Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Pagans (4)
- Christians (3)
- Active subversion of the rule of law (1)
- Culture wars (1)
- Efforts to undermine Mueller's investigation (1)
-
- Error distribution function (1)
- Error function (1)
- Freedom of religion (1)
- Gauss error function (1)
- James Comey (1)
- Jews (1)
- Polemics (1)
- Religious liberty (1)
- Robert Mueller (1)
- Rule of law (1)
- Sacred nation (1)
- Secularists (1)
- Special Counsel Mueller Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Election (1)
- Special prosecutor (1)
- Standard of proof (1)
- Student protesters (1)
- T.S. Eliot (1)
- Teapot dome scandal (1)
- Watergate (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Jews, Not Pagans, Richard Schragger, Micah Schwartzman
Jews, Not Pagans, Richard Schragger, Micah Schwartzman
San Diego Law Review
Richard Schragger & Micah Schwartzman’s contribution to the 2019 Editors’ Symposium: Pagans and Christians in the City.
Pagans, Christians, And Student Protesters, Stanley Fish
Pagans, Christians, And Student Protesters, Stanley Fish
San Diego Law Review
Stanley Fish’s contribution to the 2019 Editors’ Symposium: Pagans and Christians in the City.
Christians And Pagans In The Sacred Nation, Christopher J. Eberle
Christians And Pagans In The Sacred Nation, Christopher J. Eberle
San Diego Law Review
Christopher J. Eberle’s contribution to the 2019 Editors’ Symposium: Pagans and Christians in the City.
This Isn’T About You: A Comment On Smith’S Pagans And Christians In The City, Andrew Koppelman
This Isn’T About You: A Comment On Smith’S Pagans And Christians In The City, Andrew Koppelman
San Diego Law Review
Andrew Koppelman’s contribution to the 2019 Editors’ Symposium: Pagans and Christians in the City.
Prosecuting The Executive, Tiffany R. Murphy
Prosecuting The Executive, Tiffany R. Murphy
San Diego Law Review
A special counsel is appointed to investigate and potentially prosecute any criminal activity involving those in the Executive Branch. When an attorney general makes such a decision, the individual should consider not only the scope of the appointment but whether the special counsel will protect the fundamental rules of law upon which the Constitution rests; no one person is above the law. Recent history illustrates the abuses of the special prosecutor’s role where it was used as a political weapon or for low level officials. Instead, a special counsel should be used only when the crisis is severe enough that …
The Case For Varying Standards Of Proof, Gustavo Ribeiro
The Case For Varying Standards Of Proof, Gustavo Ribeiro
San Diego Law Review
This Article defends a system with a greater variation in the number of standards of proof than we currently have as both normatively and descriptively valuable. Standards of proof are mechanisms for allocating the risk of factual error between parties. For example, the heightened “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard in criminal cases reflects an aspiration for a legal system erring more in favor of mistaken acquittals than mistaken convictions. Surprisingly, we then assign the same standard to very different cases under the justification that we accept, or should accept, the same error-distribution for those cases. This Article argues that, however …