Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 1 of 1
Full-Text Articles in Medicine and Health Sciences
Rpe Vs. Percentage 1rm Loading In Periodized Programs Matched For Sets And Repetitions, Eric R. Helms, Ryan K. Byrnes, Daniel M. Cooke, Michael H. Haischer, Joseph P. Carzoli, Trevor K. Johnson, Matt R. Cross, John B. Cronin, Adam G. Storey, Michael C. Zourdos
Rpe Vs. Percentage 1rm Loading In Periodized Programs Matched For Sets And Repetitions, Eric R. Helms, Ryan K. Byrnes, Daniel M. Cooke, Michael H. Haischer, Joseph P. Carzoli, Trevor K. Johnson, Matt R. Cross, John B. Cronin, Adam G. Storey, Michael C. Zourdos
Research outputs 2014 to 2021
Purpose: To investigate differences between rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and percentage one-repetition maximum (1RM) load assignment in resistance-trained males (19-35 years) performing protocols with matched sets and repetitions differentiated by load-assignment. Methods: Participants performed squats then bench press 3x/weeks in a daily undulating format over 8-weeks. Participants were counterbalanced by pre-test 1RM then assigned to percentage 1RM (1RMG, n = 11); load-assignment via percentage 1RMs, or RPE groups (RPEG, n = 10); participant-selected loads to reach target RPE ranges. Ultrasonography determined pre and post-test pectoralis (PMT), and vastus lateralis muscle thickness at 50 (VLMT50) and 70% (VLMT70) femur-length. Results: …