Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences

The Impact Of Third Places On Community Quality Of Life, Leo Wayne Jeffres, Cheryl Campanella Bracken, Guowei Jian, Mary F. Casey Dec 2009

The Impact Of Third Places On Community Quality Of Life, Leo Wayne Jeffres, Cheryl Campanella Bracken, Guowei Jian, Mary F. Casey

Communication Faculty Publications

Older cities struggling with issues of survival focus on jobs and the economy, but competition requires all cities to pay attention to the quality of life that attracts residents. Creating such an inviting environment includes “third places” that foster community and communication among people outside of home and work, yet we have little empirical evidence that speaks to the subject, or their importance for a community’s quality of life. Here we report on a national U.S. survey that asked people to identify such places in their community, producing a wide variety of “third places” that ranged from the most popular …


The Impact Of Third Places On Community Quality Of Life, Leo W. Jeffres, Cheryl C. Bracken, Guowei Jian, Mary F. Casey Oct 2009

The Impact Of Third Places On Community Quality Of Life, Leo W. Jeffres, Cheryl C. Bracken, Guowei Jian, Mary F. Casey

Communication Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Parameter Estimation Validity And Relationship Robustness: A Comparison Of Telephone And Internet Survey Techniques, Cheryl C. Bracken, Leo W. Jeffres, Kimberly Neuendorf, David Atkin May 2009

Parameter Estimation Validity And Relationship Robustness: A Comparison Of Telephone And Internet Survey Techniques, Cheryl C. Bracken, Leo W. Jeffres, Kimberly Neuendorf, David Atkin

Communication Faculty Publications

With the expansion of telecommunication and online technologies for the purpose of survey administration, the issue of measurement validity has come to the fore. The proliferation of automated audio services and computer-based survey techniques has been matched by a corresponding denigration of the quality of traditional phone survey data, most notably as an outcome of falling response rates. This trend, combined with the introduction of screening technologies and answering machines, represents a barrier to the proper execution of survey research. Whereas the question was once, “can technology-assisted surveys achieve the same level of validity as traditional phone surveys?”, the question …