Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (6)
- State and Local Government Law (5)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Commercial Law (3)
- Contracts (3)
-
- Courts (3)
- Environmental Law (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Medical Jurisprudence (2)
- Privacy Law (2)
- Accounting Law (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Air and Space Law (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Computer Law (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Environmental Health (1)
- Estates and Trusts (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (11)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- UIC School of Law (4)
- Campbell University School of Law (3)
- West Virginia University (3)
-
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of New Hampshire (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Torts (6)
- Libel and slander (5)
- Tort (5)
- Compensation (3)
- Liability (3)
-
- Negligence (3)
- Canada (2)
- Pragmatism (2)
- Regulation (2)
- Remedies (2)
- Amaya v. Home Ice Fuel and Supply Co. (1)
- Amendments (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Aristotelian (1)
- Aviation laws (1)
- Awarding (1)
- Bankruptcy Code (1)
- Banks v. Harris (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bivens (1)
- Bonnie Sue Goodman (1)
- Book review (1)
- Breeding v. Koch Carbon (1)
- Bulala v. Boyd (1)
- Bystander rule (1)
- Cancer (1)
- Chemicals (1)
- Chodorov v. Eley (1)
- Cofield v. Nuckles (1)
- Cognitive awareness (1)
- Publication
-
- Washington and Lee Law Review (11)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- Campbell Law Review (3)
- UIC Law Review (3)
- West Virginia Law Review (3)
-
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (2)
- RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002) (2)
- Touro Law Review (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- University of Baltimore Law Review (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- Villanova Law Review (2)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- NYLS Journal of Human Rights (1)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (1)
- University of Miami Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 56
Full-Text Articles in Torts
Torts, Cynthia Trimboli Adams, Charles R. Adams Iii
Torts, Cynthia Trimboli Adams, Charles R. Adams Iii
Mercer Law Review
In its formative years, the late nineteenth-century academic-judicial symbiosis placed a high value on the achievement of order and coherence in fields of law. A successful law review article or treatise was one that "illuminated" a field by propounding doctrines capable of continuing to organize an increasing number of cases in intelligible fashion.
Perhaps more than any other type of law review publication, the survey article continues to serve this lofty ideal. It will be for the reader to judge these writers" success in attaining it here.
To Quote Or Not To Quote: The Status Of Misquoted Material In Defamation Law, Sharon A. Mattingly
To Quote Or Not To Quote: The Status Of Misquoted Material In Defamation Law, Sharon A. Mattingly
Vanderbilt Law Review
To quote or not to quote' is no longer a valid question in defamation law because courts have lessened the burden on writers to use the exact words of the speaker in quoted language. If individuals feel that the press has misquoted them, they have three realistic options: First,ignore the misquotation; second, contact the media and request a re-traction; and third, file a lawsuit claiming defamation and seeking monetary damages.' The first alternative is the easiest, but given the emotional overtones of defamation, it is also the most unlikely. If the media were more sensitive and less defensive, the second …
Reconsidering Efficient Tort Rules For Personal Injury: The Case Of Single Activity Accidents, Jennifer H. Arlen
Reconsidering Efficient Tort Rules For Personal Injury: The Case Of Single Activity Accidents, Jennifer H. Arlen
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Employer's Intentional Tort - Should It Be Recognized In Canadian Jurisdictions?, Leigh West
The Employer's Intentional Tort - Should It Be Recognized In Canadian Jurisdictions?, Leigh West
Dalhousie Law Journal
At the inception of Canadian worker compensation legislation, an historic trade off agreement was made between employers and their workers. By virtue of this agreement, the right of workers to sue their employer in tort was removed and in return workers were to receive swift, certain, but limited, compensation payments for job-related injuries and illness, regardless of fault. With a few minor exceptions, this agreement made worker compensation the exclusive remedy available to an injured worker. It also lodged with the various provincial worker compensation boards the responsibility to adjudicate whether or not the injury or illness claimed was one …
Product Health Claims And The First Amendment: Scientific Expression And The Twilight Zone Of Commercial Speech, Martin H. Redish
Product Health Claims And The First Amendment: Scientific Expression And The Twilight Zone Of Commercial Speech, Martin H. Redish
Vanderbilt Law Review
Imagine, for a moment, that Congress has enacted the "False and Misleading Medical and Scientific Reporting Act of 1990." The law is premised on a fear that scientific quackery may cause significant societal harm by confusing the public and inducing its members to seek out costly, worthless, and possibly harmful medical cures or supposed scientific advances. The Act establishes a special commission of scientific and medical experts to rule on the accuracy of any proposed scientific or medical theory that conceivably could cause public harm or confusion. Such scientific or medical assertions must be substantiated to the commission's satisfaction, or …
Damage Apportionment In Accounting Malpractice Actions: The Role Of Comparative Fault
Damage Apportionment In Accounting Malpractice Actions: The Role Of Comparative Fault
