Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Transnational Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

John Marshall Global Markets Law Journal

2013

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Transnational Law

Abandoning Foreign Depositors In A Bank Failure? The Efta Court Judgment In Efta Surveillance Authority V. Iceland, 2 J. Marshall Global Mkt. L.J. 1 (2013), Valia Babis Jan 2013

Abandoning Foreign Depositors In A Bank Failure? The Efta Court Judgment In Efta Surveillance Authority V. Iceland, 2 J. Marshall Global Mkt. L.J. 1 (2013), Valia Babis

John Marshall Global Markets Law Journal

Deposit insurance is a key issue in bank regulation. A mismatch exists, especially in the European Economic Area, between the freedom of banks to operate across borders and the fact that deposit insurance operates on a national basis. EFTA Surveillance Authority v. Iceland examines the protection of overseas depositors in the event of a cross-border bank failure. In EFTA Surveillance Authority, the court examined a state’s responsibility to ensure compensation to depositors and possible discrimination against foreign depositors. This Article reviews the paradoxical holding by the court in light of the facts and circumstances of the case. Further, the Article …


The Future Of The Commodity Futures Market: How Customer Segregated Accounts Can Be Better Protected From Insolvent Futures Commission Merchants, 2 J. Marshall Global Mkt. L.J. 13 (2013), Zachary Brumfield Jan 2013

The Future Of The Commodity Futures Market: How Customer Segregated Accounts Can Be Better Protected From Insolvent Futures Commission Merchants, 2 J. Marshall Global Mkt. L.J. 13 (2013), Zachary Brumfield

John Marshall Global Markets Law Journal

Two of the largest futures commission merchants (“FMCs”)—MF Global and Peregrine Financial Group—filed for bankruptcy in 2011 and 2012, respectively. The bankruptcies of two of the largest players in the futures commodity market shook up the industry. Many customers became weary and distrustful of FCMs. This Article proposes solutions in order to boost customer confidence in the futures market without deterring the largest futures traders. Further, this Article discusses the pitfalls of the current regulatory model with respect to customer segregated funds and the necessary changes to the current regime by the CFTC and other self-regulatory organizations. After the MF …


Transatlantic Mutual Recognition In The Field Of Global Financial Regulation, 2 J. Marshall Global Mkt. L.J. 43 (2013), Nico Klein Jan 2013

Transatlantic Mutual Recognition In The Field Of Global Financial Regulation, 2 J. Marshall Global Mkt. L.J. 43 (2013), Nico Klein

John Marshall Global Markets Law Journal

International cooperation and coordination among countries is a highly sought after goal for many. In that regard, in order to achieve international cooperation and coordination, this Article focuses on the concept of mutual recognition and the key areas of global financial regulatory reform to which the concept could be applied. The benefits of mutual recognition are increased market liberalization, facilitation of private cross-border movement, and increased regulatory standards. To discuss the concept of mutual recognition, this Article examines the European Union/European Economic Area approach provided by the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MiFID”). This Article reviews the EU’s idea of …


The D.C. Circuit Court’S Opinion In Hunter V. Ferc: A Panacea For Resolving A Jurisdictional Dispute Or Mere Panache?, 2 J. Marshall Global Mkt. L.J. 69 (2013), Matthew Kluchenek, Regina Speed-Bost, Laura Chipkin, Rachel Remke Jan 2013

The D.C. Circuit Court’S Opinion In Hunter V. Ferc: A Panacea For Resolving A Jurisdictional Dispute Or Mere Panache?, 2 J. Marshall Global Mkt. L.J. 69 (2013), Matthew Kluchenek, Regina Speed-Bost, Laura Chipkin, Rachel Remke

John Marshall Global Markets Law Journal

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) were in a jurisdictional tug-of-war until March 2013, when the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a much anticipated decision in Hunter v. FERC. This Article discusses the Hunter case, which offered some clarity as to the jurisdictional boundaries of the CFTC and FERC with regard to certain types of futures contracts. Historically, the CFTC has been authorized by the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) to prevent and regulate fraud and manipulation in the futures market. On the other hand, FERC is an independent agency charged with the …