Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Alien Tort Statute (2)
- Charming Betsy (1)
- Choice of law (1)
- Data Territoriality (1)
- Electronic Records (1)
-
- Enforcement Jurisdiction (1)
- Extraterritorial (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Ireland (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Kiobel (1)
- Microsoft (1)
- Morrison (1)
- Prescriptive jurisdiction (1)
- Presumption Against Extraterritoriality (1)
- Sovereignty (1)
- Statutory construction (1)
- Stored Communications Act (1)
- Subject matter jurisdiction (1)
- Territoriality (1)
- Transnational Crime (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Transnational Law
International Law And Extraterritoriality: Brief Of International And Extraterritorial Law Scholars As Amici Curiae (U.S. V. Microsoft), Anthony J. Colangelo, Austen L. Parrish
International Law And Extraterritoriality: Brief Of International And Extraterritorial Law Scholars As Amici Curiae (U.S. V. Microsoft), Anthony J. Colangelo, Austen L. Parrish
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Written by international and extraterritorial law scholars, the attached amicus brief was submitted in the U.S. v. Microsoft case. That case involves whether Congress, when it enacted the Stored Communications Act, intended to provide federal and local law enforcement authority to unilaterally seize the private email communications of foreign citizens stored abroad.
The amicus brief explains how the Charming Betsy canon and the law of extraterritoriality are part of a well-defined body of law the U.S. Supreme Court has developed for determining how American law applies abroad. These doctrines exist independently: one aims to avoid unsanctioned violations of international law. …
Post-Kiobel Procedure: Subject Matter Jurisdiction Or Prescriptive Jurisdiction?, Anthony J. Colangelo, Christopher R. Knight
Post-Kiobel Procedure: Subject Matter Jurisdiction Or Prescriptive Jurisdiction?, Anthony J. Colangelo, Christopher R. Knight
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This essay evaluates whether Alien Tort Statute (ATS) cases involving foreign elements raise questions of prescriptive jurisdiction or subject matter jurisdiction after the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum. It concludes that the lower court trend treats Kiobel as going to subject matter jurisdiction, and that this trend is probably correct. It would have been helpful for the Supreme Court to clearly provide guidance on this question — which has major doctrinal and procedural consequences for the law and litigants. The procedural implications of viewing challenges based on Kiobel as going to judicial subject matter jurisdiction are …
The Alien Tort Statute And The Law Of Nations In Kiobel And Beyond, Anthony J. Colangelo
The Alien Tort Statute And The Law Of Nations In Kiobel And Beyond, Anthony J. Colangelo
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
In Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum the U.S. Supreme Court wrongly applied a presumption against extraterritoriality to claims authorized by the Alien Tort Statute (ATS). Even assuming such a presumption properly could extend to the ATS and claims authorized thereunder, the presumption is easily overcome by Congress’s unambiguous instruction that the statute encompasses violations of “the law of nations,” which includes both substantive and jurisdictional components — including principles of extraterritorial jurisdiction. Early 19th Century case law and congressional reaction thereto clearly demonstrate that Congress expressly invoked “the law of nations” to overturn the Court’s imposition of a limiting presumption …
'De Facto Sovereignty': Boumediene And Beyond, Anthony J. Colangelo
'De Facto Sovereignty': Boumediene And Beyond, Anthony J. Colangelo
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
In Boumediene v. Bush, which grants non-citizens detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, constitutional habeas corpus privileges the Supreme Court took notice that the United States maintains "de facto sovereignty" over that territory. As its sole precedential support, the Court cited a case that never mentions the term de facto sovereignty. What is this concept? How important is it to the Court's holding? Did the Court get the concept right given its longstanding usage and meaning in Supreme Court precedent? And what can de facto sovereignty tell us about when the Court will find habeas to extend to other situations …
Constitutional Limits On Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: Terrorism And The Intersection Of National And International Law, Anthony J. Colangelo
Constitutional Limits On Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: Terrorism And The Intersection Of National And International Law, Anthony J. Colangelo
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This Article addresses the possible constitutional limits on the ability of the United States to project and apply extraterritorially its criminal laws and, in particular, its anti-terror laws. Although plainly central to exceedingly urgent and important issues presently facing the United States, this topic has been under-treated in academic commentary and muddled in the courts. Yet its analysis pits U.S. sovereignty and prevailing efforts to combat dangerous criminal activity beyond our borders squarely against principles of limited government and individual rights: What sources of lawmaking authority empower Congress to project U.S. law abroad? Does the Constitution protect individual defendants against …
International Harmonization Of Private Law, Peter Winship
International Harmonization Of Private Law, Peter Winship
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
No abstract provided.