Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Preemption (2)
- 360k(a) (1)
- 510(k) (1)
- Civil justice reform (1)
- Common Law Intentional Tort Exception (1)
-
- Compensation (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Damages (1)
- Design defect (1)
- Duty of care (1)
- Employment Intentional Tort (1)
- Federal preemption (1)
- Malpractice (1)
- Medical Device Amendments (1)
- Medical device manufacturer liability (1)
- Medical devices (1)
- Medtronic v. Lohr (1)
- ORC 2745.01 (1)
- Ohio (1)
- Ohio law (1)
- Open courts (1)
- Product liability (1)
- Punitive damages (1)
- Sexual abuse (1)
- State torts (1)
- Third party standing (1)
- Tort reform (1)
- Workers’ Compensation (1)
- Workers’ Compensation in Ohio (1)
- Wrongly accused (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Torts
Meeting The Objectives Of The Mda: Implied Preemption Of State Tort Claims By The Medical Device Amendments, Theresa J. Pulley Radwan
Meeting The Objectives Of The Mda: Implied Preemption Of State Tort Claims By The Medical Device Amendments, Theresa J. Pulley Radwan
Journal of Law and Health
This article attempts to reconcile the competing purposes of the MDA, and to offer one alternative to effectuate Congress' purposes without preempting some claims and permitting others. First, this article will describe the arrangement of the MDA, including the classification provisions for medical devices and the preemption provision of the MDA. Next, this article will interpret the caselaw regarding preemption in general, and specifically preemption of state tort claims by the MDA. Finally, this article seeks to reconcile two competing purposes of Congress in enacting the MDA through implied preemption of state tort claims, with exceptions for devices which have …
Medtronic V. Lohr: State Lawsuits May Proceed Against Medical Device Manufacturers, Robert A. Gerberry
Medtronic V. Lohr: State Lawsuits May Proceed Against Medical Device Manufacturers, Robert A. Gerberry
Journal of Law and Health
This comment discusses the Medical Device Amendments of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and its effect on the marketing of medical products. Part II examines the statutory language of the MDA and its regulatory impact on medical devices. Part III explores the history of the preemption doctrine established by the Supreme Court Cipollone. Part IV delineates the facts and procedural history of Medtronic v. Lohr and analyzes the effect of this case on the federal preemption of state common law suits. Finally, Part V assesses the impact of this decision on the medical device industry and the expansiveness …
Ridicule Or Recourse: Parents Falsely Accused Of Past Sexual Abuse Fight Back , Jeffrey M. Whitesell
Ridicule Or Recourse: Parents Falsely Accused Of Past Sexual Abuse Fight Back , Jeffrey M. Whitesell
Journal of Law and Health
This Note argues that wrongly accused parents should be granted standing by the courts to bring suit against therapists who negligently suggest that their children are victims of sexual abuse. The first section will analyze the validity of recovered memories obtained through the use of various suggestive techniques. The second section will explore the various causes of action that courts are considering actionable by innocent third parties against the therapists who implant false memories. The causes of action that will be analyzed are malpractice, negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, loss of companionship and society, and breach of contract. …
Ohio Tort Reform Versus The Ohio Constitution, Stephen J. Werber
Ohio Tort Reform Versus The Ohio Constitution, Stephen J. Werber
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Ohio tort law is about to be changed in a dramatic and comprehensive manner. House Bill 350 will be enacted as a major piece of tort reform legislation with provisions substantially like those discussed herein. The vast majority of this legislative change is directed to areas of the law in need of change and the restoration of balance. Most of the proposed changes either raise no constitutional concerns or should be deemed in compliance with the Ohio Constitution. In a few areas, most notably statutes of repose and limitations on damages, the governmental need is weak, the effect drastic, and …
Attempted Cap On Punitive Damages Continues To Spark Debate, Susan J. Becker
Attempted Cap On Punitive Damages Continues To Spark Debate, Susan J. Becker
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
The debate surrounding federal product liability law has not been silenced by recent compromises reached by the House and Senate regarding appropriate boundaries for such laws. To the contrary, President Clinton's threatened veto of Congress's Common Sense Product Liability Reform Act of 1996 and continued opposition by the ABA Section of Litigation and other groups to parts of the Act guarantee that the 20-year-old debate will continue to rage.
Ohio's Employment Intentional Tort: A Workers' Compensation Exception, Or The Creation Of An Entirely New Cause Of Action, Marc A. Claybon
Ohio's Employment Intentional Tort: A Workers' Compensation Exception, Or The Creation Of An Entirely New Cause Of Action, Marc A. Claybon
Cleveland State Law Review
This note will begin with a review of the history of workers' compensation in Ohio, including the development of the exclusive remedy provision. Next, this note will discuss the types of injuries normally compensated by the Ohio Workers' Compensation Act, followed by an analysis of the Ohio Supreme Court cases and legislation creating an intentional tort exception in Ohio. Finally, this note will critique newly enacted Revised Code section 2745.01, discuss the severe problems associated with an expansive interpretation of the statute, and suggest that continuing legislative reform is needed in this area of law.