Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Fordham Law School (19)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (11)
- Brooklyn Law School (9)
- Columbia Law School (9)
- BLR (7)
-
- New York Law School (7)
- Duke Law (5)
- UC Law SF (5)
- UIC School of Law (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- The University of Akron (3)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (3)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- University of San Diego (3)
- University of Washington School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
- Singapore Management University (2)
- Keyword
-
- Corporate governance (17)
- Corporations (16)
- SEC (14)
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act (10)
- Sarbanes-Oxley (8)
-
- Corporate law (7)
- Business ethics (6)
- Corporate bureacracy (6)
- Corporate decision-making (6)
- Corporate setting (6)
- Judaism (6)
- Moral mazes (6)
- Religious values (6)
- Robert Jackall (6)
- Roman Catholic Church (6)
- Sapientia et doctrina (6)
- Securities Law (6)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (6)
- Enron (5)
- Fraud (5)
- Law and Economics (5)
- Securities regulation (5)
- Attorney-client privilege (4)
- Banking and Finance (4)
- Economics (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Professional Ethics (4)
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (4)
- Securities (4)
- Whistleblowing (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (32)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (13)
- Journal of Business & Technology Law (8)
- ExpressO (7)
- NYLS Law Review (5)
-
- UC Law Business Journal (5)
- UIC Law Review (5)
- Articles (4)
- Faculty Articles (4)
- Akron Law Review (3)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Works (3)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (3)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (3)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Buffalo Law Review (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Florida Law Review (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (2)
- Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business (2)
- San Diego International Law Journal (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (2)
- Working Paper Series (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- American University Business Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 120 of 166
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Foreword, Corporate Governance Five Years After Sarbanes-Oxley: Is There Real Change, Faith Stevelman
Foreword, Corporate Governance Five Years After Sarbanes-Oxley: Is There Real Change, Faith Stevelman
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Sarbanes-Oxley, Kermit The Frog, And Competition Regarding Audit Quality, Matthew J. Barrett
Sarbanes-Oxley, Kermit The Frog, And Competition Regarding Audit Quality, Matthew J. Barrett
Journal Articles
The regulatory scheme after Sarbanes-Oxley has significantly improved public company audits in the United States, or at least has demonstrated the potential to do so, but the obligation to preserve client confidentially still prevents auditors from competing for new clients on the basis of audit quality. This paper suggests a simple way for the SEC to facilitate such competition within the existing regulatory framework. The SEC should require issuers and registrants to disclose whether their independent audits uncovered any financial fraud and, within specified ranges, the number and amount of all audit adjustments incorporated into the financial statements filed with …
Class Action Criminality, Lisa L. Casey
Class Action Criminality, Lisa L. Casey
Journal Articles
This paper examines the criminal prosecution of Milberg Weiss, formerly the most successful plaintiffs’ securities class action firm in the country, for allegedly making undisclosed incentive payments to class representatives. In particular, the article examines the government’s primary charge - that the firm’s practice violated the “honest services” theory of mail and wire fraud. The government’s application of this theory presumes a fiduciary relationship between the class representatives and the class which has never been clearly delineated and, indeed, is against the weight of case law and the realities of class action litigation.
The Article proceeds on two different levels. …
Of Breaches Of The Peace, Home Invasions, And Securities Fraud, A. Christine Hurt
Of Breaches Of The Peace, Home Invasions, And Securities Fraud, A. Christine Hurt
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Prescription To Retire The Rhetoric Of "Principles-Based Systems" In Corporate Law, Securities Regulation, And Accounting, Lawrence A. Cunningham
A Prescription To Retire The Rhetoric Of "Principles-Based Systems" In Corporate Law, Securities Regulation, And Accounting, Lawrence A. Cunningham
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Article corrects widespread misconception about whether complex regulatory systems can be described fairly as either "rules-based" or "principles-based" (also called "standards-based'). Promiscuous use of these labels has proliferated in the years since the implosion of Enron Corp. Users show an increasing habit of celebrating systems dubbed principles-based and scorning those called rules-based. While the concepts of rules and principles (or standards) are useful to classify individual provisions, they are not scalable to the level of complex regulatory systems. The Article uses examples from corporate law, securities regulation, and accounting to illustrate this problematic phenomenon. To describe or design systems …
A Director's Good Faith, Elizabeth A. Nowicki
A Director's Good Faith, Elizabeth A. Nowicki
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rewarding Outside Directors, Assaf Hamdani, Reinier Kraakman
Rewarding Outside Directors, Assaf Hamdani, Reinier Kraakman
Michigan Law Review
