Amendment. This result is reached by one of those anomalous and objectionable devices which characterize our methods of solving fundamental constitutional questions. The case arose upon a bill for specific performance of a contract, whereby the plaintiff, …
Note And Comment, Albert V. Baumann Jr, Stannley E. Gifford, Donald F. Melhorn, Ralph W. Aigler
Note And Comment, Albert V. Baumann Jr, Stannley E. Gifford, Donald F. Melhorn, Ralph W. Aigler
Michigan Law Review
Interstate Commerce and State Control Over Foreign Corporations - Since Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 13 Pet. 519, there seems to have been no real occasion to doubt the power of a state totally to exclude foreign corporations seeking to engage in intrastate business only. The power to exclude being absolute, there has been no question as to the right of the state to allow the entrance of the foreign corporation for such business upon terms, and the terms may be of any sort, reasonable or unreasonable, except that the corporation seeking to enter cannot as a condition precedent to …
"The Dred Scott Case", Henry S. Barker
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
Attachment - Property in Custodia Legis; Bankruptcy - Promise After Adjudication to Pay Dischargeable Debt; Bills and Notes - Provision for Extension of Time of Payment; Bills and Notes - Transfer as Collateral for Pre-Existing Debt; Carriers - Ticket Not Conclusive Evidence of Contract of Carriage; Constitutional Law - Race Discrimination in Selection of Jury; Corporations - Rights of Pledgor of Stock; Courts - English the Official Language of the Phillippines; Evidence - Declarations as to Pedigree; Evidence - Expert Testimony; Husband and Wife - Power of Husband to Dispose of his Personalty by Gift Causa Mortis; Insurance - Liability …
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Appearance--appeal from Action in Rem as General Appearance; Bankruptcy--Suit by Trustee--Right to Trial by Jury; Bills and Notes--Draft by Agent on Principal--Necessity of Acceptance; Carriers--Merchandise as Baggage--Notice; Constitutional Law--Impairing Obligation of Contract--Clause of Insurance Contract Limiting the Time in Which to Bring Action; Constitutional Law--Invalidating Existing Contracts for Free Transportation; Contracts--Mutual Promises--Independent or Conditional; Courts--Supreme Court--Jurisdiction--Mandamus to Compel Entry of Judgment by Lower Court; Eminent Domain--Damages; Evidence--Confession of an Alleged Accomplice; Evidence--Statutes--Enrolled bill as Evidence; Homestead--Does Joinder of Wife to Release Dower Bar Her Homestead Right?; Insurance--Increase of Hazard; Libel and slander--Absolute Privilege--Judicial Proceedings; Parent and Child--May Parent Authorize Agent …