Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Antidiscrimination law (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Doux Commerce (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Freedom of contract (1)
-
- Gay and lesbian rights (1)
- LGBT rights (1)
- Market (1)
- Perpetual suspect classes (1)
- Pluralism (1)
- Post-Racialism (1)
- Post-racial America (1)
- Prejudice (1)
- Private actor (1)
- Private causes of action (1)
- Protected classes (1)
- Public accomadations (1)
- Public life (1)
- RFRA (1)
- Race-conscious (1)
- Racial justice (1)
- Religion (1)
- Religious Freedom Restoration Act (1)
- Religious exemptions (1)
- Religious liberty (1)
- Same-sex marriage (1)
- Social engineering (1)
- Sweet commerce (1)
- The end of strict scrutiny (1)
- The limits of antidiscrimination law (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Doux Commerce, Religion, And The Limits Of Antidiscrimination Law, Nathan B. Oman
Doux Commerce, Religion, And The Limits Of Antidiscrimination Law, Nathan B. Oman
Indiana Law Journal
This Article addresses the question of law, religion, and the market directly. It does so by developing three theories of how one might conceptualize the proper relationship between commerce and religion. The first two theories I offer are not meant to be summaries of any position explicitly articulated by any particular thinker. There is a paucity of explicit reflection on the question of markets and reli-gion and virtually no effort to generate broad legal theories of that relationship. Rather, these theories are an attempt to explicitly articulate clusters of intuitions that seem to travel together. My hope is to show …
Post-Racialism And The End Of Strict Scrutiny, David Schraub
Post-Racialism And The End Of Strict Scrutiny, David Schraub
Indiana Law Journal
In recent years, a growing social consensus has emerged around the aspiration of a “post-racial” America: one where race is no longer a fault line for social strife or, perhaps, a morally significant trait whatsoever. This ambition, however, lies in tension with the most basic constitutional principle governing our treatment of race in the public sphere: that of “strict scrutiny.” Post-racialism seeks to diminish the salience of race to near negligibility. The strict scrutiny of racial classifications, by contrast, significantly enhances the salience of race by treating it differently from virtually every other personal attribute or characteristic—including hair or eye …