Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- APA (1)
- APHIS (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Adoptive homes (1)
- Agriculture (1)
-
- Alexander Blewett III School of Law (1)
- Article I (1)
- BIA (1)
- Brackeen v. Zinke (1)
- Brackeens (1)
- Bradley E. Tinker (1)
- Bradley Tinker (1)
- Case summary (1)
- Citrus (1)
- Cliffords (1)
- Compelling government interest (1)
- Competitive standing (1)
- Delegation (1)
- Due process (1)
- Environmental standing (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Fifth amendment (1)
- Final Rule (1)
- ICWA (1)
- Indian Child Welfare Act (1)
- Indian children (1)
- Indian tribes (1)
- Law (1)
- Law review (1)
- Law school (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Brackeen V. Zinke, Bradley E. Tinker
Brackeen V. Zinke, Bradley E. Tinker
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In 1978, Congress enacted the Indian Child Welfare Act to counter practices of removing Indian children from their homes, and to ensure the continued existence of Indian tribes through their children. The law created a framework establishing how Indian children are adopted as a way to protect those children and their relationship with their tribe. ICWA also established federal standards for Indian children being placed into non-Indian adoptive homes. Brackeen v. Zinke made an important distinction for the placement preferences of the Indian children adopted by non-Indian plaintiffs; rather than viewing the placement preferences in ICWA as based upon Indians’ …
United States Citrus Science Council V. United States Department Of Agriculture, Stephanie George
United States Citrus Science Council V. United States Department Of Agriculture, Stephanie George
Public Land & Resources Law Review
As our world becomes increasingly more dependent on global trade, issues have arisen with respect to the harm caused to domestic producers. In U.S. Citrus Science Council v. USDA, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California clarified domestic lemon producers’ standing to challenge agency decisions that result in the importation of foreign crops. This decision could create similar pathways for future challenges to the importation of other commodities into the United States.