Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Palliative care (3)
- Medical ethics (2)
- Acute Lung Injury (1)
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (1)
- Acute Respiratory Failure (1)
-
- Acute renal failure (1)
- Autonomy (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Communication (1)
- Cultural influences (1)
- End of life care (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Intensive Care (1)
- Intensive care (1)
- Mechanical Ventilation (1)
- Patient-Centered Communication (1)
- Physician-assisted dying (1)
- Prognostication (1)
- Renal replacement therapy (1)
- Shared Decision-Making (1)
- Shared decision-making (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Medicine and Health Sciences
"Farewell" To Prognosis In Shared Decision-Making, Robert F. Johnson
"Farewell" To Prognosis In Shared Decision-Making, Robert F. Johnson
Peer Reviewed Articles
Whether because of a cultural pattern or personal preference, palliative care clinicians encounter persons approaching the end of life who wish to limit or forego prognostic information relating to their situation. This scenario has received attention in a recent motion picture as well as a newly available advance directive modification—the Prognosis Declaration form. The ordinary expectation for end-of-life shared decision-making with a capable person is clinician disclosure of the best effort at prognostic assessment. The optimal match between the expressed values, goals, and preferences of the person with available clinician expertise is hopefully achieved. For the clinician, a person’s choice …
Going Beyond ‘Do No Harm’: A Critical Annotation, Robert F. Johnson
Going Beyond ‘Do No Harm’: A Critical Annotation, Robert F. Johnson
Peer Reviewed Articles
The Op-Ed article in the New York Times (November 4th, 2016), “On Assisted Suicide, Going Beyond Do No Harm” by Haider Javed Warraich provided an articulate and timely plea for more widespread availability and application of physician-assisted dying, or “suicide”, as part of end-of-life medical care. While this profound intervention should be considered by physicians and others as an option for those able to express their wishes at the end-of-life, it must be considered in the context of the ethical principles appropriate for all health care interventions and recognized for its limited role in the overall approach to compassionate care …
Why It’S Not Ok For Doctors To Participate In Executions, Robert F. Johnson
Why It’S Not Ok For Doctors To Participate In Executions, Robert F. Johnson
Peer Reviewed Articles
A plea for direct physician participation in executions was presented by Sandeep Jauhar in a New York Times Op-Ed (“Why It’s OK for Doctors to Participate in Executions”—April 21, 2017). Jauhar’s article is not a discussion of the ethics of capital punishment. He describes his own opposition “as a matter of principle, as a doctor.” However, since capital punishment is legal in 31 states, with required physician participation in several, he acquiesces to a utilitarian stance rather than the principled approach he acknowledges is expected of a physician in this circumstance.
Acute Lung Injury And Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Requiring Tracheal Intubation And Mechanical Ventilation In The Intensive Care Unit: Impact On Managing Uncertainty For Patient-Centered Communication, Robert F. Johnson Jr., Jillian Gustin
Acute Lung Injury And Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Requiring Tracheal Intubation And Mechanical Ventilation In The Intensive Care Unit: Impact On Managing Uncertainty For Patient-Centered Communication, Robert F. Johnson Jr., Jillian Gustin
Peer Reviewed Articles
A 56 year-old male presented with symptoms of pneumonia and findings consistent with acute lung injury (ALI). Deterioration of respiratory function occurred over the first 24 hours of hospitalization leading to placement in an intensive care unit (ICU) followed by tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (ETMV). At that time criteria defining acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were present. The palliative medicine service was asked to address concerns expressed by the patient’s spouse reflecting uncertainty regarding outcome expectations.
When interacting with families of incapacitated critically ill patients, clinicians are advised to employ a patient-centered communication process to alleviate family distress and …
Acute Renal Failure Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy In The Intensive Care Unit: Impact On Prognostic Assessment For Shared Decision-Making, Robert F. Johnson Jr., Jillian Gustin
Acute Renal Failure Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy In The Intensive Care Unit: Impact On Prognostic Assessment For Shared Decision-Making, Robert F. Johnson Jr., Jillian Gustin
Peer Reviewed Articles
A 69 year-old female was receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) for acute renal failure (ARF) in an intensive care unit (ICU). Consultation was requested from the palliative medicine service to facilitate a shared decision-making process regarding goals of care.
Clinician responsibility in shared decision-making includes the formulation and expression of a prognostic assessment providing the necessary perspective for a spokesperson to match patient values with treatment options. For this patient, ARF requiring RRT in the ICU was used as a focal point for preparing a prognostic assessment. A prognostic assessment should include the outcomes of most importance to a discussion …