Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2003

Medicine and Health Sciences

Alzheimer's disease

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Physical Sciences and Mathematics

High-Field 19.6 T 27Al Solid-State Mas Nmr Of In Vitro Aluminated Brain Tissue, Pamela L. Bryant, Walter J. Lukiw, Zhehong Gan, Randall W. Hall, Leslie G. Butler Sep 2003

High-Field 19.6 T 27Al Solid-State Mas Nmr Of In Vitro Aluminated Brain Tissue, Pamela L. Bryant, Walter J. Lukiw, Zhehong Gan, Randall W. Hall, Leslie G. Butler

Randall W. Hall

The combination of 27Al high-field solid-state NMR (19.6 T) with rapid spinning speeds (17.8 kHz) is used to acquire 27Al NMR spectra of total RNA human brain temporal lobe tissues exposed to 0.10 mM Al3+ (as AlCl3) and of human retinal pigment epithelial cells (ARPE-19), grown in 0.10 mM AlCl3. The spectra of these model systems show multiple Al3+ binding sites, good signal/noise ratios and apparent chemical shift dispersions. A single broad peak (−3 to 11 ppm) is seen for the aluminated ARPE-19 cells, consistent with reported solution-state NMR chemical shifts of Al-transferrin. The aluminated brain tissue has a considerably …

Go to article

Adjusting For Non-Ignorable Verification Bias In Clinical Studies For Alzheimer’S Disease, Xiao-Hua Zhou, Pete Castelluccio Jul 2003

Adjusting For Non-Ignorable Verification Bias In Clinical Studies For Alzheimer’S Disease, Xiao-Hua Zhou, Pete Castelluccio

UW Biostatistics Working Paper Series

A common problem for comparing the relative accuracy of two screening tests for Alzheimer’s disease (D) in a two-stage design study is verification bias. If the verification bias can be assumed to be ignorable, Zhou and Higgs (2000) have proposed a maximum likelihood approach to compare the relative accuracy of screening tests in a two-stage design study. However, if the verification mechanism also depends on the unobserved disease status, the ignorable assumption does not hold. In this paper, we discuss how to use a profile likelihood approach to compare the relative accuracy of two screening tests for AD without assuming …

Go to article