Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Medicine and Health Sciences Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Orthopedics

PDF

Thomas Jefferson University

Surveys and Questionnaires

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Medicine and Health Sciences

Orthopass: Long-Term Outcomes Following Implementation Of An Orthopaedic Patient Handoff Template., Harry Lightsey, Caleb Yeung, Laura Rossi, Antonia Chen, Mitchel Harris, Derek Stenquist Nov 2023

Orthopass: Long-Term Outcomes Following Implementation Of An Orthopaedic Patient Handoff Template., Harry Lightsey, Caleb Yeung, Laura Rossi, Antonia Chen, Mitchel Harris, Derek Stenquist

Rothman Institute Faculty Papers

Standardized handoff tools improve communication and patient care; however, their widespread use in surgical fields is lacking. OrthoPass, an orthopaedic adaptation of I-PASS, was developed in 2019 to address handoff concerns and demonstrated sustained improvements across multiple handoff domains over an 18-month period. We sought to characterize the longitudinal effect and sustainability of OrthoPass within a single large residency program 3.5 years after its implementation. This mixed methods study involved electronic handoff review for quality domains in addition to survey distribution and evaluation. We conducted comparative analyses of handoff adherence and survey questions as well as a thematic analysis of …


Membership And Feedback On The American Academy Of Orthopaedic Surgeons And Other Subspecialty Societies: A Survey Study Of Orthopaedic Surgeons., Arjun Saxena, Gregory R Toci, Parker L Brush, Alexis Reinhardt, Pedro K Beredjiklian, Alan S. Hilibrand, Alex R. Vaccaro, Daniel Fletcher Nov 2022

Membership And Feedback On The American Academy Of Orthopaedic Surgeons And Other Subspecialty Societies: A Survey Study Of Orthopaedic Surgeons., Arjun Saxena, Gregory R Toci, Parker L Brush, Alexis Reinhardt, Pedro K Beredjiklian, Alan S. Hilibrand, Alex R. Vaccaro, Daniel Fletcher

Rothman Institute Faculty Papers

Introduction: Orthopaedic surgeons face decreased reimbursement, lower income, and increased rates of burnout. As subspecializing through fellowship training in orthopaedics becomes more and more prevalent, the value of membership to a general orthopaedic society (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons [AAOS]) warrants investigation.

Methods: One hundred thirty orthopaedic surgeons were surveyed by e-mail through a 14-item anonymous survey administered through SurveyMonkey. The survey inquired about surgeon experience, practice type, fellowship training, and details regarding AAOS and subspecialty society membership.

Results: The response rate was 67%, with 94% of respondents indicating that they were members of AAOS and a subspecialty society. The …


Variations In Management Of A3 And A4 Cervical Spine Fractures As Designated By The Ao Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System, Barry Ting Sheen Kweh, Jin Wee Tee, Sander Muijs, F Cumhur Oner, Klaus John Schnake, Lorin Michael Benneker, Emiliano Neves Vialle, Frank Kanziora, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran, Gregory D. Schroeder, Alex R. Vaccaro, Ao Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System Validation Group Sep 2021

Variations In Management Of A3 And A4 Cervical Spine Fractures As Designated By The Ao Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System, Barry Ting Sheen Kweh, Jin Wee Tee, Sander Muijs, F Cumhur Oner, Klaus John Schnake, Lorin Michael Benneker, Emiliano Neves Vialle, Frank Kanziora, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran, Gregory D. Schroeder, Alex R. Vaccaro, Ao Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System Validation Group

Rothman Institute Faculty Papers

Objective: Optimal management of A3 and A4 cervical spine fractures, as defined by the AO Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System, remains controversial. The objectives of this study were to determine whether significant management variations exist with respect to 1) fracture location across the upper, middle, and lower subaxial cervical spine and 2) geographic region, experience, or specialty.

Methods: A survey was internationally distributed to 272 AO Spine members across six geographic regions (North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Middle East). Participants' management of A3 and A4 subaxial cervical fractures across cervical regions was assessed in four clinical …


Reliability And Validity Of The English Version Of The Aospine Prost (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma), Said Sadiqi, Marcel F Dvorak, Alex R. Vaccaro, Gregory D. Schroeder, Marcel W Post, Lorin M Benneker, Frank Kandziora, S Rajasekaran, Klaus J Schnake, Emiliano N Vialle, F Cumhur Oner Sep 2020

Reliability And Validity Of The English Version Of The Aospine Prost (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma), Said Sadiqi, Marcel F Dvorak, Alex R. Vaccaro, Gregory D. Schroeder, Marcel W Post, Lorin M Benneker, Frank Kandziora, S Rajasekaran, Klaus J Schnake, Emiliano N Vialle, F Cumhur Oner

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty Papers

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter validation study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to translate and adapt the AOSpine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) into English, and test its psychometric properties among North-American spine trauma patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In the absence of an outcome instrument specifically designed and validated for traumatic spinal column injury patients, it is difficult to measure the effect size of various treatment options. The AOSpine Knowledge Forum Trauma initiated a project and developed the AOSpine PROST consisting of 19 items.

METHODS: Patients were recruited from two level-1 North-American trauma centers. For concurrent validity, next …