Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Medicine and Health Sciences Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Medical Specialties

Thomas Jefferson University

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Faculty Papers

Series

Bowel preparation

Publication Year

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Medicine and Health Sciences

Bowel Preparation Quality Scales For Colonoscopy., David Kastenberg, Gerald Bertiger, Stuart Brogadir Jul 2018

Bowel Preparation Quality Scales For Colonoscopy., David Kastenberg, Gerald Bertiger, Stuart Brogadir

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Faculty Papers

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Colonoscopy is widely preferred for CRC screening and is the most commonly used method in the United States. Adequate bowel preparation is essential for successful colonoscopy CRC screening. However, up to one-quarter of colonoscopies are associated with inadequate bowel preparation, which may result in reduced polyp and adenoma detection rates, unsuccessful screens, and an increased likelihood of repeat procedure. In addition, standardized criteria and assessment scales for bowel preparation quality are lacking. While several bowel preparation quality scales are referred …


Multicenter, Randomized Study To Optimize Bowel For Colon Capsule Endoscopy, David Kastenberg, Wilmot C. Burch Jr, David P. Romeo, Pankaj K. Kashyap, David C. Pound, Neophytos Papageorgiou, Ignacio Fernández-Urien Sainz, Carly E. Sokach, Douglas K. Rex Dec 2017

Multicenter, Randomized Study To Optimize Bowel For Colon Capsule Endoscopy, David Kastenberg, Wilmot C. Burch Jr, David P. Romeo, Pankaj K. Kashyap, David C. Pound, Neophytos Papageorgiou, Ignacio Fernández-Urien Sainz, Carly E. Sokach, Douglas K. Rex

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Faculty Papers

AIM To assess the cleansing efficacy and safety of a new Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) bowel preparation regimen. METHODS This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing two CCE regimens. Subjects were asymptomatic and average risk for colorectal cancer. The second generation CCE system (PillCam® COLON 2; Medtronic, Yoqneam, Israel) was utilized. Preparation regimens differed in the 1st and 2nd boosts with the Study regimen using oral sulfate solution (89 mL) with diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium solution (“diatrizoate solution”) (boost 1 = 60 mL, boost 2 = 30 mL) and the Control regimen oral sulfate …