Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Settlements (2)
- Assignees (1)
- Beneficiaries (1)
- California (1)
- Capacity-constraint (1)
-
- Caseloads (1)
- Civil liability (1)
- Class actions (1)
- Collusion (1)
- Compensation (1)
- Damages (1)
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Empirical studies (1)
- Failure to protect (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Governmental liability (1)
- Incentives (1)
- Income tax laws (1)
- Injuries (1)
- Insurance cycle (1)
- Juries (1)
- Lawyers (1)
- Letters of credit (1)
- Liability (1)
- Liaibility insurance crisis (1)
- Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants (1)
- Loss reserves (1)
- Mass torts (1)
- Medical malpractice (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Torts
Toward A Tax-Based Explanation Of The Liability Insurance Crisis, Kyle D. Logue
Toward A Tax-Based Explanation Of The Liability Insurance Crisis, Kyle D. Logue
Articles
The so-called liability insurance crisis of 1985 and 1986 transformed the way we think about tort law and about liability insurance markets. The crisis phenomena, which first appeared in late 1984 and lasted until mid-1986, consisted of enormous increases in liability insurance premiums and alarming reductions in the availability of certain types of liability coverage. In the two principal liability lines of insurance (Other Liability and Medical Malpractice), premiums increased by hundreds (in some cases thousands) of percentage points in a matter of months. At the same time, the availability of liability insurance contracted sharply. The liability policies that were …
Affirmative Duties, Systemic Harms, And The Due Process Clause, Barbara E. Armacost
Affirmative Duties, Systemic Harms, And The Due Process Clause, Barbara E. Armacost
Michigan Law Review
Part I of the article lays out the major academic criticisms of DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services. Part II describes the contours of liability for failure to protect in tort. Part III offers a positive explanation for the strong presumption against governmental liability in failure-to-protect cases: permitting broad liability for failure to protect would involve the courts in second-guessing political decisions about the use of limited community resources. This explanation has two parts. First, as a matter of institutional competence, budgetary decisions about the appropriate level and distribution of public services are better suited to political rather …
Turning From Tort To Administration, Richard A. Nagareda
Turning From Tort To Administration, Richard A. Nagareda
Michigan Law Review
My objective here is to challenge the notion that the recent mass tort settlements - for all their novel qualities in the mass tort area - are truly sui generis in the law. Rather, I contend that the rise of such settlements in tort mirrors the development of public administrative agencies earlier in this century - that, in both instances, powerful new institutions emerged outside preexisting channels of control to wield significant power over human lives and resources. I argue that courts usefully may draw upon familiar doctrines of judicial review in administrative law to form a conceptual framework for …
Letters Of Credit: Highlights Of Revised Article 5, Edwin E. Smith, James J. White
Letters Of Credit: Highlights Of Revised Article 5, Edwin E. Smith, James J. White
Other Publications
1. Under what circumstances is it bad faith for an issuer to honor a letter of credit in the face of an applicant's offer of proof of fraud by the beneficiary? 2. What is the issuer's obligation where there is a waiver by the applicant that the issue chooses not to honor? 3. What are the rights of transferees of transferable letters of credit and assigness of proceeds?
Don't Try: Civil Jury Verdicts In A System Geared To Settlement, Samuel R. Gross, Kent D. Syverud
Don't Try: Civil Jury Verdicts In A System Geared To Settlement, Samuel R. Gross, Kent D. Syverud
Articles
If it is true, as we often hear, that we are one of the most litigious societies on earth, it is because of our propensity to sue, not our affinity for trials. Of the hundreds of thousands of civil lawsuits that are filed each year in America, the great majority are settled; of those that are not settled, most are ultimately dismissed by the plaintiffs or by the courts; only a few percent are tried to a jury or a judge. This is no accident. We prefer settlements and have designed a system of civil justice that embodies and expresses …