While they often rely on the threat of penalties to produce deterrence, legal systems rarely use the promise of rewards. In this Article, we consider the use of rewards to motivate director vigilance. Measures to enhance director liability are commonly perceived to be too costly. We, however demonstrate that properly designed reward regimes could match the behavioral incentives offered by negligence-based liability regimes but with significantly lower costs. We further argue that the market itself cannot implement such a regime in the form of equity compensation for directors. We conclude by providing preliminary sketches of two alternative reward regimes. While …
Sarbanes-Oxley's Purported Over-Criminalization Of Corporate Offenders, Lisa H. Nicholson
Sarbanes-Oxley's Purported Over-Criminalization Of Corporate Offenders, Lisa H. Nicholson
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
The Impact On Director And Officer Behavior, Douglas M. Branson
The Impact On Director And Officer Behavior, Douglas M. Branson
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
The Impact On Shareholders And Other Constituents, Jennifer O'Hare
The Impact On Shareholders And Other Constituents, Jennifer O'Hare
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
A Social Defense Of Sarbanes-Oxley, James A. Fanto
A Social Defense Of Sarbanes-Oxley, James A. Fanto
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Financial Journalists In Corporate Governance, Michael J. Borden
The Role Of Financial Journalists In Corporate Governance, Michael J. Borden
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This Article pursues the important theme of disclosure, but focuses on a feature that has remained almost entirely overlooked by corporate and securities law scholars: the role of financial journalists in corporate governance. This omission is perhaps due to the fact that journalists do not fit easily into a legal discussion because they are largely unregulated. They are, in a sense, not legal actors, and, therefore do not comfortably become the subject of a legal prescription. Nevertheless, journalists contribute in many ways to the legal system at large and the system of corporate governance in particular.This Article uses case studies …
Marrying Diversity And Independence In The Boardroom: Just How Far Have You Come, Baby?, Erica Beecher-Monas
Marrying Diversity And Independence In The Boardroom: Just How Far Have You Come, Baby?, Erica Beecher-Monas
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
The Rise Of Independent Directors In The United States, 1950-2005: Of Shareholder Value And Stock Market Prices, Jeffrey N. Gordon
The Rise Of Independent Directors In The United States, 1950-2005: Of Shareholder Value And Stock Market Prices, Jeffrey N. Gordon
Faculty Scholarship
Between 1950 and 2005, the composition of large public company boards dramatically shifted towards independent directors, from approximately 20% independents to 75% independents. The standards for independence also became increasingly rigorous over the period. The available empirical evidence provides no convincing explanation for this change. This Article explains the trend in terms of two interrelated developments in U.S. political economy: first, the shift to shareholder value as the primary corporate objective; second, the greater informativeness of stock market prices. The overriding effect is to commit the firm to a shareholder wealth maximizing strategy as best measured by stock price performance. …
The Role Of Financial Journalists In Corporate Governance, Michael J. Borden
The Role Of Financial Journalists In Corporate Governance, Michael J. Borden
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
No abstract provided.
A Social Defense Of Sarbanes-Oxley, James A. Fanto
A Social Defense Of Sarbanes-Oxley, James A. Fanto
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Foreward, Faith Stevelman
A Social Defense Of Sarbanes-Oxley, James Fanto
From Lapdog To Watchdog: Sarbanes-Oxley Section 307 And A New Role For Corporate Lawyers, Peter C. Kostant
From Lapdog To Watchdog: Sarbanes-Oxley Section 307 And A New Role For Corporate Lawyers, Peter C. Kostant
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Internal Whistleblowing And Sarbanes-Oxley Section 806: Balancing The Interests Of Employee And Employer, Kevin Rubinstein
Internal Whistleblowing And Sarbanes-Oxley Section 806: Balancing The Interests Of Employee And Employer, Kevin Rubinstein
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Going Private At The Intersection Of The Market And The Law, Faith Stevelman
Going Private At The Intersection Of The Market And The Law, Faith Stevelman
Articles & Chapters
Delaware's fiduciary doctrine governing going private transactions by controlling stockholders is presently in disarray. Controllers generally select between single step cash-out mergers and tender offers followed by short-form mergers to do these freezeouts, and they are subject to very different equitable standards depending on the format selected. Further disarray arises because the courts' longstanding commitment to strict scrutiny in freezeouts is in tension with the popular disfavor towards private class-action litigation. This disarray threatens minority investors' interests in freezeouts, and capital market values more broadly. First, the disparities in freezeout doctrine have encouraged controllers to arbitrage the legal standards for …
Sarbanes-Oxley's Effects On Small Firms: What Is The Evidence?, Ehud Kamar, Pinar Karaca-Mandic, Eric L. Talley
Sarbanes-Oxley's Effects On Small Firms: What Is The Evidence?, Ehud Kamar, Pinar Karaca-Mandic, Eric L. Talley
Faculty Scholarship
This article presents an overview of the regulatory regime created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) and its implications for small firms. We review the available evidence in three distinct domains: compliance costs, stock price reactions, and firms' decisions to exit regulated securities markets.