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Eimann V. Soldier Of Fortune Magazine: Determining The Scope Of Duty In Negligence Cases, Whitney E. Peterson
Eimann V. Soldier Of Fortune Magazine: Determining The Scope Of Duty In Negligence Cases, Whitney E. Peterson
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tort Law As Corrective Justice: A Pragmatic Justification For Jury Adjudication, Catharine Pierce Wells
Tort Law As Corrective Justice: A Pragmatic Justification For Jury Adjudication, Catharine Pierce Wells
Michigan Law Review
The purpose of this article is to develop a pragmatic analysis of corrective justice that will serve as a partial justification for current practices of tort adjudication. Part I discusses the concept of corrective justice and explores its relationship to the problem of justifying tort law. Part II argues that certain contemporary theories of corrective justice fail to provide an adequate basis for regarding individual tort outcomes as just. Part III develops a pragmatic account of corrective justice and argues that it accurately describes current practices of tort adjudication. Finally, Part IV argues that these practices are justified in the …
From Res Ipsa Loquitur R To Diethylstilbestrol: The Unidentifiable Tortfeasor In California, Stephen A. Spitz
From Res Ipsa Loquitur R To Diethylstilbestrol: The Unidentifiable Tortfeasor In California, Stephen A. Spitz
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Book Reviews, Thomas G. Field Jr.
Book Reviews, Thomas G. Field Jr.
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
Reviews of the following books prepared by Thomas G. Field, Jr., Editor-in-Chief of Risk:
Stephen D. Sugarman, Doing Away with Personal Injury Law, (1989).
Chet Fleming, If We can Keep a Severed Head Alive, (1988).
The Question Of A Duty To Rescue In Canadian Tort Law: An Answer From France, Mitchell Mcinnes
The Question Of A Duty To Rescue In Canadian Tort Law: An Answer From France, Mitchell Mcinnes
Dalhousie Law Journal
A man witnesses a canoeist drowning a short distance from the shore.2 For over forty minutes the tenants of an apartment complex listen to the tortured screams of a woman being murdered in the streets below.3 A handful of railway employees watch a boy bleed to death for want of medical attention after he was struck by a passing car.4 The owner of a pleasure craft learns that one of his passengers has fallen overboard into an icy lake.' An innocent party to a motor vehicle accident finds that the driver at fault was injured as a result of the …
The Product Liability Mess: How Business Can Be Rescued From The Politics Of State Courts, Matthew Harris
The Product Liability Mess: How Business Can Be Rescued From The Politics Of State Courts, Matthew Harris
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Product Liability Mess: How Business Can Be Rescued from the Politics of State Courts by Richard Neely
In The Regulation Of Manmade Carcinogens, If Feasibility Analysis Is The Answer, What Is The Question?, Christopher H. Schroeder
In The Regulation Of Manmade Carcinogens, If Feasibility Analysis Is The Answer, What Is The Question?, Christopher H. Schroeder
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Environmentally Induced Cancer and the Law by Frank B. Cross
Coup De Grace For Personal Injury Torts?, Alfred F. Conard
Coup De Grace For Personal Injury Torts?, Alfred F. Conard
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Doing Away with Personal Injury Law: New Compensation Mechanisms for Victims, Consumers and Business by Stephen D. Sugarman
Re-Vision Of The Bankruptcy System: New Images Of Individual Debtors, Karen Gross
Re-Vision Of The Bankruptcy System: New Images Of Individual Debtors, Karen Gross
Michigan Law Review
A Review of As We Forgive Our Debtors: Bankruptcy and Consumer Credit in American by Teresa A. Sullivan, Elizabeth Warren, and Jay Lawrene Westbrook
A Physician's Respondeat Superior Liability For The Negligent Acts Of Other Medical Professionals—When The Captain Goes Down Without The Ship, Lynn D. Lisk
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
No More Teachers' Dirty Looks -- Now They Sue: Analysis Of Plaintiff Status Determinations In Defamation Actions By Public Educators, Richard E. Johnson
No More Teachers' Dirty Looks -- Now They Sue: Analysis Of Plaintiff Status Determinations In Defamation Actions By Public Educators, Richard E. Johnson
Florida State University Law Review
The constitutionalization of defamation law in 1964 created a revolution in first amendment jurisprudence. The United States Supreme Court established protection for statements concerning public officials unless the statements were made with actual malice, i.e., knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of truth or falsity. Later, the Court extended much of that protection to statements about public figures who are not government employees. Though the Court eventually narrowed the scope of its public figure doctrine, it never receded from the protection accorded to statements about public officials. The author of this Article contends that this distinction has eluded many state …
The Doctrine Of In Loco Parentis, Tort Liability And The Student-College Relationship, Theodore C. Stamatakos
The Doctrine Of In Loco Parentis, Tort Liability And The Student-College Relationship, Theodore C. Stamatakos
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Hospital Liability For Defamation Of Character During The Peer Review Process: Sticks And Stones May Break My Bones, But Words May Cost Me My Job
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Book Reviews, Risk Editorial Board
Book Reviews, Risk Editorial Board
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
Reviews of the following books prepared by the editors of Risk on the topic of toxic tort litigation and/or public regulation of toxic substances:
Frank B. Cross, Environmentally Induced Cancer and the Law: Risks, Regulation and Victim Compensation, (1989).
