Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Copyright Developments In 2012 (Version 1.1), Laura Quilter
Copyright Developments In 2012 (Version 1.1), Laura Quilter
Laura Quilter
No abstract provided.
District Court: Cambridge Univ. Press V. Becker - Ruling (2012), Orinda Evans
District Court: Cambridge Univ. Press V. Becker - Ruling (2012), Orinda Evans
Georgia State University Copyright Lawsuit
Ruling from the District Court
Cambridge Univ. Press v. Becker, 863 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (N.D. Ga. 2012)
Keeping And Deleting Patron Records In Law Libraries, Benjamin J. Keele
Keeping And Deleting Patron Records In Law Libraries, Benjamin J. Keele
Library Staff Publications
No abstract provided.
Panel Discussion On Libraries And Best Practices In Fair Use, Andrée J. Rathemacher
Panel Discussion On Libraries And Best Practices In Fair Use, Andrée J. Rathemacher
Technical Services Department Faculty Publications
This report covers a panel discussion on the Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Academic and Research Libraries, published in January 2012 by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL). The panel was held at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) on March 23, 2012 and was hosted by the MIT Libraries. Panelists were Patricia Aufderheide of the Center for Social Media at American University; Brandon Butler of ARL; Kyle Courtney of Harvard Law School; and Jay Wilcoxson of MIT.
Your Money Or Your Speech: The Children's Internet Protection Act And The Congressional Assault On The First Amendment In Public Libraries, Steven D. Hinckley
Your Money Or Your Speech: The Children's Internet Protection Act And The Congressional Assault On The First Amendment In Public Libraries, Steven D. Hinckley
Steven D. Hinckley
This article examines the inherent conflict between This article examines the inherent conflict between two Congressional approaches to public access to the Internet - the provision of federal funding support to schools and public libraries to ensure broad access to online information regardless of financial means, and federal restrictions on children's use of school and public library computers to access content that the government feels could be harmful to them. It analyzes the efficacy and constitutionality of the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), Congress's attempt to use its powers of the purse to control objectionable online content in the very …