Enron And The Special Purpose Entity. Use Or Abuse? The Real Problem - The Real Focus, Neal F. Newman
Enron And The Special Purpose Entity. Use Or Abuse? The Real Problem - The Real Focus, Neal F. Newman
ExpressO
In December of 2001, Enron Corporation filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code; one of the largest corporate bankruptcy filings at that time. When the investigations commenced and the tangled Enron web was unraveled, it was discovered that Enron had perpetrated a very sophisticated form of accounting fraud through its repeated use of what are referred to as Special Purpose Entities (“SPEs”). In their most basic forms, SPEs are business entities formed for the purpose of conducting a well specified activity such as construction of a gas pipeline, or collection of a specific group of accounts …
Sarbanes-Oxley's Structural Model To Encourage Corporate Whistleblowers, Richard E. Moberly
Sarbanes-Oxley's Structural Model To Encourage Corporate Whistleblowers, Richard E. Moberly
ExpressO
Recent corporate scandals demonstrate that rank-and-file employees often remain silent in the face of significant fraud. This silence is unfortunate because corporate employees have inside knowledge of misconduct that gives them an information advantage over more traditional corporate monitors, such as independent directors and government regulators. To address this problem, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act utilized a new approach that encourages employee whistleblowers to disclose information about corporate wrongdoing. This approach, which Professor Richard Moberly labels the “Structural Model,” requires that corporations provide a standardized channel for employees to report organizational misconduct to official monitors within the corporation. This Article offers an …
Legislation And Legitimation: Congress And Insider Trading In The 1980s, Thomas W. Joo
Legislation And Legitimation: Congress And Insider Trading In The 1980s, Thomas W. Joo
ExpressO
Legislation and Legitimation:
Congress and Insider Trading in the 1980s
Abstract
Orthodox corporate law-and-economics holds that American corporate and securities regulation has evolved inexorably toward economic efficiency. That position is difficult to square with the fact that regulation is the product of government actors and institutions. Indeed, the rational behavior assumptions of law-and-economics suggest that those actors and institutions would tend to place their own self-interest ahead of economic efficiency. This article provides anecdotal evidence of such self-interest at work. Based on an analysis of legislative history—primarily Congressional hearings—this article argues that Congress had little interest in the economic policy …
Implementation Of Sarbanes-Oxley: New Rules For Lawyers And What Lawyers Think, Olga Yevglevskaya-Wayne
Implementation Of Sarbanes-Oxley: New Rules For Lawyers And What Lawyers Think, Olga Yevglevskaya-Wayne
ExpressO
This paper discusses practical implications of Sarbanes-Oxley for lawyers. Emphasis is on the new federal rules of professional responsibility the Act sets up. The paper includes the views of various renowned practitioners interpreting and using these rules. The paper also contains suggestions for how the Securities and Exchange Commission could potentially improve those areas that are proving problematic for attorneys so as to better effectuate the purpose of this major new law, in light of its legislative history and intent, which are also discussed in the paper.
Restoring Trust In Corporate Directors: The Disney Standard And The ‘New’ Good Faith, Sarah Helene Duggin, Stephen M. Goldman
Restoring Trust In Corporate Directors: The Disney Standard And The ‘New’ Good Faith, Sarah Helene Duggin, Stephen M. Goldman
Scholarly Articles
The purpose of this Article is to explore the parameters and potential impact of the good faith standard articulated in Disney V and clarified in Stone. Part I begins with a brief review of the historical impact of the tension between entrepreneurial freedom and managerial accountability, and Part II explains why the Disney standard differs significantly from the traditional understanding of good faith as the absence of subjective bad faith. Part III points out that the court's use of the language of bad faith to articulate the new good faith may undercut the effectiveness of the standard. It urges further …
A Comparative Analysis Of Shareholder Protections In Italy And The United States: Parmalat As A Case Study, Lorenzo Segato
A Comparative Analysis Of Shareholder Protections In Italy And The United States: Parmalat As A Case Study, Lorenzo Segato
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
The goal of this article is to compare the protections offered to minority shareholders by the Italian system of corporate law with those offered by the U.S. legal system of corporate and securities law in order to determine if Parmalat's minority shareholders would have been better off had Parmalat been an American company listed in the U.S. financial market. This analysis will reveal several weaknesses in Italian corporate and securities laws, thereby providing a basis for suggestions on how to improve minority shareholders' rights in Italy based on the U.S. experience. Section II of this paper provides an overview of …
Senior Corporate Officers And The Duty Of Candor: Do The Ceo And Dfo Have A Duty To Inform?, Z. Jill Barclift
Senior Corporate Officers And The Duty Of Candor: Do The Ceo And Dfo Have A Duty To Inform?, Z. Jill Barclift
Faculty Scholarship
This article focuses on the duty to inform as a framework to assess liability of senior officers of public companies who withhold information from directors. The broadening of the definition of the duty to inform that senior officers owe directors to include an underlying affirmative duty to provide information, even when director or shareholder action is not requested, offers an opportunity for greater monitoring of corporate governance by focusing on those often most culpable. Currently, the plain language of Delaware’s delegation of authority statute protects directors who reasonably rely in good faith on the reports of corporate officers. However, officers’ …
Panel Discussion: Bigger Carrots And Bigger Sticks: Issues And Developments In Corporate Sentencing, Jill E. Fisch, Hon. John S. Martin, Richard C. Breeden, Timothy Coleman, Stephen M. Cutler, Celeste Koeleveld, Richard H. Walker
Panel Discussion: Bigger Carrots And Bigger Sticks: Issues And Developments In Corporate Sentencing, Jill E. Fisch, Hon. John S. Martin, Richard C. Breeden, Timothy Coleman, Stephen M. Cutler, Celeste Koeleveld, Richard H. Walker
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
No abstract provided.