Chemical Contamination and Its Victims: Medical Remedies, Legal Redress, and Public Policy (David W. Schnare & Martin T. Katzman, eds., 1989.
The Role of Science in Toxic Tort Litigation: Evaluating Causation and Risk: Drawn from Papers Presented at the TIPS Annual Meeting, August 1988, Toronto, Canada. Chicago, Ill: Tort and Insurance Practice Section, American Bar Association.
Corrective Justice From Aristotle To Second Order Liability: Who Should Pay When The Culpable Cannot?, Kathryn R. Heidt
Corrective Justice From Aristotle To Second Order Liability: Who Should Pay When The Culpable Cannot?, Kathryn R. Heidt
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Women, Mothers, And The Law Of Fright: A History, Martha Chamallas, Linda K. Kerber
Women, Mothers, And The Law Of Fright: A History, Martha Chamallas, Linda K. Kerber
Michigan Law Review
This article presents a gendered history of the law's treatment of fright-based physical injuries. Our goal is to connect the law of fright to the changing cultural and intellectual forces of the twentieth century. Through a feminist lens, we reexamine the accounts of the legal treatment of fright-based injuries offered by Victorian-erajurists, traditionalist legal scholars of the first two decades of the twentieth century, a legal realist in the 1930s, and a Freudian medical-legal commentator from the 1940s, all of whom helped to shape present-day tort doctrine. We conclude with an account of Dillon v. Legg, in which the …
Casenotes: Torts — Loss Of Consortium — Children Do Not Have A Cause Of Action For Loss Of Parental Consortium When A Parent Survives A Tortious Injury. Gaver V. Harrant, 316 Md. 17, 557 A.2d 210 (1989), James E. Myers
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tort Liability For Artificial Intelligence And Expert Systems, 10 Computer L.J. 127 (1990), George S. Cole
Tort Liability For Artificial Intelligence And Expert Systems, 10 Computer L.J. 127 (1990), George S. Cole
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Frame V. Kothari: May Plaintiffs Recover In New Jersey For The Emotional Distress Suffered Due To The Negligent Misdiagnosis Of Third Persons, Michael P. Gaughan
Frame V. Kothari: May Plaintiffs Recover In New Jersey For The Emotional Distress Suffered Due To The Negligent Misdiagnosis Of Third Persons, Michael P. Gaughan
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Duty To Warn In Aviation Law: A New Tort Theory In The Aftermath Of Pan American Flight 103, Cynthia Dokas
The Duty To Warn In Aviation Law: A New Tort Theory In The Aftermath Of Pan American Flight 103, Cynthia Dokas
NYLS Journal of Human Rights
No abstract provided.
Notes: Torts — Parent-Child Immunity: Parent-Child Tort Immunity Defense Is Applicable In Wrongful Death And Survival Actions Despite The Modern Trend Toward Abrogation Of The Doctrine. Smith V. Gross, 319 Md. 138, 571 A.2d 1219 (1990), Sallie M. Brinkley
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Tort Law, Sharon Maitland Moon
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Tort Law, Sharon Maitland Moon
University of Richmond Law Review
This article addresses tort legislation considered during the 1990 Session of the Virginia General Assembly. This article also reviews significant cases involving torts and products liability decided from January 1, 1989, through May 31, 1990, by the Supreme Court of Virginia, The United States Supreme Court, and the federal courts sitting in Virginia.