Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Flickering Affect, Su Ballard
Fatty Acids Differentially Affect 5-Ht2 Receptor And Transporter Binding In The Rat Brain, Xu-Feng Huang, Chao Deng, Warren Bell, Teresa Du Bois
Fatty Acids Differentially Affect 5-Ht2 Receptor And Transporter Binding In The Rat Brain, Xu-Feng Huang, Chao Deng, Warren Bell, Teresa Du Bois
Xu-Feng Huang
No abstract provided.
School-Based Cancer Education Programs: An Opportunity To Affect The National Cancer Problem, Donald Iverson, J Scheer
School-Based Cancer Education Programs: An Opportunity To Affect The National Cancer Problem, Donald Iverson, J Scheer
Don C. Iverson
No abstract provided.
Understanding The Social Consequences Of Microblogging, L. Qiu, Angela K.-Y. Leung, N. Tang
Understanding The Social Consequences Of Microblogging, L. Qiu, Angela K.-Y. Leung, N. Tang
Ka Yee Angela LEUNG
Microblogging has recently become a new form of communication that is rapidly changing everyone’s life. Through services such as Twitter, millions of people can broadcast short messages to their followers via instant messaging, SMS, or web interfaces. However, few studies have been conducted to understand the impact of these emerging phenomenons. In this study, we seek to understand the social consequences of microblogging. Further, we want to examine which aspects of microblogging are related to the consequences. We recruited 120 undergraduates and randomly assigned them to one of four groups (29 to 31 participants in each group). Each group was …
Mutually Dependent: Power, Trust, Affect And The Use Of Deception In Negotiation, Mara Olekalns, Philip Smith
Mutually Dependent: Power, Trust, Affect And The Use Of Deception In Negotiation, Mara Olekalns, Philip Smith
Mara Olekalns
Using a simulated two-party negotiation, we examined how trustworthiness and power balance affected deception. To trigger deception, we used an issue that had no value for one of the two parties. We found that high cognitive trust increased deception whereas high affective trust decreased deception. Negotiators who expressed anxiety also used more deception whereas those who expressed optimism also used less deception. The nature of the negotiating relationship (mutuality and level of dependence) interacted with trust and negotiators’ affect to influence levels of deception. Deception was most likely to occur when negotiators reported low trust or expressed negative emotions in …