Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Administrative Law (1)
- Agriculture Law (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Courts (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Government Contracts (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Insurance Law (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Gandhi’S Prophecy: Corporate Violence And A Mindful Law For Bhopal, Nehal A. Patel
Gandhi’S Prophecy: Corporate Violence And A Mindful Law For Bhopal, Nehal A. Patel
Nehal A. Patel
AbstractOver thirty years have passed since the Bhopal chemical disaster began,and in that time scholars of corporate social responsibility (CSR) havediscussed and debated several frameworks for improving corporate responseto social and environmental problems. However, CSR discourse rarelydelves into the fundamental architecture of legal thought that oftenbuttresses corporate dominance in the global economy. Moreover, CSRdiscourse does little to challenge the ontological and epistemologicalassumptions that form the foundation for modern economics and the role ofcorporations in the world.I explore methods of transforming CSR by employing the thought ofMohandas Gandhi. I pay particular attention to Gandhi’s critique ofindustrialization and principle of swadeshi (self-sufficiency) …
Holding Standards For Randsome: A Remedial Perspective On Rand Licensing Commitments, Layne S. Keele
Holding Standards For Randsome: A Remedial Perspective On Rand Licensing Commitments, Layne S. Keele
Layne S. Keele
In Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., 757 F.3d 1286 (Fed. Cir. 2014), the four federal judges who considered the case—Judge Posner by designation at the trial level, and three Federal Circuit judges on appeal—all expressed differing opinions on the question of whether and to what extent extraordinary patent remedies should be available for the infringement of standard-essential patents. This article aims to simplify this muddled and confusing topic.
The article employs a teleological approach, examining the purposes behind remedies in general, the purposes of extraordinary remedies in patent law, and the purposes of RAND commitments (commitments to license standard-essential …