Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Animal health (17)
- Beef cattle production (17)
- Food science (17)
- Forages and pastures (17)
- Allogenic (1)
-
- Brain anatomy (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Chicken anatomy (1)
- Chicken brain (1)
- Colorectal cancer (1)
- Colorectal cancer screening (1)
- Common complications (1)
- Culturally appropriate healthcare (1)
- Health disparities (1)
- Inequality (1)
- Latino (1)
- Linguistic healthcare (1)
- Mistrust (1)
- Racial disparities (1)
- Screening uptake (1)
- Stem cell transplants (1)
- Stratification (1)
- Survivorship care plans (1)
- Swine production (1)
- Trust (1)
- Vaccination (1)
- Publication Year
Articles 1 - 21 of 21
Full-Text Articles in Life Sciences
Colorectal Cancer Screening In The Latino Population At A Family Medicine Clinic: A Quality Improvement Project, Michael S. Vinson
Colorectal Cancer Screening In The Latino Population At A Family Medicine Clinic: A Quality Improvement Project, Michael S. Vinson
The Eleanor Mann School of Nursing Student Works
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a preventable and curable disease that affects all genders, races, and ethnicities, and its impact on society can be reduced with early screening. The Latino population is at greater risk compared to groups or ethnicities due to social determinants and health disparities within the community. Review of Literature: Language barriers, low education levels, persistent social stressors, poor healthcare navigation, and structural barriers make it difficult for this population to be properly screened at appropriate intervals. Purpose: This quality improvement (QI) project was designed to combat reduced screening rates seen in the Latino population. The target …
Forum 1: Social Inequality, Justice, And Vaccine Intent And Distribution In The United States, Grant Drawve, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Casey Harris
Forum 1: Social Inequality, Justice, And Vaccine Intent And Distribution In The United States, Grant Drawve, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Casey Harris
Vaccine Course
The key issues for the distribution of the COVID vaccine are shared. These issues include funding, racial and ethnic disparities, supply and logistics, communication and trust, federal, state and local roles, and coverage and costs.
The Effects Of A Survivorship Care Plan On Hospital Readmission Rates In Allogenic Stem Cell Transplant Patients, Chantaney Williams
The Effects Of A Survivorship Care Plan On Hospital Readmission Rates In Allogenic Stem Cell Transplant Patients, Chantaney Williams
The Eleanor Mann School of Nursing Student Works
Stem cell transplants (SCTs) are complicated treatments utilized to treat hematologic malignancies and other disorders, such as multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, acute myeloid leukemia, neuroblastomas, germ cell tumors, amyloidosis, and autoimmune disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis. The complex care of patients undergoing SCTs place them at high risk for adverse outcomes, including infection, cytomegalovirus, graft vs host disease, secondary new cancers, infertility, and sexual dysfunction (American Cancer Society, 2020). Survivorship care plans (SCPs) are a vital part of the discharge process to educate allogenic SCT patients about post-transplantation care. SCPs are implemented to reduce …
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2016, Paul Beck, Jason Apple, Shane Gadberry, Beth Kegley, Charles Rosenkrans Jr.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2016, Paul Beck, Jason Apple, Shane Gadberry, Beth Kegley, Charles Rosenkrans Jr.
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2015, Paul Beck, Jason Apple, Beth Kegley, Charles Rosenkrans Jr.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2015, Paul Beck, Jason Apple, Beth Kegley, Charles Rosenkrans Jr.
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2014, David L. Kreider, Paul Beck
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2014, David L. Kreider, Paul Beck
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2013, David L. Kreider, Paul Beck
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2013, David L. Kreider, Paul Beck
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2012, David L. Kreider
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2012, David L. Kreider
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2011, David L. Kreider
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2011, David L. Kreider
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2010, David L. Kreider
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2010, David L. Kreider
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2010, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2010, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2008, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2008, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2006, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2006, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2004, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2004, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2003, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2003, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
The faculty and staff of the Animal Science Program are pleased to present the sixth edition of the Arkansas Animal Science Report. As with virtually all programs in the country, budget constraints presented serious challenges to teaching, research, and extension programming. However, the faculty and staff responded with innovation, good management, and hard work to maintain a productive program designed to benefit the students of the University and the citizens of the state. We are committed to remaining faithful to our Land-Grant mission. A sincere thank you is owed to Dr. Zelpha Johnson and Dr. Wayne Kellogg for editing this …
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2002, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2002, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2000, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2000, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
Animal Science is very much devoted to youth education and development. During the past year, over 20,000 youth were involved in 4-H livestock projects. Two very successful activities that took place last year were the Mid-American Grassland Evaluation Contest and Livestock Judging Camps. The Grassland Contest is designed to teach students about grassland resource management for livestock and wildlife uses. The contest was held in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Firstplace honors in the 4-H division went to White County, and second place honors went to Van Buren County. Two Livestock Judging Camps (Fayetteville and Hope) were conducted this past year. A …
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 1999, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 1999, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 1998, Stacey Gunter
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 1998, Stacey Gunter
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Cooperative Beef Bull Performance Test 1991, M. W. Eaton, A. E. Brown Jr., J. A. Hornsby, R. W. Parham, J. D. Shockey, W. C. Loe
Arkansas Cooperative Beef Bull Performance Test 1991, M. W. Eaton, A. E. Brown Jr., J. A. Hornsby, R. W. Parham, J. D. Shockey, W. C. Loe
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
Performance testing of beef bulls was initiated to improve productivity of Arkansas beef cattle through breeding. This cooperative testing program provides cattlemen with reliable information for identifying animals with superior breeding value for the traits of production measured in the test. By using the information as a basis for herd sire selection, a breeder can greatly increase the chances of obtaining a bull that will sire rapid-gaining, more efficient, highquality calves. Such calves can increase profits for both the breeder and the feeder. This testing program provides information that is useful to financial institutes in arranging their lending programs and …
A Stereotaxic Atlas Of The Brain Of The Chick (Gallus Domesticus), Wayne J. Kuenzel, Manju Masson
A Stereotaxic Atlas Of The Brain Of The Chick (Gallus Domesticus), Wayne J. Kuenzel, Manju Masson
Poultry Science Faculty Publications and Presentations
Nine brains taken from chicks two weeks of age were used for the development of this atlas. Each chick was first anesthetized with an intravenous (IV) injection of Chloropent2 (1.8 ml/kg). Chicks were then perfused via the heart with 90 ml physiological saline followed by 90 ml Heidenhain's3 solution. Each head was then positioned in a stereotaxic instrument as described in the previous section and three stainless steel (SS) insect pins (#2) were implanted in each brain at known coordinates. In the case of the brains used to construct the cross- sectional atlas plates, two pins were implanted horizontal to …