Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- And (1)
- And explain how this reading differs from the dom- inant scientific-determinist reading of Marx. This examination then leads to a discussion of why MacIntyre abandoned both Marxism and Christian- ity in 1968. Finally (1)
- Are ones given to us by God. I contend that this argument entails that we must see Mac- Intyre’s early Marxist commitments as given to him by God (1)
- Aristotle (1)
- ChristianityI argue that we must read Alasdair MacIntyre’s mature work through a Marxist lens. I begin by discussing his argument that we must choose which God to worship on principles of justice (1)
-
- Communitarianism (1)
- Community (1)
- Foucault (1)
- I turn to his more recent writing on Marx. I contend that if we view them through his argument about the principles of justice and which God to worship (1)
- Ideology (1)
- Individualism (1)
- It turns out (1)
- Liberalism (1)
- Marxism (1)
- Perhaps even MacIntyre himself (1)
- Pop Culture and Philosophy (1)
- That he has never abandoned them in his turn to Thomistic-Aristotelianism. I examine his reading of Marx (1)
- Therefore (1)
- We see MacIntyre’s mature philosophy as more Marxist than most people (1)
- Which (1)
- With its emphasis on the concept of alienation as a Christian concept (1)
- Would allow. (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Toward A Radical Integral Humanism: Macintyre’S Continuing Marxism, Jeffery L. Nicholas
Toward A Radical Integral Humanism: Macintyre’S Continuing Marxism, Jeffery L. Nicholas
Jeffery L Nicholas
I argue that we must read Alasdair MacIntyre’s mature work through a Marxist lens. I begin by discussing his argument that we must choose which God to worship on principles of justice, which, it turns out, are ones given to us by God. I contend that this argument entails that we must see Mac- Intyre’s early Marxist commitments as given to him by God, and, therefore, that he has never abandoned them in his turn to Thomistic-Aristotelianism. I examine his reading of Marx, with its emphasis on the concept of alienation as a Christian concept, and explain how this reading …
Eucharist And Dragon Fighting As Resistance: Against Commodity Fetishism And Scientism, Jeffery L. Nicholas
Eucharist And Dragon Fighting As Resistance: Against Commodity Fetishism And Scientism, Jeffery L. Nicholas
Jeffery L Nicholas
This paper examines two practices – the Roman Catholic Practice of Eucharist and the game Dungeons and Dragons – to show how social critique can be mounted from within a practice. It begins by relating Alasdair MacIntyre’s notion of tradition to his earlier analysis of ideology and to the notion of ideology in general. The paper then tackles two dominant forms of ideology – Commodity Fetishism and Scientism – and shows how both Eucharist and Dungeons and Dragons promote critical thinking to resist those ideologies. In the process, it denies the Althusserian-Foucauldian analysis of ideology as mere materiality and defends …
Rights, Individualism, Community: Aristotle And The Communitarian-Liberalism Debate, Jeffery L. Nicholas
Rights, Individualism, Community: Aristotle And The Communitarian-Liberalism Debate, Jeffery L. Nicholas
Jeffery L Nicholas
I argue that Aristotle could not be a fore-runner to liberalism, because his view of humanity is that human beings are constituted by a community and achieve self-fulfillment only as so constituted. Thus, Aristotle endorses a unique position that defends the freedom and self-development of the individual within the parameters of a social order.