Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 1 of 1
Full-Text Articles in Life Sciences
Recurrence Score Testing Does Not Appear To Benefit Patients With Grade 1, Progesterone Receptor Positive Breast Cancers: An Opportunity To Eliminate Over-Treatment And Decrease Testing Costs, Udai S. Sibia, Thomas J. Sanders, Charles Mylander, Martin Rosman, Carol Tweed, Lorraine Tafra, Rubie S. Jackson
Recurrence Score Testing Does Not Appear To Benefit Patients With Grade 1, Progesterone Receptor Positive Breast Cancers: An Opportunity To Eliminate Over-Treatment And Decrease Testing Costs, Udai S. Sibia, Thomas J. Sanders, Charles Mylander, Martin Rosman, Carol Tweed, Lorraine Tafra, Rubie S. Jackson
Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy
Background: We previously described a risk prediction model (Anne Arundel Medical Center [AAMC] model) based on pathology which may eliminate the need for recurrence score (RS) testing in select early-stage breast cancers. There is a concern that patients in discordant risk prediction groups (AAMC vs. RS) may be overtreated or undertreated if RS testing were omitted. Methods: We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for all breast cancer patients between 2004 and 2015. AAMC low-risk was defined as Grade 1 and progesterone receptor-positive (PR þ ) tumors, while AAMC high-risk was defined as Grade 3 or estrogen-negative …