Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
2006 Nccaa Division I Men's Soccer Championship, Cedarville University
2006 Nccaa Division I Men's Soccer Championship, Cedarville University
Men's Soccer Programs
No abstract provided.
Cedarville Vs. Malone, Cedarville University
Cedarville Vs. Malone, Cedarville University
Men's Soccer Programs
No abstract provided.
Cedarville Vs. Ohio Dominican, Cedarville University
Cedarville Vs. Ohio Dominican, Cedarville University
Men's Soccer Programs
No abstract provided.
Cedarville Vs. Tiffin, Cedarville University
Cedarville Vs. Tiffin, Cedarville University
Men's Soccer Programs
No abstract provided.
Cedarville Vs. Notre Dame, Cedarville University
Cedarville Vs. Notre Dame, Cedarville University
Men's Soccer Programs
No abstract provided.
Cedarville Vs. Shawnee State, Cedarville University
Cedarville Vs. Shawnee State, Cedarville University
Men's Soccer Programs
No abstract provided.
2006 Dave Jones Memorial Classic, Cedarville University
2006 Dave Jones Memorial Classic, Cedarville University
Men's Soccer Programs
No abstract provided.
Cedarville Vs. Siena Heights, Cedarville University
Cedarville Vs. Siena Heights, Cedarville University
Men's Soccer Programs
No abstract provided.
2006 All-America Luncheon, Cedarville University
2006 All-America Luncheon, Cedarville University
Men's Soccer Programs
No abstract provided.
What Makes A Screening Program Ethical?, Annette J. Braunack-Mayer
What Makes A Screening Program Ethical?, Annette J. Braunack-Mayer
Faculty of Social Sciences - Papers (Archive)
Ethics, as a discipline, asks "is this decision, situation, program or policy good? Under what circumstances is it good? Why?". This paper applies these questions to screening: "Is screening good? Under what circumstances is it good? Why is it good?". Of course, the answer to these questions depends on how one defines "good". A consequentialist, for instance, will suggest that a screening program is good when it prevents or, at least, reduces harm and suffering1 whereas non-consequentialists are likely to take a rather different approach. In this short paper, I have room only to skate across the surface of these …