Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Adaptive architectures (1)
- Bares formalism (1)
- Coalition interoperability (1)
- Coalition systems (1)
- Command centers (1)
-
- Decision making (1)
- Five stage interacting decision maker model (1)
- Geographic sectors (1)
- Heterogenous factors (1)
- Hofstede (1)
- Interconnectivity (1)
- Knowledge sharing (1)
- Multinational coalition operations (1)
- Nationalistic difference (1)
- Organizational behavior (1)
- Performance (1)
- Power distance (1)
- Uncertainty avoidance (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Incorporating Heterogeneity In Command Center Interactions, Holly A. H. Handley, Alexander H. Levis
Incorporating Heterogeneity In Command Center Interactions, Holly A. H. Handley, Alexander H. Levis
Engineering Management & Systems Engineering Faculty Publications
One of the many complexities of multinational coalition operations stems from differences in culture, military procedures, and command and control processes between the cooperating command centers. These differences can influence the interactions between decision makers of different command centers and can affect the outcome of the coalition operation. A coalition model, composed of individual models of the five-stage interacting decision maker model, was used in a virtual experiment. The subjective parameters included in the decision maker model can be any attribute that characterizes the heterogeneity of the decision makers. In this case, the parameters of power distance and uncertainty avoidance …
Levels Of Interoperability In Coalition Systems, Holly A. H. Handley, Alexander H. Levis, Michel Bares
Levels Of Interoperability In Coalition Systems, Holly A. H. Handley, Alexander H. Levis, Michel Bares
Engineering Management & Systems Engineering Faculty Publications
Systems of different command centers that are brought together in a coalition operation must have some level of interoperability in order to work together. Bares [2000] has introduced a formalism of three interoperability domains that describe the ability of the systems to define their own level of interoperability within the coalition by assessing their own and the other systems’ ability to interact on actions of the coalition. The lowest domain, interconnectivity, reflects the ability to exchange messages; this level must already have been achieved in order for the systems to participate in the coalition. The second domain, interoperability, reflects a …